Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2019

01-12-2019 | Breast Cancer | Breast Oncology

Does Breast Density Increase the Risk of Re-excision for Women with Breast Cancer Having Breast-Conservation Therapy?

Authors: Siun M. Walsh, MD, Sandra B. Brennan, MD, Emily C. Zabor, DrPH, Laura H. Rosenberger, MD, Michelle Stempel, MPH, Lizza Lebron-Zapata, MD, Mary L. Gemignani, MD, MPH

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 13/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Women with dense breasts may have less-accurate preoperative evaluation of extent of disease, potentially affecting the achievement of negative margins. The goal of this study is to examine the association between breast density and re-excision rates in women having breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer.

Patients and Methods

Women with stage I/II invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery between 1/1/2014 and 10/31/2014 were included. Breast density was assessed by two radiologists. The association between breast density and re-excision was examined using logistic regression.

Results

Seven hundred and one women were included. Overall, 106 (15.1%) women had at least one re-excision. Younger age at diagnosis was associated with increased breast density (p < 0.001). On univariable analysis, increased breast density was associated with significantly increased odds of re-excision (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–1.83), as was multifocal disease, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive status, and extensive intraductal component (EIC) (all p < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, breast density remained significantly associated with increased odds of re-excision (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.00–1.86), as did multifocality and EIC. HER2 positive status was not significantly associated with re-excision on multivariable analysis.

Conclusions

Women with dense breasts are more likely to need additional surgery (re-excision after breast-conserving surgery), but increased breast density did not adversely affect disease-free survival in our study. Our findings support the need for further study in developing techniques that can help decrease re-excisions for women with dense breasts who undergo breast-conserving surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Bronskill M, Yaffe MJ, Duric N, Minkin S. Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(16):1224–37.CrossRef Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Bronskill M, Yaffe MJ, Duric N, Minkin S. Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(16):1224–37.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kerlikowske K, Ichikawa L, Miglioretti DL, et al. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(5):386–95.CrossRef Kerlikowske K, Ichikawa L, Miglioretti DL, et al. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(5):386–95.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(3):227–36.CrossRef Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(3):227–36.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(13):1081–7.CrossRef Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(13):1081–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wanders JO, Holland K, Veldhuis WB, et al. Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;162(1):95–103.CrossRef Wanders JO, Holland K, Veldhuis WB, et al. Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;162(1):95–103.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wanders JOP, Holland K, Karssemeijer N, et al. The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study. Breast Cancer Res. 2017;19(1):67.CrossRef Wanders JOP, Holland K, Karssemeijer N, et al. The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study. Breast Cancer Res. 2017;19(1):67.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Park CC, Rembert J, Chew K, Moore D, Kerlikowske K. High mammographic breast density is independent predictor of local but not distant recurrence after lumpectomy and radiotherapy for invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73(1):75–9.CrossRef Park CC, Rembert J, Chew K, Moore D, Kerlikowske K. High mammographic breast density is independent predictor of local but not distant recurrence after lumpectomy and radiotherapy for invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73(1):75–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bani MR, Lux MP, Heusinger K, et al. Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35(1):32–7.CrossRef Bani MR, Lux MP, Heusinger K, et al. Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35(1):32–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Edwards BL, Guidry CA, Larson KN, Novicoff WM, Harvey JA, Schroen AT. Does mammographic density have an impact on the margin re-excision rate after breast-conserving surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(3):782–8.CrossRef Edwards BL, Guidry CA, Larson KN, Novicoff WM, Harvey JA, Schroen AT. Does mammographic density have an impact on the margin re-excision rate after breast-conserving surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(3):782–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kapoor NS, Eaton A, King TA, et al. Should breast density influence patient selection for breast-conserving surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(2):600–6.CrossRef Kapoor NS, Eaton A, King TA, et al. Should breast density influence patient selection for breast-conserving surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(2):600–6.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(14):1507–15.CrossRef Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(14):1507–15.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pilewskie M, Zabor EC, Mamtani A, Barrio AV, Stempel M, Morrow M. The optimal treatment plan to avoid axillary lymph node dissection in early-stage breast cancer patients differs by surgical strategy and tumor subtype. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:3527–33CrossRef Pilewskie M, Zabor EC, Mamtani A, Barrio AV, Stempel M, Morrow M. The optimal treatment plan to avoid axillary lymph node dissection in early-stage breast cancer patients differs by surgical strategy and tumor subtype. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:3527–33CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chagpar AB, Killelea BK, Tsangaris TN, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(6):503–10.CrossRef Chagpar AB, Killelea BK, Tsangaris TN, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(6):503–10.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rosenberger LH, Mamtani A, Fuzesi S, et al. Early adoption of the SSO-ASTRO consensus guidelines on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stage I and II invasive breast cancer: initial experience from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3239–46.CrossRef Rosenberger LH, Mamtani A, Fuzesi S, et al. Early adoption of the SSO-ASTRO consensus guidelines on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stage I and II invasive breast cancer: initial experience from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3239–46.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sickles E, D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, et al. ACR BI-RADS® Mammography 2013. Sickles E, D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, et al. ACR BI-RADS® Mammography 2013.
16.
go back to reference Torabi R, Hsu CH, Patel PN, Dave H, Bouton ME, Komenaka IK. Predictors of margin status after breast-conserving operations in an underscreened population. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013;398(3):455–62.CrossRef Torabi R, Hsu CH, Patel PN, Dave H, Bouton ME, Komenaka IK. Predictors of margin status after breast-conserving operations in an underscreened population. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013;398(3):455–62.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Alrahbi S, Chan PM, Ho BC, Seah MD, Chen JJ, Tan EY. Extent of margin involvement, lymphovascular invasion, and extensive intraductal component predict for residual disease after wide local excision for breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2015;15(3):219–26.CrossRef Alrahbi S, Chan PM, Ho BC, Seah MD, Chen JJ, Tan EY. Extent of margin involvement, lymphovascular invasion, and extensive intraductal component predict for residual disease after wide local excision for breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2015;15(3):219–26.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kitchen PR, Cawson JN, Moore SE, et al. Margins and outcome of screen-detected breast cancer with extensive in situ component. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76(7):591–5.CrossRef Kitchen PR, Cawson JN, Moore SE, et al. Margins and outcome of screen-detected breast cancer with extensive in situ component. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76(7):591–5.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Agostinho JL, Zhao X, Sun W, et al. Prediction of positive margins following breast conserving surgery. Breast. 2015;24(1):46–50.CrossRef Agostinho JL, Zhao X, Sun W, et al. Prediction of positive margins following breast conserving surgery. Breast. 2015;24(1):46–50.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Reedijk M, Hodgson N, Gohla G, et al. A prospective study of tumor and technical factors associated with positive margins in breast-conservation therapy for nonpalpable malignancy. Am J Surg. 2012;204(3):263–8.CrossRef Reedijk M, Hodgson N, Gohla G, et al. A prospective study of tumor and technical factors associated with positive margins in breast-conservation therapy for nonpalpable malignancy. Am J Surg. 2012;204(3):263–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference del Carmen MG, Hughes KS, Halpern E, et al. Racial differences in mammographic breast density. Cancer. 2003;98(3):590–6.CrossRef del Carmen MG, Hughes KS, Halpern E, et al. Racial differences in mammographic breast density. Cancer. 2003;98(3):590–6.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference El-Bastawissi AY, White E, Mandelson MT, Taplin S. Variation in mammographic breast density by race. Ann Epidemiol. 2001;11(4):257–63.CrossRef El-Bastawissi AY, White E, Mandelson MT, Taplin S. Variation in mammographic breast density by race. Ann Epidemiol. 2001;11(4):257–63.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gillman J, Chun J, Schwartz S, Schnabel F, Moy L. The relationship of obesity, mammographic breast density, and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with breast cancer. Clin Imaging. 2016;40(6):1167–72.CrossRef Gillman J, Chun J, Schwartz S, Schnabel F, Moy L. The relationship of obesity, mammographic breast density, and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with breast cancer. Clin Imaging. 2016;40(6):1167–72.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lai HW, Huang RH, Wu YT, et al. Clinicopathologic factors related to surgical margin involvement, reoperation, and residual cancer in primary operable breast cancer - An analysis of 2050 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(11):1725–35.CrossRef Lai HW, Huang RH, Wu YT, et al. Clinicopathologic factors related to surgical margin involvement, reoperation, and residual cancer in primary operable breast cancer - An analysis of 2050 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(11):1725–35.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Huszti E, Melnichouk O, et al. Mammographic features associated with interval breast cancers in screening programs. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(4):417.CrossRef Boyd NF, Huszti E, Melnichouk O, et al. Mammographic features associated with interval breast cancers in screening programs. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(4):417.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kerlikowske K, Zhu W, Tosteson AN, et al. Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(10):673–81.CrossRef Kerlikowske K, Zhu W, Tosteson AN, et al. Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(10):673–81.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kim BK, Choi YH, Nguyen TL, et al. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer in Korean women. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2015;24(5):422–9.CrossRef Kim BK, Choi YH, Nguyen TL, et al. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer in Korean women. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2015;24(5):422–9.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Nelson HD, Zakher B, Cantor A, et al. Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(9):635–48.CrossRef Nelson HD, Zakher B, Cantor A, et al. Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(9):635–48.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Pettersson A, Graff RE, Ursin G, et al. Mammographic density phenotypes and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(5):1–11. Pettersson A, Graff RE, Ursin G, et al. Mammographic density phenotypes and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(5):1–11.
30.
go back to reference Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Tamimi RM. Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to the time since the mammogram. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22(6):1110–7.CrossRef Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Tamimi RM. Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to the time since the mammogram. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22(6):1110–7.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Olsen AH, Bihrmann K, Jensen MB, Vejborg I, Lynge E. Breast density and outcome of mammography screening: a cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2009;100(7):1205–8.CrossRef Olsen AH, Bihrmann K, Jensen MB, Vejborg I, Lynge E. Breast density and outcome of mammography screening: a cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2009;100(7):1205–8.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Melnichouk O, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density, response to hormones, and breast cancer risk. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(22):2985–92.CrossRef Boyd NF, Melnichouk O, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density, response to hormones, and breast cancer risk. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(22):2985–92.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Kerlikowske K, Gard CC, Tice JA, Ziv E, Cummings SR, Miglioretti DL. Risk factors that increase risk of estrogen receptor-positive and -negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109(5):1–9. Kerlikowske K, Gard CC, Tice JA, Ziv E, Cummings SR, Miglioretti DL. Risk factors that increase risk of estrogen receptor-positive and -negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109(5):1–9.
34.
go back to reference 34. Holm J, Humphreys K, Li J, et al. Risk factors and tumor characteristics of interval cancers by mammographic density. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(9):1030–7.CrossRef 34. Holm J, Humphreys K, Li J, et al. Risk factors and tumor characteristics of interval cancers by mammographic density. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(9):1030–7.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Habel LA, Capra AM, Achacoso NS, et al. Mammographic density and risk of second breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(10):2488–95.CrossRef Habel LA, Capra AM, Achacoso NS, et al. Mammographic density and risk of second breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(10):2488–95.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Hwang ES, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, Weaver DL, Kerlikowske K. Association between breast density and subsequent breast cancer following treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(12):2587–93.CrossRef Hwang ES, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, Weaver DL, Kerlikowske K. Association between breast density and subsequent breast cancer following treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(12):2587–93.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Brand JS, Czene K, Shepherd JA, et al. Automated measurement of volumetric mammographic density: a tool for widespread breast cancer risk assessment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(9):1764–72.CrossRef Brand JS, Czene K, Shepherd JA, et al. Automated measurement of volumetric mammographic density: a tool for widespread breast cancer risk assessment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(9):1764–72.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Nickson C, Arzhaeva Y, Aitken Z, et al. AutoDensity: an automated method to measure mammographic breast density that predicts breast cancer risk and screening outcomes. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15(5):R80.CrossRef Nickson C, Arzhaeva Y, Aitken Z, et al. AutoDensity: an automated method to measure mammographic breast density that predicts breast cancer risk and screening outcomes. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15(5):R80.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Pertuz S, McDonald ES, Weinstein SP, Conant EF, Kontos D. Fully Automated quantitative estimation of volumetric breast density from digital breast tomosynthesis images: preliminary results and comparison with digital mammography and MR imaging. Radiology. 2016;279(1):65–74.CrossRef Pertuz S, McDonald ES, Weinstein SP, Conant EF, Kontos D. Fully Automated quantitative estimation of volumetric breast density from digital breast tomosynthesis images: preliminary results and comparison with digital mammography and MR imaging. Radiology. 2016;279(1):65–74.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Does Breast Density Increase the Risk of Re-excision for Women with Breast Cancer Having Breast-Conservation Therapy?
Authors
Siun M. Walsh, MD
Sandra B. Brennan, MD
Emily C. Zabor, DrPH
Laura H. Rosenberger, MD
Michelle Stempel, MPH
Lizza Lebron-Zapata, MD
Mary L. Gemignani, MD, MPH
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 13/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07647-7

Other articles of this Issue 13/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2019 Go to the issue