Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Breast Cancer | Breast Oncology

Long-Term Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life After Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Prospective Study Using the BREAST-Q

Authors: Ilona Stolpner, MD, Jörg Heil, MD, Fabian Riedel, MD, Markus Wallwiener, MD, Benedikt Schäfgen, MD, Manuel Feißt, MSc, Michael Golatta, MD, André Hennigs, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 13/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Poor patient-reported satisfaction after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) has been associated with impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and subsequent depression in retrospective analysis. This prospective cohort study aimed to assess the HRQOL of patients who have undergone BCT using the BREAST-Q, and to identify clinical risk factors for lower patient satisfaction.

Methods

Patients with primary breast cancer undergoing BCT were asked to complete the BREAST-Q preoperatively (T1) for baseline evaluation, then 3 to 4 weeks postoperatively (T2), and finally 1 year after surgery (T3). Clinicopathologic data were extracted from the patients’ charts. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine significant differences in mean satisfaction and well-being levels among the test intervals. Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate risk factors for lower satisfaction.

Results

The study enrolled 250 patients. The lowest baseline BREAST-Q score was reported for “satisfaction with breast” (mean, 61 ± 19), but this increased postoperatively (mean, 66 ± 18) and was maintained at the 1 year follow-up evaluation (mean, 67 ± 21). “Physical well-being” decreased from T1 (mean, 82 ± 17) to T2 (mean, 28 ± 13) and did not recover much by T3 (mean, 33 ± 13), being the lowest BREAST-Q score postoperatively and in the 1-year follow-up evaluation. In multiple regression, baseline psychosocial well-being, body mass index (BMI), and type of incision were risk factors for lower “satisfaction with breasts.”

Conclusion

Both the aesthetic/surgery-related and psychological aspects are equally important with regard to “satisfaction with breasts” after BCT. The data could serve as the benchmark for future studies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.PubMedCrossRef Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mols F, Vingerhoets AJ, Coebergh JW, van de Poll-Franse LV. Quality of life among long-term breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:2613–9.PubMedCrossRef Mols F, Vingerhoets AJ, Coebergh JW, van de Poll-Franse LV. Quality of life among long-term breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:2613–9.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Quinten C, Coens C, Mauer M, et al. Baseline quality of life as a prognostic indicator of survival: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from EORTC clinical trials. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:865–71.PubMedCrossRef Quinten C, Coens C, Mauer M, et al. Baseline quality of life as a prognostic indicator of survival: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from EORTC clinical trials. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:865–71.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gupta D, Granick J, Grutsch JF, Lis CG. The prognostic association of health-related quality of life scores with survival in breast cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15:387–93.PubMedCrossRef Gupta D, Granick J, Grutsch JF, Lis CG. The prognostic association of health-related quality of life scores with survival in breast cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15:387–93.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Luckett T, Butow P, King M. Improving patient outcomes through the routine use of patient-reported data in cancer clinics: future directions. Psycho-oncol J Psychol Soc Behav Dimenons Cancer. 2009;18:1129–38. Luckett T, Butow P, King M. Improving patient outcomes through the routine use of patient-reported data in cancer clinics: future directions. Psycho-oncol J Psychol Soc Behav Dimenons Cancer. 2009;18:1129–38.
6.
go back to reference Heil J, Czink E, Golatta M, et al. Change of aesthetic and functional outcome over time and their relationship to quality of life after breast conserving therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:116–21.PubMedCrossRef Heil J, Czink E, Golatta M, et al. Change of aesthetic and functional outcome over time and their relationship to quality of life after breast conserving therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:116–21.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Waljee JF, Hu ES, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3331–7.PubMedCrossRef Waljee JF, Hu ES, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3331–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kawase K, Dimaio DJ, Tucker SL, et al. Paget’s disease of the breast: there is a role for breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:391–7.PubMedCrossRef Kawase K, Dimaio DJ, Tucker SL, et al. Paget’s disease of the breast: there is a role for breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:391–7.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference DeSalvo KB, Bloser N, Reynolds K, He J, Muntner P. Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:267.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef DeSalvo KB, Bloser N, Reynolds K, He J, Muntner P. Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:267.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hawkins M, Elsworth GR, Osborne RH. Application of validity theory and methodology to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): building an argument for validity. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1695–710.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hawkins M, Elsworth GR, Osborne RH. Application of validity theory and methodology to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): building an argument for validity. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1695–710.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Golden-Kreutz DM, Thornton LM, Gregorio W-D, et al. Traumatic stress, perceived global stress, and life events: prospectively predicting quality of life in breast cancer patients. Health Psychol. 2005;24:288.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Golden-Kreutz DM, Thornton LM, Gregorio W-D, et al. Traumatic stress, perceived global stress, and life events: prospectively predicting quality of life in breast cancer patients. Health Psychol. 2005;24:288.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Carver CS, Smith RG, Petronis VM, Antoni MH. Quality of life among long-term survivors of breast cancer: different types of antecedents predict different classes of outcomes. Psycho-oncol J Psychol Soc Behav Dimensions Cancer. 2006;15:749–58. Carver CS, Smith RG, Petronis VM, Antoni MH. Quality of life among long-term survivors of breast cancer: different types of antecedents predict different classes of outcomes. Psycho-oncol J Psychol Soc Behav Dimensions Cancer. 2006;15:749–58.
13.
go back to reference Härtl K, Engel J, Herschbach P, Reinecker H, Sommer H, Friese K. Personality traits and psychosocial stress: quality of life over 2 years following breast cancer diagnosis and psychological impact factors. Psycho-oncol J Psychol Soc Behav Dimens Cancer. 2010;19:160–9. Härtl K, Engel J, Herschbach P, Reinecker H, Sommer H, Friese K. Personality traits and psychosocial stress: quality of life over 2 years following breast cancer diagnosis and psychological impact factors. Psycho-oncol J Psychol Soc Behav Dimens Cancer. 2010;19:160–9.
14.
go back to reference Casebeer AW, Drzayich Antol D, Hopson S, et al. Using the healthy days measure to assess factors associated with poor health-related quality of life for patients with metastatic breast, lung, or colorectal cancer enrolled in a Medicare Advantage health plan. Popul Health Manag. 2019;2:19. Casebeer AW, Drzayich Antol D, Hopson S, et al. Using the healthy days measure to assess factors associated with poor health-related quality of life for patients with metastatic breast, lung, or colorectal cancer enrolled in a Medicare Advantage health plan. Popul Health Manag. 2019;2:19.
15.
go back to reference Rautalin M, Färkkilä N, Sintonen H, et al. Health-related quality of life in different states of breast cancer: comparing different instruments. Acta Oncol. 2018;57:622–8.PubMedCrossRef Rautalin M, Färkkilä N, Sintonen H, et al. Health-related quality of life in different states of breast cancer: comparing different instruments. Acta Oncol. 2018;57:622–8.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nguyen T, Seib C, Anderson D, Yate P. Lifestyle factors and health-related quality of life in Vietnamese women after cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2018;6:1698. Nguyen T, Seib C, Anderson D, Yate P. Lifestyle factors and health-related quality of life in Vietnamese women after cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2018;6:1698.
17.
go back to reference Kugbey N, Meyer-Weitz A, Asante KO. Access to health information, health literacy, and health-related quality of life among women living with breast cancer: depression and anxiety as mediators. Patient Educ Counsel. 2019;102:1357–63.CrossRef Kugbey N, Meyer-Weitz A, Asante KO. Access to health information, health literacy, and health-related quality of life among women living with breast cancer: depression and anxiety as mediators. Patient Educ Counsel. 2019;102:1357–63.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hennigs A, Biehl H, Rauch G, et al. Change of patient-reported aesthetic outcome over time and identification of factors characterizing poor aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving therapy: long-term results of a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1744–51.PubMedCrossRef Hennigs A, Biehl H, Rauch G, et al. Change of patient-reported aesthetic outcome over time and identification of factors characterizing poor aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving therapy: long-term results of a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1744–51.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Howell D, Molloy S, Wilkinson K, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1846–58.PubMedCrossRef Howell D, Molloy S, Wilkinson K, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1846–58.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:345–53.PubMedCrossRef Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:345–53.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cohen WA, Mundy LR, Ballard TN, et al. The BREAST-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009–2015. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:149–62.PubMedCrossRef Cohen WA, Mundy LR, Ballard TN, et al. The BREAST-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009–2015. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:149–62.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Stolpner I, Heil J, Feißt M, et al. Clinical validation of the BREAST-Q breast-conserving therapy module. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;3:79. Stolpner I, Heil J, Feißt M, et al. Clinical validation of the BREAST-Q breast-conserving therapy module. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;3:79.
23.
go back to reference Klassen AF, Dominici L, Fuzesi S, et al. Development and validation of the BREAST-Q breast-conserving therapy module. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;69:1–10. Klassen AF, Dominici L, Fuzesi S, et al. Development and validation of the BREAST-Q breast-conserving therapy module. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;69:1–10.
24.
25.
go back to reference Builes RS, Acea NB, García NA, Cereijo C, Bouzón A, Mosquera OJ. Evaluation of the preoperative perception of quality of life and satisfaction of women with breast cancer using the BREAST-QTM questionnaire. Cirugia Espanola. 2019;3:71. Builes RS, Acea NB, García NA, Cereijo C, Bouzón A, Mosquera OJ. Evaluation of the preoperative perception of quality of life and satisfaction of women with breast cancer using the BREAST-QTM questionnaire. Cirugia Espanola. 2019;3:71.
26.
go back to reference Jay M, Creelman B, Baliski C. Patient-reported outcomes associated with surgical intervention for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2019;3:79. Jay M, Creelman B, Baliski C. Patient-reported outcomes associated with surgical intervention for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2019;3:79.
27.
go back to reference Lagendijk M, van Egdom L, Richel C, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in breast cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:963–8.PubMedCrossRef Lagendijk M, van Egdom L, Richel C, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in breast cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:963–8.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Dahlback C, Ullmark JH, Rehn M, Ringberg A, Manjer J. Aesthetic result after breast-conserving therapy is associated with quality of life several years after treatment: Swedish women evaluated with BCCT.core and BREAST-Q. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;164:679–87.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Dahlback C, Ullmark JH, Rehn M, Ringberg A, Manjer J. Aesthetic result after breast-conserving therapy is associated with quality of life several years after treatment: Swedish women evaluated with BCCT.core and BREAST-Q. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;164:679–87.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Fuzesi S, Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Atisha D, Pusic AL. Validation of the electronic version of the BREAST-Q in the army of women study. Breast. 2017;33:44–9.PubMedCrossRef Fuzesi S, Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Atisha D, Pusic AL. Validation of the electronic version of the BREAST-Q in the army of women study. Breast. 2017;33:44–9.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference O’Connell RL, DiMicco R, Khabra K, et al. Initial experience of the BREAST-Q breast-conserving therapy module. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;160:79–89.PubMedCrossRef O’Connell RL, DiMicco R, Khabra K, et al. Initial experience of the BREAST-Q breast-conserving therapy module. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;160:79–89.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hoffmann J, Wallwiener D. Classifying breast cancer surgery: a novel, complexity-based system for oncological, oncoplastic, and reconstructive procedures, and proof of principle by analysis of 1225 operations in 1166 patients. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:1–9.CrossRef Hoffmann J, Wallwiener D. Classifying breast cancer surgery: a novel, complexity-based system for oncological, oncoplastic, and reconstructive procedures, and proof of principle by analysis of 1225 operations in 1166 patients. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:1–9.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Krzos A, Stanisławek A, Jędrych M, Łuczyk M, Ślusarska B. Satisfaction with the aesthetic effect and quality of life for women after breast conserving therapy (BCT): preliminary research. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:4682.PubMedCentralCrossRef Krzos A, Stanisławek A, Jędrych M, Łuczyk M, Ślusarska B. Satisfaction with the aesthetic effect and quality of life for women after breast conserving therapy (BCT): preliminary research. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:4682.PubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Dolen U, Thornton M, Tenenbaum MM, et al. A prospective cohort study to analyze the interaction of tumor-to-breast volume in breast conservation therapy versus mastectomy with reconstruction. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;181:611–21.PubMedCrossRef Dolen U, Thornton M, Tenenbaum MM, et al. A prospective cohort study to analyze the interaction of tumor-to-breast volume in breast conservation therapy versus mastectomy with reconstruction. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;181:611–21.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Hennigs A, Biehl H, Rauch G, et al. Change of patient-reported aesthetic outcome over time and identification of factors characterizing poor aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving therapy: long-term results of a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1744–51.PubMedCrossRef Hennigs A, Biehl H, Rauch G, et al. Change of patient-reported aesthetic outcome over time and identification of factors characterizing poor aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving therapy: long-term results of a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1744–51.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Heil J, Riedel F, Golatta M, Hennigs A. Measurement and optimizing cosmetic outcomes for breast excisions/factors influencing aesthetic outcomes of breast conservation surgery. Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Techniques for the General Surgeon. 2020;5:93–106.CrossRef Heil J, Riedel F, Golatta M, Hennigs A. Measurement and optimizing cosmetic outcomes for breast excisions/factors influencing aesthetic outcomes of breast conservation surgery. Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Techniques for the General Surgeon. 2020;5:93–106.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Kaviani A, Sodagari N, Sheikhbahaei S, et al. From radical mastectomy to breast-conserving therapy and oncoplastic breast surgery: a narrative review comparing oncological result, cosmetic outcome, quality of life, and health economy. ISRN Oncol. 2013;2013:742462.PubMedPubMedCentral Kaviani A, Sodagari N, Sheikhbahaei S, et al. From radical mastectomy to breast-conserving therapy and oncoplastic breast surgery: a narrative review comparing oncological result, cosmetic outcome, quality of life, and health economy. ISRN Oncol. 2013;2013:742462.PubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Atisha DM, Rushing CN, Samsa GP, et al. A national snapshot of satisfaction with breast cancer procedures. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:361–9.PubMedCrossRef Atisha DM, Rushing CN, Samsa GP, et al. A national snapshot of satisfaction with breast cancer procedures. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:361–9.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Rojas K, Matthews N, Raker C, et al. Body mass index (BMI), postoperative appearance satisfaction, and sexual function in breast cancer survivorship. J Cancer Survivorship. 2018;12:127–33.CrossRef Rojas K, Matthews N, Raker C, et al. Body mass index (BMI), postoperative appearance satisfaction, and sexual function in breast cancer survivorship. J Cancer Survivorship. 2018;12:127–33.CrossRef
39.
40.
go back to reference Carver CS, Smith RG, Antoni MH, Petronis VM, Weiss S, Derhagopian RP. Optimistic personality and psychosocial well-being during treatment predict psychosocial well-being among long-term survivors of breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2005;24:508.PubMedCrossRef Carver CS, Smith RG, Antoni MH, Petronis VM, Weiss S, Derhagopian RP. Optimistic personality and psychosocial well-being during treatment predict psychosocial well-being among long-term survivors of breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2005;24:508.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Weiss LA, Westerhof GJ, Bohlmeijer ET. Can we increase psychological well-being? The effects of interventions on psychological well-being: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PloS One. 2016;11:6985.CrossRef Weiss LA, Westerhof GJ, Bohlmeijer ET. Can we increase psychological well-being? The effects of interventions on psychological well-being: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PloS One. 2016;11:6985.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Hudson NW, Fraley RC. Changing for the better? Longitudinal associations between volitional personality change and psychological well-being. Person Soc Psychol Bull. 2016;42:603–15.CrossRef Hudson NW, Fraley RC. Changing for the better? Longitudinal associations between volitional personality change and psychological well-being. Person Soc Psychol Bull. 2016;42:603–15.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Euhus DM, Addae JK, Snyder CF, Canner JK. Change in health-related quality of life in older women after diagnosis of a small breast cancer. Cancer. 2019;125:1807–14.PubMedCrossRef Euhus DM, Addae JK, Snyder CF, Canner JK. Change in health-related quality of life in older women after diagnosis of a small breast cancer. Cancer. 2019;125:1807–14.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Bolier L, Haverman M, Westerhof GJ, Riper H, Smit F, Bohlmeijer E. Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:119.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bolier L, Haverman M, Westerhof GJ, Riper H, Smit F, Bohlmeijer E. Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:119.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Trudel-Fitzgerald C, Millstein RA, von Hippel C, et al. Psychological well-being as part of the public health debate? Insight into dimensions, interventions, and policy. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1–11.CrossRef Trudel-Fitzgerald C, Millstein RA, von Hippel C, et al. Psychological well-being as part of the public health debate? Insight into dimensions, interventions, and policy. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1–11.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Gardfjell A, Dahlbäck C, Åhsberg K. Patient satisfaction after unilateral oncoplastic volume displacement surgery for breast cancer, evaluated with the BREAST-Q. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17:96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gardfjell A, Dahlbäck C, Åhsberg K. Patient satisfaction after unilateral oncoplastic volume displacement surgery for breast cancer, evaluated with the BREAST-Q. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17:96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Howes BH, Watson DI, Xu C, Fosh B, Canepa M, Dean NR. Quality of life following total mastectomy with and without reconstruction versus breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: a case-controlled cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:1184–91.PubMedCrossRef Howes BH, Watson DI, Xu C, Fosh B, Canepa M, Dean NR. Quality of life following total mastectomy with and without reconstruction versus breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: a case-controlled cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:1184–91.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Aerts L, Christiaens MR, Enzlin P, Neven P, Amant F. Sexual functioning in women after mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer: a prospective controlled study. Breast. 2014;23:629–36.PubMedCrossRef Aerts L, Christiaens MR, Enzlin P, Neven P, Amant F. Sexual functioning in women after mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer: a prospective controlled study. Breast. 2014;23:629–36.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Gass JS, Onstad M, Pesek S, et al. Breast-specific sensuality and sexual function in cancer survivorship: does surgical modality matter? Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:3133–40.PubMedCrossRef Gass JS, Onstad M, Pesek S, et al. Breast-specific sensuality and sexual function in cancer survivorship: does surgical modality matter? Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:3133–40.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Sepucha KR, Langford AT, Belkora JK, et al. Impact of timing on measurement of decision quality and shared decision-making: longitudinal cohort study of breast cancer patients. Med Decis Making. 2019;39:642–50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sepucha KR, Langford AT, Belkora JK, et al. Impact of timing on measurement of decision quality and shared decision-making: longitudinal cohort study of breast cancer patients. Med Decis Making. 2019;39:642–50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Schrager S, Ovsepyan V, Burnside E. Breast cancer screening in older women: the importance of shared decision-making. J Am Board Fam Med. 2020;33:473–80.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Schrager S, Ovsepyan V, Burnside E. Breast cancer screening in older women: the importance of shared decision-making. J Am Board Fam Med. 2020;33:473–80.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Ganz PA, Balogh E. Delivering high-quality cancer care: charting a new course for a system in crisis. Washington, DC: Inst Med Natl Acad; 2013. Ganz PA, Balogh E. Delivering high-quality cancer care: charting a new course for a system in crisis. Washington, DC: Inst Med Natl Acad; 2013.
54.
go back to reference Kehl KL, Landrum MB, Arora NK, et al. Association of actual and preferred decision roles with patient-reported quality of care: shared decision-making in cancer care. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:50–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kehl KL, Landrum MB, Arora NK, et al. Association of actual and preferred decision roles with patient-reported quality of care: shared decision-making in cancer care. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:50–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Catsman CJ, Beek MA, Voogd AC, Mulder PG, Luiten EJ. The COSMAM trial: a prospective cohort study of quality of life and cosmetic outcome in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:456.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Catsman CJ, Beek MA, Voogd AC, Mulder PG, Luiten EJ. The COSMAM trial: a prospective cohort study of quality of life and cosmetic outcome in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:456.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Smith TM, Ratcliff K, Perry RA. Experiences with a cognitive rehabilitation program for five female breast cancer survivors: a focus group study. Ann Int Occup Ther. 2019;2:152–9.CrossRef Smith TM, Ratcliff K, Perry RA. Experiences with a cognitive rehabilitation program for five female breast cancer survivors: a focus group study. Ann Int Occup Ther. 2019;2:152–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Long-Term Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life After Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Prospective Study Using the BREAST-Q
Authors
Ilona Stolpner, MD
Jörg Heil, MD
Fabian Riedel, MD
Markus Wallwiener, MD
Benedikt Schäfgen, MD
Manuel Feißt, MSc
Michael Golatta, MD
André Hennigs, MD
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 13/2021
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10377-4

Other articles of this Issue 13/2021

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2021 Go to the issue