Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Breast Cancer | Research

Development and validation of a sexual relations satisfaction scale in patients with breast cancer — “SEXSAT-Q”

Authors: Rosario González Mancha, Montserrat Muñoz, Luis de la Cruz-Merino, Lourdes Calvo, Josefina Cruz, Jose Manuel Baena-Cañada, Yolanda Fernandez, Manuel Ramos, Cesar Augusto Rodriguez, Jose Ignacio Chacón, Isabel Palomero, Julia Llinares, María Rivero, Miguel Ángel Ruiz

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Because the currently available questionnaires to evaluate sexual changes on breast cancer women only address the sexual sphere with a few questions our purpose was to develop a questionnaire that assesses changes in sexual dysfunction and satisfaction in women treated for breast cancer.

Methods

A sample was selected of women aged between 18 and 65 who had had surgery for breast cancer, completed neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy treatment and could be receiving adjuvant hormonal treatment, with an active sex life at least 3 months before starting treatment. Metastatic disease was excluded. A questionnaire structured in 4 dimensions was developed. The MOS SF-12 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires were also provided. The following metric properties were evaluated: item analysis; internal consistency; temporal stability; construct validity; concurrent, convergent and divergent validity; and feasibility.

Results

Three samples were recruited: a pilot sample of 20; a reduction sample of 152; and a validation sample of 148. The presence of 6 dimensions was confirmed: 1) Loss of sex drive; 2) worsening of body image; 3) psychological coping; 4) discomfort during intercourse; 5) satisfaction with sexual relations; and 6) satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Good goodness-of-fit statistics were obtained (χ2/df = 1.5, GFI = 0.9, AGFI = 0.84, CFI = 0.959, RMSEA = 0.062). Reliability was good (α = 0.855), as was test–retest stability (r = 0.838). The correlation with the convergent questionnaires proved to be higher than that obtained with generic measurements.

Conclusions

We were able to develop a short questionnaire (17 items) capable of measuring sexual satisfaction in women with breast cancer with good metric properties.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bermejo de las Heras B, Cortes Ramon y Cajal J, Galve Calvo E, de la Haba Rodriguez J, Garcia Mata J, Moreno Anton F, et al. The economic burden of metastatic breast cancer in Spain. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy. 2018. Bermejo de las Heras B, Cortes Ramon y Cajal J, Galve Calvo E, de la Haba Rodriguez J, Garcia Mata J, Moreno Anton F, et al. The economic burden of metastatic breast cancer in Spain. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy. 2018.
2.
go back to reference Prates ACL, Freitas-Junior R, Prates MFO, Veloso MF, Barros NM. Influence of body image in women undergoing treatment for breast Cancer. Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia. 2017;39(4):175–83.CrossRef Prates ACL, Freitas-Junior R, Prates MFO, Veloso MF, Barros NM. Influence of body image in women undergoing treatment for breast Cancer. Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia. 2017;39(4):175–83.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kim MK, Kim T, Moon HG, Jin US, Kim K, Kim J, et al. Effect of cosmetic outcome on quality of life after breast cancer surgery. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. 2015;41(3):426–32.CrossRef Kim MK, Kim T, Moon HG, Jin US, Kim K, Kim J, et al. Effect of cosmetic outcome on quality of life after breast cancer surgery. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. 2015;41(3):426–32.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Guo F, Kuo YF, Shih YCT, Giordano SH, Berenson AB. Trends in breast cancer mortality by stage at diagnosis among young women in the United States. Cancer. 2018;124(17):3500–9.CrossRef Guo F, Kuo YF, Shih YCT, Giordano SH, Berenson AB. Trends in breast cancer mortality by stage at diagnosis among young women in the United States. Cancer. 2018;124(17):3500–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dubey AK, Gupta U, Jain S. Breast cancer statistics and prediction methodology: a systematic review and analysis. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP. 2015;16(10):4237–45.CrossRef Dubey AK, Gupta U, Jain S. Breast cancer statistics and prediction methodology: a systematic review and analysis. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP. 2015;16(10):4237–45.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Maiorino MI, Chiodini P, Bellastella G, Giugliano D, Esposito K. Sexual dysfunction in women with cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis of studies using the female sexual function index. Endocrine. 2016;54(2):329–41.CrossRef Maiorino MI, Chiodini P, Bellastella G, Giugliano D, Esposito K. Sexual dysfunction in women with cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis of studies using the female sexual function index. Endocrine. 2016;54(2):329–41.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of sex & marital therapy. 2000;26(2):191–208.CrossRef Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of sex & marital therapy. 2000;26(2):191–208.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray, F.GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr, accessed on 10/september/2018. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray, F.GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. Available from: http://​globocan.​iarc.​fr, accessed on 10/september/2018.
11.
go back to reference Ruiz MA, et al. Determinación del número de autovalores mayores que la unidad en el Análisis Imagen con el SPSS. Psicológica. 1992;13:107–12. Ruiz MA, et al. Determinación del número de autovalores mayores que la unidad en el Análisis Imagen con el SPSS. Psicológica. 1992;13:107–12.
12.
go back to reference Ruiz MA, el at Una simulación sobre el comportamiento de la regla K1 en la estimación del número de factores Psicothema 1992; 4: 543–50. Ruiz MA, el at Una simulación sobre el comportamiento de la regla K1 en la estimación del número de factores Psicothema 1992; 4: 543–50.
13.
go back to reference Zwick WR, et al. A comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psych Bull. 1986;3:432–42.CrossRef Zwick WR, et al. A comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psych Bull. 1986;3:432–42.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hakstian AR, Rogers WT, Cattell RB. The behavior of number-of-factors rules with simulated data. Multivar Behav Res. 1982;17(2):193–219.CrossRef Hakstian AR, Rogers WT, Cattell RB. The behavior of number-of-factors rules with simulated data. Multivar Behav Res. 1982;17(2):193–219.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gorsuch RL. New procedure for extension analysis in exploratory factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas. 1997;57(5):725–40.CrossRef Gorsuch RL. New procedure for extension analysis in exploratory factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas. 1997;57(5):725–40.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gorsuch RL. Exploratory factor analysis: its role in item analysis. J Pers Assess. 1997;68(3):532–60.CrossRef Gorsuch RL. Exploratory factor analysis: its role in item analysis. J Pers Assess. 1997;68(3):532–60.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Russell DW. In search of underlying dimensions: the use (and abuse) of factor analysis in personality and social psychology bulletin. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2002;28(12):1629–46.CrossRef Russell DW. In search of underlying dimensions: the use (and abuse) of factor analysis in personality and social psychology bulletin. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2002;28(12):1629–46.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nunnally JC, et al. Teoría Psicométrica. 3ª ed. Mexico: McGraw-Hill; 1995. Nunnally JC, et al. Teoría Psicométrica. 3ª ed. Mexico: McGraw-Hill; 1995.
19.
go back to reference Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. September 1951;16(3):297–334.CrossRef Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. September 1951;16(3):297–334.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bartko JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep. 1966;19(1):3–11.CrossRef Bartko JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep. 1966;19(1):3–11.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schreiber JB, Nora A, Stage FK, Barlow EA, King J. Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. J Educ Res. 2006;99(6):323–38.CrossRef Schreiber JB, Nora A, Stage FK, Barlow EA, King J. Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. J Educ Res. 2006;99(6):323–38.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 1990;16(3):199–208. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 1990;16(3):199–208.
23.
go back to reference Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–33.CrossRef Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–33.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Vilagut G, Ferrer M, Rajmil L, Rebollo P, Permanyer-Miralda G, Quintana JM, et al. The Spanish version of the short form 36 health survey: a decade of experience and new developments. Gac Sanit. 2005;19(2):135–50.CrossRef Vilagut G, Ferrer M, Rajmil L, Rebollo P, Permanyer-Miralda G, Quintana JM, et al. The Spanish version of the short form 36 health survey: a decade of experience and new developments. Gac Sanit. 2005;19(2):135–50.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bjorner JB, Brazier JE, et al. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 health survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA project. International quality of life assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1171–8.CrossRef Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bjorner JB, Brazier JE, et al. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 health survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA project. International quality of life assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1171–8.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sprangers MA, Groenvold M, Arraras JI, Franklin J, te Velde A, Muller M, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: first results from a three-country field study. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 1996;14(10):2756–68.CrossRef Sprangers MA, Groenvold M, Arraras JI, Franklin J, te Velde A, Muller M, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: first results from a three-country field study. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 1996;14(10):2756–68.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lee SB, Sohn G, Kim J, Chung IY, Kim HJ, Ko BS, et al. Chronological improvement in survival of patients with breast Cancer: a large-scale, single-center study. J Breast Cancer. 2018;21(1):70–9.CrossRef Lee SB, Sohn G, Kim J, Chung IY, Kim HJ, Ko BS, et al. Chronological improvement in survival of patients with breast Cancer: a large-scale, single-center study. J Breast Cancer. 2018;21(1):70–9.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Chan CWH, Law BMH, So WKW, Chow KM, Waye MMY. Novel Strategies on Personalized Medicine for Breast Cancer Treatment: An Update. International journal of molecular sciences. 2017;18(11).CrossRef Chan CWH, Law BMH, So WKW, Chow KM, Waye MMY. Novel Strategies on Personalized Medicine for Breast Cancer Treatment: An Update. International journal of molecular sciences. 2017;18(11).CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Cortes-Flores AO, Vargas-Meza A, Morgan-Villela G, Jimenez-Tornero J, Del Valle CJZ, Solano-Genesta M, et al. Sexuality among women treated for breast Cancer: a survey of three surgical procedures. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2017;41(6):1275–9.CrossRef Cortes-Flores AO, Vargas-Meza A, Morgan-Villela G, Jimenez-Tornero J, Del Valle CJZ, Solano-Genesta M, et al. Sexuality among women treated for breast Cancer: a survey of three surgical procedures. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2017;41(6):1275–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development and validation of a sexual relations satisfaction scale in patients with breast cancer — “SEXSAT-Q”
Authors
Rosario González Mancha
Montserrat Muñoz
Luis de la Cruz-Merino
Lourdes Calvo
Josefina Cruz
Jose Manuel Baena-Cañada
Yolanda Fernandez
Manuel Ramos
Cesar Augusto Rodriguez
Jose Ignacio Chacón
Isabel Palomero
Julia Llinares
María Rivero
Miguel Ángel Ruiz
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1197-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2019 Go to the issue