Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Intensive Care 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Bronchoscopy | Research

Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy in high-risk ICU patients

Authors: Enzo Lüsebrink, Alexander Krogmann, Franziska Tietz, Matthias Riebisch, Rainer Okrojek, Friedhelm Peltz, Carsten Skurk, Carsten Hullermann, Jan Sackarnd, Dietmar Wassilowsky, Karl Toischer, Clemens Scherer, Michael Preusch, Christoph Testori, Ulrike Flierl, Sven Peterss, Sabine Hoffmann, Nikolaus Kneidinger, Christian Hagl, Steffen Massberg, Sebastian Zimmer, Peter Luedike, Tienush Rassaf, Holger Thiele, Andreas Schäfer, Martin Orban, the P. D. T. Investigator Group

Published in: Annals of Intensive Care | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy (PDT) has become an established procedure in intensive care units (ICU). However, the safety of this method has been under debate given the growing number of critically ill patients with high bleeding risk receiving anticoagulation, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or even a combination of both, i.e. triple therapy. Therefore, the purpose of this study, including such a high proportion of patients on antithrombotic therapy, was to investigate whether PDT in high-risk ICU patients is associated with elevated procedural complications and to analyse the risk factors for bleeding occurring during and after PDT.

Methods

PDT interventions conducted in ICUs at 12 European sites between January 2016 and October 2019 were retrospectively analysed for procedural complications. For subgroup analyses, patient stratification into clinically relevant risk groups based on anticoagulation and antiplatelet treatment regimens was performed and the predictors of bleeding occurrence were analysed.

Results

In total, 671 patients receiving PDT were included and stratified into four clinically relevant antithrombotic treatment groups: (1) intravenous unfractionated heparin (iUFH, prophylactic dosage) (n = 101); (2) iUFH (therapeutic dosage) (n = 131); (3) antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and/or P2Y12 receptor inhibitor) with iUFH (prophylactic or therapeutic dosage) except for triple therapy (n = 290) and (4) triple therapy (DAPT with iUFH in therapeutic dosage) (n = 149). Within the whole cohort, 74 (11%) bleedings were reported to be procedure-related. Bleeding occurrence during and after PDT was independently associated with low platelet count (OR 0.73, 95% CI [0.56, 0.92], p = 0.009), chronic kidney disease (OR 1.75, 95% CI [1.01, 3.03], p = 0.047) and previous stroke (OR 2.13, 95% CI [1.1, 3.97], p = 0.02).

Conclusion

In this international, multicenter study bronchoscopy-guided PDT was a safe and low-complication airway management option, even in a cohort of high risk for bleeding on cardiovascular ICUs. Low platelet count, chronic kidney disease and previous stroke were identified as independent risk factors of bleeding during and after PDT but not triple therapy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Barbetti JK, Nichol AD, Choate KR, et al. Prospective observational study of postoperative complications after percutaneous dilatational or surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Crit Care Resusc. 2009;11:244–9.PubMed Barbetti JK, Nichol AD, Choate KR, et al. Prospective observational study of postoperative complications after percutaneous dilatational or surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Crit Care Resusc. 2009;11:244–9.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Gründling M, Quindel M. Perkutane Dilatationstracheotomie Techniken-Verfahren-Komplikationen. Anaesthesist. 2005;54:929–44.CrossRefPubMed Gründling M, Quindel M. Perkutane Dilatationstracheotomie Techniken-Verfahren-Komplikationen. Anaesthesist. 2005;54:929–44.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hazard P, Jones C, Benitone J. Comparative clinical trial of standard operative tracheostomy with percutaneous tracheostomy. Crit Care Med. 1991;19:1018–24.CrossRefPubMed Hazard P, Jones C, Benitone J. Comparative clinical trial of standard operative tracheostomy with percutaneous tracheostomy. Crit Care Med. 1991;19:1018–24.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Holdgaard HO, Pedersen J, Jensen RH, et al. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomy. A clinical randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998;42:545–50.CrossRefPubMed Holdgaard HO, Pedersen J, Jensen RH, et al. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomy. A clinical randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998;42:545–50.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Rumbak M, Newton M, Truncale T, et al. A prospective, randomized study comparing early percutaneous dilational tracheostomy to prolonged translaryngeal intubation (delayed tracheotomy) in critically ill medical patients. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:1689–93.CrossRefPubMed Rumbak M, Newton M, Truncale T, et al. A prospective, randomized study comparing early percutaneous dilational tracheostomy to prolonged translaryngeal intubation (delayed tracheotomy) in critically ill medical patients. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:1689–93.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy in high-risk ICU patients
Authors
Enzo Lüsebrink
Alexander Krogmann
Franziska Tietz
Matthias Riebisch
Rainer Okrojek
Friedhelm Peltz
Carsten Skurk
Carsten Hullermann
Jan Sackarnd
Dietmar Wassilowsky
Karl Toischer
Clemens Scherer
Michael Preusch
Christoph Testori
Ulrike Flierl
Sven Peterss
Sabine Hoffmann
Nikolaus Kneidinger
Christian Hagl
Steffen Massberg
Sebastian Zimmer
Peter Luedike
Tienush Rassaf
Holger Thiele
Andreas Schäfer
Martin Orban
the P. D. T. Investigator Group
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2110-5820
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00906-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Annals of Intensive Care 1/2021 Go to the issue