Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 4/2023

11-01-2023 | Breast Cancer

The Characteristics of Asian American Breast Cancer Survivors with Low Quality of Life: a Decision Tree Analysis

Authors: Eun-Ok Im, Jee-Seon Yi, Wonshik Chee

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 4/2023

Login to get access

Abstract 

To provide appropriate and adequate information and support for Asian American breast cancer survivors, it would be essential to identify risk groups among them to target in future cancer education interventions. In this secondary analysis, the characteristics of risk groups within Asian American breast cancer survivors who had low quality of life were identified using a decision tree analysis. For this analysis, only the pre-test data of 185 women from a parent study were selected. Multiple instruments including the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) were used in the parent study. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics and decision tree analyses. The decision tree analyses showed six combined characteristics associated with lower quality of life scores than the total mean quality of life scores. For instance, the women with lower quality of life scores (than the total mean quality of life scores) had high perceived barriers (cut point = 1.84), low self-efficacy for coping (cut point = 81.50), and high global symptom distress (cut point = 2.27). Also, the characteristics linked to the lowest quality life scores were different depending on the dimensions of the quality of life. The characteristics associated with the quality of life of Asian American breast cancer survivors need to be considered in future education programs for this specific population.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
go back to reference Chlebowski RT, Chen Z, Anderson GL, Rohan T, Aragaki A, Lane D, Dolan ND, Paskett ED, McTiernan A, Alan Hubbell F, Adams-Campbell LL, Prentice R (2005) Ethnicity and breast cancer: factors influencing differences in incidence and outcome. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(6):439–448. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji064CrossRefPubMed Chlebowski RT, Chen Z, Anderson GL, Rohan T, Aragaki A, Lane D, Dolan ND, Paskett ED, McTiernan A, Alan Hubbell F, Adams-Campbell LL, Prentice R (2005) Ethnicity and breast cancer: factors influencing differences in incidence and outcome. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(6):439–448. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​jnci/​dji064CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Im EO, Lee EO, Park YS (2002) Korean women’s breast cancer experience. Western J Nurs Res 24(7):751–765 (discussion 766-771)CrossRef Im EO, Lee EO, Park YS (2002) Korean women’s breast cancer experience. Western J Nurs Res 24(7):751–765 (discussion 766-771)CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dodd M, Janson S, Facione N et al (2001) Advancing the science of symptom management. J Adv Nurs 33(5):668–676CrossRefPubMed Dodd M, Janson S, Facione N et al (2001) Advancing the science of symptom management. J Adv Nurs 33(5):668–676CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Weinert C (2003) Measuring social support: PRQ2000. In: Strickland O, DiIorio C (eds) Measurement of nursing outcomes, vol 3. Self care and coping. Springer, New York, pp 161–172 Weinert C (2003) Measuring social support: PRQ2000. In: Strickland O, DiIorio C (eds) Measurement of nursing outcomes, vol 3. Self care and coping. Springer, New York, pp 161–172
19.
go back to reference Boyes A, Girgis A, Lecathelinais C (2009) Brief assessment of adult cancer patients’ perceived needs: development and validation of the 34-item Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-SF34). J Eval Clin Pract 15(4):602–606CrossRefPubMed Boyes A, Girgis A, Lecathelinais C (2009) Brief assessment of adult cancer patients’ perceived needs: development and validation of the 34-item Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-SF34). J Eval Clin Pract 15(4):602–606CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Chang VT, Hwang SS, Feuerman M, Kasimis BS, Thaler HT (2000) The memorial symptom assessment scale short form (MSAS-SF). Cancer 89(5):1162–1171CrossRefPubMed Chang VT, Hwang SS, Feuerman M, Kasimis BS, Thaler HT (2000) The memorial symptom assessment scale short form (MSAS-SF). Cancer 89(5):1162–1171CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, Bonomi AE, Tulsky DS, Lloyd SR, Deasy S, Cobleigh M, Shiomoto G (1997) Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol 15(3):974–986CrossRefPubMed Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, Bonomi AE, Tulsky DS, Lloyd SR, Deasy S, Cobleigh M, Shiomoto G (1997) Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol 15(3):974–986CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84(2):191–215CrossRefPubMed Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84(2):191–215CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Characteristics of Asian American Breast Cancer Survivors with Low Quality of Life: a Decision Tree Analysis
Authors
Eun-Ok Im
Jee-Seon Yi
Wonshik Chee
Publication date
11-01-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 4/2023
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-022-02260-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2023

Journal of Cancer Education 4/2023 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine