Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Cardiotocography in breech versus vertex delivery: an examiner-blinded, cross-sectional nested case-control study

Authors: Elli Toivonen, Outi Palomäki, Heini Huhtala, Jukka Uotila

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The safety of vaginal breech delivery has been debated for decades. Although it has been shown to predispose infants to immediate depression, several observational studies have also shown that attempting vaginal breech delivery does not increase perinatal morbidity or low Apgar score at the age of five minutes. Cardiotocography monitoring is recommended during vaginal breech delivery, but comparative data describing differences between cardiotocography tracings in breech and vertex deliveries is scarce. This study aims to evaluate differences in intrapartum cardiotocography tracings between breech and vertex deliveries in the final 60 min of delivery. A secondary goal is to identify risk factors for suboptimal neonatal outcome in the study population.

Methods

One hundred eight breech and 108 vertex singleton, intended vaginal deliveries at term from a tertiary hospital with 5000 annual deliveries were included. Two experienced obstetricians, blinded to fetal presentation, neonatal outcome and actual mode of delivery, evaluated traces recorded 60 min before delivery. They provided a three-tier classification and evaluated different trace features according to FIGO (1987) guidelines. Factors associated with acidemia and low Apgar scores were identified by univariate and multivariable analyses performed with binary logistic regression. Student’s T-test and chi-square test were used, as appropriate.

Results

Late decelerations were seen in 13.9 % of breech and 2.8 % of vertex deliveries (p = 0.003) and decreased variability in 26.9 % of breech and 8.3 % of vertex deliveries (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis complicated variable decelerations and breech presentation were identified as risk factors for neonatal acidemia and low Apgar score at the age of five minutes. Pathological trace and breech presentation were independent risk factors for low Apgar score at the age of one minute.

Conclusions

Decreased variability and late decelerations were more prevalent in breech compared to vertex deliveries. Pathological trace predicts immediate neonatal depression and especially complicated variable decelerations may signal more severe distress. Further research is needed to create guidelines for safe management of vaginal breech delivery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stout MJ, Cahill AG. Electronic fetal monitoring: past, present, and future. Clin Perinatol. 2011;38:127–42.CrossRefPubMed Stout MJ, Cahill AG. Electronic fetal monitoring: past, present, and future. Clin Perinatol. 2011;38:127–42.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;5:006066. Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;5:006066.
3.
go back to reference Chen HY, Chauhan SP, Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM, Abuhamad AZ. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and its relationship to neonatal and infant mortality in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:491.e1–10.CrossRef Chen HY, Chauhan SP, Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM, Abuhamad AZ. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and its relationship to neonatal and infant mortality in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:491.e1–10.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Vintzileos AM, Nochimson DJ, Guzman ER, Knuppel RA, Lake M, Schifrin BS. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85:149–55.CrossRefPubMed Vintzileos AM, Nochimson DJ, Guzman ER, Knuppel RA, Lake M, Schifrin BS. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85:149–55.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ananth CV, Chauhan SP, Chen HY, D'Alton ME, Vintzileos AM. Electronic fetal monitoring in the United States: temporal trends and adverse perinatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:927–33.CrossRefPubMed Ananth CV, Chauhan SP, Chen HY, D'Alton ME, Vintzileos AM. Electronic fetal monitoring in the United States: temporal trends and adverse perinatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:927–33.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and,Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:192–202.CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and,Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:192–202.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference FIGO. FIGO News: Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1987;25:159–67. FIGO. FIGO News: Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1987;25:159–67.
8.
go back to reference Ayres-de-Campos D, Arteiro D, Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J. Knowledge of adverse neonatal outcome alters clinicians' interpretation of the intrapartum cardiotocograph. BJOG. 2011;118:978–84.CrossRefPubMed Ayres-de-Campos D, Arteiro D, Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J. Knowledge of adverse neonatal outcome alters clinicians' interpretation of the intrapartum cardiotocograph. BJOG. 2011;118:978–84.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ayres-de-Campos D, Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Pereira-Leite L. Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision. Br J Obstet Gynaec. 1999;106:1307–10.CrossRef Ayres-de-Campos D, Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Pereira-Leite L. Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision. Br J Obstet Gynaec. 1999;106:1307–10.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Blackwell SC, Grobman WA, Antoniewicz L, Hutchinson M, Gyamfi Bannerman C. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation System. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:378.e1–5.CrossRef Blackwell SC, Grobman WA, Antoniewicz L, Hutchinson M, Gyamfi Bannerman C. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation System. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:378.e1–5.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Palomäki O, Luukkaala T, Luoto R, Tuimala R. Intrapartum cardiotocography -- the dilemma of interpretational variation. J Perinat Med. 2006;34:298–302.CrossRefPubMed Palomäki O, Luukkaala T, Luoto R, Tuimala R. Intrapartum cardiotocography -- the dilemma of interpretational variation. J Perinat Med. 2006;34:298–302.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Cunningham F, Leveno K, Bloom S, et al. Chapter 24: Breech Presentation and Delivery. In: Cunningham F, Leveno K, Bloom S, Hauth J, Rouse D, Spong C, editors. Williams Obstetrics. 23rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc; 2010. p. 527. Cunningham F, Leveno K, Bloom S, et al. Chapter 24: Breech Presentation and Delivery. In: Cunningham F, Leveno K, Bloom S, Hauth J, Rouse D, Spong C, editors. Williams Obstetrics. 23rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc; 2010. p. 527.
13.
go back to reference Alarab M, Regan C, O'Connell MP, Keane DP, O'Herlihy C, Foley ME. Singleton vaginal breech delivery at term: still a safe option. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:407–12.CrossRefPubMed Alarab M, Regan C, O'Connell MP, Keane DP, O'Herlihy C, Foley ME. Singleton vaginal breech delivery at term: still a safe option. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:407–12.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Giuliani A, Scholl WM, Basver A, Tamussino KF. Mode of delivery and outcome of 699 term singleton breech deliveries at a single center. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1694–8.CrossRefPubMed Giuliani A, Scholl WM, Basver A, Tamussino KF. Mode of delivery and outcome of 699 term singleton breech deliveries at a single center. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1694–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart JM, Alexander S, Uzan S, Subtil D, et al. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:1002–11.CrossRefPubMed Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart JM, Alexander S, Uzan S, Subtil D, et al. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:1002–11.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Golfier F, Vaudoyer F, Ecochard R, Champion F, Audra P, Raudrant D. Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section in singleton term breech presentation: a study of 1116 cases. Eur J Obstet Gyn R B. 2001;98:186–92.CrossRef Golfier F, Vaudoyer F, Ecochard R, Champion F, Audra P, Raudrant D. Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section in singleton term breech presentation: a study of 1116 cases. Eur J Obstet Gyn R B. 2001;98:186–92.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000;356:1375–83.CrossRefPubMed Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000;356:1375–83.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Collea JV, Chein C, Quilligan EJ. The randomized management of term frank breech presentation: a study of 208 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;137:235–44.CrossRefPubMed Collea JV, Chein C, Quilligan EJ. The randomized management of term frank breech presentation: a study of 208 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;137:235–44.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Gimovsky ML, Wallace RL, Schifrin BS, Paul RH. Randomized management of the nonfrank breech presentation at term: a preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;146:34–40.CrossRefPubMed Gimovsky ML, Wallace RL, Schifrin BS, Paul RH. Randomized management of the nonfrank breech presentation at term: a preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;146:34–40.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kuismanen K, Uotila J, Kirkinen P. Fetus in breech presentation, what should be told to the mother? Duodecim. 2004;120:153–9.PubMed Kuismanen K, Uotila J, Kirkinen P. Fetus in breech presentation, what should be told to the mother? Duodecim. 2004;120:153–9.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The use of electronic fetal monitoring. The use and interpretation of cardiotocography in intrapartum fetal surveillance. London: RCOG; 2001. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The use of electronic fetal monitoring. The use and interpretation of cardiotocography in intrapartum fetal surveillance. London: RCOG; 2001.
22.
go back to reference Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah M, Lawrie TA. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:000166. Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah M, Lawrie TA. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:000166.
23.
go back to reference White PC, Cibils LA. Clinical significance of fetal heart rate patterns during labor. VIII. Breech presentations. J Reprod Med. 1984;29:45–51.PubMed White PC, Cibils LA. Clinical significance of fetal heart rate patterns during labor. VIII. Breech presentations. J Reprod Med. 1984;29:45–51.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Wheeler T, Greene K. Fetal heart rate monitoring during breech labour. Br J Obstet Gynaec. 1975;82:208–14.CrossRef Wheeler T, Greene K. Fetal heart rate monitoring during breech labour. Br J Obstet Gynaec. 1975;82:208–14.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ohel G, Brjejinski A, Linder N, Navot D. Second stage fetal heart rate decelerations in breech deliveries. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;14:339–42.CrossRefPubMed Ohel G, Brjejinski A, Linder N, Navot D. Second stage fetal heart rate decelerations in breech deliveries. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;14:339–42.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Talas BB, Altinkaya SO, Talas H, Danisman N, Gungor T. Predictive factors and short-term fetal outcomes of breech presentation: a case–control study. Taiwan J Obstet Gyne. 2008;47:402–7.CrossRef Talas BB, Altinkaya SO, Talas H, Danisman N, Gungor T. Predictive factors and short-term fetal outcomes of breech presentation: a case–control study. Taiwan J Obstet Gyne. 2008;47:402–7.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kessler J, Moster D, Albrechtsen S. Intrapartum monitoring with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis in breech presentation: an observational study. BJOG. 2015;122:528–35.CrossRefPubMed Kessler J, Moster D, Albrechtsen S. Intrapartum monitoring with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis in breech presentation: an observational study. BJOG. 2015;122:528–35.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Amer-Wahlin I, Arulkumaran S, Hagberg H, Marsal K, Visser GHA. Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance. BJOG. 2007;114:1191–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Amer-Wahlin I, Arulkumaran S, Hagberg H, Marsal K, Visser GHA. Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance. BJOG. 2007;114:1191–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Toivonen E, Palomäki O, Huhtala H, Uotila J. Selective vaginal breech delivery at term - still an option. Acta Obstet Gyn Scand. 2012;91:1177–83.CrossRef Toivonen E, Palomäki O, Huhtala H, Uotila J. Selective vaginal breech delivery at term - still an option. Acta Obstet Gyn Scand. 2012;91:1177–83.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Vistad I, Cvancarova M, Hustad BL, Henriksen T. Vaginal breech delivery: results of a prospective registration study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:153.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vistad I, Cvancarova M, Hustad BL, Henriksen T. Vaginal breech delivery: results of a prospective registration study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:153.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Ayres-de-campos D. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131:13–24.CrossRefPubMed Ayres-de-campos D. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131:13–24.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Su M, McLeod L, Ross S, Willan A, Hannah WJ, Hutton E, et al. Factors associated with adverse perinatal outcome in the Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:740–5.CrossRefPubMed Su M, McLeod L, Ross S, Willan A, Hannah WJ, Hutton E, et al. Factors associated with adverse perinatal outcome in the Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:740–5.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Ulander VM, Gissler M, Nuutila M, Ylikorkala O. Are health expectations of term breech infants unrealistically high? Acta Obstet Gyn Scand. 2004;83:180–6.CrossRef Ulander VM, Gissler M, Nuutila M, Ylikorkala O. Are health expectations of term breech infants unrealistically high? Acta Obstet Gyn Scand. 2004;83:180–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cardiotocography in breech versus vertex delivery: an examiner-blinded, cross-sectional nested case-control study
Authors
Elli Toivonen
Outi Palomäki
Heini Huhtala
Jukka Uotila
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1115-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2016 Go to the issue