Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medicine 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Breast Cancer | Research article

Mammography screening is associated with more favourable breast cancer tumour characteristics and better overall survival: case-only analysis of 3739 Asian breast cancer patients

Authors: Zi Lin Lim, Peh Joo Ho, Alexis Jiaying Khng, Yen Shing Yeoh, Amanda Tse Woon Ong, Benita Kiat Tee Tan, Ern Yu Tan, Su-Ming Tan, Geok Hoon Lim, Jung Ah Lee, Veronique Kiak-Mien Tan, Jesse Hu, Jingmei Li, Mikael Hartman

Published in: BMC Medicine | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Early detection of breast cancer (BC) through mammography screening (MAM) is known to reduce mortality. We examined the differential effect that mammography has on BC characteristics and overall survival and the sociodemographic determinants of MAM utilization in a multi-ethnic Asian population.

Methods

This study included 3739 BC patients from the Singapore Breast Cancer Cohort (2010–2018). Self-reported sociodemographic characteristics were collected using a structured questionnaire. Clinical data were obtained through medical records. Patients were classified as screeners (last screening mammogram ≤ 2 years before diagnosis), non-screeners (aware but did not attend or last screen > 2years), and those unaware of MAM. Associations between MAM behaviour (MB) and sociodemographic factors and MB and tumour characteristics were examined using multinomial regression. Ten-year overall survival was modelled using Cox regression.

Results

Patients unaware of screening were more likely diagnosed with late stage (ORstage III vs stage I (Ref) [95% CI]: 4.94 [3.45–7.07], p < 0.001), high grade (ORpoorly vs well-differentiated (reference): 1.53 [1.06–2.20], p = 0.022), nodal-positive, large size (OR>5cm vs ≤2cm (reference): 5.06 [3.10–8.25], p < 0.001), and HER2-positive tumours (ORHER2-negative vs HER2-positive (reference): 0.72 [0.53–0.97], p = 0.028). Similar trends were observed between screeners and non-screeners with smaller effect sizes. Overall survival was significantly shorter than screeners in the both groups (HRnon-screeners: 1.89 [1.22–2.94], p = 0.005; HRunaware: 2.90 [1.69–4.98], p < 0.001).
Non-screeners and those unaware were less health conscious, older, of Malay ethnicity, less highly educated, of lower socioeconomic status, more frequently ever smokers, and less physically active. Among screeners, there were more reported personal histories of benign breast surgeries or gynaecological conditions and positive family history of breast cancer.

Conclusions

Mammography attendance is associated with more favourable BC characteristics and overall survival. Disparities in the utility of MAM services suggest that different strategies may be needed to improve MAM uptake.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Humphrey, L., B.K.S. Chan, S. Detlefsen, and M. Helfand, in Screening for breast cancer. 2002: Rockville (MD). Humphrey, L., B.K.S. Chan, S. Detlefsen, and M. Helfand, in Screening for breast cancer. 2002: Rockville (MD).
12.
go back to reference (HBSS), H.B.S.S. (2021) Health Behaviour Surveillance Survey (HBSS): percentage of women aged 50 to 69 years who have gone for mammography in the last 2 years. (HBSS), H.B.S.S. (2021) Health Behaviour Surveillance Survey (HBSS): percentage of women aged 50 to 69 years who have gone for mammography in the last 2 years.
26.
go back to reference Ministry of Health and Health Promotion Board, S (2020) National Population Health Survey 2019. Ministry of Health and Health Promotion Board, S (2020) National Population Health Survey 2019.
31.
go back to reference Seetoh T, Siew WF, Koh A, Liau WF, Koh GC, Lee JJ, et al. Overcoming barriers to mammography screening: a quasi-randomised pragmatic trial in a community-based primary care setting. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2014;43(12):588–94.CrossRef Seetoh T, Siew WF, Koh A, Liau WF, Koh GC, Lee JJ, et al. Overcoming barriers to mammography screening: a quasi-randomised pragmatic trial in a community-based primary care setting. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2014;43(12):588–94.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Malhotra C, Bilger M, Liu J, Finkelstein E. Barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening in Singapore: a mixed methods analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(8):3887–95.PubMed Malhotra C, Bilger M, Liu J, Finkelstein E. Barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening in Singapore: a mixed methods analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(8):3887–95.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Seow A, Straughan PT, Ng EH, Emmanuel SC, Tan CH, Lee HP. Population-based mammographic screening in Singapore: what are participants’ views? Ann Acad Med Singap. 1998;27(2):154–60.PubMed Seow A, Straughan PT, Ng EH, Emmanuel SC, Tan CH, Lee HP. Population-based mammographic screening in Singapore: what are participants’ views? Ann Acad Med Singap. 1998;27(2):154–60.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Yabroff KR, Mandelblatt JS. Interventions targeted toward patients to increase mammography use. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8(9):749–57.PubMed Yabroff KR, Mandelblatt JS. Interventions targeted toward patients to increase mammography use. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8(9):749–57.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Mammography screening is associated with more favourable breast cancer tumour characteristics and better overall survival: case-only analysis of 3739 Asian breast cancer patients
Authors
Zi Lin Lim
Peh Joo Ho
Alexis Jiaying Khng
Yen Shing Yeoh
Amanda Tse Woon Ong
Benita Kiat Tee Tan
Ern Yu Tan
Su-Ming Tan
Geok Hoon Lim
Jung Ah Lee
Veronique Kiak-Mien Tan
Jesse Hu
Jingmei Li
Mikael Hartman
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medicine / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1741-7015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02440-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Medicine 1/2022 Go to the issue