Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Breast Cancer | Research

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the stressors in breast cancer scale: a translation and validation study

Authors: Wenqi Hu, Jiahui Bao, Xiaolin Yang, Mao Ye

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To translate the Stressors in Breast Cancer Scale (SBCS) from English to Chinese and assess its psychometric properties.

Methods

The Brislin’s translation model was applied to perform forward translation, back translation, cross-cultural adaptation, Whereas the Chinese version of the SBCS was formed by conducting pre-testing. A cohort of 878 breast cancer patients participated in this methodological study. Content validity, construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and criterion-related validity were used to establish validity. Internal consistency reliability, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability were used to establish reliability.

Results

The final scale contained five dimensions and 24 items, including interpersonal relationship and healthcare strains, worries and concerns about the future, physical appearance and sex strains, daily difficulties and health. The average content validity index of the scale was 0.975. The goodness-of-fit index (χ2/DF = 2.416, RMSEA = 0.057, GFI = 0.896, CFI = 0.947, IFI = 0.947, and TLI = 0.939) indicated that the model was well-fitted. The composite reliability (CR) of the dimensions ranged from 0.825 to 0.934, the average variance extracted (AVE) ranged from 0.539 to 0.712, and the correlation coefficients of each dimension with the other dimensions were less than the square root of the AVE for that dimension. The Criterion-related validity was 0.511. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.938, and the dimensions ranged from 0.779 to 0.900. Split-half reliability was 0.853, with dimensions ranging from 0.761 to 0.892. Test-retest reliability was 0.855.

Conclusions

The Chinese version of the SBCS has good reliability and validity, which can be applied to the assessment of stressors in breast cancer patients in China.
Literature
10.
go back to reference Cox T, Griffiths A. Work-related stress: a theoretical perspective. In: Leka S, Houdmont J, editors. Occupational Health Psychology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. pp. 31–56. Cox T, Griffiths A. Work-related stress: a theoretical perspective. In: Leka S, Houdmont J, editors. Occupational Health Psychology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. pp. 31–56.
11.
go back to reference Biggs A, Brough P, Drummond S. Lazarus and Folkman’s psychological stress and coping theory. In: Cooper CL, Quick J, editors. The Handbook of Stress and Health: a guide to Research and Practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2017. pp. 351–64. Biggs A, Brough P, Drummond S. Lazarus and Folkman’s psychological stress and coping theory. In: Cooper CL, Quick J, editors. The Handbook of Stress and Health: a guide to Research and Practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2017. pp. 351–64.
13.
go back to reference Koh KB. Stress and somatic symptoms: Biopsychosociospiritual perspectives. Cham Springer; 2018. Koh KB. Stress and somatic symptoms: Biopsychosociospiritual perspectives. Cham Springer; 2018.
21.
go back to reference Herschbach P, Marten-Mittag B, Henrich G. Revision und psychometrische Prüfung Des Fragebogen Zur Belastung Von Krebskranken (FBK-R23). Z. Med. Psychol. 2003;12:69–76. Herschbach P, Marten-Mittag B, Henrich G. Revision und psychometrische Prüfung Des Fragebogen Zur Belastung Von Krebskranken (FBK-R23). Z. Med. Psychol. 2003;12:69–76.
27.
go back to reference Charalampopoulou M, Syrigos K, Filopoulos E, et al. Reliability and validity of the newly diagnosed breast Cancer stress scale in the Greek Population. J Mol Biochem. 2020;9:5–12.PubMedPubMedCentral Charalampopoulou M, Syrigos K, Filopoulos E, et al. Reliability and validity of the newly diagnosed breast Cancer stress scale in the Greek Population. J Mol Biochem. 2020;9:5–12.PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385–96.CrossRefPubMed Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385–96.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the stressors in breast cancer scale: a translation and validation study
Authors
Wenqi Hu
Jiahui Bao
Xiaolin Yang
Mao Ye
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18000-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Public Health 1/2024 Go to the issue