Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Neurocritical Care
Literature
1.
Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, et al. Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies—with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care. 2009;13(1):201.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Feldman JM. Is it a bird? Is it a plane? The role of patient monitors in medical decision making. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(3):707–10.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Pugsley J, Lerner AB. Cardiac output monitoring: is there a gold standard and how do the newer technologies compare? Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;14(4):274–82.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology. 2010;113(5):1220–35. Review.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Botero M, Kirby D, Lobato EB, et al. Measurement of cardiac output before and after cardiopulmonary bypass: Comparison among aortic transit-time ultrasound, thermodilution, and noninvasive partial CO2 rebreathing. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18:563–72.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Bajorat J, Hofmockel R, Vagts DA, et al. Comparison of invasive and less-inva- sive techniques of cardiac output measurement under different haemodynamic conditions in a pig model. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006;23:23–30.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput. 1999;15:85–91.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cardiac Output Monitoring and Fluid Responsiveness
Author
Christos Lazaridis
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Humana Press Inc
Published in
Neurocritical Care / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1541-6933
Electronic ISSN: 1556-0961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-012-9693-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Neurocritical Care 3/2012 Go to the issue

Original Article

Milrinone and Homeostasis to Treat Cerebral Vasospasm Associated with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Montreal Neurological Hospital Protocol

Original Article

Angiogram-Negative Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Relationship Between Bleeding Pattern and Clinical Outcome

Neuroimage

Waking up from Coronary Bypass Surgery and One Eye does not Move Right

Original Article

Determinants of Effective Cooling During Endovascular Hypothermia

Translational Research

Brain Tissue Oxygenation and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Thresholds of Ischemia in a Standardized Pig Brain Death Model

Practical Pearl

Accidental Intoxication with 60 mg Intrathecal Baclofen: Survived