Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery 3/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Article

Buccal Plate Preservation with Immediate Implant Placement and Provisionalization: 5-Year Follow-Up Outcomes

Authors: Alfonso Caiazzo, Federico Brugnami, Francesco Galletti, Pushkar Mehra

Published in: Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Despite socket preservation and/or immediate implant placement, resorption of the buccal plate after dental extraction continues to pose esthetic challenges to clinicians. Buccal plate preservation (BPP) is a technique that has been recently proposed with an aim to reduce the incidence of such resorption. This study was conducted to assess the long-term efficacy of BPP in maintaining the thickness of the buccal cortical plate after immediate implant insertion and provisionalization.

Materials and Methods

Ten consecutive patients were included in this study. Each patient underwent extraction of a non-restorable tooth, BPPPBPP, single immediate implant placement and immediate provisionalization. Cone beam CT scans were taken 3 months after surgery (T1) and 5 years after surgery (T2) to evaluate the effectiveness and longevity of the BPPPBPP technique in maintaining the augmented bone width. Two distinct measurements were taken for bone evaluation: (a) R1: 1 mm apical to the implant platform and (b) R2: 5 mm apical to the implant platform. The long axis of the implant was used as a fixed reference. Statistical test analysis was conducted using the SPSS software. Student’s t test was used to assess statistical significance, and a p value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

There were six females and four males in the study. The mean age of the sample was 37.6 years (range 23–64 years). At T1, the mean bone thickness of the buccal plate was found to be 2.36 mm at R1 (range: 1.9–3.1), and 2.23 at R2 (range: 1.9–3). At the T2 interval, the mean thickness of the plate was 2.28 mm at R1 (range: 1.7–3) and 2.18 at R2 (range: 1.9–3). The differences in these mean values were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

BPPPBPP is an effective means for augmentation and maintenance of the buccal cortical plate around an immediately placed and provisionalized dental implant. It is a viable alternative to socket preservation with the added benefit that it allows for immediate implant placement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cardaropoli G, Araújo M, Lindhe J (2003) Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 30:809CrossRefPubMed Cardaropoli G, Araújo M, Lindhe J (2003) Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 30:809CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Araújo MG, Lindhe J (2005) Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 32:212CrossRefPubMed Araújo MG, Lindhe J (2005) Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 32:212CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mecall RA, Rosenfeld AL (1991) Influence of residual ridge resorption patterns on implant fixture placement and tooth position. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 11:8 Mecall RA, Rosenfeld AL (1991) Influence of residual ridge resorption patterns on implant fixture placement and tooth position. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 11:8
4.
go back to reference Araújo M, Sukekava F, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J (2005) Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 32:645CrossRefPubMed Araújo M, Sukekava F, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J (2005) Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 32:645CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Schropp L, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A (2003) Bone healing following immediate versus delayed placement of titanium implants into extraction socket: a prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:189PubMed Schropp L, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A (2003) Bone healing following immediate versus delayed placement of titanium implants into extraction socket: a prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:189PubMed
6.
go back to reference De Risi V, Clementini M, Vittorini G, Mannocci A, De Sanctis M (2015) Alveolar ridge preservation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of histological and histomorphometrical data. Clin Oral Implants Res 26:50CrossRefPubMed De Risi V, Clementini M, Vittorini G, Mannocci A, De Sanctis M (2015) Alveolar ridge preservation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of histological and histomorphometrical data. Clin Oral Implants Res 26:50CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Caiazzo A, Brugnami F, Mehra P (2010) Buccal plate augmentation: a new alternative to socket preservation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:2503CrossRefPubMed Caiazzo A, Brugnami F, Mehra P (2010) Buccal plate augmentation: a new alternative to socket preservation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:2503CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Caiazzo A, Brugnami F, Mehra P (2013) Buccal plate preservation with immediate post-extraction implant placement and provisionalization: preliminary results of a new technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:666CrossRefPubMed Caiazzo A, Brugnami F, Mehra P (2013) Buccal plate preservation with immediate post-extraction implant placement and provisionalization: preliminary results of a new technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:666CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lund H, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG (2010) Cone beam computed tomography for assessment of root length and marginal bone level during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 80:466CrossRefPubMed Lund H, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG (2010) Cone beam computed tomography for assessment of root length and marginal bone level during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 80:466CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Evans CDJ, Chen ST (2008) Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res 19:73PubMed Evans CDJ, Chen ST (2008) Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res 19:73PubMed
11.
go back to reference Brugnami F, Caiazzo A (2011) Efficacy evaluation of a new buccal bone plate preservation technique: a pilot study. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 31:67 Brugnami F, Caiazzo A (2011) Efficacy evaluation of a new buccal bone plate preservation technique: a pilot study. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 31:67
Metadata
Title
Buccal Plate Preservation with Immediate Implant Placement and Provisionalization: 5-Year Follow-Up Outcomes
Authors
Alfonso Caiazzo
Federico Brugnami
Francesco Galletti
Pushkar Mehra
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0972-8279
Electronic ISSN: 0974-942X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-017-1054-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery 3/2018 Go to the issue