Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Anesthesiology 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Can ventilator settings reduce the negative effects of endotracheal suctioning? Investigations in a mechanical lung model

Authors: Espen R. Nakstad, Helge Opdahl, Fridtjof Heyerdahl, Fredrik Borchsenius, Ole H. Skjønsberg

Published in: BMC Anesthesiology | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The insertion of suction devices through endotracheal tubes (ETTs) increases airway resistance and the subsequent suctioning may reduce airway pressures and facilitate atelectasis.
The aim of this study was to investigate how airway pressures and tidal volumes change when different combinations of suction equipment and ETT sizes are used, and to what extent unfavorable effects can be ameliorated by choice of ventilator settings.

Methods

A mechanical ventilator was connected to a lung model by ETTs of 9 mm, 8 mm or 7 mm internal diameter (ID) with a pressure transducer inserted distal to the ETT. The effects of suction procedures with bronchoscope and closed catheter systems were investigated during pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) and volume controlled ventilation (VCV). In each mode, the effects of changes in inspiration:expiration (I:E) ratio, trigger sensitivity and suction pressure were examined.

Results

The variables that contributed most to negative model airway pressures and loss of tidal volume during suctioning were (in descending order); 1) Small-size ETTs (7–8 mm ID) combined with large diameter suction devices (14–16 Fr); 2) inverse I:E ratio ventilation (in VCV); 3) negative ventilator trigger sensitivity; and 4) strong suction pressure. The pressure changes observed distal to the ETTs were not identical to those detected by the ventilator.

Conclusions

Negative model airway pressure was induced by suctioning through small-size ETTs. The most extreme pressure and volume changes were ameliorated when conventional ventilator settings were used, such as PCV mode with short inspiration time and a trigger function sensitive to flow changes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference AARC Clinical Practice Guidelines. Endotracheal suctioning of mechanically ventilated patients with artificial airways 2010. Respir Care. 2010;55(6):758–64. AARC Clinical Practice Guidelines. Endotracheal suctioning of mechanically ventilated patients with artificial airways 2010. Respir Care. 2010;55(6):758–64.
2.
go back to reference Liu XW, Liu Z. [The effects of endotracheal suction on gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients under pressure-controlled or volume-controlled ventilation]. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2007;30(10):751–5.PubMed Liu XW, Liu Z. [The effects of endotracheal suction on gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients under pressure-controlled or volume-controlled ventilation]. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2007;30(10):751–5.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Lindgren S, Odenstedt H, Erlandsson K, Grivans C, Lundin S, Stenqvist O. Bronchoscopic suctioning may cause lung collapse: a lung model and clinical evaluation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52(2):209–18.CrossRefPubMed Lindgren S, Odenstedt H, Erlandsson K, Grivans C, Lundin S, Stenqvist O. Bronchoscopic suctioning may cause lung collapse: a lung model and clinical evaluation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52(2):209–18.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bourgault AM, Brown CA, Hains SM, Parlow JL. Effects of endotracheal tube suctioning on arterial oxygen tension and heart rate variability. Biol Res Nurs. 2006;7(4):268–78.CrossRefPubMed Bourgault AM, Brown CA, Hains SM, Parlow JL. Effects of endotracheal tube suctioning on arterial oxygen tension and heart rate variability. Biol Res Nurs. 2006;7(4):268–78.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Walsh JM, Vanderwarf C, Hoscheit D, Fahey PJ. Unsuspected hemodynamic alterations during endotracheal suctioning. Chest. 1989;95(1):162–5.CrossRefPubMed Walsh JM, Vanderwarf C, Hoscheit D, Fahey PJ. Unsuspected hemodynamic alterations during endotracheal suctioning. Chest. 1989;95(1):162–5.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Nakstad ER, Opdahl H, Skjonsberg OH, Borchsenius F. Intrabronchial airway pressures in intubated patients during bronchoscopy under volume controlled and pressure controlled ventilation. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011;39(3):431–9.PubMed Nakstad ER, Opdahl H, Skjonsberg OH, Borchsenius F. Intrabronchial airway pressures in intubated patients during bronchoscopy under volume controlled and pressure controlled ventilation. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011;39(3):431–9.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Bikker IG, van Bommel J, Reis Miranda D, Bakker J, Gommers D. End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions. Critical Care (London, England). 2008;12(6):R145.CrossRef Bikker IG, van Bommel J, Reis Miranda D, Bakker J, Gommers D. End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions. Critical Care (London, England). 2008;12(6):R145.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Palazzo SG, Soni B. Pressure changes during tracheal suctioning--a laboratory study. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(6):576–84.CrossRefPubMed Palazzo SG, Soni B. Pressure changes during tracheal suctioning--a laboratory study. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(6):576–84.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Almgren B, Wickerts CJ, Heinonen E, Hogman M. Side effects of endotracheal suction in pressure- and volume-controlled ventilation. Chest. 2004;125(3):1077–80.CrossRefPubMed Almgren B, Wickerts CJ, Heinonen E, Hogman M. Side effects of endotracheal suction in pressure- and volume-controlled ventilation. Chest. 2004;125(3):1077–80.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Glass C, Grap MJ, Sessler CN. Endotracheal tube narrowing after closed-system suctioning: prevalence and risk factors. Am J Crit Care. 1999;8(2):93–100.PubMed Glass C, Grap MJ, Sessler CN. Endotracheal tube narrowing after closed-system suctioning: prevalence and risk factors. Am J Crit Care. 1999;8(2):93–100.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Beuret P, Roux C, Constan A, Mercat A, Brochard L. Discrepancy between guidelines and practice of tracheal suctioning in mechanically ventilated patients: a French multicenter observational study. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(7):1335–6.CrossRefPubMed Beuret P, Roux C, Constan A, Mercat A, Brochard L. Discrepancy between guidelines and practice of tracheal suctioning in mechanically ventilated patients: a French multicenter observational study. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(7):1335–6.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Copnell B, Dargaville PA, Ryan EM, Kiraly NJ, Chin LO, Mills JF, Tingay DG. The effect of suction method, catheter size, and suction pressure on lung volume changes during endotracheal suction in piglets. Pediatr Res. 2009;66(4):405–10.CrossRefPubMed Copnell B, Dargaville PA, Ryan EM, Kiraly NJ, Chin LO, Mills JF, Tingay DG. The effect of suction method, catheter size, and suction pressure on lung volume changes during endotracheal suction in piglets. Pediatr Res. 2009;66(4):405–10.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Can ventilator settings reduce the negative effects of endotracheal suctioning? Investigations in a mechanical lung model
Authors
Espen R. Nakstad
Helge Opdahl
Fridtjof Heyerdahl
Fredrik Borchsenius
Ole H. Skjønsberg
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2253
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0196-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Anesthesiology 1/2015 Go to the issue