Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Women's Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Breast Cancer | Research

Breast cancer on social media: a quali-quantitative study on the credibility and content type of the most shared news stories

Authors: Priscila Biancovilli, Lilla Makszin, Alexandra Csongor

Published in: BMC Women's Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Female breast cancer was the most diagnosed cancer in 2020, with more than two million new cases worldwide. Access to scientifically correct information can assist patients in early detection or prevention of the disease. However, misinformation on social networking sites (SNSs) about breast cancer can be propagated rapidly, posing a threat to health communication efforts. The aim of this study is to analyse the characteristics of the most shared news stories referencing the disease that circulated on SNSs, including the credibility of this content.

Methods

This is an exploratory quali-quantitative study. Data collection was conducted between June 2019 and June 2020. We performed statistical and content analysis of the stories that had at least 1,000 total shares. Each story was classified in accordance to the following aspects: credibility; type of rumour; source; content type; mentions prevention or early detection/screening exams.

Results

The abundance of news stories in our sample (n = 1,594) were not classified according to their credibility, as they do not address science, risk factors, prevention, treatment, or other aspects which can be assessed for scientific accuracy. However, content classified as “rumours” are 3.29 times more shared than those considered scientifically correct. Regarding content type, most stories are classified as ‘real-life story’ or ‘solidarity’ (67.69%). In our sample, 5.08% of the total comment on prevention and 19.7% reference early detection.

Conclusion

We consider it can be a good strategy, in SNSs, to combine content of greater popularity, such as real-life stories, with subjects that can make a difference in a patient’s life, such as early detection, breast cancer symptoms and disease prevention strategies. Doctors, scientists and health journalists can expand the dialogue with the lay public regarding breast cancer, helping to counteract online misinformation.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Glynn RW, Kelly JC, Coffey N, Sweeney KJ, Kerin MJ. The effect of breast cancer awareness month on internet search activity—a comparison with awareness campaigns for lung and prostate cancer. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:442.CrossRef Glynn RW, Kelly JC, Coffey N, Sweeney KJ, Kerin MJ. The effect of breast cancer awareness month on internet search activity—a comparison with awareness campaigns for lung and prostate cancer. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:442.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Capurro D, Cole K, Echavarría MI, Joe J, Neogi T, Turner AM. The use of social networking sites for public health practice and research: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:79.CrossRef Capurro D, Cole K, Echavarría MI, Joe J, Neogi T, Turner AM. The use of social networking sites for public health practice and research: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:79.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Allcott H, Gentzkow M. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J Econ Perspect. 2017;31:211–36.CrossRef Allcott H, Gentzkow M. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J Econ Perspect. 2017;31:211–36.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sommariva S, Vamos C, Mantzarlis A, Đào LU-L, Martinez Tyson D. Spreading the fake news: exploring health messages on social media and the implications for health professionals using a case study. Am J Health Educ. 2018;49:246–55.CrossRef Sommariva S, Vamos C, Mantzarlis A, Đào LU-L, Martinez Tyson D. Spreading the fake news: exploring health messages on social media and the implications for health professionals using a case study. Am J Health Educ. 2018;49:246–55.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lazer DMJ, Baum MA, Benkler Y, Berinsky AJ, Greenhill KM, Menczer F, et al. The science of fake news. Science. 2018;359:1094–6.CrossRef Lazer DMJ, Baum MA, Benkler Y, Berinsky AJ, Greenhill KM, Menczer F, et al. The science of fake news. Science. 2018;359:1094–6.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wang Y, McKee M, Torbica A, Stuckler D. Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media. Soc Sci Med. 2019;240:112552.CrossRef Wang Y, McKee M, Torbica A, Stuckler D. Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media. Soc Sci Med. 2019;240:112552.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Barua Z, Barua S, Aktar S, Kabir N, Li M. Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation. Prog Disaster Sci. 2020;8:100119.CrossRef Barua Z, Barua S, Aktar S, Kabir N, Li M. Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation. Prog Disaster Sci. 2020;8:100119.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fetzer JH. Disinformation: the use of false information. Mind Mach. 2004;14:231–40.CrossRef Fetzer JH. Disinformation: the use of false information. Mind Mach. 2004;14:231–40.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference The Lancet Oncology. Oncology, “fake” news, and legal liability. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1135.CrossRef The Lancet Oncology. Oncology, “fake” news, and legal liability. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1135.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Johnson SB, Park HS, Gross CP, Yu JB. Use of alternative medicine for cancer and its impact on survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110:121–4.CrossRef Johnson SB, Park HS, Gross CP, Yu JB. Use of alternative medicine for cancer and its impact on survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110:121–4.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Johnson SB, Park HS, Gross CP, Yu JB. Complementary medicine, refusal of conventional cancer therapy, and survival among patients with curable cancers. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:1375.CrossRef Johnson SB, Park HS, Gross CP, Yu JB. Complementary medicine, refusal of conventional cancer therapy, and survival among patients with curable cancers. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:1375.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bardin L. L’analyse de contenu. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 2013.CrossRef Bardin L. L’analyse de contenu. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 2013.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Gondim SMG, Bendassolli PF. Uma crítica da utilização da análise de conteúdo qualitativa em psicologia. Psicol estud. 2014;19:191–9.CrossRef Gondim SMG, Bendassolli PF. Uma crítica da utilização da análise de conteúdo qualitativa em psicologia. Psicol estud. 2014;19:191–9.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Alsyouf M, Stokes P, Hur D, Amasyali A, Ruckle H, Hu B. ‘Fake News’ in urology: evaluating the accuracy of articles shared on social media in genitourinary malignancies. BJU Int. 2019;124:701–6.CrossRef Alsyouf M, Stokes P, Hur D, Amasyali A, Ruckle H, Hu B. ‘Fake News’ in urology: evaluating the accuracy of articles shared on social media in genitourinary malignancies. BJU Int. 2019;124:701–6.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Waszak PM, Kasprzycka-Waszak W, Kubanek A. The spread of medical fake news in social media—the pilot quantitative study. Health Policy Technol. 2018;7:115–8.CrossRef Waszak PM, Kasprzycka-Waszak W, Kubanek A. The spread of medical fake news in social media—the pilot quantitative study. Health Policy Technol. 2018;7:115–8.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Chen L, Wang X, Peng T-Q. Nature and diffusion of gynecologic cancer-related misinformation on social media: analysis of tweets. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:e11515.CrossRef Chen L, Wang X, Peng T-Q. Nature and diffusion of gynecologic cancer-related misinformation on social media: analysis of tweets. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:e11515.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Biancovilli P, Jurberg C. How to optimize health messages about cancer on Facebook: mixed-methods study. JMIR Cancer. 2018;4:e11073.CrossRef Biancovilli P, Jurberg C. How to optimize health messages about cancer on Facebook: mixed-methods study. JMIR Cancer. 2018;4:e11073.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Britt KL, Cuzick J, Phillips K-A. Key steps for effective breast cancer prevention. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20:417–36.CrossRef Britt KL, Cuzick J, Phillips K-A. Key steps for effective breast cancer prevention. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20:417–36.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Reményi Kissné D, Gede N, Szakács Z, Kiss I. Breast cancer screening knowledge among Hungarian women: a cross-sectional study. BMC Women’s Health. 2021;21:69.CrossRef Reményi Kissné D, Gede N, Szakács Z, Kiss I. Breast cancer screening knowledge among Hungarian women: a cross-sectional study. BMC Women’s Health. 2021;21:69.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Getachew S, Tesfaw A, Kaba M, Wienke A, Taylor L, Kantelhardt EJ, et al. Perceived barriers to early diagnosis of breast Cancer in south and southwestern Ethiopia: a qualitative study. BMC Women’s Health. 2020;20:38.CrossRef Getachew S, Tesfaw A, Kaba M, Wienke A, Taylor L, Kantelhardt EJ, et al. Perceived barriers to early diagnosis of breast Cancer in south and southwestern Ethiopia: a qualitative study. BMC Women’s Health. 2020;20:38.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Idowu A, Olowookere SA, Olumide A, Popoola GO, Abiodun A, Oluwagbemi A, et al. Breast cancer awareness, knowledge and screening practice among women resident in an urban local government area of Oyo State, Nigeria. J Cancer Policy. 2019;20:100179.CrossRef Idowu A, Olowookere SA, Olumide A, Popoola GO, Abiodun A, Oluwagbemi A, et al. Breast cancer awareness, knowledge and screening practice among women resident in an urban local government area of Oyo State, Nigeria. J Cancer Policy. 2019;20:100179.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Vasconcellos-Silva PR, Sormunen T, Craftman ÅG. Evolution of accesses to information on breast cancer and screening on the Brazilian National Cancer Institute website: an exploratory study. Ciênc saúde coletiva. 2018;23:1303–12.CrossRef Vasconcellos-Silva PR, Sormunen T, Craftman ÅG. Evolution of accesses to information on breast cancer and screening on the Brazilian National Cancer Institute website: an exploratory study. Ciênc saúde coletiva. 2018;23:1303–12.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Döbrössy B, Girasek E, Susánszky A, Koncz Z, Győrffy Z, Bognár VK. “Clicks, likes, shares and comments” a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0231422.CrossRef Döbrössy B, Girasek E, Susánszky A, Koncz Z, Győrffy Z, Bognár VK. “Clicks, likes, shares and comments” a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0231422.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Vasconcellos-Silva PR, Carvalho DBF, Trajano V, de La Rocque LR, Sawada ACMB, Juvanhol LL. Using Google Trends data to study public interest in breast cancer screening in Brazil: why not a pink February? JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017;3:e17.CrossRef Vasconcellos-Silva PR, Carvalho DBF, Trajano V, de La Rocque LR, Sawada ACMB, Juvanhol LL. Using Google Trends data to study public interest in breast cancer screening in Brazil: why not a pink February? JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017;3:e17.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Thackeray R, Burton SH, Giraud-Carrier C, Rollins S, Draper CR. Using Twitter for breast cancer prevention: an analysis of breast cancer awareness month. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:508.CrossRef Thackeray R, Burton SH, Giraud-Carrier C, Rollins S, Draper CR. Using Twitter for breast cancer prevention: an analysis of breast cancer awareness month. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:508.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Mainous AG. Perspectives in primary care: disseminating scientific findings in an era of fake news and science denial. Ann Fam Med. 2018;16:490–1.CrossRef Mainous AG. Perspectives in primary care: disseminating scientific findings in an era of fake news and science denial. Ann Fam Med. 2018;16:490–1.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Breast cancer on social media: a quali-quantitative study on the credibility and content type of the most shared news stories
Authors
Priscila Biancovilli
Lilla Makszin
Alexandra Csongor
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Women's Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6874
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01352-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Women's Health 1/2021 Go to the issue