Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Breast Cancer | Research

Coverage determinants of breast cancer screening in Flanders: an evaluation of the past decade

Authors: L. Ding, S. Jidkova, M. J. W. Greuter, K. Van Herck, M. Goossens, P. Martens, G. H. de Bock, G. Van Hal

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women in the developed world. In order to find developing cancers in an early stage, BC screening is commonly used. In Flanders, screening is performed in and outside an organized breast cancer screening program (BCSP). However, the determinants of BC screening coverage for both screening strategies are yet unknown.

Objective

To assess the determinants of BC screening coverage in Flanders.

Methods

Reimbursement data were used to attribute a screening status to each woman in the target population for the years 2008–2016. Yearly coverage data were categorized as screening inside or outside BCSP or no screening. Data were clustered by municipality level. A generalized linear equation model was used to assess the determinants of screening type.

Results

Over all years and municipalities, the median screening coverage rate inside and outside BCSP was 48.40% (IQR: 41.50–54.40%) and 14.10% (IQR: 9.80–19.80%) respectively. A higher coverage rate outside BSCP was statistically significantly (P < 0.001) associated with more crowded households (OR: 3.797, 95% CI: 3.199–4.508), younger age, higher population densities (OR: 2.528, 95% CI: 2.455–2.606), a lower proportion of unemployed job seekers (OR: 0.641, 95% CI: 0.624–0.658) and lower use of dental care (OR: 0.969, 95% CI: 0.967–0.972).

Conclusion

Coverage rate of BC screening is not optimal in Flanders. Women with low SES that are characterized by younger age, living in a high population density area, living in crowded households, or having low dental care are less likely to be screened for BC in Flanders. If screened, they are more likely to be screened outside the BCSP.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bray F, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries: global Cancer statistics 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. Bray F, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries: global Cancer statistics 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.
3.
go back to reference Myers ER, et al. Benefits and harms of breast Cancer screening: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015;314(15):1615–34.CrossRef Myers ER, et al. Benefits and harms of breast Cancer screening: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015;314(15):1615–34.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lauby-Secretan B, et al. Breast-Cancer screening — viewpoint of the IARC working group. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2353–8.CrossRef Lauby-Secretan B, et al. Breast-Cancer screening — viewpoint of the IARC working group. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2353–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Goossens M, et al. Quantifying independent risk factors for failing to rescreen in a breast cancer screening program in Flanders, Belgium. Prev Med. 2014;69:280–6.CrossRef Goossens M, et al. Quantifying independent risk factors for failing to rescreen in a breast cancer screening program in Flanders, Belgium. Prev Med. 2014;69:280–6.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Duport N. Characteristics of women using organized or opportunistic breast cancer screening in France. Analysis of the 2006 French health, health care and insurance survey. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2012;60(6):421–30.CrossRef Duport N. Characteristics of women using organized or opportunistic breast cancer screening in France. Analysis of the 2006 French health, health care and insurance survey. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2012;60(6):421–30.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Eichholzer M, et al. Breast cancer screening attendance in two Swiss regions dominated by opportunistic or organized screening. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):519.CrossRef Eichholzer M, et al. Breast cancer screening attendance in two Swiss regions dominated by opportunistic or organized screening. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):519.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Massat N, et al. Variation in cervical and breast cancer screening coverage in England: a cross-sectional analysis to characterise districts with atypical behaviour. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e007735.CrossRef Massat N, et al. Variation in cervical and breast cancer screening coverage in England: a cross-sectional analysis to characterise districts with atypical behaviour. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e007735.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Perry N, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(4):614–22.CrossRef Perry N, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(4):614–22.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Annual Report Population Screening for Cancer 2018. Center for Cancer detection-Belgian Cancer registry, Bruges, 2018. Annual Report Population Screening for Cancer 2018. Center for Cancer detection-Belgian Cancer registry, Bruges, 2018.
12.
go back to reference Sarma EA. Barriers to screening mammography. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(1):42–62.CrossRef Sarma EA. Barriers to screening mammography. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(1):42–62.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Katz D, et al. Patient and physician characteristics affect adherence to screening mammography: a population-based cohort study. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):12.CrossRef Katz D, et al. Patient and physician characteristics affect adherence to screening mammography: a population-based cohort study. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):12.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zackrisson S, et al. Non-attendance in breast cancer screening is associated with unfavourable socio-economic circumstances and advanced carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2004;108(5):754–60.CrossRef Zackrisson S, et al. Non-attendance in breast cancer screening is associated with unfavourable socio-economic circumstances and advanced carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2004;108(5):754–60.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jensen LF, et al. Identifying specific non-attending groups in breast cancer screening - population-based registry study of participation and socio-demography. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:9.CrossRef Jensen LF, et al. Identifying specific non-attending groups in breast cancer screening - population-based registry study of participation and socio-demography. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Smith D, et al. The breast cancer paradox: a systematic review of the association between area-level deprivation and breast cancer screening uptake in Europe. Cancer Epidemiol. 2019;60:77–85.CrossRef Smith D, et al. The breast cancer paradox: a systematic review of the association between area-level deprivation and breast cancer screening uptake in Europe. Cancer Epidemiol. 2019;60:77–85.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pornet C, et al. Socioeconomic and healthcare supply statistical determinants of compliance to mammography screening programs: a multilevel analysis in Calvados, France. Cancer Epidemiol. 2010;34(3):309–15.CrossRef Pornet C, et al. Socioeconomic and healthcare supply statistical determinants of compliance to mammography screening programs: a multilevel analysis in Calvados, France. Cancer Epidemiol. 2010;34(3):309–15.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zackrisson S, et al. Social predictors of non-attendance in an urban mammographic screening programme: a multilevel analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(5):548–54.CrossRef Zackrisson S, et al. Social predictors of non-attendance in an urban mammographic screening programme: a multilevel analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(5):548–54.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference von Euler-Chelpin M, et al. Socio-demographic determinants of participation in mammography screening. Int J Cancer. 2008;122(2):418–23.CrossRef von Euler-Chelpin M, et al. Socio-demographic determinants of participation in mammography screening. Int J Cancer. 2008;122(2):418–23.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Zha N, et al. Beyond Universal Health Care: Barriers to Breast Cancer Screening Participation in Canada. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019;16(4 Pt B):570–9.CrossRef Zha N, et al. Beyond Universal Health Care: Barriers to Breast Cancer Screening Participation in Canada. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019;16(4 Pt B):570–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Miles RC, et al. Chronic medical illness as a risk factor for poor mammography screening adherence. J Women's Health (Larchmt). 2019;28(10):1378–83. Miles RC, et al. Chronic medical illness as a risk factor for poor mammography screening adherence. J Women's Health (Larchmt). 2019;28(10):1378–83.
22.
go back to reference Ferrat E, et al. Understanding barriers to organized breast cancer screening in France: women's perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge. Fam Pract. 2013;30(4):445–51.CrossRef Ferrat E, et al. Understanding barriers to organized breast cancer screening in France: women's perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge. Fam Pract. 2013;30(4):445–51.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Van Oyen H, Verellen W. Breast cancer screening in the Flemish region, Belgium. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1994;3(Suppl 1):7–12.CrossRef Van Oyen H, Verellen W. Breast cancer screening in the Flemish region, Belgium. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1994;3(Suppl 1):7–12.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Willems B, Bracke P. The impact of regional screening policies on the diffusion of cancer screening participation in Belgium: time trends in educational inequalities in Flanders and Wallonia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):943.CrossRef Willems B, Bracke P. The impact of regional screening policies on the diffusion of cancer screening participation in Belgium: time trends in educational inequalities in Flanders and Wallonia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):943.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Goossens M, et al. Flemish breast cancer screening programme: 15 years of key performance indicators (2002-2016). BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):1012.CrossRef Goossens M, et al. Flemish breast cancer screening programme: 15 years of key performance indicators (2002-2016). BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):1012.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Portnov BA, Dubnov J, Barchana M. On ecological fallacy, assessment errors stemming from misguided variable selection, and the effect of aggregation on the outcome of epidemiological study. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007;17(1):106–21.CrossRef Portnov BA, Dubnov J, Barchana M. On ecological fallacy, assessment errors stemming from misguided variable selection, and the effect of aggregation on the outcome of epidemiological study. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007;17(1):106–21.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Giordano L, et al. Mammographic screening programmes in Europe: organization, coverage and participation. J Med Screen. 2012;19(Suppl 1):72–82.CrossRef Giordano L, et al. Mammographic screening programmes in Europe: organization, coverage and participation. J Med Screen. 2012;19(Suppl 1):72–82.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Jovicevic A, et al. Factors influencing participation in breast cancer opportunistic screening in Belgrade, Serbia. J Buon. 2018;23(3):706–12.PubMed Jovicevic A, et al. Factors influencing participation in breast cancer opportunistic screening in Belgrade, Serbia. J Buon. 2018;23(3):706–12.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Wouters M, Vleminckx F, Van Hal G. How to reach a higher participation rate for breast cancer screening in Flanders? Arch Public Health Brussels. 2006;64(2/3):109–21. Wouters M, Vleminckx F, Van Hal G. How to reach a higher participation rate for breast cancer screening in Flanders? Arch Public Health Brussels. 2006;64(2/3):109–21.
30.
go back to reference Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of innovations.5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003. Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of innovations.5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
31.
go back to reference Ouedraogo S, et al. Breast cancer screening programmes: challenging the coexistence with opportunistic mammography. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;97(3):410–7.CrossRef Ouedraogo S, et al. Breast cancer screening programmes: challenging the coexistence with opportunistic mammography. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;97(3):410–7.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Beaber EF, et al. Multilevel predictors of continued adherence to breast cancer screening among women ages 50-74 years in a screening population. J Women's Health. 2019;28(8):1051–59. Beaber EF, et al. Multilevel predictors of continued adherence to breast cancer screening among women ages 50-74 years in a screening population. J Women's Health. 2019;28(8):1051–59.
33.
go back to reference Zhu Z, et al. The impact of urban characteristics and residents’ income on commuting in China. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ. 2017;57:474–83.CrossRef Zhu Z, et al. The impact of urban characteristics and residents’ income on commuting in China. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ. 2017;57:474–83.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Melki IS, et al. Household crowding index: a correlate of socioeconomic status and inter-pregnancy spacing in an urban setting. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58(6):476.CrossRef Melki IS, et al. Household crowding index: a correlate of socioeconomic status and inter-pregnancy spacing in an urban setting. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58(6):476.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Lambert MJ, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in caries experience, care level and dental attendance in primary school children in Belgium: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2017;7(7):e015042.CrossRef Lambert MJ, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in caries experience, care level and dental attendance in primary school children in Belgium: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2017;7(7):e015042.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Kailembo A, et al. Income and wealth as correlates of socioeconomic disparity in dentist visits among adults aged 20 years and over in the United States, 2011–2014. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):147.CrossRef Kailembo A, et al. Income and wealth as correlates of socioeconomic disparity in dentist visits among adults aged 20 years and over in the United States, 2011–2014. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):147.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Jensen A, et al. Do nonattenders in mammography screening programmes seek mammography elsewhere? Int J Cancer. 2005;113(3):464–70.CrossRef Jensen A, et al. Do nonattenders in mammography screening programmes seek mammography elsewhere? Int J Cancer. 2005;113(3):464–70.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Guo Y, et al. Health literacy: a pathway to better oral health. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(7):e85–91.CrossRef Guo Y, et al. Health literacy: a pathway to better oral health. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(7):e85–91.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Collie-Akers VL, et al. Assessment of characteristics of capacity among breast cancer screening facilities. J Community Health. 2012;37(3):626–31.CrossRef Collie-Akers VL, et al. Assessment of characteristics of capacity among breast cancer screening facilities. J Community Health. 2012;37(3):626–31.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Elkin EB, et al. Changes in the availability of screening mammography, 2000-2010. Cancer. 2013;119(21):3847–53.CrossRef Elkin EB, et al. Changes in the availability of screening mammography, 2000-2010. Cancer. 2013;119(21):3847–53.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Russo L, Beauguitte L. Aggregation level matters: evidence from French electoral data. Qual Quant. 2014;48(2):923–38. Russo L, Beauguitte L. Aggregation level matters: evidence from French electoral data. Qual Quant. 2014;48(2):923–38.
Metadata
Title
Coverage determinants of breast cancer screening in Flanders: an evaluation of the past decade
Authors
L. Ding
S. Jidkova
M. J. W. Greuter
K. Van Herck
M. Goossens
P. Martens
G. H. de Bock
G. Van Hal
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01323-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2020 Go to the issue