Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2019

01-08-2019 | Breast Cancer | Original Article

Assessing structure and characteristics of social networks among cancer survivors: impact on general health

Authors: Nicolette Payne, Elizabeth Palmer Kelly, Timothy M. Pawlik

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 8/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Robust social networks are associated with improved health and quality of life for cancer survivors. Certain cancer diagnoses are associated with higher levels of stigma than breast cancer. However, little is known about the differences in social networks depending on the type of malignancy. This study aims to assess the differences in social networks and general health between breast cancer and more stigmatized cancers.

Methods

Cancer survivors were recruited to participate in a cross-sectional online survey study. Social network size and satisfaction was measured using the Cancer Survivor Social Networks Measure. General health was measured with a five-point-Likert-style item.

Results

The average age of the sample (n = 99) was 57.6 years old (SD = 13.4) and the majority were female (67.7%). Breast cancer survivors had an average of 1.39 more members in their social network than other cancers (t(94) = 2.28, p = 0.025). There were no significant differences between groups in network satisfaction. Results of a binary logistic regression model explained 26.9% of the variance in general health (x2(5) = 18.35, p = 0.003). There was a significant association among formal support network satisfaction (β = − 1.23, p = 0.021), formal support network size (β = − 0.36, p = 0.019), malignancy type (breast vs. other) (β = 1.05, p = 0.05), and better general health.

Conclusions

The results suggest breast cancer survivors had more formal social supports then other malignancy types. An association among greater formal social network size and satisfaction, a diagnosis of breast instead of other cancers, and better general health was noted. Emphasizing formal support sources for all cancer survivors may improve their overall health.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Kim BH, Wallington SF, Makambi KH, Adams-Campbell LL (2015) Social networks and physical activity behaviors among cancer survivors: data from the 2005 health information national trends survey. J Health Commun 20:656–662CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim BH, Wallington SF, Makambi KH, Adams-Campbell LL (2015) Social networks and physical activity behaviors among cancer survivors: data from the 2005 health information national trends survey. J Health Commun 20:656–662CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Fife BL, Wright ER (2000) The dimensionality of stigma: a comparison of its impact on the self of persons with HIV/AIDS and cancer. J Health Soc Behav 41:50–67CrossRefPubMed Fife BL, Wright ER (2000) The dimensionality of stigma: a comparison of its impact on the self of persons with HIV/AIDS and cancer. J Health Soc Behav 41:50–67CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Koller M, Kussman J, Lorenz W, Jenkins M, Voss M, Arens E, Richter E, Rothmund M (1996) Symptom reporting in cancer patients: the role of negative affect and experienced social stigma. Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society 77(5)983–995 Koller M, Kussman J, Lorenz W, Jenkins M, Voss M, Arens E, Richter E, Rothmund M (1996) Symptom reporting in cancer patients: the role of negative affect and experienced social stigma. Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society 77(5)983–995
11.
go back to reference Lebel S, Devins GM (2008) Stigma in cancer patients whose behavior may have contributed to their disease. Future Oncol 4(5):717–733CrossRefPubMed Lebel S, Devins GM (2008) Stigma in cancer patients whose behavior may have contributed to their disease. Future Oncol 4(5):717–733CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference ResearchMatch. Version 2018. Vanderbilt University ResearchMatch. Version 2018. Vanderbilt University
19.
go back to reference Qualtrics Labs, Inc [computer program]. Version June 2018. Provo, Utah, USA. 2009 Qualtrics Labs, Inc [computer program]. Version June 2018. Provo, Utah, USA. 2009
20.
go back to reference IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS statistics for Macintosh, version 25.0. IBM Corp, Armonk IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS statistics for Macintosh, version 25.0. IBM Corp, Armonk
26.
go back to reference Kuchler T, Henne-Bruns D, Rappat S et al (1999) Impact of psychotherapeutic support on gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing surgery: survival results of a trial. Hepatogastroenterology 46(25):322–335PubMed Kuchler T, Henne-Bruns D, Rappat S et al (1999) Impact of psychotherapeutic support on gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing surgery: survival results of a trial. Hepatogastroenterology 46(25):322–335PubMed
31.
go back to reference Zhu K, Hunter S, Bernard LJ et al (2000) Mammography screening in single older African-American women: a study of related factors. Ethn Dis Zhu K, Hunter S, Bernard LJ et al (2000) Mammography screening in single older African-American women: a study of related factors. Ethn Dis
32.
go back to reference Kang SH, Bloom JR (1993) Social support and cancer screening among older black Americans. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:737–742CrossRefPubMed Kang SH, Bloom JR (1993) Social support and cancer screening among older black Americans. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:737–742CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Guidry JJ, Aday LA, Zhang D, Winn RJ (1997) The role of informal and formal social support networks for patients with cancer. Cancer Pract Guidry JJ, Aday LA, Zhang D, Winn RJ (1997) The role of informal and formal social support networks for patients with cancer. Cancer Pract
43.
go back to reference Decker CL (2007) Social support and adolescent cancer survivors: a review of the literature. Psychooncology 16:1–11CrossRefPubMed Decker CL (2007) Social support and adolescent cancer survivors: a review of the literature. Psychooncology 16:1–11CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Assessing structure and characteristics of social networks among cancer survivors: impact on general health
Authors
Nicolette Payne
Elizabeth Palmer Kelly
Timothy M. Pawlik
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4620-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine