Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2021

01-12-2021 | Care | Original Article

A pre-post evaluation of oncology healthcare providers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices following the implementation of a complementary medicine practice guideline

Authors: Emilie N. Hayward, Cody Z. Watling, Lynda G. Balneaves

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 12/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Complementary medicine (CM) use is prevalent among cancer patients, yet it is often not assessed by oncology healthcare providers (HCPs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate oncology HCPs’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices surrounding CM use before and after the implementation of a practice guideline focusing on standardizing assessment and documentation of CM.

Methods

Oncology HCPs across a provincial cancer agency were invited to participate in the study. The implementation strategy included an initial education session for HCPs and standardized CM assessment forms. Pre-post surveys assessing knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to CM were completed by HCPs prior to attending the education session and following the 4-month implementation period. Paired t-tests were conducted to determine differences between baseline and follow-up surveys.

Results

A total of 31 oncology HCPs completed both baseline and follow-up surveys, with over 3700 patient CM assessment forms being completed during the 4-month study period. At the end of the study, HCPs reported greater CM knowledge (p < 0.001), readiness to support cancer patients’ CM decisions (p = 0.002), and willingness to consult with another HCP about CM (p = 0.004). No significant change in HCPs’ reported attitudes towards CM, or other clinical practices related to CM were observed.

Conclusion

Implementing a practice guideline, including a CM education session and a standardized assessment form, was found to improve oncology HCPs’ self-reported CM knowledge and readiness to answer cancer patients’ questions about CM. The findings provide support for future knowledge translation research aimed at standardizing how CM is addressed within cancer care settings.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
6.
go back to reference Huebner J, Marienfeld S, Abbenhardt C et al (2014) Counseling patients on cancer diets: a review of the literature and recommendations for clinical practice. Anticancer Res 34:39PubMed Huebner J, Marienfeld S, Abbenhardt C et al (2014) Counseling patients on cancer diets: a review of the literature and recommendations for clinical practice. Anticancer Res 34:39PubMed
7.
go back to reference Tascilar M, de Jong FA, Verweij J, Mathijssen RHJ (2006) Complementary and alternative medicine during cancer treatment: beyond innocence. Oncologist 11:732–741CrossRef Tascilar M, de Jong FA, Verweij J, Mathijssen RHJ (2006) Complementary and alternative medicine during cancer treatment: beyond innocence. Oncologist 11:732–741CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Werneke U, Earl J, Seydel C et al (2004) Potential health risks of complementary alternative medicines in cancer patients. Br J Cancer 90:408–413CrossRef Werneke U, Earl J, Seydel C et al (2004) Potential health risks of complementary alternative medicines in cancer patients. Br J Cancer 90:408–413CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hessig RE, Arcand LL, Frost MH (2004) The effects of an educational intervention on oncology nurses’ attitude, perceived knowledge, and self-reported application of complementary therapies. Oncol Nurs Forum 31:71–78CrossRef Hessig RE, Arcand LL, Frost MH (2004) The effects of an educational intervention on oncology nurses’ attitude, perceived knowledge, and self-reported application of complementary therapies. Oncol Nurs Forum 31:71–78CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wahner-Roedler DL, Vincent A, Elkin PL et al (2006) Physicians’ attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine and their knowledge of specific therapies: a survey at an academic medical center. Evidence-Based Complement Altern Med 3:495–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nel036CrossRef Wahner-Roedler DL, Vincent A, Elkin PL et al (2006) Physicians’ attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine and their knowledge of specific therapies: a survey at an academic medical center. Evidence-Based Complement Altern Med 3:495–501. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​ecam/​nel036CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Gall A, Anderson K, Adams J, et al (2019) An exploration of healthcare providers’ experiences and perspectives of traditional and complementary medicine usage and disclosure by Indigenous cancer patients. BMC Complement Altern Med 19:259. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2665-7 Gall A, Anderson K, Adams J, et al (2019) An exploration of healthcare providers’ experiences and perspectives of traditional and complementary medicine usage and disclosure by Indigenous cancer patients. BMC Complement Altern Med 19:259. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12906-019-2665-7
29.
go back to reference Brazier ASA, Balneaves LG, Seely D et al (2008) Integrative practice of Canadian oncology health professionals. Curr Oncol 15:S87 Brazier ASA, Balneaves LG, Seely D et al (2008) Integrative practice of Canadian oncology health professionals. Curr Oncol 15:S87
31.
go back to reference Gruppen L, Benn R, White C, Fantone J, Smith K, Warber S (2013) Psychometric characteristics of an attitude instrument for complementary and alternative medicine. Paper presented at: Research in Medical Education (RIME) Conference; November 7–12, 2003; Washington, DC Gruppen L, Benn R, White C, Fantone J, Smith K, Warber S (2013) Psychometric characteristics of an attitude instrument for complementary and alternative medicine. Paper presented at: Research in Medical Education (RIME) Conference; November 7–12, 2003; Washington, DC
Metadata
Title
A pre-post evaluation of oncology healthcare providers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices following the implementation of a complementary medicine practice guideline
Authors
Emilie N. Hayward
Cody Z. Watling
Lynda G. Balneaves
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Care
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 12/2021
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06318-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2021

Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2021 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine