Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 2/2023

04-04-2022 | Care | Original Article

A Qualitative Study of Decision-making (DM) in Surgery and Cancer Care: an Indian Perspective

Authors: Narasimhaiah Srinivasaiah, N. Ravishankar, M. A. Kuriakose, J. R. Monson, R. Hargest

Published in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology | Issue 2/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Cancer psychology is a vitally important part of cancer management. Qualitative research is a gateway to exploring this. Weighing the treatment options in terms of quality of life and survival is important. Given the globalization of healthcare seen in the last decade, the exploration of the decision-making process in a developing nation was deemed highly appropriate. The aim is to explore the thoughts of surgical colleagues and care providing clinicians about patient decision-making in cancer care in developing countries, with special reference to India. The secondary objective was to identify factors that may have a role to play in decision-making in India. A prospective qualitative study. The exercise was carried out at Kiran Mazumdhar Shah Cancer Center. The hospital is a tertiary referral center for cancer services in the city of Bangalore, India. A qualitative study by methodology, a focus group discussion was undertaken with the members of the head and neck tumor board. The results showed, in India, decision-making is predominantly led by the clinicians and the patient’s family members. A number of factors play an important role in the decision-making process. These include as follows: health outcome measures (quality of life, health-related quality of life), clinician factors (knowledge, skill, expertise, judgment), patient factors (socio-economic, education, cultural), nursing factors, translational research, and resource infrastructure. Important themes and outcomes emerged from the qualitative study. As modern healthcare moves towards a patient-centered care approach, evidence-based patient choice and patient decision-making clearly have a greater role to play, and the cultural and practical issues demonstrated in this article must be considered.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Obeidat RF, Homish GG, Lally RM (2013) Shared decision making among individuals with cancer in non-Western cultures: a literature review. Oncol Nurs Forum 40(5):454–463CrossRefPubMed Obeidat RF, Homish GG, Lally RM (2013) Shared decision making among individuals with cancer in non-Western cultures: a literature review. Oncol Nurs Forum 40(5):454–463CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Smith TJ, Bodurtha JN (1995) Ethical considerations in oncology: balancing the interests of patients, oncologists, and society. J Clin Oncol 13(9):2464–2470CrossRefPubMed Smith TJ, Bodurtha JN (1995) Ethical considerations in oncology: balancing the interests of patients, oncologists, and society. J Clin Oncol 13(9):2464–2470CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lee K, Lee SH (2020) Artificial intelligence-driven oncology clinical decision support system for multidisciplinary teams. Sensors (Basel) 20(17):4693CrossRefPubMed Lee K, Lee SH (2020) Artificial intelligence-driven oncology clinical decision support system for multidisciplinary teams. Sensors (Basel) 20(17):4693CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Basch CE (1987) Focus group interview: an underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Educ Q 14(4):411–448CrossRefPubMed Basch CE (1987) Focus group interview: an underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Educ Q 14(4):411–448CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Festervand TA (1984) An introduction and application of focus group research to the health care industry. Health Mark Q 2(2–3):199–209PubMed Festervand TA (1984) An introduction and application of focus group research to the health care industry. Health Mark Q 2(2–3):199–209PubMed
7.
go back to reference Gott M, Ingleton C, Bennett MI, Gardiner C. Transitions to palliative care in acute hospitals in England: qualitative study. BMJ 342:d1773 Gott M, Ingleton C, Bennett MI, Gardiner C. Transitions to palliative care in acute hospitals in England: qualitative study. BMJ 342:d1773
8.
go back to reference Jorgenson DL (1989) Participant observation: a methodology for human studies. Sage, Newbury Park, p 107CrossRef Jorgenson DL (1989) Participant observation: a methodology for human studies. Sage, Newbury Park, p 107CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zisman-Ilani Y, Obeidat R, Fang L, Hsieh S, Berger Z (2020) Shared decision making and patient-centered care in Israel, Jordan, and the United States: exploratory and comparative survey study of physician perceptions. JMIR Form Res 4(8):e18223CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zisman-Ilani Y, Obeidat R, Fang L, Hsieh S, Berger Z (2020) Shared decision making and patient-centered care in Israel, Jordan, and the United States: exploratory and comparative survey study of physician perceptions. JMIR Form Res 4(8):e18223CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Shinkunas LA, Klipowicz CJ, Carlisle EM (2020) Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 20(1):190CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shinkunas LA, Klipowicz CJ, Carlisle EM (2020) Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 20(1):190CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Chaturvedi SK (2008) Ethical dilemmas in palliative care in traditional developing societies, with special reference to the Indian setting. J Med Ethics 34(8):611–615CrossRefPubMed Chaturvedi SK (2008) Ethical dilemmas in palliative care in traditional developing societies, with special reference to the Indian setting. J Med Ethics 34(8):611–615CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Castleton K, Fong T, Wang-Gillam A, Waqar MA, Jeffe DB, Kehlenbrink L et al (2011) A survey of Internet utilization among patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer 19(8):1183–1190CrossRefPubMed Castleton K, Fong T, Wang-Gillam A, Waqar MA, Jeffe DB, Kehlenbrink L et al (2011) A survey of Internet utilization among patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer 19(8):1183–1190CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Datta SS, Ghosal N, Daruvala R, Chakraborty S, Shrimali RK, van Zanten C et al (2019) How do clinicians rate patient’s performance status using the ECOG performance scale? A mixed-methods exploration of variability in decision-making in oncology. Ecancermedicalscience 13:913CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Datta SS, Ghosal N, Daruvala R, Chakraborty S, Shrimali RK, van Zanten C et al (2019) How do clinicians rate patient’s performance status using the ECOG performance scale? A mixed-methods exploration of variability in decision-making in oncology. Ecancermedicalscience 13:913CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Wood JJ, Metcalfe C, Paes A, Sylvester P, Durdey P, Thomas MG et al (2008) An evaluation of treatment decisions at a colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team. Colorectal Dis 10(8):769–772CrossRefPubMed Wood JJ, Metcalfe C, Paes A, Sylvester P, Durdey P, Thomas MG et al (2008) An evaluation of treatment decisions at a colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team. Colorectal Dis 10(8):769–772CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ekerstad N, Lofmark R, Carlsson P (2010) Elderly people with multi-morbidity and acute coronary syndrome: doctors’ views on decision-making. Scand J Public Health 38(3):325–331CrossRefPubMed Ekerstad N, Lofmark R, Carlsson P (2010) Elderly people with multi-morbidity and acute coronary syndrome: doctors’ views on decision-making. Scand J Public Health 38(3):325–331CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Barnhart JM, Wassertheil-Smoller S (2006) The effect of race/ethnicity, sex, and social circumstances on coronary revascularization preferences: a vignette comparison. Cardiol Rev 14(5):215–222CrossRefPubMed Barnhart JM, Wassertheil-Smoller S (2006) The effect of race/ethnicity, sex, and social circumstances on coronary revascularization preferences: a vignette comparison. Cardiol Rev 14(5):215–222CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ernst E, Cassileth BR (1998) The prevalence of complementary/alternative medicine in cancer: a systematic review. Cancer 83(4):777–782CrossRefPubMed Ernst E, Cassileth BR (1998) The prevalence of complementary/alternative medicine in cancer: a systematic review. Cancer 83(4):777–782CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Mahalakshmi S, Suresh S (2020) Barriers to cancer screening uptake in women: a qualitative study from Tamil Nadu. India Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 21(4):1081–1087CrossRefPubMed Mahalakshmi S, Suresh S (2020) Barriers to cancer screening uptake in women: a qualitative study from Tamil Nadu. India Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 21(4):1081–1087CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A Qualitative Study of Decision-making (DM) in Surgery and Cancer Care: an Indian Perspective
Authors
Narasimhaiah Srinivasaiah
N. Ravishankar
M. A. Kuriakose
J. R. Monson
R. Hargest
Publication date
04-04-2022
Publisher
Springer India
Keyword
Care
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology / Issue 2/2023
Print ISSN: 0975-7651
Electronic ISSN: 0976-6952
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-022-01521-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2023

Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 2/2023 Go to the issue