Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 2/2022

01-02-2022 | Breast Cancer | Original Paper

Identify factors for insufficient (> 2 yr) mammogram screening among Oregonian women

Authors: Zhenzhen Zhang, Grace Curran, Kenneth Xu, Jeong Youn Lim, Paige E. Farris, Jackilen Shannon

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Women with breast cancer diagnosed from mammogram screenings have a lower mortality risk than women diagnosed from symptoms. Currently, the U.S Preventive Services Task Force recommends biannual screening for women aged 50–74 years old. In this study, we aimed to identify factors associated with inadequate screening defined as “no mammogram screening within past 2 years” to guide cancer prevention and early detection efforts.

Methods

This study utilized area-based probabilistic sampling survey data, collected across Oregon in 2019. Dataset weights were calculated using a raking approach. Demographic and behavior information were collected with existing validated questionnaire items from national surveys. Weighted multivariable logistic regression analyses with missing-value imputations were conducted to identify factors associated with inadequate mammogram screening.

Results

The study included 254 women 50–74 years old without previous breast or ovarian cancer history. 19.29% of the sample reported no mammogram within two years, including 1.57% with no previous mammograms. Following unadjusted analyses, the significant factors included education, occupation status, health insurance and smoking and were therefore included into the adjusted model. In the multivariate adjusted model education remained significant while occupation status, health insurance and smoking were no longer significant. Compared to women with a college graduate degree, women with less than college graduate degree were at higher risk of inadequate screening [OR (95% CI) = 3.23 (1.54, 6.74)].

Conclusions

Lack of education was significantly associated with inadequate mammogram screening even after adjusting for occupation status, health insurance and smoking, which should prompt further outreach and education.
Literature
1.
go back to reference DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM et al (2019) Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 69:438–451CrossRefPubMed DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM et al (2019) Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 69:438–451CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Nelson HD, Fu R, Cantor A, Pappas M, Daeges M, Humphrey L (2016) Effectiveness of breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis to update the 2009 U.S. preventive services task force recommendation. Ann Intern Med 164:244–255CrossRefPubMed Nelson HD, Fu R, Cantor A, Pappas M, Daeges M, Humphrey L (2016) Effectiveness of breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis to update the 2009 U.S. preventive services task force recommendation. Ann Intern Med 164:244–255CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lawrenson R, Lao C, Jacobson G et al (2019) Outcomes in different ethnic groups of New Zealand patients with screen-detected vs. non-screen-detected breast cancer. J Med Screen 26:197–203CrossRefPubMed Lawrenson R, Lao C, Jacobson G et al (2019) Outcomes in different ethnic groups of New Zealand patients with screen-detected vs. non-screen-detected breast cancer. J Med Screen 26:197–203CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Massat NJ, Dibden A, Parmar D, Cuzick J, Sasieni PD, Duffy SW (2016) Impact of screening on breast cancer mortality: The UK Program 20 Years on. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 25:455–462CrossRefPubMed Massat NJ, Dibden A, Parmar D, Cuzick J, Sasieni PD, Duffy SW (2016) Impact of screening on breast cancer mortality: The UK Program 20 Years on. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 25:455–462CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Narayan AK, Lee CI, Lehman CD (2020) Screening for breast cancer. Med Clin North Am 104:1007–1021CrossRefPubMed Narayan AK, Lee CI, Lehman CD (2020) Screening for breast cancer. Med Clin North Am 104:1007–1021CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Palmer JR, Gerlovin H, Bethea TN et al (2016) Predicted 25-hydroxyvitamin D in relation to incidence of breast cancer in a large cohort of African American women. Breast Cancer Res 18:86CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Palmer JR, Gerlovin H, Bethea TN et al (2016) Predicted 25-hydroxyvitamin D in relation to incidence of breast cancer in a large cohort of African American women. Breast Cancer Res 18:86CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Feldstein AC, Perrin N, Rosales AG, Schneider J, Rix MM, Glasgow RE (2011) Patient barriers to mammography identified during a reminder program. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 20:421–428CrossRef Feldstein AC, Perrin N, Rosales AG, Schneider J, Rix MM, Glasgow RE (2011) Patient barriers to mammography identified during a reminder program. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 20:421–428CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Plescia M, White MC (2013) The National Prevention Strategy and breast cancer screening: scientific evidence for public health action. Am J Public Health 103:1545–1548CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Plescia M, White MC (2013) The National Prevention Strategy and breast cancer screening: scientific evidence for public health action. Am J Public Health 103:1545–1548CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Alexandraki I, Mooradian AD (2010) Barriers related to mammography use for breast cancer screening among minority women. J Natl Med Assoc 102:206–218CrossRefPubMed Alexandraki I, Mooradian AD (2010) Barriers related to mammography use for breast cancer screening among minority women. J Natl Med Assoc 102:206–218CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Nazzal Z, Sholi H, Sholi SB, Sholi MB, Lahaseh R (2018) Motivators and barriers to mammography screening uptake by female health-care workers in primary health-care centres: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 391(Suppl 2):S51CrossRefPubMed Nazzal Z, Sholi H, Sholi SB, Sholi MB, Lahaseh R (2018) Motivators and barriers to mammography screening uptake by female health-care workers in primary health-care centres: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 391(Suppl 2):S51CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference 2018 BRFSS Survey Data is the source for this data collected by the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2018 BRFSS Survey Data is the source for this data collected by the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
14.
go back to reference Thangarajan EP, Balasubramanian G. (2018) Missing Data Imputation and Its Effect on the Accuracy of Classification. PhUSE US Connect 2018. Thangarajan EP, Balasubramanian G. (2018) Missing Data Imputation and Its Effect on the Accuracy of Classification. PhUSE US Connect 2018.
15.
16.
17.
18.
go back to reference McElrath K, MMartin M. (2021) Bachelor’s Degree Attainment in the United States: 2005 to 2019. American Community Survey Brief. McElrath K, MMartin M. (2021) Bachelor’s Degree Attainment in the United States: 2005 to 2019. American Community Survey Brief.
19.
go back to reference Damiani G, Basso D, Acampora A et al (2015) The impact of level of education on adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med 81:281–289CrossRefPubMed Damiani G, Basso D, Acampora A et al (2015) The impact of level of education on adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med 81:281–289CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Tomioka K, Kurumatani N, Saeki K (2020) The association between education and smoking prevalence, independent of occupation: a nationally representative survey in Japan. J Epidemiol 30:136–142CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tomioka K, Kurumatani N, Saeki K (2020) The association between education and smoking prevalence, independent of occupation: a nationally representative survey in Japan. J Epidemiol 30:136–142CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Droomers M, Schrijvers CT, Mackenbach JP (2001) Educational level and decreases in leisure time physical activity: predictors from the longitudinal GLOBE study. J Epidemiol Community Health 55:562–568CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Droomers M, Schrijvers CT, Mackenbach JP (2001) Educational level and decreases in leisure time physical activity: predictors from the longitudinal GLOBE study. J Epidemiol Community Health 55:562–568CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Rundle A, Iles S, Matheson K et al (2020) Women’s views about breast cancer prevention at mammography screening units and well women’s clinics. Curr Oncol 27:e336–e342CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rundle A, Iles S, Matheson K et al (2020) Women’s views about breast cancer prevention at mammography screening units and well women’s clinics. Curr Oncol 27:e336–e342CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Heck KE, Pamuk ER (1997) Explaining the relation between education and postmenopausal breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 145:366–372CrossRefPubMed Heck KE, Pamuk ER (1997) Explaining the relation between education and postmenopausal breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 145:366–372CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Hussain SK, Altieri A, Sundquist J, Hemminki K (2008) Influence of education level on breast cancer risk and survival in Sweden between 1990 and 2004. Int J Cancer 122:165–169CrossRefPubMed Hussain SK, Altieri A, Sundquist J, Hemminki K (2008) Influence of education level on breast cancer risk and survival in Sweden between 1990 and 2004. Int J Cancer 122:165–169CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Menvielle G, Kunst AE, van Gils CH et al (2011) The contribution of risk factors to the higher incidence of invasive and in situ breast cancers in women with higher levels of education in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Am J Epidemiol 173:26–37CrossRefPubMed Menvielle G, Kunst AE, van Gils CH et al (2011) The contribution of risk factors to the higher incidence of invasive and in situ breast cancers in women with higher levels of education in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Am J Epidemiol 173:26–37CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Arpey NC, Gaglioti AH, Rosenbaum ME (2017) How Socioeconomic Status Affects Patient Perceptions of Health Care: A Qualitative Study. J Prim Care Community Health 8:169–175CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Arpey NC, Gaglioti AH, Rosenbaum ME (2017) How Socioeconomic Status Affects Patient Perceptions of Health Care: A Qualitative Study. J Prim Care Community Health 8:169–175CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Bernheim SM, Ross JS, Krumholz HM, Bradley EH (2008) Influence of patients’ socioeconomic status on clinical management decisions: a qualitative study. Ann Fam Med 6:53–59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bernheim SM, Ross JS, Krumholz HM, Bradley EH (2008) Influence of patients’ socioeconomic status on clinical management decisions: a qualitative study. Ann Fam Med 6:53–59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Chapman EN, Kaatz A, Carnes M (2013) Physicians and implicit bias: how doctors may unwittingly perpetuate health care disparities. J Gen Intern Med 28:1504–1510CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chapman EN, Kaatz A, Carnes M (2013) Physicians and implicit bias: how doctors may unwittingly perpetuate health care disparities. J Gen Intern Med 28:1504–1510CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Pagan JA, Asch DA, Brown CJ, Guerra CE, Armstrong K (2008) Lack of community insurance and mammography screening rates among insured and uninsured women. J Clin Oncol 26:1865–1870CrossRefPubMed Pagan JA, Asch DA, Brown CJ, Guerra CE, Armstrong K (2008) Lack of community insurance and mammography screening rates among insured and uninsured women. J Clin Oncol 26:1865–1870CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Bryant H, Mah Z (1992) Breast cancer screening attitudes and behaviors of rural and urban women. Prev Med 21:405–418CrossRefPubMed Bryant H, Mah Z (1992) Breast cancer screening attitudes and behaviors of rural and urban women. Prev Med 21:405–418CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Nuno T, Gerald JK, Harris R, Martinez ME, Estrada A, Garcia F (2012) Comparison of breast and cervical cancer screening utilization among rural and urban Hispanic and American Indian women in the Southwestern United States. Cancer Causes Control 23:1333–1341CrossRefPubMed Nuno T, Gerald JK, Harris R, Martinez ME, Estrada A, Garcia F (2012) Comparison of breast and cervical cancer screening utilization among rural and urban Hispanic and American Indian women in the Southwestern United States. Cancer Causes Control 23:1333–1341CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Lor M, Khang PY, Xiong P, Moua KF, Lauver D (2013) Understanding Hmong women’s beliefs, feelings, norms, and external conditions about breast and cervical cancer screening. Public Health Nurs 30:420–428CrossRefPubMed Lor M, Khang PY, Xiong P, Moua KF, Lauver D (2013) Understanding Hmong women’s beliefs, feelings, norms, and external conditions about breast and cervical cancer screening. Public Health Nurs 30:420–428CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Lawal O, Murphy F, Hogg P, Nightingale J (2017) Health behavioural theories and their application to women’s participation in mammography screening. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 48:122–127CrossRefPubMed Lawal O, Murphy F, Hogg P, Nightingale J (2017) Health behavioural theories and their application to women’s participation in mammography screening. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 48:122–127CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Denise R. Sackett DO, Tala Dajani MM. (2019) Fat Shaming in Medicine: Overview of Alternative Patient Strategies. Osteopathic Family Physician. 11. Denise R. Sackett DO, Tala Dajani MM. (2019) Fat Shaming in Medicine: Overview of Alternative Patient Strategies. Osteopathic Family Physician. 11.
Metadata
Title
Identify factors for insufficient (> 2 yr) mammogram screening among Oregonian women
Authors
Zhenzhen Zhang
Grace Curran
Kenneth Xu
Jeong Youn Lim
Paige E. Farris
Jackilen Shannon
Publication date
01-02-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-021-01529-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Cancer Causes & Control 2/2022 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine