Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Familial Cancer 3/2019

Open Access 01-07-2019 | Breast Cancer | Original Article

Moving into the mainstream: healthcare professionals’ views of implementing treatment focussed genetic testing in breast cancer care

Authors: Nina Hallowell, S. Wright, D. Stirling, C. Gourley, O. Young, M. Porteous

Published in: Familial Cancer | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

A proportion of breast cancers are attributable to BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Technological advances has meant that mutation testing in newly diagnosed cancer patients can be used to inform treatment plans. Although oncologists increasingly deliver treatment-focused genetic testing (TFGT) as part of mainstream ovarian cancer care, we know little about non-genetics specialists’ views about offering genetic testing to newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. This study sought to determine genetics and non-genetics specialists’ views of a proposal to mainstream BRCA1 and 2 testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Qualitative interview study. Nineteen healthcare professionals currently responsible for offering TFGT in a standard (triage + referral) pathway (breast surgeons + clinical genetics team) and oncologists preparing to offer TFGT to breast cancer patients in a mainstreamed pathway participated in in-depth interviews. Genetics and non-genetics professionals’ perceptions of mainstreaming are influenced by their views of: their clinical roles and responsibilities, the impact of TFGT on their workload and the patient pathway and the perceived relevance of genetic testing for patient care in the short-term. Perceived barriers to mainstreaming may be overcome by: more effective communication between specialities, clearer guidelines/patient pathways and the recruitment of mainstreaming champions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Claus EB, Schildkraut JM, Thompson WD et al (1996) The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer 77:2318–2324CrossRefPubMed Claus EB, Schildkraut JM, Thompson WD et al (1996) The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer 77:2318–2324CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Zhang S, Royer R, Li S et al (2011) Frequencies of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among 1,342 unselected patients with invasive ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 121:353–357CrossRefPubMed Zhang S, Royer R, Li S et al (2011) Frequencies of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among 1,342 unselected patients with invasive ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 121:353–357CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR et al (2017) Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA 317:2402–2416CrossRefPubMed Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR et al (2017) Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA 317:2402–2416CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Haffty BG, Harrold E, Khan AJ et al (2002) Outcome of conservatively managed early-onset breast cancer by BRCA1/2 status. Lancet 359:1471–1477CrossRefPubMed Haffty BG, Harrold E, Khan AJ et al (2002) Outcome of conservatively managed early-onset breast cancer by BRCA1/2 status. Lancet 359:1471–1477CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2013) Familial breast cancer: classification, care and managing breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast cancer. NICE guideline [CG164]. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2013) Familial breast cancer: classification, care and managing breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast cancer. NICE guideline [CG164]. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
6.
go back to reference George A, Kaye S, Banerjee S (2017) Delivering widespread BRCA testing and PARP inhibition to patients with ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14:284–296CrossRefPubMed George A, Kaye S, Banerjee S (2017) Delivering widespread BRCA testing and PARP inhibition to patients with ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14:284–296CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Telli ML, Jensen KC, Vinayak S, et a (2015) Phase II study of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and imiparib as neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative and BRCA1/2 mutation-associated breast cancer with assessment of a tumor-based measure of genomic instability: PrECOG 0105. J Clin Oncol 33:1895–1901CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Telli ML, Jensen KC, Vinayak S, et a (2015) Phase II study of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and imiparib as neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative and BRCA1/2 mutation-associated breast cancer with assessment of a tumor-based measure of genomic instability: PrECOG 0105. J Clin Oncol 33:1895–1901CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Davies SC (2017) Annual report of the Chief Medical Officer 2016, generation genome. Department of Health, London Davies SC (2017) Annual report of the Chief Medical Officer 2016, generation genome. Department of Health, London
12.
go back to reference Independent Cancer Taskforce (2015) Achieving world-class cancer outcomes a strategy for England 2015–2020 Independent Cancer Taskforce (2015) Achieving world-class cancer outcomes a strategy for England 2015–2020
16.
go back to reference Kentwell M, Dow E, Antill Y et al (2017) Mainstreaming cancer genetics: a model integrating germline BRCA testing into routine ovarian cancer clinics. Gynecol Oncol 145:130–136CrossRefPubMed Kentwell M, Dow E, Antill Y et al (2017) Mainstreaming cancer genetics: a model integrating germline BRCA testing into routine ovarian cancer clinics. Gynecol Oncol 145:130–136CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Maxwell JA (2012) Qualitative research design: an interactive approach, vol 41. Sage Publications, London Maxwell JA (2012) Qualitative research design: an interactive approach, vol 41. Sage Publications, London
25.
go back to reference Mikat-Stevens NA, Larson IA, Tarini BA (2015) Primary-care providers’ perceived barriers to integration of genetics services: a systematic review of the literature. Genet Med 17:169–176CrossRefPubMed Mikat-Stevens NA, Larson IA, Tarini BA (2015) Primary-care providers’ perceived barriers to integration of genetics services: a systematic review of the literature. Genet Med 17:169–176CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Robins R, Metcalfe S (2004) Integrating genetics as practices of primary care. Soc Sci Med 59:223–233CrossRefPubMed Robins R, Metcalfe S (2004) Integrating genetics as practices of primary care. Soc Sci Med 59:223–233CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Moving into the mainstream: healthcare professionals’ views of implementing treatment focussed genetic testing in breast cancer care
Authors
Nina Hallowell
S. Wright
D. Stirling
C. Gourley
O. Young
M. Porteous
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Familial Cancer / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1389-9600
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-019-00122-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Familial Cancer 3/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine