Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2/2012

01-02-2012 | Orthopaedic Surgery

Can CT-based patient-matched instrumentation achieve consistent rotational alignment in knee arthroplasty?

Authors: C. O. Tibesku, B. Innocenti, P. Wong, A. Salehi, L. Labey

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Long-term success of contemporary total knee replacements relies to a large extent on proper implant alignment. This study was undertaken to test whether specimen-matched cutting blocks based on computed axial tomography (CT) scans could provide accurate rotational alignment of the femoral component.

Methods

CT scans of five fresh frozen full leg cadaver specimens, equipped with infrared reflective markers, were used to produce a specimen-matched femoral cutting block. Using those blocks, the bone cuts were made to implant a bi-compartmental femoral component. Rotational alignment of the components in the horizontal plane was determined using an optical measurement system and compared with all relevant rotational reference axes identified on the CT scans.

Results

Average rotational alignment for the bi-compartmental component in the horizontal plane was 1.9° (range 0°–6.3°; standard deviation 2.6°). One specimen that showed the highest deviation from the planned alignment also featured a completely degraded medial articular surface.

Conclusions

The CT-based specimen-matched cutting blocks achieved good rotational alignment accuracy except for one specimen with badly damaged cartilage. In such cases, imaging techniques that visualize the cartilage layer might be more suitable to design cutting blocks, as they will provide a better fit and increased surface support.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jenny J-Y, Clemens U, Kohler S, Kiefer H, Konermann W, Miehlke RK (2005) Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: a case–control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses. J Arthroplast 20(7):832–839. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2005.02.002 CrossRef Jenny J-Y, Clemens U, Kohler S, Kiefer H, Konermann W, Miehlke RK (2005) Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: a case–control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses. J Arthroplast 20(7):832–839. doi:10.​1016/​j.​arth.​2005.​02.​002 CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Austin MS, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH (2004) Knee failure mechanisms after total knee arthroplasty. Tech Knee Surg 3(1):55–59CrossRef Austin MS, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH (2004) Knee failure mechanisms after total knee arthroplasty. Tech Knee Surg 3(1):55–59CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M (2001) Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:315–318PubMedCrossRef Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M (2001) Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:315–318PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7–13PubMedCrossRef Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7–13PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Siston RA, Cromie MJ, Gold GE, Goodman SB, Delp SL, Maloney WJ, Giori NJ (2008) Averaging different alignment axes improves femoral rotational alignment in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(10):2098–2104. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.00996 PubMedCrossRef Siston RA, Cromie MJ, Gold GE, Goodman SB, Delp SL, Maloney WJ, Giori NJ (2008) Averaging different alignment axes improves femoral rotational alignment in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(10):2098–2104. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​G.​00996 PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jenny JY, Boeri C, Picard F, Leitner F (2004) Reproducibility of intra-operative measurement of the mechanical axes of the lower limb during total knee replacement with a non-image-based navigation system. Comput Aided Surg 9(4):161–165. doi:10.1080/10929080500095517 PubMed Jenny JY, Boeri C, Picard F, Leitner F (2004) Reproducibility of intra-operative measurement of the mechanical axes of the lower limb during total knee replacement with a non-image-based navigation system. Comput Aided Surg 9(4):161–165. doi:10.​1080/​1092908050009551​7 PubMed
8.
go back to reference Jerosch J, Peuker E, Philipps B, Filler T (2002) Interindividual reproducibility in perioperative rotational alignment of femoral components in knee prosthetic surgery using the transepicondylar axis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10(3):194–197. doi:10.1007/s00167-001-0271-x PubMedCrossRef Jerosch J, Peuker E, Philipps B, Filler T (2002) Interindividual reproducibility in perioperative rotational alignment of femoral components in knee prosthetic surgery using the transepicondylar axis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10(3):194–197. doi:10.​1007/​s00167-001-0271-x PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hirschmann MT, Konala P, Amsler F, Iranpour F, Friederich NF, Cobb JP (2011) The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93-B (5):629–633 doi:10.1302/0301-620x.93b5.25893 Hirschmann MT, Konala P, Amsler F, Iranpour F, Friederich NF, Cobb JP (2011) The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93-B (5):629–633 doi:10.​1302/​0301-620x.​93b5.​25893
10.
go back to reference Kessler O, Lacatusu E, Sommers MB, Mayr E, Bottlang M (2006) Malrotation in total knee arthroplasty: effect on tibial cortex strain captured by laser-based strain acquisition. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21 (6):603-609. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.01.011 Kessler O, Lacatusu E, Sommers MB, Mayr E, Bottlang M (2006) Malrotation in total knee arthroplasty: effect on tibial cortex strain captured by laser-based strain acquisition. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21 (6):603-609. doi: 10.​1016/​j.​clinbiomech.​2006.​01.​011
11.
go back to reference Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (356):144–153 Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (356):144–153
12.
go back to reference Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique: a randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br B 86(3):372–377. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14643 Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique: a randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br B 86(3):372–377. doi:10.​1302/​0301-620x.​86b3.​14643
13.
go back to reference Delp SL, Stulberg DS, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F (1998) Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:49–56PubMedCrossRef Delp SL, Stulberg DS, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F (1998) Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:49–56PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Stulberg DS (2003) How accurate is current TKR instrumentation? Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:177–184PubMedCrossRef Stulberg DS (2003) How accurate is current TKR instrumentation? Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:177–184PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C (2007) A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(2):236–243. doi:10.2106/jbjs.f.00386 PubMedCrossRef Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C (2007) A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(2):236–243. doi:10.​2106/​jbjs.​f.​00386 PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lutzner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C, Gunther KP, Kirschner S (2008) Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: a comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and ct evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br B 90(8):1039–1044. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.90b8.20553 Lutzner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C, Gunther KP, Kirschner S (2008) Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: a comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and ct evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br B 90(8):1039–1044. doi:10.​1302/​0301-620x.​90b8.​20553
23.
go back to reference Slover JD, Tosteson ANA, Bozic KJ, Rubash HE, Malchau H (2008) Impact of hospital volume on the economic value of computer navigation for total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(7):1492–1500. doi:10.2106/jbjs.g.00888 PubMedCrossRef Slover JD, Tosteson ANA, Bozic KJ, Rubash HE, Malchau H (2008) Impact of hospital volume on the economic value of computer navigation for total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(7):1492–1500. doi:10.​2106/​jbjs.​g.​00888 PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Victor J, Van Doninck D, Labey L, Innocenti B, Parizel PM, Bellemans J (2009) How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee? Knee 16(5):358–365PubMedCrossRef Victor J, Van Doninck D, Labey L, Innocenti B, Parizel PM, Bellemans J (2009) How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee? Knee 16(5):358–365PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lustig S, Lavoie F, Selmi T, Servien E, Neyret P (2008) Relationship between the surgical epicondylar axis and the articular surface of the distal femur: an anatomic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(7):674–682. doi:10.1007/s00167-008-0551-9 PubMedCrossRef Lustig S, Lavoie F, Selmi T, Servien E, Neyret P (2008) Relationship between the surgical epicondylar axis and the articular surface of the distal femur: an anatomic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(7):674–682. doi:10.​1007/​s00167-008-0551-9 PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Victor J, Van Doninck D, Labey L, Van Glabbeek F, Parizel P, Bellemans J (2009) A common reference frame for describing rotation of the distal femur: a CT-based kinematic study using cadavers. J Bone Joint Surg Br B 91(5):683–690. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.91b5.21827 Victor J, Van Doninck D, Labey L, Van Glabbeek F, Parizel P, Bellemans J (2009) A common reference frame for describing rotation of the distal femur: a CT-based kinematic study using cadavers. J Bone Joint Surg Br B 91(5):683–690. doi:10.​1302/​0301-620x.​91b5.​21827
28.
go back to reference Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ (1987) Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(5):745–749PubMed Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ (1987) Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(5):745–749PubMed
Metadata
Title
Can CT-based patient-matched instrumentation achieve consistent rotational alignment in knee arthroplasty?
Authors
C. O. Tibesku
B. Innocenti
P. Wong
A. Salehi
L. Labey
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1406-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2/2012 Go to the issue