Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Burnout Syndrome | Research

The relationship between telework from home and employee health: a systematic review

Authors: Lars-Kristian Lunde, Lise Fløvik, Jan Olav Christensen, Håkon A. Johannessen, Live Bakke Finne, Ingrid Løken Jørgensen, Benedicte Mohr, Jolien Vleeshouwers

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Globalization and technological progress have made telework arrangements such as telework from home (TWFH) well-established in modern economies. TWFH was rapidly and widely implemented to reduce virus spread during the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, and will probably be widespread also post-pandemic. How such work arrangements affect employee health is largely unknown. Main objective of this review was to assess the evidence on the relationship between TWFH and employee health.

Methods

We conducted electronic searches in MEDLINE, Embase, Amed, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Scopus for peer-reviewed, original research with quantitative design published from January 2010 to February 2021. Our aim was to assess the evidence for associations between TWFH and health-related outcomes in employed office workers. Risk of bias in each study was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the collected body of evidence was evaluated using the the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Results

We included 14 relevant studies (22,919 participants) reporting on 28 outcomes, which were sorted into six outcome categories (general health, pain, well-being, stress, exhaustion & burnout, and satisfaction with overall life & leisure). Few studies, with many having suboptimal designs and/or other methodological issues, investigating a limited number of outcomes, resulted in the body of evidence for the detected outcome categories being GRADED either as low or very low.

Conclusions

The consisting evidence on the relationship between TWFH and employee health is scarce. The non-existence of studies on many relevant and important health outcomes indicates a vast knowledge gap that is crucial to fill when determining how to implement TWFH in the future working life.

Systematic review registration number

PROSPERO registration ID # CRD42021233796.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Kingma S. New ways of working (NWW): work space and cultural change in virtualizing organizations. Cult Organ. 2019;25(5):383–406.CrossRef
2.
Messenger JC. Telework in the 21st century: an evolutionary perspective. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2019.
3.
International Labour Organization. COVID-19: Guidance for labour statistics data collection. ILO technical note 2020.CrossRef
4.
Shamir B, Salomon I. Work-at-home and the quality of working life. Acad Manag Rev. 1985;10(3):455–64.CrossRef
5.
Eurofound and ILO. Working anytime, anywhere: the effects on the world of work. Geneva: Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, and The International Labour Office; 2017.
6.
Eurofound. Living, working and Covid-19. In: Covid 19. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2020.
7.
Butterworth P, Leach LS, Strazdins L, Olesen SC, Rodgers B, Broom DH. The psychosocial quality of work determines whether employment has benefits for mental health: results from a longitudinal national household panel survey. Occup Environ Med. 2011;68(11):806–12.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Kim TJ, von dem Knesebeck O. Perceived job insecurity, unemployment and depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016;89(4):561–73.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Grzywacz JG, Butler AB, Almeida DM. Work, Family, and health: work-family balance as a protective factor against stresses of daily life. In: The changing realities of work and family: A multidisciplinary approach. United States: Wiley Blackwell; 2008:194-215.
10.
Christensen JO, Nielsen MB, Finne LB, Knardahl S. Comprehensive profiles of psychological and social work factors as predictors of site-specific and multi-site pain. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018;44(3):291–302.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Finne LB, Christensen JO, Knardahl S. Psychological and social work factors as predictors of mental distress: a prospective study. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102514.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
de Lange AH, Taris TW, Kompier MA, Houtman IL, Bongers PM. "the very best of the millennium": longitudinal research and the demand-control-(support) model. J Occup Health Psychol. 2003;8(4):282–305.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Stansfeld S, Candy B. Psychosocial work environment and mental health--a meta-analytic review. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(6):443–62.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Hauke A, Flintrop J, Brun E, Rugulies R. The impact of work-related psychosocial stressors on the onset of musculoskeletal disorders in specific body regions: A review and meta-analysis of 54 longitudinal studies. Work Stress. 2011;25(3):243–56.CrossRef
15.
Amiri S, Behnezhad S. Association between job strain and sick leave: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Public Health. 2020;185:235–42.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Amiri S, Behnezhad S. Job strain and mortality ratio: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Public Health. 2020;181:24–33.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Kivimäki M, Nyberg ST, Batty GD, Fransson EI, Heikkilä K, Alfredsson L, et al. Job strain as a risk factor for coronary heart disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet. 2012;380(9852):1491–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
Dieker AC, IJzelenberg W, Proper KI, Burdorf A, Ket JC, van der Beek AJ, et al. The contribution of work and lifestyle factors to socioeconomic inequalities in self-rated health – a systematic review. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019;45(2):114–25.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Gerding T, Syck M, Daniel D, Naylor J, Kotowski SE, Gillespie GL, et al. An assessment of ergonomic issues in the home offices of university employees sent home due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Work. 2021;68(4):981–92.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj. 2021;372:n71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
22.
Wells G, Shea B, O'Connell J. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in Meta-analyses. Ottawa: Health Research Institute Web site; 2014. p. 7.
23.
Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9):603–5.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Andrews JC, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Pottie K, Meerpohl JJ, Coello PA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(7):726–35.PubMedCrossRef
25.
26.
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care: University of York; 2009.
27.
Kroll C, Nuesch S. The effects of flexible work practices on employee attitudes: evidence from a large-scale panel study in Germany. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2019;30(9):1505–25.CrossRef
28.
Reusche D. The subjective well-being of homeworkers across life domains. Environ Plan A. 2019;51(6):1326–49.CrossRef
29.
Song Y, Gao J. Does telework stress employees out? A study on working at home and subjective well-being for wage/salary workers. J Happiness Stud. 2020;21(7):2649–68.CrossRef
30.
Giménez-Nadal JI, Molina JA, Velilla J. Work time and well-being for workers at home: evidence from the American time use survey. Int J Manpow. 2020;41(2):184–206.CrossRef
31.
Vander Elst T, Verhoogen R, Sercu M, Van den Broeck A, Baillien E, Godderis L. Not extent of telecommuting, but job characteristics as proximal predictors of work-related well-being. J Occup Environ Med. 2017;59(10):e180–6.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Anderson AJ, Kaplan SA, Vega RP. The impact of telework on emotional experience: when, and for whom, does telework improve daily affective well-being? Eur J Work and Org Psychol. 2015;24(6):882–97.CrossRef
33.
Baard N, Thomas A. Teleworking in South Africa and challenges : original research. SA J Hum Resour Manag. 2010;8(1):1–10.CrossRef
34.
Delanoeije J, Verbruggen M. Between-person and within-person effects of telework: a quasi-field experiment. Eur J Work Org Psychol. 2020;29(6):795–808.CrossRef
35.
Fonner KL, Roloff ME. Testing the connectivity paradox: linking teleworkers' communication media use to social presence, stress from interruptions, and organizational identification. Commun Monogr. 2012;79(2):205–31.CrossRef
36.
Henke RM, Benevent R, Schulte P, Rinehart C, Crighton K, Corcoran M. The effects of telecommuting intensity on employee health. Am J Health Promot. 2016;30(8):604–12.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Hoffman KE, Garner D, Koong AC, Woodward WA. Understanding the intersection of working from home and burnout to optimize post-COVID19 work arrangements in radiation oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;108(2):370–3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
Sardeshmukh SR, Sharma D, Golden TD. Impact of telework on exhaustion and job engagement: A job demands and job resources model. N Technol Work Employ. 2012;27(3):193–207.CrossRef
39.
Shepherd-Banigan M, Bell JF, Basu A, Booth-LaForce C, Harris JR. Workplace stress and working from home influence depressive symptoms among employed women with young children. Int J Behav Med. 2016;23(1):102–11.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Windeler JB, Chudoba KM, Sundrup RZ. Getting away from them all: managing exhaustion from social interaction with telework. J Organ Behav. 2017;38(7):977–95.CrossRef
41.
de Macêdo TAM, Cabral E, Silva Castro WR, de Souza Junior CC, da Costa Junior JF, Pedrosa FM, et al. Ergonomics and telework: A systematic review. Work. 2020;66(4):777–88.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Charalampous M, Grant CA, Tramontano C, Michailidis E. Systematically reviewing remote e-workers' well-being at work: A multidimensional approach. Eur J Work Org Psychol. 2019;28(1):51–73.CrossRef
43.
Buomprisco G, Ricci S, Perri R, De Sio S. Health and telework: new challenges after COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Environ Public Health. 2021;5:em0073.CrossRef
44.
Oakman J, Kinsman N, Stuckey R, Graham M, Weale V. A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: how do we optimise health? BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1825.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
Vleeshouwers J, Knardahl S, Christensen JO. A prospective study of work–private life conflict and number of pain sites: moderated mediation by sleep problems and support. J Behav Med. 2019;42(2):234–45.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Demerouti E, Derks D, ten Brummelhuis LL, Bakker AB. New ways of working: Impact on working conditions, work-family balance, and well-being. In: The impact of ICT on quality of working life. New York: Springer Science + Business Media; US; 2014. p. 123–41.CrossRef
47.
Gajendran RS, Harrison DA. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(6):1524–41.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Kotera Y, Correa VK. Psychological impacts of the new ways of working (NWW): A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(14):14.CrossRef
49.
Büchler N, ter Hoeven CL, van Zoonen W. Understanding constant connectivity to work: how and for whom is constant connectivity related to employee well-being? Inf Organ. 2020;30(3):100302.CrossRef
50.
López-Bueno R, Sundstrup E, Vinstrup J, Casajús JA, Andersen LL. High leisure-time physical activity reduces the risk of long-term sickness absence. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020;30(5):939–46.PubMedCrossRef
51.
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Telework and health risks in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the field and policy implications. Luxembourg: Publications office of the european union; 2021.
52.
Boutron I, Page MJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Lundh A, Hróbjartsson A. Section 7.2.3.1 selective publication of study reports. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: The Cochrane Collaboration and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2019.
Metadata
Title
The relationship between telework from home and employee health: a systematic review
Authors
Lars-Kristian Lunde
Lise Fløvik
Jan Olav Christensen
Håkon A. Johannessen
Live Bakke Finne
Ingrid Løken Jørgensen
Benedicte Mohr
Jolien Vleeshouwers
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12481-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Public Health 1/2022 Go to the issue

Research article

Smoking intensity and urinary nicotine metabolites by socioeconomic status in the Heinz Nixdorf Recall study

Research

The relationship between depression symptoms and academic performance among first-year undergraduate students at a South African university: a cross-sectional study

Research

Factors and at-risk group associated with hypertension self-management patterns among people with physical disabilities: a latent class analysis

Research

Enhanced passive safety surveillance of a quadrivalent inactivated split virion influenza vaccine in Finland during the influenza season 2020/21

Research

Implementation evaluation of a collective impact initiative to promote adolescent health in Oklahoma County, USA

Research

Flight crew fatigue risk assessment for international flights under the COVID-19 outbreak response exemption policy