Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2022

23-09-2022 | Breast Cancer | Breast Oncology

Who Are We Missing: Does Engagement in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Breast Cancer Vary by Age, Race, or Disease Stage?

Authors: Marissa K. Srour, MD, Audree B. Tadros, MD, Varadan Sevilimedu, MBSS, DrPH, Jonas A. Nelson, MD, MPH, Jennifer R. Cracchiolo, MD, Taylor M. McCready, MPH, Nicholas Silva, BS, Tracy-Ann Moo, MD, Monica Morrow, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 13/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) are used to assess value-based care. Little is known as to whether PROM response in breast cancer reflects the diverse patient population. The BREAST-Q, a validated measure of satisfaction and quality of life, and Recovery Tracker, a postoperative assessment tool, are PROM routinely delivered to all patients undergoing breast surgery at our institution. Here we determine whether response to PROM differs by age, race, language, or disease stage.

Methods

All patients who had a breast operation between January 2020 and July 2021 were requested to complete the BREAST-Q and Recovery Tracker. Non-responders did not complete the PROM at any timepoint; responders completed 1 or more. Primary outcomes included rates of non-response versus response overall.

Results

Of 6374 patients identified, 5653 (88.7%) responded to either PROM [4366/4751 (91.9%) BREAST-Q; 2746/3384 (81.1%) Recovery Tracker]. On univariate analysis, non-responders were older (60 years versus 55 years, p < 0.001) and more often non-English speaking (p < 0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (p = 0.031), and Black race (p < 0.001), versus responders. On multivariate analysis, non-responders were significantly more often Black race and non-English speaking (p < 0.001). Non-English speakers were significantly less responsive among all ethnicities and races except Black race. Although breast cancer stage did not reach significance for response, patients with malignant disease and those receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy responded more often.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate high patient engagement using 2 different PROM following breast surgery, but suggest that PROM results may not reflect the experience of the entire breast cancer population. Care process changes based solely on PROM should consider these findings to ensure that the views of the entire spectrum of patients with breast cancer are represented.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cano S, Klassen AF, Scott A, Thoma A, Feeny D, Pusic A. Health outcome and economic measurement in breast cancer surgery: challenges and opportunities. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;10(5):583–94.CrossRefPubMed Cano S, Klassen AF, Scott A, Thoma A, Feeny D, Pusic A. Health outcome and economic measurement in breast cancer surgery: challenges and opportunities. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;10(5):583–94.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL. The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(2):293–302.CrossRefPubMed Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL. The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(2):293–302.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Chen CM, Cano SJ, Klassen AF, et al. Measuring quality of life in oncologic breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures. Breast J. 2010;16(6):587–97.CrossRefPubMed Chen CM, Cano SJ, Klassen AF, et al. Measuring quality of life in oncologic breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures. Breast J. 2010;16(6):587–97.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Tevis SE, James TA, Kuerer HM, et al. Patient-reported outcomes for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(10):2839–45.CrossRefPubMed Tevis SE, James TA, Kuerer HM, et al. Patient-reported outcomes for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(10):2839–45.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Efficace F, Fayers P, Pusic A, et al. Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting across cancer randomized controlled trials according to the CONSORT patient-reported outcome extension: a pooled analysis of 557 trials. Cancer. 2015;121(18):3335–42.CrossRefPubMed Efficace F, Fayers P, Pusic A, et al. Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting across cancer randomized controlled trials according to the CONSORT patient-reported outcome extension: a pooled analysis of 557 trials. Cancer. 2015;121(18):3335–42.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Basch E. Patient-reported outcomes—harnessing patients’ voices to improve clinical care. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(2):105–8.CrossRefPubMed Basch E. Patient-reported outcomes—harnessing patients’ voices to improve clinical care. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(2):105–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Atisha DM, Rushing CN, Samsa GP, et al. A national snapshot of satisfaction with breast cancer procedures. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(2):361–9.CrossRefPubMed Atisha DM, Rushing CN, Samsa GP, et al. A national snapshot of satisfaction with breast cancer procedures. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(2):361–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Johnson TP, Wislar JS. Response rates and nonresponse errors in surveys. JAMA. 2012;307(17):1805–6.CrossRefPubMed Johnson TP, Wislar JS. Response rates and nonresponse errors in surveys. JAMA. 2012;307(17):1805–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Neve OM, van Benthem PPG, Stiggelbout AM, Hensen EF. Response rate of patient reported outcomes: the delivery method matters. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021;21(1):220.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Neve OM, van Benthem PPG, Stiggelbout AM, Hensen EF. Response rate of patient reported outcomes: the delivery method matters. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021;21(1):220.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):345–53.CrossRefPubMed Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):345–53.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Simon BA, Assel MJ, Tin AL, et al. Association between electronic patient symptom reporting with alerts and potentially avoidable urgent care visits after ambulatory cancer surgery. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(8):740–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Simon BA, Assel MJ, Tin AL, et al. Association between electronic patient symptom reporting with alerts and potentially avoidable urgent care visits after ambulatory cancer surgery. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(8):740–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Kamin ST, Beyer A, Lang FR. Social support is associated with technology use in old age. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2020;53(3):256–62.CrossRefPubMed Kamin ST, Beyer A, Lang FR. Social support is associated with technology use in old age. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2020;53(3):256–62.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Albaba H, Barnes TA, Veitch Z, et al. Acceptability of routine evaluations using patient-reported outcomes of common terminology criteria for adverse events and other patient-reported symptom outcome tools in cancer outpatients: princess Margaret cancer Centre experience. Oncologist. 2019;24(11):e1219–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Albaba H, Barnes TA, Veitch Z, et al. Acceptability of routine evaluations using patient-reported outcomes of common terminology criteria for adverse events and other patient-reported symptom outcome tools in cancer outpatients: princess Margaret cancer Centre experience. Oncologist. 2019;24(11):e1219–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Hutchings A, Neuburger J, Grosse Frie K, Black N, van der Meulen J. Factors associated with non-response in routine use of patient reported outcome measures after elective surgery in England. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hutchings A, Neuburger J, Grosse Frie K, Black N, van der Meulen J. Factors associated with non-response in routine use of patient reported outcome measures after elective surgery in England. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference King-Kallimanis BL, Kanapuru B, Blumenthal GM, Theoret MR, Kluetz PG. Age-related differences in patient-reported outcomes in patients with advanced lung cancer receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Semin Oncol. 2018;45(4):201–9.CrossRefPubMed King-Kallimanis BL, Kanapuru B, Blumenthal GM, Theoret MR, Kluetz PG. Age-related differences in patient-reported outcomes in patients with advanced lung cancer receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Semin Oncol. 2018;45(4):201–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Vogel MME, Eitz KA, Combs SE. Web-based patient self-reported outcome after radiotherapy in adolescents and young adults with cancer: survey on acceptance of digital tools. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9(1):e19727.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vogel MME, Eitz KA, Combs SE. Web-based patient self-reported outcome after radiotherapy in adolescents and young adults with cancer: survey on acceptance of digital tools. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9(1):e19727.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Withycombe JS, McFatrich M, Pinheiro L, et al. The association of age, literacy, and race on completing patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric oncology. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(7):1793–801.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Withycombe JS, McFatrich M, Pinheiro L, et al. The association of age, literacy, and race on completing patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric oncology. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(7):1793–801.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Winters ZE, Benson JR, Pusic AL. A systematic review of the clinical evidence to guide treatment recommendations in breast reconstruction based on patient-reported outcome measures and health-related quality of life. Ann Surg. 2010;252(6):929–42.CrossRefPubMed Winters ZE, Benson JR, Pusic AL. A systematic review of the clinical evidence to guide treatment recommendations in breast reconstruction based on patient-reported outcome measures and health-related quality of life. Ann Surg. 2010;252(6):929–42.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Fuzesi S, Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Atisha D, Pusic AL. Validation of the electronic version of the BREAST-Q in the army of women study. Breast. 2017;33:44–9.CrossRefPubMed Fuzesi S, Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Atisha D, Pusic AL. Validation of the electronic version of the BREAST-Q in the army of women study. Breast. 2017;33:44–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kozlov N, Benzon HT. Role of gender and race in patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction. Anesthesiol Clin. 2020;38(2):417–31.CrossRefPubMed Kozlov N, Benzon HT. Role of gender and race in patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction. Anesthesiol Clin. 2020;38(2):417–31.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Who Are We Missing: Does Engagement in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Breast Cancer Vary by Age, Race, or Disease Stage?
Authors
Marissa K. Srour, MD
Audree B. Tadros, MD
Varadan Sevilimedu, MBSS, DrPH
Jonas A. Nelson, MD, MPH
Jennifer R. Cracchiolo, MD
Taylor M. McCready, MPH
Nicholas Silva, BS
Tracy-Ann Moo, MD
Monica Morrow, MD
Publication date
23-09-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 13/2022
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12477-1

Other articles of this Issue 13/2022

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2022 Go to the issue