Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2020

01-05-2020 | Care | Original Article

Effects of a Cancer Survivorship Clinic—preliminary results

Authors: Anish Jammu, Martin Chasen, Rardi van Heest, Sean Hollingshead, Deepanjali Kaushik, Harprit Gill, Ravi Bhargava

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Initial investigation of the impact of a Cancer Survivorship Clinic following its introduction in February 2017.

Methods

A systematic chart review of 176 patients enrolled in the Cancer Survivorship Clinic (CSC) who completed a minimum of one follow-up visit after the initial baseline visit. This was assessed using three screening tools: distress thermometer (DT), Canadian Problem Checklist (CPC), and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). Descriptive statistics and t tests were utilized to assess the impact of the CSC.

Results

Distress thermometer: Statistically significant decline in scores from the baseline visit to the follow-up visit among the study population (p < 0.05). There was a significant decline in score among high-risk patients with an initial DT≥4 (p < 0.0001). Canadian Problem Checklist: Based on the initial baseline visit, the top five reported causes of distress among the study population include pain, anxiety, fatigue, tingling in hands and feet, sleep. Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale: Statistically significant decline in reported pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, and shortness of breath scores (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Overall, patients had a significant reduction in distress from the baseline visit to the follow-up visit. High-risk patients experienced a more significant reduction in distress. Reduction in patient distress was independent of the number of visits to the clinic. Reported symptom severity for pain, tiredness, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, and shortness of breath also declined significantly following clinic intervention. Further qualitative studies required to establish the clinical significance of study findings.

Implications for cancer survivors

Continued active clinical support and education for cancer survivors should be considered a potentially essential element in the cancer treatment trajectory to address patient well-being and distress.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Suija K, Kordemets T, Annuk K, Kalda R (2016) The role of general practitioners in cancer care: a mixed method design. J Cancer Educ 31:136–141CrossRef Suija K, Kordemets T, Annuk K, Kalda R (2016) The role of general practitioners in cancer care: a mixed method design. J Cancer Educ 31:136–141CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hoekstra RA, Heins MJ, Korevaar JC (2014) Health care needs of cancer survivors in general practice: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract 15:94CrossRef Hoekstra RA, Heins MJ, Korevaar JC (2014) Health care needs of cancer survivors in general practice: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract 15:94CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E (2006) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, DC Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E (2006) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, DC
5.
go back to reference Cheng KKF, Wong WH, Koh C (2016) Unmet needs mediate the relationship between symptoms and quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 24:2025–2033CrossRef Cheng KKF, Wong WH, Koh C (2016) Unmet needs mediate the relationship between symptoms and quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 24:2025–2033CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Faller H, Koch U, Brahler E et al (2016) Satisfaction with information and unmet information needs in men and women with cancer. J Cancer Surviv 10:62–70CrossRef Faller H, Koch U, Brahler E et al (2016) Satisfaction with information and unmet information needs in men and women with cancer. J Cancer Surviv 10:62–70CrossRef
7.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (2010) Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: distress management. Fort Washington, Maryland National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (2010) Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: distress management. Fort Washington, Maryland
8.
go back to reference Bultz BD, Groff SL, Fitch M, Blais MC, Howes J, Levy K, Mayer C (2011) Implementing screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: a Canadian strategy for changing practice. Psychooncology 20:463–469CrossRef Bultz BD, Groff SL, Fitch M, Blais MC, Howes J, Levy K, Mayer C (2011) Implementing screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: a Canadian strategy for changing practice. Psychooncology 20:463–469CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Holland JC, Anderson B, Breitbart WS et al (2010) Distress management. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 5:66–98 Holland JC, Anderson B, Breitbart WS et al (2010) Distress management. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 5:66–98
10.
go back to reference Kennard BD, Stewart SM, Olvera R, Bawdon RE, Hailin AO, Lewis CP, Winick NJ (2004) Nonadherence in adolescent oncology: preliminary data on psychological risk factors and relationships to outcome. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 11:30–39CrossRef Kennard BD, Stewart SM, Olvera R, Bawdon RE, Hailin AO, Lewis CP, Winick NJ (2004) Nonadherence in adolescent oncology: preliminary data on psychological risk factors and relationships to outcome. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 11:30–39CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Von Essen L, Larsson G, Oberg K, Sjödén PO (2002) ‘Satisfaction with care’: associations with health related quality of life and psychosocial function among Swedish patients with endocrine gastrointestinal tumors. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 11:91–99CrossRef Von Essen L, Larsson G, Oberg K, Sjödén PO (2002) ‘Satisfaction with care’: associations with health related quality of life and psychosocial function among Swedish patients with endocrine gastrointestinal tumors. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 11:91–99CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Steel JL, Geller DA, Gamblin TC, Olek MC, Carr BI (2007) Depression, immunity, and survival in patients with hepatobiliary carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 25:2397–2405CrossRef Steel JL, Geller DA, Gamblin TC, Olek MC, Carr BI (2007) Depression, immunity, and survival in patients with hepatobiliary carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 25:2397–2405CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hui D, Bruera E (2017) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System 25 years later: past, present and future developments. J Pain Symptom Manag 53:630–643CrossRef Hui D, Bruera E (2017) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System 25 years later: past, present and future developments. J Pain Symptom Manag 53:630–643CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cancer Journey Action Group (2009) Guide to implementing screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: moving towards person-centred care (part a). Toronto, Ontario Cancer Journey Action Group (2009) Guide to implementing screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: moving towards person-centred care (part a). Toronto, Ontario
15.
go back to reference Howell D, Keller-Olaman S, Oliver TK, Hack TF, Broadfield L, Biggs K, Chung J, Gravelle D, Green E, Hamel M, Harth T, Johnston P, McLeod D, Swinton N, Syme A, Olson K (2013) A pan-Canadian practice guideline and algorithm: screening, assessment, and supportive care of adults with cancer-related fatigue. Curr Oncol 20:233–246CrossRef Howell D, Keller-Olaman S, Oliver TK, Hack TF, Broadfield L, Biggs K, Chung J, Gravelle D, Green E, Hamel M, Harth T, Johnston P, McLeod D, Swinton N, Syme A, Olson K (2013) A pan-Canadian practice guideline and algorithm: screening, assessment, and supportive care of adults with cancer-related fatigue. Curr Oncol 20:233–246CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Linden W, Yi D, Barroetavena MC, MacKenzie R, Doll R (2005) Development and validation of a psychosocial screening instrument for cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes 3:54CrossRef Linden W, Yi D, Barroetavena MC, MacKenzie R, Doll R (2005) Development and validation of a psychosocial screening instrument for cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes 3:54CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nekolaishuk C, Watanbe S, Beaumont C (2008) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: a 15-year retrospective review of validation studies (1991-2006). Palliat Med 22:111–122CrossRef Nekolaishuk C, Watanbe S, Beaumont C (2008) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: a 15-year retrospective review of validation studies (1991-2006). Palliat Med 22:111–122CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cancer Care Ontario (2004) Telephone nursing practice and symptom management guidelines. Toronto, Ontario Cancer Care Ontario (2004) Telephone nursing practice and symptom management guidelines. Toronto, Ontario
19.
go back to reference Cancer Care Ontario (2005) Palliative care collaborative care plan: fatigue (cancer patients). Toronto, Ontario Cancer Care Ontario (2005) Palliative care collaborative care plan: fatigue (cancer patients). Toronto, Ontario
20.
go back to reference Oldenmenger WH, de Raaf PJ, de Klerk C, van der Rijt CC (2013) Cut points on 0-10 numeric rating scales for symptoms included in the Edmonton Sympton Assessment Scale in cancer patients: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manag 45:1083–1093CrossRef Oldenmenger WH, de Raaf PJ, de Klerk C, van der Rijt CC (2013) Cut points on 0-10 numeric rating scales for symptoms included in the Edmonton Sympton Assessment Scale in cancer patients: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manag 45:1083–1093CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Feldstain A, Tomei C, Bélanger M, Lebel S (2014) Screening for distress in patients with cancer: methodologic considerations. Curr Oncol 21:330–333CrossRef Feldstain A, Tomei C, Bélanger M, Lebel S (2014) Screening for distress in patients with cancer: methodologic considerations. Curr Oncol 21:330–333CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Howell D, Hack TF, Oliver TK et al (2011) Survivorship services for adult cancer populations: a pan-Canadian guideline. Curr Oncol 18:e265–e281PubMedPubMedCentral Howell D, Hack TF, Oliver TK et al (2011) Survivorship services for adult cancer populations: a pan-Canadian guideline. Curr Oncol 18:e265–e281PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Fitch MI (2000) Supportive care for cancer patients. Hosp Q 3:39–46PubMed Fitch MI (2000) Supportive care for cancer patients. Hosp Q 3:39–46PubMed
25.
go back to reference O’Donnell E (2013) The distress thermometer: a rapid and effective tool for the oncology social worker. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 26:353–359CrossRef O’Donnell E (2013) The distress thermometer: a rapid and effective tool for the oncology social worker. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 26:353–359CrossRef
26.
go back to reference VanHoose L, Black LL, Doty K, Sabata D, Twumasi-Ankrah P, Taylor S, Johnson R (2015) An analysis of the distress thermometer problem list and distress in patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer 23:1225–1232CrossRef VanHoose L, Black LL, Doty K, Sabata D, Twumasi-Ankrah P, Taylor S, Johnson R (2015) An analysis of the distress thermometer problem list and distress in patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer 23:1225–1232CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Olesen ML, Hansen MK, Hansson H, Ottesen B, Andersen KK, Zoffmann V (2018) The distress thermometer in survivors of gynaecological cancer: accuracy in screening and association with the need for person-centred support. Support Care Cancer 26:1143–1150CrossRef Olesen ML, Hansen MK, Hansson H, Ottesen B, Andersen KK, Zoffmann V (2018) The distress thermometer in survivors of gynaecological cancer: accuracy in screening and association with the need for person-centred support. Support Care Cancer 26:1143–1150CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Jacobsen PB, Donovan KA, Trask PC, Fleishman SB, Zabora J, Baker F, Holland JC (2005) Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer 103:1494–1502CrossRef Jacobsen PB, Donovan KA, Trask PC, Fleishman SB, Zabora J, Baker F, Holland JC (2005) Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer 103:1494–1502CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Roth AJ, Kornblith AB, Batel-Copel L, Peabody E, Scher HI, Holland JC (1998) Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostrate carcinoma. Cancer 82:1904–1908CrossRef Roth AJ, Kornblith AB, Batel-Copel L, Peabody E, Scher HI, Holland JC (1998) Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostrate carcinoma. Cancer 82:1904–1908CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ma X, Zhang J, Zhong W, Shu C, Wang F, Wen J, Zhou M, Sang Y, Jiang Y, Liu L (2014) The diagnostic role of a short screening tool – the distress thermometer: a meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 22:1741–1755CrossRef Ma X, Zhang J, Zhong W, Shu C, Wang F, Wen J, Zhou M, Sang Y, Jiang Y, Liu L (2014) The diagnostic role of a short screening tool – the distress thermometer: a meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 22:1741–1755CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Donovan KA, Grassi L, McGinty HL, Jacobsen PB (2013) Validation for the distress thermometer worldwide: state of the science. Psychooncology 23:241–250CrossRef Donovan KA, Grassi L, McGinty HL, Jacobsen PB (2013) Validation for the distress thermometer worldwide: state of the science. Psychooncology 23:241–250CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Boyes A, Bonevski B, Burton L, Cook P (2000) The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Cancer 88:226–237CrossRef Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Boyes A, Bonevski B, Burton L, Cook P (2000) The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Cancer 88:226–237CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Cancer Journey Portfolio (2012) Screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: a guide to implementing best practices in person-centred care. Toronto, Ontario Cancer Journey Portfolio (2012) Screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: a guide to implementing best practices in person-centred care. Toronto, Ontario
Metadata
Title
Effects of a Cancer Survivorship Clinic—preliminary results
Authors
Anish Jammu
Martin Chasen
Rardi van Heest
Sean Hollingshead
Deepanjali Kaushik
Harprit Gill
Ravi Bhargava
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords
Care
Anxiety
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05067-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine