Top

Systematic Reviews

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Burnout Syndrome | Protocol

The worldwide prevalence of burnout syndrome among bank employees: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Authors: Sharareh Azedi Tehrani, Abbasali Keshtkar, Akilesh Ramasamy, Majid Fadaei

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Background

Burnout is a syndrome caused by chronic stress in the workplace that has not been successfully managed. Although prevalence of burnout is well documented in different fields, little is known about this syndrome in the context of banking work. The objective of this review will be to assess worldwide pooled prevalence of burnout syndrome among bank employees.

Methods

This is a study protocol for a systematic review. We will search the following electronic databases (from their inception onwards): PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, PsycINFO, ERIC, EBSCOhost, Emerald Insight, and Google Scholar. Grey literature will be identified through searching SCOPUS, Google Scholar, ProQuest databases, and websites of related organizations. We will consider studies that include any type of employee in the banking industry and report extractable prevalence estimates of burnout. Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data. The study methodological quality (or bias) will be appraised using an appropriate tool. If feasible, we will conduct random effect meta-analysis of prevalence data. Additional analyses will be conducted to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity (e.g., setting, sex, burnout assessment method, country, and work hours).

Discussion

This systematic review will assess the worldwide prevalence of burnout syndrome among bank employees. The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. As it presents an analysis of published literature, the study does not require ethical approval.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42020213565

Available only for authorised users

Freudenberger H. Staff burn-out. J Soc Issues. 1974; 30(1):159–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x.CrossRef

Maslach C. Burned-out. Hum Behav. 1976; 9:16–22.

Freudenberger H. The staff burn-out syndrome in alternative institutions. Psychother Theory Res Pract. 1975; 12(1):73–82.CrossRef

Nabi Khan S. The relationship between job burnout and gender-based socio-demographic characteristics in Lahore. Lahore J Bus. 2013; 1(2):65–95. https://doi.org/10.35536/ljb.2013.v1.i2.a4.CrossRef

Belias D, Koustelios A. Job satisfaction and job burnout among Greek bank employees. Int J Manag. 2014; 5(1):33–45.

Kaur G. Perception of bank employees’ towards working environment of selected Indian universal banks. Int J Bank Mark. 2015; 33(1):58–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-10-2013-0117.CrossRef

NM E-H, AM A, S E-B. Job burnout among employees in National Bank of Egypt At Mansoura City. Egypt J Occup Med. 2017; 41(1):143–55. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejom.2017.967.CrossRef

Dias F, Angélico A. Burnout syndrome in bank employees: a literature review. Trends Psychol. 2018; 26(1):15–46. https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2018.1-02En.

Maslach C, Jackson S. The measurement of experienced burnout. J Organ Behav. 1981; 2(2):99–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205.CrossRef

10.

Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart L, Group P-P. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015; 4(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.CrossRef

11.

Munn Z, Moola S, Lisy K, Riitano D, Tufanaru C. Chapter 5 Systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI: 2020. https://doi:https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.

12.

Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff J, Akl E, Brennan S, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw J, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu M, Li T, Loder E, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness L, Stewart L, Thomas J, Tricco A, Welch V, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.CrossRef

13.

Boyle M. Guidelines for evaluating prevalence studies. Evid Based Ment Health. 1998; 1(2):37–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmh.1.2.37.CrossRef

14.

Rethlefsen M, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, Ayala A, Moher D, Page M, Koffel J, Blunt H, Brigham T, Chang S, Clark J, Conway A, Couban R, de Kock S, Farrah K, Fehrmann P, Foster M, Fowler S, Glanville J, Harris E, Hoffecker L, Isojarvi J, Kaunelis D, Ket H, Levay P, Lyon J, McGowan J, Murad M, Nicholson J, Pannabecker V, Paynter R, Pinotti R, Ross-White A, Sampson M, Shields T, Stevens A, Sutton A, Weinfurter E, Wright K, Young S, Group P-S. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Syst Rev. 2021; 10(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.CrossRef

15.

Clark J, Sanders S, Carter M, Honeyman D, Cleo G, Auld Y, Booth D, Condron P, Dalais C, Bateup S, Linthwaite B, May N, Munn J, Ramsay L, Rickett K, Rutter C, Smith A, Sondergeld P, Wallin M, Jones M, Beller E. Improving the translation of search strategies using the Polyglot Search Translator: a randomized controlled trial,. J Med Libr Assoc JMLA. 2020; 108(2):195–207. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.834.PubMed

16.

Clark J, Glasziou P, Del Mar C, Bannach-Brown A, Stehlik P, Scott A. A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study,. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020; 121:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.008.CrossRef

17.

Rathbone J, Carter M, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module,. Syst Rev. 2015; 4(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-6.CrossRef

18.

Munn Z, Moola S, Riitano D, Lisy K. The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014; 3(3):123–8.CrossRef

19.

Munn Z, Moola S, Lisy K, Riitano D, Tufanaru C. Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data,. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015; 13(3):147–53. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000054.CrossRef

20.

Higgins J, Thompson S, Deeks J, Altman D. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses,. BMJ (Clin Res ed). 2003; 327(7414):557–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.CrossRef

21.

Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG. Chapter 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane: 2021. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook.

Title: The worldwide prevalence of burnout syndrome among bank employees: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
Authors: Sharareh Azedi Tehrani
Abbasali Keshtkar
Akilesh Ramasamy
Majid Fadaei
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keyword: Burnout Syndrome
Published in: Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01833-z

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

The worldwide prevalence of burnout syndrome among bank employees: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Abstract

Background

Methods

Discussion

Systematic review registration

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Discussion

Systematic review registration

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Discrete choice experiment to determine preferences of decision-makers in healthcare for different formats of rapid reviews

P value and Bayesian analysis in randomized-controlled trials in child health research published over 10 years, 2007 to 2017: a methodological review protocol

Mesenchymal stromal cells as a therapeutic intervention for COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Knowledge of prostate cancer presentation, etiology, and screening practices among women: a mixed-methods systematic review

Safety and efficacy of different antibiotic regimens in patients with ocular toxoplasmosis: systematic review and meta-analysis

CogTale: an online platform for the evaluation, synthesis, and dissemination of evidence from cognitive interventions studies