Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Buprenorphine | Research

Creation of an algorithm for clinical decision support for treatment of opioid use disorder with buprenorphine in primary care

Authors: Adriane M. dela Cruz, Robrina Walker, Ronny Pipes, Sidarth Wakhlu, Madhukar H. Trivedi

Published in: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The treatment capacity for opioid use disorder (OUD) lags far behind the number of patients in need of treatment. Capacity is limited, in part, by the limited number of physicians who offer office based OUD treatment with buprenorphine. Measurement based care (MBC) has been proposed as a means to support primary care physicians in treating OUD. Here, we propose a set of measures and a clinical decision support algorithm to provide MBC for the treatment of OUD.

Methods

We utilized literature search and expert consensus to identify measures for universal screening and symptom tracking. We used expert consensus to create the clinical decision support algorithm.

Results

The Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription medication, and other Substance use (TAPS) tool was selected as the best published measure for universal screening in primary care. No published measure was identified as appropriate for symptom tracking or medication adherence; therefore, we created the OUD Symptom Checklist from the DSM-5 criteria for OUD and the Patient Adherence Questionnaire for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (PAQ-OUD) to assess medication adherence. We developed and present a clinical decision support algorithm to provide direct guidance regarding treatment interventions during the first 12 weeks of buprenorphine treatment.

Conclusion

Creation of these tools is the necessary first step for implementation of MBC for the treatment of OUD with buprenorphine in primary care. Further work is needed to test the feasibility and acceptability of these tools.
Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04059016; 16 August 2019; retrospectively registered; https://​clinicaltrials.​gov/​ct2/​show/​NCT04059016
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rudd RA, Seth P, David F, Scholl L. Increases in drug and opioid-involved overdose deaths—United States, 2010–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(5051):1445–52.CrossRef Rudd RA, Seth P, David F, Scholl L. Increases in drug and opioid-involved overdose deaths—United States, 2010–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(5051):1445–52.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Seth P, Rudd RA, Noonan RK, Haegerich TM. Quantifying the epidemic of prescription opioid overdose deaths. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(4):500–2.CrossRef Seth P, Rudd RA, Noonan RK, Haegerich TM. Quantifying the epidemic of prescription opioid overdose deaths. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(4):500–2.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Seth P, Scholl L, Rudd RA, Bacon S. Overdose deaths involving opioids, cocaine, and psychostimulants—United States, 2015–2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(12):349–58.CrossRef Seth P, Scholl L, Rudd RA, Bacon S. Overdose deaths involving opioids, cocaine, and psychostimulants—United States, 2015–2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(12):349–58.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lee JD, Nunes EV Jr, Novo P, Bachrach K, Bailey GL, Bhatt S, et al. Comparative effectiveness of extended-release naltrexone versus buprenorphine–naloxone for opioid relapse prevention (X:BOT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10118):309–18.CrossRef Lee JD, Nunes EV Jr, Novo P, Bachrach K, Bailey GL, Bhatt S, et al. Comparative effectiveness of extended-release naltrexone versus buprenorphine–naloxone for opioid relapse prevention (X:BOT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10118):309–18.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Moore BA, Fiellin DA, Barry DT, Sullivan LE, Chawarski MC, O’Connor PG, et al. Primary care office-based buprenorphine treatment: comparison of heroin and prescription opioid dependent patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(4):527–30.CrossRef Moore BA, Fiellin DA, Barry DT, Sullivan LE, Chawarski MC, O’Connor PG, et al. Primary care office-based buprenorphine treatment: comparison of heroin and prescription opioid dependent patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(4):527–30.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Andrilla CHA, Moore TE, Patterson DG, Larson EH. Geographic distribution of providers with a DEA waiver to prescribe buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder: a 5-year update. J Rural Health. 2019;35(1):108–12.CrossRef Andrilla CHA, Moore TE, Patterson DG, Larson EH. Geographic distribution of providers with a DEA waiver to prescribe buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder: a 5-year update. J Rural Health. 2019;35(1):108–12.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Korthuis PT, McCarty D, Weimer M, Bougatsos C, Blazina I, Zakher B, et al. Primary care-based models for the treatment of opioid use disorder: a scoping review. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(4):268–78.CrossRef Korthuis PT, McCarty D, Weimer M, Bougatsos C, Blazina I, Zakher B, et al. Primary care-based models for the treatment of opioid use disorder: a scoping review. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(4):268–78.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Marsden J, Tai B, Ali R, Hu L, Rush AJ, Volkow N. Measurement-based care using DSM-5 for opioid use disorder: can we make opioid medication treatment more effective? Addiction. 2019;114:1346–53.CrossRef Marsden J, Tai B, Ali R, Hu L, Rush AJ, Volkow N. Measurement-based care using DSM-5 for opioid use disorder: can we make opioid medication treatment more effective? Addiction. 2019;114:1346–53.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Harding KJ, Rush AJ, Arbuckle M, Trivedi MH, Pincus HA. Measurement-based care in psychiatric practice: a policy framework for implementation. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72(8):1136–43.CrossRef Harding KJ, Rush AJ, Arbuckle M, Trivedi MH, Pincus HA. Measurement-based care in psychiatric practice: a policy framework for implementation. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72(8):1136–43.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Trivedi MH, Daly EJ. Measurement-based care for refractory depression: a clinical decision support model for clinical research and practice. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;88(Suppl 2):S61-71.CrossRef Trivedi MH, Daly EJ. Measurement-based care for refractory depression: a clinical decision support model for clinical research and practice. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;88(Suppl 2):S61-71.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Adli M, Bauer M, Rush AJ. Algorithms and collaborative-care systems for depression: are they effective and why? A systematic review Biol Psychiatry. 2006;59(11):1029–38.CrossRef Adli M, Bauer M, Rush AJ. Algorithms and collaborative-care systems for depression: are they effective and why? A systematic review Biol Psychiatry. 2006;59(11):1029–38.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kurian BT, Trivedi MH, Grannemann BD, Claassen CA, Daly EJ, Sunderajan P. A computerized decision support system for depression in primary care. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;11(4):140–6.CrossRef Kurian BT, Trivedi MH, Grannemann BD, Claassen CA, Daly EJ, Sunderajan P. A computerized decision support system for depression in primary care. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;11(4):140–6.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gaynes BN, Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Balasubramani GK, McGrath PJ, et al. Primary versus specialty care outcomes for depressed outpatients managed with measurement-based care: results from STAR*D. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(5):551–60.CrossRef Gaynes BN, Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Balasubramani GK, McGrath PJ, et al. Primary versus specialty care outcomes for depressed outpatients managed with measurement-based care: results from STAR*D. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(5):551–60.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fortney JC, Unutzer J, Wrenn G, Pyne JM, Smith GR, Schoenbaum M, et al. A tipping point for measurement-based care. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68(2):179–88.CrossRef Fortney JC, Unutzer J, Wrenn G, Pyne JM, Smith GR, Schoenbaum M, et al. A tipping point for measurement-based care. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68(2):179–88.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kahalnik F, Sanchez K, Faria A, Grannemann B, Jha M, Tovian C, et al. Improving the identification and treatment of depression in low-income primary care clinics: a qualitative study of providers in the VitalSign6 program. Int J Qual Health Care. 2019;31(1):57–63.CrossRef Kahalnik F, Sanchez K, Faria A, Grannemann B, Jha M, Tovian C, et al. Improving the identification and treatment of depression in low-income primary care clinics: a qualitative study of providers in the VitalSign6 program. Int J Qual Health Care. 2019;31(1):57–63.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Trivedi MH, Jha MK, Kahalnik F, Pipes R, Levinson S, Lawson T, et al. VitalSign(6): a primary care first (PCP-First) model for universal screening and measurement-based care for depression. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2019;12(2):71.CrossRef Trivedi MH, Jha MK, Kahalnik F, Pipes R, Levinson S, Lawson T, et al. VitalSign(6): a primary care first (PCP-First) model for universal screening and measurement-based care for depression. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2019;12(2):71.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Jha MK, Grannemann BD, Trombello JM, Clark EW, Eidelman SL, Lawson T, et al. A structured approach to detecting and treating depression in primary care: VitalSign6 project. Ann Fam Med. 2019;17(4):326–35.CrossRef Jha MK, Grannemann BD, Trombello JM, Clark EW, Eidelman SL, Lawson T, et al. A structured approach to detecting and treating depression in primary care: VitalSign6 project. Ann Fam Med. 2019;17(4):326–35.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Medications for Opiiod Use Disorder. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 63: Publication No. (SMA) 18-5063PT3 Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2018. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Medications for Opiiod Use Disorder. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 63: Publication No. (SMA) 18-5063PT3 Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2018.
21.
go back to reference Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration. Decisions in Recovery: Medications for Opioid Use Disorder. Publication No. SMA-16-4993 Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2016. Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration. Decisions in Recovery: Medications for Opioid Use Disorder. Publication No. SMA-16-4993 Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2016.
24.
go back to reference Mitchell SG, Kelly SM, Gryczynski J, Myers CP, O’Grady KE, Kirk AS, et al. The CRAFFT cut-points and DSM-5 criteria for alcohol and other drugs: a reevaluation and reexamination. Subst Abus. 2014;35(4):376–80.CrossRef Mitchell SG, Kelly SM, Gryczynski J, Myers CP, O’Grady KE, Kirk AS, et al. The CRAFFT cut-points and DSM-5 criteria for alcohol and other drugs: a reevaluation and reexamination. Subst Abus. 2014;35(4):376–80.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Smith PC, Schmidt SM, Allensworth-Davies D, Saitz R. A single-question screening test for drug use in primary care. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(13):1155–60.CrossRef Smith PC, Schmidt SM, Allensworth-Davies D, Saitz R. A single-question screening test for drug use in primary care. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(13):1155–60.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ali R, Meena S, Eastwood B, Richards I, Marsden J. Ultra-rapid screening for substance-use disorders: the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST-Lite). Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;132(1–2):352–61.CrossRef Ali R, Meena S, Eastwood B, Richards I, Marsden J. Ultra-rapid screening for substance-use disorders: the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST-Lite). Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;132(1–2):352–61.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference McNeely J, Wu LT, Subramaniam G, Sharma G, Cathers LA, Svikis D, et al. Performance of the Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription Medication, and Other Substance Use (TAPS) Tool for Substance Use Screening in Primary Care Patients. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(10):690–9.CrossRef McNeely J, Wu LT, Subramaniam G, Sharma G, Cathers LA, Svikis D, et al. Performance of the Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription Medication, and Other Substance Use (TAPS) Tool for Substance Use Screening in Primary Care Patients. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(10):690–9.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Cacciola JS, Alterman AI, Dephilippis D, Drapkin ML, Valadez C Jr, Fala NC, et al. Development and initial evaluation of the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM). J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013;44(3):256–63.CrossRef Cacciola JS, Alterman AI, Dephilippis D, Drapkin ML, Valadez C Jr, Fala NC, et al. Development and initial evaluation of the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM). J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013;44(3):256–63.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Gaddy MA, Casner HG, Rosinski J. Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Brief Addiction Monitor. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018;90:29–37.CrossRef Gaddy MA, Casner HG, Rosinski J. Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Brief Addiction Monitor. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018;90:29–37.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Raistrick D, Bradshaw J, Tober G, Weiner J, Allison J, Healey C. Development of the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ): a questionnaire to measure alcohol and opiate dependence in the context of a treatment evaluation package. Addiction. 1994;89(5):563–72.CrossRef Raistrick D, Bradshaw J, Tober G, Weiner J, Allison J, Healey C. Development of the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ): a questionnaire to measure alcohol and opiate dependence in the context of a treatment evaluation package. Addiction. 1994;89(5):563–72.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Heather N, Raistrick D, Tober G, Godfrey C, Parrott S. Leeds Dependence questionnaire: new data from a large sample of clinic attenders. Addict Res Theory. 2001;9(3):253–69.CrossRef Heather N, Raistrick D, Tober G, Godfrey C, Parrott S. Leeds Dependence questionnaire: new data from a large sample of clinic attenders. Addict Res Theory. 2001;9(3):253–69.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Marsden J, Farrell M, Bradbury C, Dale-Perera A, Eastwood B, Roxburgh M, et al. Development of the treatment outcomes profile. Addiction. 2008;103(9):1450–60.CrossRef Marsden J, Farrell M, Bradbury C, Dale-Perera A, Eastwood B, Roxburgh M, et al. Development of the treatment outcomes profile. Addiction. 2008;103(9):1450–60.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Ling W, Farabee D, Liepa D, Wu LT. The Treatment Effectiveness Assessment (TEA): an efficient, patient-centered instrument for evaluating progress in recovery from addiction. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2012;3(1):129–36.CrossRef Ling W, Farabee D, Liepa D, Wu LT. The Treatment Effectiveness Assessment (TEA): an efficient, patient-centered instrument for evaluating progress in recovery from addiction. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2012;3(1):129–36.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Warden D, Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Fava M, Wisniewski SR. The STAR*D Project results: a comprehensive review of findings. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2007;9(6):449–59.CrossRef Warden D, Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Fava M, Wisniewski SR. The STAR*D Project results: a comprehensive review of findings. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2007;9(6):449–59.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Carroll KM, Weiss RD. The role of behavioral interventions in buprenorphine maintenance treatment: a review. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174(8):738–47.CrossRef Carroll KM, Weiss RD. The role of behavioral interventions in buprenorphine maintenance treatment: a review. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174(8):738–47.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Creation of an algorithm for clinical decision support for treatment of opioid use disorder with buprenorphine in primary care
Authors
Adriane M. dela Cruz
Robrina Walker
Ronny Pipes
Sidarth Wakhlu
Madhukar H. Trivedi
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1940-0640
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-021-00222-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Addiction Science & Clinical Practice 1/2021 Go to the issue