Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2005

01-01-2005 | Original Article

Can Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Be Omitted in Patients With Favorable Breast Cancer Histology?

Authors: Jane E. Mendez, MD, Jane V. Fey, MPH, Hiram Cody, MD, Patrick I. Borgen, MD, Lisa M. Sclafani, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The widespread use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) to replace axillary dissection has broadened the indications for axillary staging in breast cancer. Recent studies have demonstrated a finite risk of lymphedema and sensory morbidity associated with SLNB. We undertook this study to determine whether SLNB could be omitted in clinically node-negative patients with favorable-histology breast cancer.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of a prospective database of SLNBs performed at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1996 to 2003 to determine the incidence of lymph node metastases by histological subtype. For the favorable subtypes, the patient’s age, tumor size, estrogen receptor status, lymphovascular invasion, nuclear grade, and histological grade were compared by nodal status to determine their predictive value.

Results

A total of 196 cases with favorable breast cancer subtypes were identified with a 4.1% (8 of 196) sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity rate. Each of the histological subtypes included patients with positive SLNs, with the exception of adenoid cystic (n = 4) and secretory (n = 1) breast carcinoma, which were quite rare in our series. When compared by nodal status, the patient’s age, tumor size, estrogen receptor status, lymphovascular invasion, nuclear grade, and histological grade failed to predict those with positive SLNs.

Conclusions

Patients with favorable breast cancer histology have a small risk of axillary SLN metastases. The use of SLNB in these patients should be individualized, taking into consideration the small incidence of axillary metastases and the risks and benefits associated with the SLN procedure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Klauber-DeMoreTan, LK, Liberman, L, et al. 2000Sentinel lymph node biopsy: is it indicated in patients with high-risk ductal carcinoma-in-situ and ductal carcinoma-in-situ with microinvasion?Ann Surg Oncol763664 Klauber-DeMoreTan, LK, Liberman, L,  et al. 2000Sentinel lymph node biopsy: is it indicated in patients with high-risk ductal carcinoma-in-situ and ductal carcinoma-in-situ with microinvasion?Ann Surg Oncol763664
2.
go back to reference Montgomery, L, Thorne, A, Van Zee, K, et al. 2002Isosulfan blue dye reactions during sentinel lymph node mapping for breast cancerAnesth Analg953858 Montgomery, L, Thorne, A, Van Zee, K,  et al. 2002Isosulfan blue dye reactions during sentinel lymph node mapping for breast cancerAnesth Analg953858
3.
go back to reference Sener, SF, Winchester, DJ, Martz, CH, et al. 2001Lymphedema after sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast carcinomaCancer9274852CrossRefPubMed Sener, SF, Winchester, DJ, Martz, CH,  et al. 2001Lymphedema after sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast carcinomaCancer9274852CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Blanchard, DK, Donohue, JH, Reynolds, C, et al. 2003Relapse and morbidity in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy alone or with axillary dissection for breast cancerArch Surg1384828CrossRefPubMed Blanchard, DK, Donohue, JH, Reynolds, C,  et al. 2003Relapse and morbidity in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy alone or with axillary dissection for breast cancerArch Surg1384828CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Baron, RH, Fey, JV, Raboy, S, et al. 2002Eighteen sensations after breast cancer surgery: a comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary node dissectionOncol Nurs Forum296519 Baron, RH, Fey, JV, Raboy, S,  et al. 2002Eighteen sensations after breast cancer surgery: a comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary node dissectionOncol Nurs Forum296519
6.
go back to reference Page, DL 2003Special types of invasive breast cancer, with clinical implicationsAm J Clin Pathol278325 Page, DL 2003Special types of invasive breast cancer, with clinical implicationsAm J Clin Pathol278325
7.
go back to reference Simpson, JF, Page, DL 1992Prognostic value of histopathology in the breastSemin Oncol1925462 Simpson, JF, Page, DL 1992Prognostic value of histopathology in the breastSemin Oncol1925462
8.
go back to reference Wong, SL, Chao, C, Edwards, MJ, et al. 2002Frequency of sentinel lymph node metastases in patients with favorable breast cancer histologic subtypesAm J Surg1844928 Wong, SL, Chao, C, Edwards, MJ,  et al. 2002Frequency of sentinel lymph node metastases in patients with favorable breast cancer histologic subtypesAm J Surg1844928
9.
go back to reference Cody, HS, Fey, JV, Akhurst, T, et al. 2001Complementarity of blue dye and isotope in sentinel node localization for breast cancer: univariate and multivariate analysisAnn Surg Oncol8139 Cody, HS, Fey, JV, Akhurst, T,  et al. 2001Complementarity of blue dye and isotope in sentinel node localization for breast cancer: univariate and multivariate analysisAnn Surg Oncol8139
10.
go back to reference Rosen, PP, Groshen, S, Kinne, DW, et al. 1993Factors influencing prognosis in node-negative breast carcinoma: analysis of 767 T1N0M0/T2N0M0 patients with long-term follow-upJ Clin Oncol112090100 Rosen, PP, Groshen, S, Kinne, DW,  et al. 1993Factors influencing prognosis in node-negative breast carcinoma: analysis of 767 T1N0M0/T2N0M0 patients with long-term follow-upJ Clin Oncol112090100
11.
go back to reference Paramo, JC, Wilson, C, Velarde, D, et al. 2002Pure mucinous carcinoma of the breast: is axillary staging necessary?Ann Surg Oncol91614 Paramo, JC, Wilson, C, Velarde, D,  et al. 2002Pure mucinous carcinoma of the breast: is axillary staging necessary?Ann Surg Oncol91614
12.
go back to reference Ridolfi, RL, Rosen, PP, Port, A, et al. 1977Medullary carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic study with 10-year follow-upCancer40136585PubMed Ridolfi, RL, Rosen, PP, Port, A,  et al. 1977Medullary carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic study with 10-year follow-upCancer40136585PubMed
13.
go back to reference Diab, SG, Clark, GM, Osborne, CK, et al. 1999Tumor characteristics and clinical outcome of tubular and mucinous carcinomasJ Clin Oncol1714428 Diab, SG, Clark, GM, Osborne, CK,  et al. 1999Tumor characteristics and clinical outcome of tubular and mucinous carcinomasJ Clin Oncol1714428
14.
go back to reference Maibenco, DC, Weiss, LK, Pawlish, KS, et al. 1999Axillary lymph node metastases associated with small invasive breast carcinomasCancer8515306 Maibenco, DC, Weiss, LK, Pawlish, KS,  et al. 1999Axillary lymph node metastases associated with small invasive breast carcinomasCancer8515306
15.
go back to reference Papadatos, G Rangan, AM Psarianos et al. 2001Probability of axillary nodal involvement in patients with tubular carcinoma of the breastBr J Surg888604 Papadatos, G Rangan, AM Psarianos et al. 2001Probability of axillary nodal involvement in patients with tubular carcinoma of the breastBr J Surg888604
16.
go back to reference Winchester, DJ, Sahin, AA, Tucker, SL, et al. 1996Tubular carcinoma of the breast: predicting axillary nodal metastases and recurrenceAnn Surg2233427 Winchester, DJ, Sahin, AA, Tucker, SL,  et al. 1996Tubular carcinoma of the breast: predicting axillary nodal metastases and recurrenceAnn Surg2233427
17.
go back to reference Voogd, AC, Coebergh, JW, Repelaer van Driel, OJ, et al. 2000The risk of nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with clinically negative lymph nodes: a population-based analysisBreast Cancer Res Treat60639 Voogd, AC, Coebergh, JW, Repelaer van Driel, OJ,  et al. 2000The risk of nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with clinically negative lymph nodes: a population-based analysisBreast Cancer Res Treat60639
Metadata
Title
Can Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Be Omitted in Patients With Favorable Breast Cancer Histology?
Authors
Jane E. Mendez, MD
Jane V. Fey, MPH
Hiram Cody, MD
Patrick I. Borgen, MD
Lisa M. Sclafani, MD
Publication date
01-01-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2005
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-004-1169-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2005

Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2005 Go to the issue