Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2007

Open Access 01-12-2007 | Study protocol

Breast MRI in nonpalpable breast lesions: a randomized trial with diagnostic and therapeutic outcome – MONET – study

Authors: Nicky HGM Peters, Inne HM Borel Rinkes, Willem PTM Mali, Maurice AAJ van den Bosch, Remmert K Storm, Peter W Plaisier, Erwin de Boer, Adriaan J van Overbeeke, Petra HM Peeters

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In recent years there has been an increasing interest in MRI as a non-invasive diagnostic modality for the work-up of suspicious breast lesions. The additional value of Breast MRI lies mainly in its capacity to detect multicentric and multifocal disease, to detect invasive components in ductal carcinoma in situ lesions and to depict the tumor in a 3-dimensional image. Breast MRI therefore has the potential to improve the diagnosis and provide better preoperative staging and possibly surgical care in patients with breast cancer. The aim of our study is to assess whether performing contrast enhanced Breast MRI can reduce the number of surgical procedures due to better preoperative staging and whether a subgroup of women with suspicious nonpalpable breast lesions can be identified in which the combination of mammography, ultrasound and state-of-the-art contrast-enhanced Breast MRI can provide a definite diagnosis.

Methods/Design

The MONET – study (M R mammography O f N onpalpable BrE ast T umors) is a randomized controlled trial with diagnostic and therapeutic endpoints. We aim to include 500 patients with nonpalpable suspicious breast lesions who are referred for biopsy. With this number of patients, the expected 12% reduction in surgical procedures due to more accurate preoperative staging with Breast MRI can be detected with a high power (90%). The secondary outcome is the positive and negative predictive value of contrast enhanced Breast MRI. If the predictive values are deemed sufficiently close to those for large core biopsy then the latter, invasive, procedure could possibly be avoided in some women. The rationale, study design and the baseline characteristics of the first 100 included patients are described.

Trial registration

Study protocol number NCT00302120
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006, 56: 106-130.CrossRefPubMed Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006, 56: 106-130.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Incidence of breast cancer in the Netherlands 1999/2000. Eleventh report of the Netherlands cancer registry. 2003, Edition1.0: Incidence of breast cancer in the Netherlands 1999/2000. Eleventh report of the Netherlands cancer registry. 2003, Edition1.0:
3.
go back to reference National evaluation of breast cancer screening in the Netherlands. 2002 National evaluation of breast cancer screening in the Netherlands. 2002
4.
go back to reference Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Blanks R, Ballard-Barbash R, Bobo JK, Lee NC, Wallis MG, Patnick J, Kerlikowske K: Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. JAMA. 2003, 290: 2129-2137. 10.1001/jama.290.16.2129.CrossRefPubMed Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Blanks R, Ballard-Barbash R, Bobo JK, Lee NC, Wallis MG, Patnick J, Kerlikowske K: Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. JAMA. 2003, 290: 2129-2137. 10.1001/jama.290.16.2129.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hrung JM, Sonnad SS, Schwartz JS, Langlotz CP: Accuracy of MR imaging in the work-up of suspicious breast lesions: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Acad Radiol. 1999, 6: 387-397. 10.1016/S1076-6332(99)80189-5.CrossRefPubMed Hrung JM, Sonnad SS, Schwartz JS, Langlotz CP: Accuracy of MR imaging in the work-up of suspicious breast lesions: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Acad Radiol. 1999, 6: 387-397. 10.1016/S1076-6332(99)80189-5.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, Mali WP, Moons KG, Peeters PH: Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology. 2008, 246 (1): 116-24.CrossRefPubMed Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, Mali WP, Moons KG, Peeters PH: Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology. 2008, 246 (1): 116-24.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Strijk SP, Wobbes T, Hendriks JH, Ruys SH: Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology. 1995, 197: 743-747.CrossRefPubMed Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Strijk SP, Wobbes T, Hendriks JH, Ruys SH: Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology. 1995, 197: 743-747.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hlawatsch A, Teifke A, Schmidt M, Thelen M: Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002, 179: 1493-1501.CrossRefPubMed Hlawatsch A, Teifke A, Schmidt M, Thelen M: Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002, 179: 1493-1501.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kacl GM, Liu P, Debatin JF, Garzoli E, Caduff RF, Krestin GP: Detection of breast cancer with conventional mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 1998, 8: 194-200. 10.1007/s003300050362.CrossRefPubMed Kacl GM, Liu P, Debatin JF, Garzoli E, Caduff RF, Krestin GP: Detection of breast cancer with conventional mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 1998, 8: 194-200. 10.1007/s003300050362.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Malur S, Wurdinger S, Moritz A, Michels W, Schneider A: Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography. Breast Cancer Res. 2001, 3: 55-60. 10.1186/bcr271.CrossRefPubMed Malur S, Wurdinger S, Moritz A, Michels W, Schneider A: Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography. Breast Cancer Res. 2001, 3: 55-60. 10.1186/bcr271.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mumtaz H, Hall-Craggs MA, Davidson T, Walmsley K, Thurell W, Kissin MW, Taylor I: Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997, 169: 417-424.CrossRefPubMed Mumtaz H, Hall-Craggs MA, Davidson T, Walmsley K, Thurell W, Kissin MW, Taylor I: Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997, 169: 417-424.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P, Bazzocchi M, Fausto A, Simonetti G, Lattanzio V, Del MA: Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in Fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004, 183: 1149-1157.CrossRefPubMed Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P, Bazzocchi M, Fausto A, Simonetti G, Lattanzio V, Del MA: Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in Fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004, 183: 1149-1157.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Schelfout K, Van GM, Kersschot E, Colpaert C, Schelfhout AM, Leyman P, Verslegers I, Biltjes I, Van Den HJ, Gillardin JP, Tjalma W, Van Der Auwera JC, Buytaert P, De SA: Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004, 30: 501-507. 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.02.003.CrossRefPubMed Schelfout K, Van GM, Kersschot E, Colpaert C, Schelfhout AM, Leyman P, Verslegers I, Biltjes I, Van Den HJ, Gillardin JP, Tjalma W, Van Der Auwera JC, Buytaert P, De SA: Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004, 30: 501-507. 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.02.003.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hwang ES, Kinkel K, Esserman LJ, Lu Y, Weidner N, Hylton NM: Magnetic resonance imaging in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma-in-situ: value in the diagnosis of residual disease, occult invasion, and multicentricity. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003, 10: 381-388. 10.1245/ASO.2003.03.085.CrossRefPubMed Hwang ES, Kinkel K, Esserman LJ, Lu Y, Weidner N, Hylton NM: Magnetic resonance imaging in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma-in-situ: value in the diagnosis of residual disease, occult invasion, and multicentricity. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003, 10: 381-388. 10.1245/ASO.2003.03.085.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kristoffersen WM, Aspelin P, Sylvan M, Bone B: Comparison of lesion size estimated by dynamic MR imaging, mammography and histopathology in breast neoplasms. Eur Radiol. 2003, 13: 1207-1212. Kristoffersen WM, Aspelin P, Sylvan M, Bone B: Comparison of lesion size estimated by dynamic MR imaging, mammography and histopathology in breast neoplasms. Eur Radiol. 2003, 13: 1207-1212.
16.
go back to reference Amano G, Ohuchi N, Ishibashi T, Ishida T, Amari M, Satomi S: Correlation of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging with precise histopathological map concerning carcinoma extension in the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000, 60: 43-55. 10.1023/A:1006342711426.CrossRefPubMed Amano G, Ohuchi N, Ishibashi T, Ishida T, Amari M, Satomi S: Correlation of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging with precise histopathological map concerning carcinoma extension in the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000, 60: 43-55. 10.1023/A:1006342711426.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, Hochman MG, Kuhl CK, Kaiser WA, Weinreb JC, Smazal SF, Degani H, Viehweg P, Barclay J, Schnall MD: Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001, 13: 889-895. 10.1002/jmri.1127.CrossRefPubMed Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, Hochman MG, Kuhl CK, Kaiser WA, Weinreb JC, Smazal SF, Degani H, Viehweg P, Barclay J, Schnall MD: Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001, 13: 889-895. 10.1002/jmri.1127.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E: Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999, 213: 881-888.CrossRefPubMed Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E: Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999, 213: 881-888.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hoorntje LE, Peeters PH, Mali WP, Borel R: Is stereotactic large-core needle biopsy beneficial prior to surgical treatment in BI-RADS 5 lesions?1498. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004, 86: 165-170. 10.1023/B:BREA.0000032984.56442.35.CrossRefPubMed Hoorntje LE, Peeters PH, Mali WP, Borel R: Is stereotactic large-core needle biopsy beneficial prior to surgical treatment in BI-RADS 5 lesions?1498. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004, 86: 165-170. 10.1023/B:BREA.0000032984.56442.35.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Fischer U, Zachariae O, Baum F, von HD, Funke M, Liersch T: The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer1497. Eur Radiol. 2004, 14: 1725-1731.CrossRefPubMed Fischer U, Zachariae O, Baum F, von HD, Funke M, Liersch T: The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer1497. Eur Radiol. 2004, 14: 1725-1731.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hoorntje LE: Nonpalpable breast lesions: challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Thesis. 2003, Utrecht, The Netherlands Hoorntje LE: Nonpalpable breast lesions: challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Thesis. 2003, Utrecht, The Netherlands
24.
go back to reference Intra M, Zurrida S, Maffini F, Sonzogni A, Trifiro G, Gennari R, Arnone P, Bassani G, Opazo A, Paganelli G, Viale G, Veronesi U: Sentinel lymph node metastasis in microinvasive breast cancer1496. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003, 10: 1160-1165. 10.1245/ASO.2003.04.009.CrossRefPubMed Intra M, Zurrida S, Maffini F, Sonzogni A, Trifiro G, Gennari R, Arnone P, Bassani G, Opazo A, Paganelli G, Viale G, Veronesi U: Sentinel lymph node metastasis in microinvasive breast cancer1496. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003, 10: 1160-1165. 10.1245/ASO.2003.04.009.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Verkooijen HM: Stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease. The COBRA study. Thesis. 2000, Utrecht, The Netherlands Verkooijen HM: Stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease. The COBRA study. Thesis. 2000, Utrecht, The Netherlands
26.
go back to reference Estourgie SH: Excisional biopsy of breast lesions. Changes in the drainage pattern: a reproducibility study of lymphoscintigraphy. Thesis, . 2004, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Estourgie SH: Excisional biopsy of breast lesions. Changes in the drainage pattern: a reproducibility study of lymphoscintigraphy. Thesis, . 2004, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
27.
go back to reference Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG, Schnall M, Reynolds C, Spitz FR, Callans LS, Buzby GP, Rosato EF, Fraker DL, Czerniecki BJ: Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2003, 98: 468-473. 10.1002/cncr.11490.CrossRefPubMed Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG, Schnall M, Reynolds C, Spitz FR, Callans LS, Buzby GP, Rosato EF, Fraker DL, Czerniecki BJ: Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2003, 98: 468-473. 10.1002/cncr.11490.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Breast MRI in nonpalpable breast lesions: a randomized trial with diagnostic and therapeutic outcome – MONET – study
Authors
Nicky HGM Peters
Inne HM Borel Rinkes
Willem PTM Mali
Maurice AAJ van den Bosch
Remmert K Storm
Peter W Plaisier
Erwin de Boer
Adriaan J van Overbeeke
Petra HM Peeters
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2007
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-40

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

Trials 1/2007 Go to the issue