Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Breast Cancer | Methodology

A novel Bayesian adaptive design incorporating both primary and secondary endpoints for randomized IIB chemoprevention study of women at increased risk for breast cancer

Authors: Byron J. Gajewski, Bruce F. Kimler, Devin C. Koestler, Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam, Kate Young, Carol J. Fabian

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Our randomized controlled clinical trial will explore the potential of bazedoxifene plus conjugated estrogen to modulate breast tissue-based risk biomarkers as a surrogate for breast cancer risk reduction. This paper investigates the statistical design features of the trial and the rationale for the final choice of its design. Group sequential designs are a popular design approach to allow a trial to stop early for success or futility, potentially saving time and money over a fixed trial design. While Bayesian adaptive designs enjoy the same properties as group sequential designs, they have the added benefit of using prior information as well as inferential interpretation conditional on the data. Whether a frequentist or Bayesian trial, most adaptive designs have interim analyses that allow for early stopping, typically utilizing only the primary endpoint. A drawback to this approach is that the study may not have enough data for adequate comparisons of a single, key secondary endpoint. This can happen, for example, if the secondary endpoint has a smaller effect than the primary endpoint.

Methods

In this paper, we investigate a trial design called two-endpoint adaptive, which stops early only if a criterion is met for primary and secondary endpoints. The approach focuses the final analysis on the primary endpoint but ensures adequate data for the secondary analysis. Our study has two arms with a primary (change in mammographic fibroglandular volume) and secondary endpoint (change in mammary tissue Ki-67).

Results

We present operating characteristics including power, trial duration, and type I error rate and discuss the value and risks of modeling Bayesian group sequential designs with primary and secondary endpoints, comparing against alternative designs. The results indicate that the two-endpoint adaptive design has better operating characteristics than competing designs if one is concerned about having adequate information for a key secondary endpoint.

Discussion

Our approach balances trial speed and the need for information on the single, key secondary endpoint.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fabian CJ, Kimler BF, Mayo MS, Khan SA. Breast-tissue sampling for risk assessment and prevention. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2005;12:185–213.CrossRefPubMed Fabian CJ, Kimler BF, Mayo MS, Khan SA. Breast-tissue sampling for risk assessment and prevention. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2005;12:185–213.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Smith SG, Sestak I, Forster A, Partridge A, Side L, Wolf MS, et al. Factors affecting uptake and adherence to breast cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:575–90.CrossRefPubMed Smith SG, Sestak I, Forster A, Partridge A, Side L, Wolf MS, et al. Factors affecting uptake and adherence to breast cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:575–90.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Komm BS, Mirkin S, Jenkins SN. Development of conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene, the first tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC) for management of menopausal hot flashes and postmenopausal bone loss. Steroids. 2014;90:71–81.CrossRefPubMed Komm BS, Mirkin S, Jenkins SN. Development of conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene, the first tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC) for management of menopausal hot flashes and postmenopausal bone loss. Steroids. 2014;90:71–81.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ethun KF, Wood CE, Register TC, Cline JM, Appt SE, Clarkson TB. Effects of bazedoxifene acetate with and without conjugated equine estrogens on the breast of postmenopausal monkeys. Menopause. 2012;19:1242–52.CrossRefPubMed Ethun KF, Wood CE, Register TC, Cline JM, Appt SE, Clarkson TB. Effects of bazedoxifene acetate with and without conjugated equine estrogens on the breast of postmenopausal monkeys. Menopause. 2012;19:1242–52.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Santen RJ, Song Y, Wang JP, Yue W. Preclinical breast effects of a tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC) including conjugated estrogen with bazedoxifene. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2017;170:61–4.CrossRefPubMed Santen RJ, Song Y, Wang JP, Yue W. Preclinical breast effects of a tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC) including conjugated estrogen with bazedoxifene. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2017;170:61–4.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Shaaban AM, Sloane JP, West CR, Foster CS. Breast cancer risk in usual ductal hyperplasia is defined by estrogen receptor-alpha and Ki-67 expression. Am J Pathol. 2002;160:597–604.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shaaban AM, Sloane JP, West CR, Foster CS. Breast cancer risk in usual ductal hyperplasia is defined by estrogen receptor-alpha and Ki-67 expression. Am J Pathol. 2002;160:597–604.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Huh SJ, Oh H, Peterson MA, Almendro V, Hu R, Bowden M, et al. The proliferative activity of mammary epithelial cells in normal tissue predicts breast cancer risk in premenopausal women. Cancer Res. 2016;76:1926–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huh SJ, Oh H, Peterson MA, Almendro V, Hu R, Bowden M, et al. The proliferative activity of mammary epithelial cells in normal tissue predicts breast cancer risk in premenopausal women. Cancer Res. 2016;76:1926–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Fabian C, Nye L, Powers K, Nydegger J, Kreutzjens A, Phillips T, et al. Effect of bazedoxifene and conjugated estrogen (Duavee®) on breast cancer risk biomarkers in high risk women: a pilot study. Cancer Prev Res. 2019;12(10):711–20.CrossRef Fabian C, Nye L, Powers K, Nydegger J, Kreutzjens A, Phillips T, et al. Effect of bazedoxifene and conjugated estrogen (Duavee®) on breast cancer risk biomarkers in high risk women: a pilot study. Cancer Prev Res. 2019;12(10):711–20.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Khan QJ, Kimler BF, O'Dea AP, Zalles CM, Sharma P, Fabian CJ. Mammographic density does not correlate with Ki-67 expression or cytomorphology in benign breast cells obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration from women at high risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9(3):R35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khan QJ, Kimler BF, O'Dea AP, Zalles CM, Sharma P, Fabian CJ. Mammographic density does not correlate with Ki-67 expression or cytomorphology in benign breast cells obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration from women at high risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9(3):R35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Jennison C, Turnbull BW. Group sequential methods with applications to clinical trials. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRS; 2000. Jennison C, Turnbull BW. Group sequential methods with applications to clinical trials. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRS; 2000.
12.
go back to reference Gajewski BJ, Berry SM, Quintana M, Pasnoor M, Dimachkie M, Herbelin L, et al. Building efficient comparative effectiveness trials through adaptive designs, utility functions, and accrual rate optimization: finding the sweet spot. Stat Med. 2015;34(7):1134–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gajewski BJ, Berry SM, Quintana M, Pasnoor M, Dimachkie M, Herbelin L, et al. Building efficient comparative effectiveness trials through adaptive designs, utility functions, and accrual rate optimization: finding the sweet spot. Stat Med. 2015;34(7):1134–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Berry SM, Carlin BP, Lee JJ, Muller P. Bayesian adaptive methods for clinical trials. New York: CRC Press; 2011. Berry SM, Carlin BP, Lee JJ, Muller P. Bayesian adaptive methods for clinical trials. New York: CRC Press; 2011.
14.
15.
go back to reference Lin M, Lee S, Zhen B, et al. CBER’s experience with adaptive design clinical trials. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016;50:195–203.CrossRefPubMed Lin M, Lee S, Zhen B, et al. CBER’s experience with adaptive design clinical trials. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016;50:195–203.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Li X, Wulfsohn MS, Koch GG. Considerations on testing secondary endpoints in group sequential design. Stat Biopharm Res. 2017;9(4):333–7.CrossRef Li X, Wulfsohn MS, Koch GG. Considerations on testing secondary endpoints in group sequential design. Stat Biopharm Res. 2017;9(4):333–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dmitrienko A, Tamhane AC. Gatekeeping procedures with clinical trial applications. Pharm Stat. 2007;6(3):171–80.CrossRefPubMed Dmitrienko A, Tamhane AC. Gatekeeping procedures with clinical trial applications. Pharm Stat. 2007;6(3):171–80.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Guo B, Liu S. An optimal Bayesian predictive probability design for phase II clinical trials with simple and complicated endpoints. Biom J. 2020;62(2):339–49.CrossRefPubMed Guo B, Liu S. An optimal Bayesian predictive probability design for phase II clinical trials with simple and complicated endpoints. Biom J. 2020;62(2):339–49.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Zhou H, Chen C, Sun L, Yuan Y. Bayesian optimal phase II clinical trial design with time-to-event endpoint. Pharm Stat. 2020;19(6):776–86.CrossRefPubMed Zhou H, Chen C, Sun L, Yuan Y. Bayesian optimal phase II clinical trial design with time-to-event endpoint. Pharm Stat. 2020;19(6):776–86.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Thall PF, Cook JD. Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs. Biometrics. 2004;60:684–93.CrossRefPubMed Thall PF, Cook JD. Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs. Biometrics. 2004;60:684–93.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Berry S, Spinelli W, Littman GS, Liang JZ, Fardipour P, Berry DA, et al. A Bayesian dose-finding trial with adaptive dose expansion to flexibly assess efficacy and safety of an investigational drug. Clin Trials. 2010;7:121–35.CrossRefPubMed Berry S, Spinelli W, Littman GS, Liang JZ, Fardipour P, Berry DA, et al. A Bayesian dose-finding trial with adaptive dose expansion to flexibly assess efficacy and safety of an investigational drug. Clin Trials. 2010;7:121–35.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB. Bayesian data analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2014. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB. Bayesian data analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2014.
Metadata
Title
A novel Bayesian adaptive design incorporating both primary and secondary endpoints for randomized IIB chemoprevention study of women at increased risk for breast cancer
Authors
Byron J. Gajewski
Bruce F. Kimler
Devin C. Koestler
Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam
Kate Young
Carol J. Fabian
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06930-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Trials 1/2022 Go to the issue