Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 4/2007

01-04-2007 | Breast

Breast MR imaging in women at high-risk of breast cancer. Is something changing in early breast cancer detection?

Authors: Francesco Sardanelli, Franca Podo

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 4/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

In the last few years, several papers have addressed the introduction of contrast-enhanced MR imaging for screening women at high risk for breast cancer. Taking in consideration five prospective studies, on 3,571 screened women with hereditary predisposition to the disease and 9,652 rounds, we found that 168 patients were diagnosed with breast cancer (155 screen-detected, eight interval, and five cancers excluded from analysis) with a detection rate per year of 1.7%. These cancers were small (49% equal to or less than 10 mm in diameter) but aggressive, 82% being invasive and 49% with histologic grade 3; however, only 19% of these invasive cancers were associated with nodal involvement. The pooled sensitivity was 16% for clinical breast examination, 40% for mammography, 43% for ultrasound, and 81% for MR. The positive predictive value (calculated on the basis of the number of invasive diagnostic procedures due to false positives) was 33%, 47%, 18%, and 53%, respectively. Aim of the present article is to present the historical development of MR imaging of breast tumors that made this application theoretically and technically possible, to explain what strategic problems we face in the presence of a hereditary predisposition to the disease, to review the main results of the published studies, and to outline open problems and future perspectives.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC et al (2000) Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: Preliminary results. Radiology 215:267–279PubMed Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC et al (2000) Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: Preliminary results. Radiology 215:267–279PubMed
2.
go back to reference Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Obdeijn IMM, Bartels KC, de Koning HJ, Oudkerk M (2000) First experiences in screening women at high risk for breast cancer with MR imaging. Breast Cancer Res Treat 63:53–60PubMed Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Obdeijn IMM, Bartels KC, de Koning HJ, Oudkerk M (2000) First experiences in screening women at high risk for breast cancer with MR imaging. Breast Cancer Res Treat 63:53–60PubMed
3.
go back to reference Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS et al (2001) Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:3524–3531PubMed Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS et al (2001) Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:3524–3531PubMed
4.
go back to reference Podo F, Sardanelli F, Canese R et al (2002) The Italian multi-centre project on evaluation of MRI and other imaging modalities in early detection of breast cancer in subjects at high genetic risk. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 21(Suppl 3):115–124PubMed Podo F, Sardanelli F, Canese R et al (2002) The Italian multi-centre project on evaluation of MRI and other imaging modalities in early detection of breast cancer in subjects at high genetic risk. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 21(Suppl 3):115–124PubMed
5.
go back to reference Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C et al (2004) Efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging and mammography for breast cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351:427–437PubMed Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C et al (2004) Efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging and mammography for breast cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351:427–437PubMed
6.
go back to reference Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA et al (2004) Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 292:1317–1325PubMed Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA et al (2004) Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 292:1317–1325PubMed
7.
go back to reference Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK et al (2005) Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 365:1769–1778PubMed Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK et al (2005) Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 365:1769–1778PubMed
8.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al (2005) Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469–8476PubMed Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al (2005) Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469–8476PubMed
9.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Podo F, D’Agnolo G et al (2006) Multicenter comparative surveillance of women at genetic-familial high-risk of breast cancer using contrast-enhanced MR imaging, mammography, ultrasound and clinical breast examination. Interim results. Radiology (in press) Sardanelli F, Podo F, D’Agnolo G et al (2006) Multicenter comparative surveillance of women at genetic-familial high-risk of breast cancer using contrast-enhanced MR imaging, mammography, ultrasound and clinical breast examination. Interim results. Radiology (in press)
10.
go back to reference Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C, Jager GJ et al (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1095–1102PubMed Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C, Jager GJ et al (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1095–1102PubMed
11.
go back to reference Morris EA, Liberman L, Ballon DJ (2003) MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high-risk population. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:619–626PubMed Morris EA, Liberman L, Ballon DJ (2003) MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high-risk population. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:619–626PubMed
12.
go back to reference Israeli D, Tartter PI, Brower ST, Mizrachy B, Bratton J (1994) The significance of family history for patients with carcinoma of the breast. J Am Coll Surg 179:29–32PubMed Israeli D, Tartter PI, Brower ST, Mizrachy B, Bratton J (1994) The significance of family history for patients with carcinoma of the breast. J Am Coll Surg 179:29–32PubMed
13.
go back to reference Hoskins KF, Stopfer JE, Calzone KA et al (1995) Assessment and counselling for women with a family history of breast cancer. A guide for clinicians. JAMA 273:577–585PubMed Hoskins KF, Stopfer JE, Calzone KA et al (1995) Assessment and counselling for women with a family history of breast cancer. A guide for clinicians. JAMA 273:577–585PubMed
14.
go back to reference Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD (1994) Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer. Implications for risk prediction. Cancer 73:643–651PubMed Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD (1994) Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer. Implications for risk prediction. Cancer 73:643–651PubMed
15.
go back to reference Claus EB, Schildkraut JM, Thompson WD, Risch NJ (1996) The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer 77:2318–2324PubMed Claus EB, Schildkraut JM, Thompson WD, Risch NJ (1996) The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer 77:2318–2324PubMed
16.
go back to reference Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M et al (1998) Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The breast cancer linkage consortium. Am J Hum Genet 62:676–689PubMed Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M et al (1998) Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The breast cancer linkage consortium. Am J Hum Genet 62:676–689PubMed
17.
go back to reference Marchetti P, Di Rocco CZ, Ricevuto E et al (2004) Reducing breast cancer incidence in familial breast cancer: overlooking the present panorama. Ann Oncol 15(suppl 1):I27–I34PubMed Marchetti P, Di Rocco CZ, Ricevuto E et al (2004) Reducing breast cancer incidence in familial breast cancer: overlooking the present panorama. Ann Oncol 15(suppl 1):I27–I34PubMed
18.
go back to reference Koutcher JA, Goldsmith M, Damadian R (1978) NMR in cancer. X. A malignancy index to discriminate normal and cancerous tissue. Cancer 41:174–182PubMed Koutcher JA, Goldsmith M, Damadian R (1978) NMR in cancer. X. A malignancy index to discriminate normal and cancerous tissue. Cancer 41:174–182PubMed
19.
go back to reference Heywang SH, Hahn D, Eiermann W, Krischke I, Lissner J (1985) Nuclear magnetic resonance tomography in breast cancer diagnosis-present status and future outlook. Digitale Bilddiagn 5:107–111PubMed Heywang SH, Hahn D, Eiermann W, Krischke I, Lissner J (1985) Nuclear magnetic resonance tomography in breast cancer diagnosis-present status and future outlook. Digitale Bilddiagn 5:107–111PubMed
20.
go back to reference Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Beck R (1995) Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Beck R (1995) Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
21.
go back to reference Goodman CM, Cohen V, Thornby J, Netscher D (1998) The life span of silicone gel breast implants and a comparison of mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting implant rupture: a meta-analysis. Ann Plast Surg 41:577–585PubMed Goodman CM, Cohen V, Thornby J, Netscher D (1998) The life span of silicone gel breast implants and a comparison of mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting implant rupture: a meta-analysis. Ann Plast Surg 41:577–585PubMed
22.
go back to reference Heywang SH, Hahn D, Schmidt H et al (1986) MRI of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. J Comput Assist Tomogr 10:199–204PubMed Heywang SH, Hahn D, Schmidt H et al (1986) MRI of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. J Comput Assist Tomogr 10:199–204PubMed
23.
go back to reference Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W (1989) MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 171:95–103PubMed Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W (1989) MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 171:95–103PubMed
24.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, Schild HH (1999) Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 211:101–110PubMed Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, Schild HH (1999) Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 211:101–110PubMed
25.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Iozzelli A, Fausto A (2003) MR imaging of the breast: indications, established technique and new directions. Eur Radiol 13(Suppl 3):N28–N36PubMed Sardanelli F, Iozzelli A, Fausto A (2003) MR imaging of the breast: indications, established technique and new directions. Eur Radiol 13(Suppl 3):N28–N36PubMed
26.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Fausto A, Iozzelli A, Rescinito G, Calabrese M (2004) Dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging. Effect of changing the region of interest on early enhancement using 2D and 3D techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:642–646PubMed Sardanelli F, Fausto A, Iozzelli A, Rescinito G, Calabrese M (2004) Dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging. Effect of changing the region of interest on early enhancement using 2D and 3D techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:642–646PubMed
27.
go back to reference Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM et al (1995) Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 196:115–122PubMed Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM et al (1995) Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 196:115–122PubMed
28.
go back to reference Boné B, Aspelin P, Bronge L, Isberg B, Perbeck L, Veress B (1996) Sensitivity and specificity of MR mammography with histopathological correlation in 250 breasts. Acta Radiol 37:208–213PubMedCrossRef Boné B, Aspelin P, Bronge L, Isberg B, Perbeck L, Veress B (1996) Sensitivity and specificity of MR mammography with histopathological correlation in 250 breasts. Acta Radiol 37:208–213PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Viehweg P, Heinig A, Kuchler C (1997) Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol 24:94–108PubMed Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Viehweg P, Heinig A, Kuchler C (1997) Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol 24:94–108PubMed
30.
go back to reference Del Maschio A, Panizza P (1998) MR state of the art. Eur J Radiol 27(Suppl 2):S250–S253PubMed Del Maschio A, Panizza P (1998) MR state of the art. Eur J Radiol 27(Suppl 2):S250–S253PubMed
31.
go back to reference Fischer U, Westerhof JP, Brinck U, Korabiowska M, Schauer A, Grabbe E (1996) Ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic MR-mammography at 1.5 T. Rofo 164:290–294PubMed Fischer U, Westerhof JP, Brinck U, Korabiowska M, Schauer A, Grabbe E (1996) Ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic MR-mammography at 1.5 T. Rofo 164:290–294PubMed
32.
go back to reference Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213:881–888PubMed Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213:881–888PubMed
33.
go back to reference Malur S, Wurdinger S, Moritz A, Michels W, Schneider A (2001) Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography. Breast Cancer Res 3:55–60PubMed Malur S, Wurdinger S, Moritz A, Michels W, Schneider A (2001) Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography. Breast Cancer Res 3:55–60PubMed
34.
go back to reference Oshida K, Nagashima T, Ueda T et al (2005) Pharmacokinetic analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using dynamic MR mammography. Eur Radiol 15:1353–1360PubMed Oshida K, Nagashima T, Ueda T et al (2005) Pharmacokinetic analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using dynamic MR mammography. Eur Radiol 15:1353–1360PubMed
35.
go back to reference Orel SG, Hochman MG, Schnall MD, Reynolds C, Sullivan DC (1996) High-resolution MR imaging of the breast: clinical context. Radiographics 16:1385–1401PubMed Orel SG, Hochman MG, Schnall MD, Reynolds C, Sullivan DC (1996) High-resolution MR imaging of the breast: clinical context. Radiographics 16:1385–1401PubMed
36.
go back to reference Vomweg TW, Teifke A, Kunz RP et al (2004) Combination of low and high resolution sequences in two orientations for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: more than a compromise. Eur Radiol 14:1732–1742PubMed Vomweg TW, Teifke A, Kunz RP et al (2004) Combination of low and high resolution sequences in two orientations for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: more than a compromise. Eur Radiol 14:1732–1742PubMed
37.
go back to reference Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK (2003) MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:901–910PubMed Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK (2003) MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:901–910PubMed
38.
go back to reference Fischer U, Zachariae O, Baum F, von Heyden D, Funke M, Liersch T (2004) The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 14:1725–1731PubMed Fischer U, Zachariae O, Baum F, von Heyden D, Funke M, Liersch T (2004) The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 14:1725–1731PubMed
39.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P et al (2004) Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1149–1157PubMed Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P et al (2004) Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1149–1157PubMed
40.
go back to reference Van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Kersschot E et al (2004) Enhancing area surrounding breast carcinoma on MR mammography: comparison with pathological examination. Eur Radiol 14:1363–1370PubMed Van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Kersschot E et al (2004) Enhancing area surrounding breast carcinoma on MR mammography: comparison with pathological examination. Eur Radiol 14:1363–1370PubMed
41.
go back to reference Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E et al (2004) Preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur Radiol 14:1209–1216PubMed Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E et al (2004) Preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur Radiol 14:1209–1216PubMed
42.
go back to reference Liberman L, Morris EA, Kim CM et al (2003) MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:333–341PubMed Liberman L, Morris EA, Kim CM et al (2003) MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:333–341PubMed
43.
go back to reference Belli P, Costantini M, Romani M, Marano P, Pastore G (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer recurrence. Breast Cancer Res Treat 73:223–235PubMed Belli P, Costantini M, Romani M, Marano P, Pastore G (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer recurrence. Breast Cancer Res Treat 73:223–235PubMed
44.
go back to reference Morakkabati N, Leutner CC, Schmiedel A, Schild HH, Kuhl CK (2003) Breast MR imaging during or soon after radiation therapy. Radiology 229:893–901PubMed Morakkabati N, Leutner CC, Schmiedel A, Schild HH, Kuhl CK (2003) Breast MR imaging during or soon after radiation therapy. Radiology 229:893–901PubMed
45.
go back to reference Partridge SC, Gibbs JE, Lu Y et al (2005) MRI measurements of breast tumor volume predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence-free survival. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1774–1781PubMed Partridge SC, Gibbs JE, Lu Y et al (2005) MRI measurements of breast tumor volume predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence-free survival. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1774–1781PubMed
46.
go back to reference Yeh E, Slanetz P, Kopans DB et al (2005) Prospective comparison of mammography, sonography, and MRI in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for palpable breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:868–877PubMed Yeh E, Slanetz P, Kopans DB et al (2005) Prospective comparison of mammography, sonography, and MRI in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for palpable breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:868–877PubMed
47.
go back to reference Obdeijn IM, Brouwers-Kuyper EM, Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Wiggers T, Oudkerk M (2000) MR imaging-guided sonography follwed by fine-needle aspiration cytology in occult carcinoma of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1079–1084PubMed Obdeijn IM, Brouwers-Kuyper EM, Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Wiggers T, Oudkerk M (2000) MR imaging-guided sonography follwed by fine-needle aspiration cytology in occult carcinoma of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1079–1084PubMed
48.
go back to reference Schorn C, Fischer U, Luftner-Nagel S, Westerhof JP, Grabbe E (1999) MRI of the breast in patients with metastatic disease of unknown primary. Eur Radiol 9:470–473PubMed Schorn C, Fischer U, Luftner-Nagel S, Westerhof JP, Grabbe E (1999) MRI of the breast in patients with metastatic disease of unknown primary. Eur Radiol 9:470–473PubMed
49.
go back to reference Orel SG, Weinstein SP, Schnall MD et al (1999 ) Breast MR imaging in patients with axillary node metastases and unknown primary malignancy. Radiology 212:543–549PubMed Orel SG, Weinstein SP, Schnall MD et al (1999 ) Breast MR imaging in patients with axillary node metastases and unknown primary malignancy. Radiology 212:543–549PubMed
50.
go back to reference Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, Hochman MG, Langlotz CP, Reynolds CA, Torosian MH (1997) Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 202:833–841PubMed Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, Hochman MG, Langlotz CP, Reynolds CA, Torosian MH (1997) Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 202:833–841PubMed
51.
go back to reference Vomveg TW, Buscema M, Kauczor H et al (2003) Improved artificial neural networks in prediction of malignancy of lesions in contrast-enhanced MR-mammography. Med Phys 30:2350–2359 Vomveg TW, Buscema M, Kauczor H et al (2003) Improved artificial neural networks in prediction of malignancy of lesions in contrast-enhanced MR-mammography. Med Phys 30:2350–2359
52.
go back to reference Baum F, Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Grabbe E (2002) Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast. Eur Radiol 12:1087–1092PubMed Baum F, Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Grabbe E (2002) Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast. Eur Radiol 12:1087–1092PubMed
53.
go back to reference Fischer DR, Baltzer P, Malich A et al (2004) Is the “blooming sign” a promising additional tool to determine malignancy in MR mammography? Eur Radiol 14:394–401PubMed Fischer DR, Baltzer P, Malich A et al (2004) Is the “blooming sign” a promising additional tool to determine malignancy in MR mammography? Eur Radiol 14:394–401PubMed
54.
go back to reference Morris EA (2005) Breast MRI for cancer screening in high-risk patients. Applied Radiology May (Suppl):4–9 Morris EA (2005) Breast MRI for cancer screening in high-risk patients. Applied Radiology May (Suppl):4–9
55.
go back to reference LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Dershaw DD, Liberman L (2003) Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US. Radiology 227:856–861PubMed LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Dershaw DD, Liberman L (2003) Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US. Radiology 227:856–861PubMed
56.
go back to reference Orel SG, Schnall MD, Newman RW et al (1994) MR imaging-guided localization and biopsy of breast lesions: initial experience. Radiology 193:97–102PubMed Orel SG, Schnall MD, Newman RW et al (1994) MR imaging-guided localization and biopsy of breast lesions: initial experience. Radiology 193:97–102PubMed
57.
go back to reference Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1998) Magnetic resonance guided localization and biopsy of suspicious breast lesions. Top Magn Reson Imaging 9:44–59PubMed Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1998) Magnetic resonance guided localization and biopsy of suspicious breast lesions. Top Magn Reson Imaging 9:44–59PubMed
58.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Elevelt A, Leutner CC et al (1997) Interventional breast MR imaging: clinical use of a stereotactic localization and biopsy device. Radiology 204:667–675PubMed Kuhl CK, Elevelt A, Leutner CC et al (1997) Interventional breast MR imaging: clinical use of a stereotactic localization and biopsy device. Radiology 204:667–675PubMed
59.
go back to reference Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Pickuth D et al (2000) Interventional MRI of the breast: lesion localization and biopsy. Eur Radiol 10:36–45PubMed Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Pickuth D et al (2000) Interventional MRI of the breast: lesion localization and biopsy. Eur Radiol 10:36–45PubMed
60.
go back to reference Morris EA, Liberman L, Dershaw DD et al (2002) Preoperative MR imaging-guided needle localization of breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1211–1220PubMed Morris EA, Liberman L, Dershaw DD et al (2002) Preoperative MR imaging-guided needle localization of breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1211–1220PubMed
61.
go back to reference Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD et al (2003) Fast MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:1283–1293PubMed Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD et al (2003) Fast MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:1283–1293PubMed
62.
63.
go back to reference Siesling S, van Dijck JA, Visser O, Coebergh JW; Working Group of The Netherlands Cancer Registry (2003) Trends in incidence of and mortality from cancer in The Netherlands in the period 1989–1998. Eur J Cancer 39:2521–2530PubMed Siesling S, van Dijck JA, Visser O, Coebergh JW; Working Group of The Netherlands Cancer Registry (2003) Trends in incidence of and mortality from cancer in The Netherlands in the period 1989–1998. Eur J Cancer 39:2521–2530PubMed
64.
go back to reference Serova OM, Mazoyer S, Puget N et al (1997) Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast cancer families: are there more breast cancer-susceptibility genes? Am J Hum Genet 60:486–495PubMed Serova OM, Mazoyer S, Puget N et al (1997) Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast cancer families: are there more breast cancer-susceptibility genes? Am J Hum Genet 60:486–495PubMed
65.
go back to reference Szabo CI, King MC (1997) Population genetics of BRCA 1 and BRCA2. Am J Hum Genet 60:1013–1020PubMed Szabo CI, King MC (1997) Population genetics of BRCA 1 and BRCA2. Am J Hum Genet 60:1013–1020PubMed
66.
go back to reference No authors listed (1997) Pathology of familial breast cancer: differences between breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA 2 mutations and sporadic cases. Breast cancer linkage consortium. Lancet 349:1505–1510 No authors listed (1997) Pathology of familial breast cancer: differences between breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA 2 mutations and sporadic cases. Breast cancer linkage consortium. Lancet 349:1505–1510
67.
go back to reference Krainer M, Silva-Arrieta S, FitzGerald MG et al (1997) Differential contributions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 to early-onset breast cancers. N Engl J Med 336:1416–1421PubMed Krainer M, Silva-Arrieta S, FitzGerald MG et al (1997) Differential contributions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 to early-onset breast cancers. N Engl J Med 336:1416–1421PubMed
68.
go back to reference Lakhani SR, Jacquemier J, Sloane JP et al (1998) Multifactorial analysis of differences between sporadic breast cancers and cancers involving BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1138–1145PubMed Lakhani SR, Jacquemier J, Sloane JP et al (1998) Multifactorial analysis of differences between sporadic breast cancers and cancers involving BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1138–1145PubMed
69.
go back to reference Porter DE, Dixon M, Smyth E, Steel CM (1993) Breast cancer survival in BRCA1 carriers. Lancet 341:184–185PubMed Porter DE, Dixon M, Smyth E, Steel CM (1993) Breast cancer survival in BRCA1 carriers. Lancet 341:184–185PubMed
70.
go back to reference Verhoog LC, Brekelmans CT, Seynaeve C et al (1998) Survival and tumour characteristics of breast-cancer patients with germline mutations of BRCA1. Lancet 351:316–321PubMed Verhoog LC, Brekelmans CT, Seynaeve C et al (1998) Survival and tumour characteristics of breast-cancer patients with germline mutations of BRCA1. Lancet 351:316–321PubMed
71.
go back to reference Thull DL, Vogel VG (2004) Recognition and management of hereditary breast cancer syndromes. Oncologist 9:13–24PubMed Thull DL, Vogel VG (2004) Recognition and management of hereditary breast cancer syndromes. Oncologist 9:13–24PubMed
72.
go back to reference Ardern-Jones A, Kenen R, Eeles R (2005) Too much, too soon? Patients and health professionals’ views concerning the impact of genetic testing at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in women under the age of 40. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 14:272–281 Ardern-Jones A, Kenen R, Eeles R (2005) Too much, too soon? Patients and health professionals’ views concerning the impact of genetic testing at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in women under the age of 40. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 14:272–281
73.
go back to reference Sevilla C, Julian-Reynier C, Eisinger F et al (2003) Impact of gene patents on the cost-effective delivery of care: the case of BRCA1 genetic testing. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 19:287–300PubMed Sevilla C, Julian-Reynier C, Eisinger F et al (2003) Impact of gene patents on the cost-effective delivery of care: the case of BRCA1 genetic testing. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 19:287–300PubMed
74.
go back to reference Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP et al (1989) Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1879–1886PubMed Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP et al (1989) Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1879–1886PubMed
75.
go back to reference Gail MH, Costantino J, Bryant J et al (1999) Weighing the risks and benefits of tamoxifen treatment for preventing breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1829–1846PubMed Gail MH, Costantino J, Bryant J et al (1999) Weighing the risks and benefits of tamoxifen treatment for preventing breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1829–1846PubMed
76.
go back to reference Friedenson B (2004) Assessing and managing breast cancer risk: clinical tools for advising patients. MedGenMed 6:8PubMed Friedenson B (2004) Assessing and managing breast cancer risk: clinical tools for advising patients. MedGenMed 6:8PubMed
77.
go back to reference Domchek SM, Eisen A, Calzone K et al (2003) Application of breast cancer risk prediction models in clinical practice. J Clin Oncol 21:593–601PubMed Domchek SM, Eisen A, Calzone K et al (2003) Application of breast cancer risk prediction models in clinical practice. J Clin Oncol 21:593–601PubMed
78.
go back to reference McTiernan A, Kuniyuki A, Yasui Y et al (2001) Comparisons of two breast cancer risk estimates in women with a family history of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10:333–338PubMed McTiernan A, Kuniyuki A, Yasui Y et al (2001) Comparisons of two breast cancer risk estimates in women with a family history of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10:333–338PubMed
79.
go back to reference Bonadona V, Sinilnikova OM, Lenoir GM, Lasset C (2002) Pretest prediction of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation by risk counselors and the computer model BRCAPRO. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1583–1584 Bonadona V, Sinilnikova OM, Lenoir GM, Lasset C (2002) Pretest prediction of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation by risk counselors and the computer model BRCAPRO. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1583–1584
80.
go back to reference Berg WA (2004) Image-guided breast biopsy and management of high-risk lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 42:935–946PubMed Berg WA (2004) Image-guided breast biopsy and management of high-risk lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 42:935–946PubMed
81.
go back to reference Sewell CW (2004) Pathology of high-risk breast lesions and ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiol Clin North Am 42:821–830PubMed Sewell CW (2004) Pathology of high-risk breast lesions and ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiol Clin North Am 42:821–830PubMed
82.
go back to reference Dershaw DD (2000) Mammographic screening of the high-risk woman. Am J Surg 180:288–289PubMed Dershaw DD (2000) Mammographic screening of the high-risk woman. Am J Surg 180:288–289PubMed
83.
go back to reference Burke W, Daly M, Garber J et al (1997) Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to breast cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer genetics studies consortium. JAMA 227:997–1003 Burke W, Daly M, Garber J et al (1997) Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to breast cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer genetics studies consortium. JAMA 227:997–1003
84.
go back to reference Chart PL, Franssen E (1997) Management of women at increased risk for breast cancer: preliminary results from a new program. CMAJ 157:1235–1242PubMed Chart PL, Franssen E (1997) Management of women at increased risk for breast cancer: preliminary results from a new program. CMAJ 157:1235–1242PubMed
85.
go back to reference Lalloo F, Boggis CR, Evans DG, Shenton A, Threlfall AG, Howell A (1998) Screening by mammography, women with a family history of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 34:937–940PubMed Lalloo F, Boggis CR, Evans DG, Shenton A, Threlfall AG, Howell A (1998) Screening by mammography, women with a family history of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 34:937–940PubMed
86.
go back to reference Kollias J, Sibbering DM, Blamey RW et al (1998) Screening women aged less than 50 years with a familial history of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 34:878–883PubMed Kollias J, Sibbering DM, Blamey RW et al (1998) Screening women aged less than 50 years with a familial history of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 34:878–883PubMed
87.
go back to reference Macmillan RD (2000) Screening women with a family history of breast cancer—results from the british familial breast cancer group. Eur J Surg Oncol 26:149–152PubMed Macmillan RD (2000) Screening women with a family history of breast cancer—results from the british familial breast cancer group. Eur J Surg Oncol 26:149–152PubMed
88.
go back to reference Brekelmans CT, Seynaeve C, Bartels CC et al (2001) Effectiveness of breast cancer surveillance in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and women with high familial risk. J Clin Oncol 19:924–930PubMed Brekelmans CT, Seynaeve C, Bartels CC et al (2001) Effectiveness of breast cancer surveillance in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and women with high familial risk. J Clin Oncol 19:924–930PubMed
89.
go back to reference Scheuer L, Kauff N, Robson M et al (2002) Outcome of preventive surgery and screening for breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 20:1260–1268PubMed Scheuer L, Kauff N, Robson M et al (2002) Outcome of preventive surgery and screening for breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 20:1260–1268PubMed
90.
go back to reference Den Otter W, Merchant TE, Beijerinck D et al (1996) Breast cancer induction due to mammography screening in hereditarily affected women. Anticancer Res 16:3173–3175 Den Otter W, Merchant TE, Beijerinck D et al (1996) Breast cancer induction due to mammography screening in hereditarily affected women. Anticancer Res 16:3173–3175
91.
go back to reference Law J (1997) Cancer detected and induced in mammographic screening: new screening schedules and younger women with family history. Br J Radiol 70:62–69PubMed Law J (1997) Cancer detected and induced in mammographic screening: new screening schedules and younger women with family history. Br J Radiol 70:62–69PubMed
92.
go back to reference Sharan SK, Morimatsu M, Albrecht U et al (1997) Embryonic lethality and radiation hypersensitivity mediated by Rad51 in mice lacking Brca2. Nature 386:804–810PubMed Sharan SK, Morimatsu M, Albrecht U et al (1997) Embryonic lethality and radiation hypersensitivity mediated by Rad51 in mice lacking Brca2. Nature 386:804–810PubMed
93.
go back to reference Beemsterboer PM, Warmerdam PG, Boer R, de Koning HJ (1998) Radiation risk of mammography related to benefit in screening programmes: a favourable balance? J Med Screen 5:81–87PubMed Beemsterboer PM, Warmerdam PG, Boer R, de Koning HJ (1998) Radiation risk of mammography related to benefit in screening programmes: a favourable balance? J Med Screen 5:81–87PubMed
94.
go back to reference Mettler FA, Upton AC, Kelsey CA, Ashby RN, Rosenberg RD, Linver MN (1996) Benefits versus risks from mammography: a critical reassessment. Cancer 77:903–909PubMed Mettler FA, Upton AC, Kelsey CA, Ashby RN, Rosenberg RD, Linver MN (1996) Benefits versus risks from mammography: a critical reassessment. Cancer 77:903–909PubMed
95.
go back to reference van Leeuwen FE, Klokman WJ, Hagenbeek A et al (1994) Second cancer risk following Hodgkin disease: a 20-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 12:312–325PubMed van Leeuwen FE, Klokman WJ, Hagenbeek A et al (1994) Second cancer risk following Hodgkin disease: a 20-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 12:312–325PubMed
96.
go back to reference O’Brien PC, Barton MB, Fisher R (1995) Breast cancer following treatment for Hodgkin’s disease: the need for screening in a young population. Australasian radiation oncology lymphoma group (AROLG). Australas Radiol 39:271–276PubMed O’Brien PC, Barton MB, Fisher R (1995) Breast cancer following treatment for Hodgkin’s disease: the need for screening in a young population. Australasian radiation oncology lymphoma group (AROLG). Australas Radiol 39:271–276PubMed
97.
go back to reference Boice JD Jr, Land CE, Shore RE, Norman JE, Tokunaga M (1979) Risk of breast cancer following low-dose radiation exposure. Radiology 131:589–597PubMed Boice JD Jr, Land CE, Shore RE, Norman JE, Tokunaga M (1979) Risk of breast cancer following low-dose radiation exposure. Radiology 131:589–597PubMed
98.
go back to reference Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165–175PubMed Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165–175PubMed
99.
go back to reference Berg WA (2004) Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts. Radiol Clin North Am 42:845–851PubMed Berg WA (2004) Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts. Radiol Clin North Am 42:845–851PubMed
100.
go back to reference Pennisi VR, Capozzi A (1989) Subcutaneous mastectomy data: a final statistical analysis of 1500 patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 13:15–21PubMed Pennisi VR, Capozzi A (1989) Subcutaneous mastectomy data: a final statistical analysis of 1500 patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 13:15–21PubMed
101.
go back to reference Geiger AM, Yu O, Herrinton LJ (2005) A population-based study of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy efficacy in women at elevated risk of breast cancer in community practices. Arch Intern Med 165:516–520PubMed Geiger AM, Yu O, Herrinton LJ (2005) A population-based study of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy efficacy in women at elevated risk of breast cancer in community practices. Arch Intern Med 165:516–520PubMed
102.
go back to reference Meijers-Heijboer H, van Geel B, van Putten WL et al (2001) Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 345:159–164PubMed Meijers-Heijboer H, van Geel B, van Putten WL et al (2001) Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 345:159–164PubMed
103.
go back to reference Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Schaid DJ et al (2001) Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1633–1637PubMed Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Schaid DJ et al (2001) Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1633–1637PubMed
104.
go back to reference Kauff ND, Satagopan JM, Robson ME et al (2002) Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med 346:1609–1615PubMed Kauff ND, Satagopan JM, Robson ME et al (2002) Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med 346:1609–1615PubMed
105.
go back to reference Rebbeck TR, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL et al (2002) Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 346:1616–1622PubMed Rebbeck TR, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL et al (2002) Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 346:1616–1622PubMed
106.
go back to reference Calderon-Margalit R, Paltiel O (2004) Prevention of breast cancer in women who carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: a critical review of the literature. Int J Cancer 112:357–364PubMed Calderon-Margalit R, Paltiel O (2004) Prevention of breast cancer in women who carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: a critical review of the literature. Int J Cancer 112:357–364PubMed
107.
go back to reference King MC, Wieand S, Hale K et al (2001) Tamoxifen and breast cancer incidence among women with inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project (NSABP-P1) Breast cancer prevention trial. JAMA 286:2251–2256PubMed King MC, Wieand S, Hale K et al (2001) Tamoxifen and breast cancer incidence among women with inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project (NSABP-P1) Breast cancer prevention trial. JAMA 286:2251–2256PubMed
108.
go back to reference Caines JS, Schaller GH, Iles SE et al (2005) Ten years of breast screening in the Nova Scotia Breast Screening Program, 1991–2001 experience: use of an adaptable stereotactic device in the diagnosis of screening-detected abnormalities. Can Assoc Radiol J 56:82–93PubMed Caines JS, Schaller GH, Iles SE et al (2005) Ten years of breast screening in the Nova Scotia Breast Screening Program, 1991–2001 experience: use of an adaptable stereotactic device in the diagnosis of screening-detected abnormalities. Can Assoc Radiol J 56:82–93PubMed
109.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Schild HH, Morakkabati N (2005) Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology 236:789–800PubMed Kuhl CK, Schild HH, Morakkabati N (2005) Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology 236:789–800PubMed
110.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Podo F (2005) Women with history of breast cancer excluded from screening programs: is it the right choice? (letter). Radiology 234:971–972PubMed Sardanelli F, Podo F (2005) Women with history of breast cancer excluded from screening programs: is it the right choice? (letter). Radiology 234:971–972PubMed
111.
go back to reference Bernstein JL, Thompson WD, Risch N, Holford TR (1992) Risk factors predicting the incidence of second primary breast cancer among women diagnosed with a first primary breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 136:925–936PubMed Bernstein JL, Thompson WD, Risch N, Holford TR (1992) Risk factors predicting the incidence of second primary breast cancer among women diagnosed with a first primary breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 136:925–936PubMed
112.
go back to reference Robson M, Gilewski T, Haas B et al (1998) BRCA-associated breast cancer in young women. J Clin Oncol 16:1642–1649PubMed Robson M, Gilewski T, Haas B et al (1998) BRCA-associated breast cancer in young women. J Clin Oncol 16:1642–1649PubMed
113.
go back to reference Metcalfe KA, Semple JL, Narod SA (2005) Time to reconsider subcutaneous mastectomy for breast-cancer prevention? Lancet Oncol 6:431–434PubMed Metcalfe KA, Semple JL, Narod SA (2005) Time to reconsider subcutaneous mastectomy for breast-cancer prevention? Lancet Oncol 6:431–434PubMed
114.
go back to reference Stefanek ME, Helzlsouer KJ, Wilcox PM, Houn F (1995) Predictors of and satisfaction with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. Prev Med 24:412–419PubMed Stefanek ME, Helzlsouer KJ, Wilcox PM, Houn F (1995) Predictors of and satisfaction with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. Prev Med 24:412–419PubMed
115.
go back to reference Meyer L, Ringberg A (1986) A prospective study of psychiatric and psychosocial sequelae of bilateral subcutaneous mastectomy. Scan J Plast Reconstr Surg 20:101–107 Meyer L, Ringberg A (1986) A prospective study of psychiatric and psychosocial sequelae of bilateral subcutaneous mastectomy. Scan J Plast Reconstr Surg 20:101–107
116.
go back to reference Goin MK, Goin JM (1982) Pyschological reactions to prophylactic mastectomy synchronous with contralateral breast reconstruction Plast Reconstr Surg 70:355–359PubMed Goin MK, Goin JM (1982) Pyschological reactions to prophylactic mastectomy synchronous with contralateral breast reconstruction Plast Reconstr Surg 70:355–359PubMed
117.
go back to reference Heinig A, Lampe D, Kolbl H, Beck R, Heywang-Kobrunner SH (2002) Suppression of unspecific enhancement on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by antiestrogen medication. Tumori 88:215–223PubMed Heinig A, Lampe D, Kolbl H, Beck R, Heywang-Kobrunner SH (2002) Suppression of unspecific enhancement on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by antiestrogen medication. Tumori 88:215–223PubMed
118.
go back to reference Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Williamson MR et al (1998) Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Radiology 209:511–518PubMed Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Williamson MR et al (1998) Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Radiology 209:511–518PubMed
119.
go back to reference Armes JE, Venter DJ (2002) The pathology of inherited breast cancer. Pathology 34:309–314PubMed Armes JE, Venter DJ (2002) The pathology of inherited breast cancer. Pathology 34:309–314PubMed
120.
go back to reference Sun CC, Lenoir G, Lynch H, Narod SA (1996) In-situ breast cancer and BRCA1. Lancet 348:408PubMed Sun CC, Lenoir G, Lynch H, Narod SA (1996) In-situ breast cancer and BRCA1. Lancet 348:408PubMed
121.
go back to reference Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Kriege M, Boetes C et al (2005) Hereditary breast cancer growth rates and its impact on screening policy. Eur J Cancer 41:1610–1617PubMed Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Kriege M, Boetes C et al (2005) Hereditary breast cancer growth rates and its impact on screening policy. Eur J Cancer 41:1610–1617PubMed
Metadata
Title
Breast MR imaging in women at high-risk of breast cancer. Is something changing in early breast cancer detection?
Authors
Francesco Sardanelli
Franca Podo
Publication date
01-04-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0389-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2007

European Radiology 4/2007 Go to the issue