Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 4/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Original Article

Can the frontal tibiofemoral alignment be assessed on anteroposterior knee radiographs?

Authors: M. Sgroi, M. Faschingbauer, H. Reichel, T. Kappe

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of total knee arthroplasty is, amongst others, the reconstruction of a physiological axis of the leg with a tibiofemoral angle in the frontal plane of an average of 6°. The aim of this study is to clarify how much of the bone length on the femur and tibia has to be reproduced on anteroposterior (AP) knee radiographs in order to determine the leg’s alignment after a total knee arthroplasty.

Materials and methods

We analyzed the postoperative hip-to-ankle (HTA) radiographs of 100 patients who had undergone a total knee arthroplasty at our institution.

Results

There were strong correlations between the measured values on HTA and 20 cm bone length [lateral distal femur angle (LDFA) r = 0.887, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) r = 0.874, tibiofemoral angle (TFA) r = 0.888], but not between the measurements on HTA and 10 cm (LDFA r = 0.267, MPTA r = 0.102, TFA r = 0.161). There were significant differences between all measurements both on HTA and 20 cm and on HTA and 10 cm, with the exception of the LDFA between HTA and 10 cm (p = 0.085) and of the MPTA between HTA and 20 cm (p = 0.227). The intra- and inter-observer correlations were both high.

Conclusion

If preoperatively crude axis deviations are excluded, the tibiofemoral angle on AP knee radiographs can be determined with an accuracy of ±2.6° if at least 20 cm length of bone is reproduced (measured from the femoral and tibial joint line). Due to the high 95 % confidence intervals and bearing in mind that deviations greater than 3° may lead to inferior clinical results, however, it appears inappropriate to determine lower limb alignment with anteroposterior radiographs.

Level of evidence

Level 2.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J (2012) The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(1):45–53CrossRefPubMed Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J (2012) The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(1):45–53CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Benjamin J (2006) Component alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 55:405–412PubMed Benjamin J (2006) Component alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 55:405–412PubMed
3.
go back to reference Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R et al (2004) Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:26–34CrossRefPubMed Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R et al (2004) Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:26–34CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Felson DT, Cooke TD, Niu J, Goggins J, Choi J, Yu J et al (2009) Can anatomic alignment measured from a knee radiograph substitute for mechanical alignment from full limb films? Osteoarthritis Cartilage 17(11):1448–1452CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Felson DT, Cooke TD, Niu J, Goggins J, Choi J, Yu J et al (2009) Can anatomic alignment measured from a knee radiograph substitute for mechanical alignment from full limb films? Osteoarthritis Cartilage 17(11):1448–1452CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Hirschmann MT, Konala P, Amsler F, Iranpour F, Friederich NF, Cobb JP (2011) The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(5):629–633CrossRefPubMed Hirschmann MT, Konala P, Amsler F, Iranpour F, Friederich NF, Cobb JP (2011) The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(5):629–633CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(5):709–714PubMed Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(5):709–714PubMed
7.
go back to reference Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Ng VY (2011) Neutral mechanical alignment: a requirement for successful TKA: affirms. Orthopedics 34(9):e504–e506PubMed Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Ng VY (2011) Neutral mechanical alignment: a requirement for successful TKA: affirms. Orthopedics 34(9):e504–e506PubMed
8.
go back to reference Lonner JH, Laird MT, Stuchin SA (1996) Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:102–106CrossRefPubMed Lonner JH, Laird MT, Stuchin SA (1996) Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:102–106CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Matziolis G, Adam J, Perka C (2010) Varus malalignment has no influence on clinical outcome in midterm follow-up after total knee replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130(12):1487–1491CrossRefPubMed Matziolis G, Adam J, Perka C (2010) Varus malalignment has no influence on clinical outcome in midterm follow-up after total knee replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130(12):1487–1491CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference McGrory JE, Trousdale RT, Pagnano MW, Nigbur M (2002) Preoperative hip to ankle radiographs in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:196–202CrossRefPubMed McGrory JE, Trousdale RT, Pagnano MW, Nigbur M (2002) Preoperative hip to ankle radiographs in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:196–202CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Miehlke R, Schwenen M (1980) Roentgenological assessment of knee joint arthroplasties (author’s transl)]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 118(1):66–72CrossRefPubMed Miehlke R, Schwenen M (1980) Roentgenological assessment of knee joint arthroplasties (author’s transl)]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 118(1):66–72CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Paley D, Pfeil J (2000) Principles of deformity correction around the knee. Der Orthopade 29(1):18–38PubMed Paley D, Pfeil J (2000) Principles of deformity correction around the knee. Der Orthopade 29(1):18–38PubMed
13.
go back to reference Petersen TL, Engh GA (1988) Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3(1):67–72CrossRefPubMed Petersen TL, Engh GA (1988) Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3(1):67–72CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153–156PubMed Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153–156PubMed
15.
go back to reference Skytta ET, Lohman M, Tallroth K, Remes V (2009) Comparison of standard anteroposterior knee and hip-to-ankle radiographs in determining the lower limb and implant alignment after total knee arthroplasty. Scand J Surg 98(4):250–253PubMed Skytta ET, Lohman M, Tallroth K, Remes V (2009) Comparison of standard anteroposterior knee and hip-to-ankle radiographs in determining the lower limb and implant alignment after total knee arthroplasty. Scand J Surg 98(4):250–253PubMed
Metadata
Title
Can the frontal tibiofemoral alignment be assessed on anteroposterior knee radiographs?
Authors
M. Sgroi
M. Faschingbauer
H. Reichel
T. Kappe
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1590-9921
Electronic ISSN: 1590-9999
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-016-0404-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 4/2016 Go to the issue