Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Translational Behavioral Medicine 4/2017

01-12-2017 | Original Research

Bridging the divide: building infrastructure to support community-academic partnerships and improve capacity to conduct patient-centered outcomes research

Authors: Jennifer Huang, PhD, Paula Darby Lipman, PhD, C. Daniel Mullins, PhD

Published in: Translational Behavioral Medicine | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

For research to be useful, trustworthy, and ultimately lead to greater dissemination of findings to patients and communities, it is important to train and mentor academic researchers to meaningfully engage community members in patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR). Thus, it is necessary for research institutions to strengthen their underlying infrastructure to support PCOR. PATIENTS—PATient-centered Involvement in Evaluating effectiveNess of TreatmentS—at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, focuses on improving PCOR methods and addressing health disparities. It relies on evidence-based engagement methods to sustain and leverage innovative partnerships so patients, health care providers, and academic partners are motivated to participate in the conduct and dissemination of PCOR. Program components address training needs, bi-directional engagement, cultural competency, and dissemination and implementation. Activities (guided by community representatives, leadership from university schools, patient advocates, and PCOR experts) include providing resources, conducting PCOR projects, engaging community members, and disseminating PCOR findings. With its emphasis on the broad range of PCOR topics and methods, and through fostering sustainable relationships with community members and researchers, PATIENTS has successfully cultivated bi-directional partnerships and provided operational and scientific support for a new generation of skilled PCOR researchers. Early evidence of effectiveness includes progress in training and mentoring students and investigators, an increase in submission of PCOR proposals, and community-informed strategies for dissemination. Programs such as PATIENTS reinforce the value of bridging the traditional divide between academia and communities to support patient- and community-engaged dissemination and implementation research and foster sustainable PCOR infrastructure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Horowitz, C. R., Robinson, M., & Sarena, S. (2009). Community-based participatory research from the margin to the mainstream: are researchers prepared? Circulation, 119, 2633–2642.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Horowitz, C. R., Robinson, M., & Sarena, S. (2009). Community-based participatory research from the margin to the mainstream: are researchers prepared? Circulation, 119, 2633–2642.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Hartwig K, Calleson D, Williams M. Unit 1: Community-based participatory research: getting grounded. In: The examining community-institutional partnerships for prevention research group. Developing and sustaining community-based participatory research partnerships: a skill-building curriculum. www.cbprcurriculum.info. 2006. Accessed May 15, 2016. Hartwig K, Calleson D, Williams M. Unit 1: Community-based participatory research: getting grounded. In: The examining community-institutional partnerships for prevention research group. Developing and sustaining community-based participatory research partnerships: a skill-building curriculum. www.​cbprcurriculum.​info. 2006. Accessed May 15, 2016.
6.
go back to reference Mullins, C. D., Abdulhalim, A. M., & Lavallee, D. C. (2012). Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 307(15), 1587–1588.CrossRefPubMed Mullins, C. D., Abdulhalim, A. M., & Lavallee, D. C. (2012). Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 307(15), 1587–1588.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ahmed, S. M., & Palermo, A. G. (2010). Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review. American Journal of Public Health, 100(8), 1380–1387.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ahmed, S. M., & Palermo, A. G. (2010). Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review. American Journal of Public Health, 100(8), 1380–1387.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Carter-Edwards, L., Cook, J. L., McDonald, M. A., Weaver, S. M., Chukwuka, K., & Eder, M. M. (2013). Report on CTSA consortium use of the community engagement consulting service. Clinical and Translational Science, 6(1), 34–39.CrossRefPubMed Carter-Edwards, L., Cook, J. L., McDonald, M. A., Weaver, S. M., Chukwuka, K., & Eder, M. M. (2013). Report on CTSA consortium use of the community engagement consulting service. Clinical and Translational Science, 6(1), 34–39.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Handley M, Pasick R, Potter M, Oliva G, Goldstein E, Nguyen T. Community engaged research: a quick-start guide for researchers. From the Series: UCSF Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) resource manuals and guides to community-engaged research, P. Fleisher, ed. Published by Clinical Translational Science Institute Community Engagement Program, University of California San Francisco. https://accelerate.ucsf.edu/files/CE/guide_for_researchers.pdf. Accessed June 7, 2016. Handley M, Pasick R, Potter M, Oliva G, Goldstein E, Nguyen T. Community engaged research: a quick-start guide for researchers. From the Series: UCSF Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) resource manuals and guides to community-engaged research, P. Fleisher, ed. Published by Clinical Translational Science Institute Community Engagement Program, University of California San Francisco. https://​accelerate.​ucsf.​edu/​files/​CE/​guide_​for_​researchers.​pdf. Accessed June 7, 2016.
10.
go back to reference Kauffman, K., dosReis, S., Ross, M., Barnet, B., Onukwugha, E., & Mullins, C. D. (2013). Engaging hard-to-reach patients in patient-centered outcomes research. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research., 2(3), 313–324.CrossRefPubMed Kauffman, K., dosReis, S., Ross, M., Barnet, B., Onukwugha, E., & Mullins, C. D. (2013). Engaging hard-to-reach patients in patient-centered outcomes research. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research., 2(3), 313–324.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Faridi, Z., Grunbaum, J. A., Gray, B. S., Franks, A., & Simoes, E. (2007). Community-based participatory research: necessary next steps. Preventing Chronic Disease, 4(3), A70.PubMedPubMedCentral Faridi, Z., Grunbaum, J. A., Gray, B. S., Franks, A., & Simoes, E. (2007). Community-based participatory research: necessary next steps. Preventing Chronic Disease, 4(3), A70.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Fadem, P., Minkler, M., Perry, M., Blum, K., Moore, I., & Rogers, J. (2003). Ethical challenges in community based participatory research. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community based participatory research for health (pp. 242–262). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Fadem, P., Minkler, M., Perry, M., Blum, K., Moore, I., & Rogers, J. (2003). Ethical challenges in community based participatory research. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community based participatory research for health (pp. 242–262). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
go back to reference Lavallee, D. C., Wicks, P., Alfonso, C. R., & Mullins, C. D. (2014). Stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research: high-touch or high-tech? Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research., 14(3), 335–344.CrossRef Lavallee, D. C., Wicks, P., Alfonso, C. R., & Mullins, C. D. (2014). Stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research: high-touch or high-tech? Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research., 14(3), 335–344.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sofolahan-Oladeinde, Y., Mullins, C. D., & Baquet, C. R. (2015). Using community-based participatory research in patient-centered outcomes research to address health disparities in under-represented communities. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research., 4(5), 515–523.CrossRefPubMed Sofolahan-Oladeinde, Y., Mullins, C. D., & Baquet, C. R. (2015). Using community-based participatory research in patient-centered outcomes research to address health disparities in under-represented communities. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research., 4(5), 515–523.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Mullins CD, Chiauzzi E, Frye D, Mack M. Continuous patient engagement: how do we partner with patients throughout the research life cycle? Issues Panel, ISPOR 20 th International Annual Meeting. Philadelphia. 2015. Mullins CD, Chiauzzi E, Frye D, Mack M. Continuous patient engagement: how do we partner with patients throughout the research life cycle? Issues Panel, ISPOR 20 th International Annual Meeting. Philadelphia. 2015.
17.
go back to reference Chauhan, C. (2016). Patients’ views can improve clinical trials for participants. BMJ, 353. Chauhan, C. (2016). Patients’ views can improve clinical trials for participants. BMJ, 353.
Metadata
Title
Bridging the divide: building infrastructure to support community-academic partnerships and improve capacity to conduct patient-centered outcomes research
Authors
Jennifer Huang, PhD
Paula Darby Lipman, PhD
C. Daniel Mullins, PhD
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Translational Behavioral Medicine / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1869-6716
Electronic ISSN: 1613-9860
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0487-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Translational Behavioral Medicine 4/2017 Go to the issue