Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 4/2020

01-08-2020 | Breast Augmentation | Original Paper

A qualitative assessment of women’s perspectives and experience of cosmetic surgery

Author: Ayhan Okumuş

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recognition of motivational factors behind the decision to seek cosmetic surgery is important in terms of improved aesthetical and psychological outcomes after cosmetic surgery. Our objective was to evaluate women’s perspectives and experience of cosmetic surgery in a general population of women with and without previous cosmetic surgery.

Methods

A total of 500 women (aged > 18 years) with (n = 250) and without (n = 250) previous cosmetic surgery were included on a voluntary basis in this questionnaire survey. The questionnaire form was applied via face-to-face method and elicited items on sociodemographic characteristics, women’s perspective of cosmetic surgery and experience of cosmetic surgery.

Results

Cosmetic surgery is considered to be performed whenever needed by most of women (58.6%), while considered to be performed only if mandatory or health-related (23.4%) or to improve quality of life (13.2%) by those aged > 35 years. The cosmetic surgery experience was highest in the 35–44 years age group (60.4%), and based on self-decision in 76.3% of cases. Physicians/hospitals (44.4%) were the most commonly searched item (via Internet search in 46.5%) before the decision of having a cosmetic surgery. Overall majority (84.6%) of women identified that they were satisfied with the postoperative outcome.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our findings revealed that cosmetic surgery was considered to be likely performed whenever the person needs without consideration of an age limit by most of women, while undergoing a cosmetic surgery was based on self-decision after following an Internet search mainly for physician/hospital options by majority of women with previous cosmetic surgery.
Level of evidence: Level V, diagnostic; therapeutic study.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Hackworth S (2012) ISAPS international survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2011. International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Hanover, NH Hackworth S (2012) ISAPS international survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2011. International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Hanover, NH
4.
go back to reference Luo W (2013) Aching for the altered body: beauty economy and Chinese women’s consumption of cosmetic surgery. Women Stud Int Forum 38:1–10CrossRef Luo W (2013) Aching for the altered body: beauty economy and Chinese women’s consumption of cosmetic surgery. Women Stud Int Forum 38:1–10CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Markey CN, Markey PM (2010) A correlational and experimental examination of reality television viewing and interest in cosmetic surgery. Body Image 7:165–171CrossRef Markey CN, Markey PM (2010) A correlational and experimental examination of reality television viewing and interest in cosmetic surgery. Body Image 7:165–171CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ching BH, Xu JT (2019) Understanding cosmetic surgery consideration in Chinese adolescent girls: contributions of materialism and sexual objectification. Body Image 28:6–15CrossRef Ching BH, Xu JT (2019) Understanding cosmetic surgery consideration in Chinese adolescent girls: contributions of materialism and sexual objectification. Body Image 28:6–15CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sarwer DB, Crerand CE (2004) Body image and cosmetic medical treatments. Body Image 1:99–111CrossRef Sarwer DB, Crerand CE (2004) Body image and cosmetic medical treatments. Body Image 1:99–111CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Solvi AS, Foss K, von Soest T, Roald HE, Skolleborg KC, Holte A (2010) Motivational factors and psychological processes in cosmetic breast augmentation surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:673–678CrossRef Solvi AS, Foss K, von Soest T, Roald HE, Skolleborg KC, Holte A (2010) Motivational factors and psychological processes in cosmetic breast augmentation surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:673–678CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Haas CF, Champion A, Secor D (2008) Motivating factors for seeking cosmetic surgery: a synthesis of the literature. Plast Surg Nurs 28:177–182CrossRef Haas CF, Champion A, Secor D (2008) Motivating factors for seeking cosmetic surgery: a synthesis of the literature. Plast Surg Nurs 28:177–182CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sarwer DB (2018) Discussion: the public face of rhinoplasty: impact on perceived attractiveness and personality. Plast Reconst Surg 142:888–889CrossRef Sarwer DB (2018) Discussion: the public face of rhinoplasty: impact on perceived attractiveness and personality. Plast Reconst Surg 142:888–889CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tranter B, Hanson D (2015) The social bases of cosmetic surgery in Australia. J Sociol 51:189–206CrossRef Tranter B, Hanson D (2015) The social bases of cosmetic surgery in Australia. J Sociol 51:189–206CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Molina A, Baker R, Nduka C (2012) ‘What women want’—the UK’s largest cosmetic surgery survey. Eur J Plast Surg 3:607–612CrossRef Molina A, Baker R, Nduka C (2012) ‘What women want’—the UK’s largest cosmetic surgery survey. Eur J Plast Surg 3:607–612CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Al-Saiari AA, Bakarman MA (2015) Experiences and attitude among Saudi female university students towards cosmetic surgery. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 10:427–431 Al-Saiari AA, Bakarman MA (2015) Experiences and attitude among Saudi female university students towards cosmetic surgery. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 10:427–431
18.
go back to reference Swami V, Chamorro-Premuzic T, Bridges S, Furnham A (2009) Acceptance of cosmetic surgery: personality and individual difference predictors. Body Image 6:7–13CrossRef Swami V, Chamorro-Premuzic T, Bridges S, Furnham A (2009) Acceptance of cosmetic surgery: personality and individual difference predictors. Body Image 6:7–13CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mori S, Lee EH (2018) Beyond the physician’s perspective: a review of patient-reported outcomes in dermatologic surgery and cosmetic dermatology. Int J Womens Dermatol 5:21–26CrossRef Mori S, Lee EH (2018) Beyond the physician’s perspective: a review of patient-reported outcomes in dermatologic surgery and cosmetic dermatology. Int J Womens Dermatol 5:21–26CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lunde C (2013) Acceptance of cosmetic surgery, body appreciation, body ideal internalization, and fashion blog reading among late adolescents in Sweden. Body Image 10:632–635CrossRef Lunde C (2013) Acceptance of cosmetic surgery, body appreciation, body ideal internalization, and fashion blog reading among late adolescents in Sweden. Body Image 10:632–635CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Myers TA, Crowther JH (2009) Social comparison as a predictor of body dissatisfaction: a meta-analytic review. J Abnorm Psychol 118:683–698CrossRef Myers TA, Crowther JH (2009) Social comparison as a predictor of body dissatisfaction: a meta-analytic review. J Abnorm Psychol 118:683–698CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schofield M, Hussain R, Loxton D, Miller Z (2002) Psychological and health behavioural covariates of cosmetic surgery. J Health Psychol 7:445–457CrossRef Schofield M, Hussain R, Loxton D, Miller Z (2002) Psychological and health behavioural covariates of cosmetic surgery. J Health Psychol 7:445–457CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ozgur F, Tuncali D, Gursu G (1998) Life satisfaction, self-esteem, and body image. Aesthet Plast Surg 22:412–419CrossRef Ozgur F, Tuncali D, Gursu G (1998) Life satisfaction, self-esteem, and body image. Aesthet Plast Surg 22:412–419CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ching S, Thoma A, McCabe R, Antony M (2003) Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:468–480CrossRef Ching S, Thoma A, McCabe R, Antony M (2003) Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:468–480CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hurst RAJ (2012) Negotiating femininity with and through mother–daughter and patient–surgeon relationships in cosmetic surgery narratives. Women Stud Int Forum 35:447–457CrossRef Hurst RAJ (2012) Negotiating femininity with and through mother–daughter and patient–surgeon relationships in cosmetic surgery narratives. Women Stud Int Forum 35:447–457CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hennink-Kaminski H, Reid LN, King KW (2010) The content of cosmetic surgery advertisements placed in large city magazines, 1985–2004. J Curr Issues Res Adv 32:41–57CrossRef Hennink-Kaminski H, Reid LN, King KW (2010) The content of cosmetic surgery advertisements placed in large city magazines, 1985–2004. J Curr Issues Res Adv 32:41–57CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Delinsky SS (2005) Cosmetic surgery: a common and accepted form of self improvement? J Appl Soc Psychol 35:2012–2028CrossRef Delinsky SS (2005) Cosmetic surgery: a common and accepted form of self improvement? J Appl Soc Psychol 35:2012–2028CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Brown A, Furnham A, Glanville L, Swami V (2007) Factors that affect the likelihood of undergoing cosmetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J 27:501–508CrossRef Brown A, Furnham A, Glanville L, Swami V (2007) Factors that affect the likelihood of undergoing cosmetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J 27:501–508CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Furnham A, Levitas J. Factors that motivate people to undergo cosmetic surgery. Can J Plast Surg. 2012 Winter;20(4):e47–50 Furnham A, Levitas J. Factors that motivate people to undergo cosmetic surgery. Can J Plast Surg. 2012 Winter;20(4):e47–50
31.
go back to reference Sharp G, Tiggemann M, Mattiske J (2014) The role of media and peer influences in Australian women’s attitudes towards cosmetic surgery. Body Image 11:482–487CrossRef Sharp G, Tiggemann M, Mattiske J (2014) The role of media and peer influences in Australian women’s attitudes towards cosmetic surgery. Body Image 11:482–487CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Rufai SR, Davis CR (2014) Aesthetic surgery and Google: ubiquitous, unregulated and enticing websites for patients considering cosmetic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67:640–643CrossRef Rufai SR, Davis CR (2014) Aesthetic surgery and Google: ubiquitous, unregulated and enticing websites for patients considering cosmetic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67:640–643CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Awal DH, Mills C (2018) Cosmetic facial surgery: are online resources reliable and do patients understand them? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:124–128CrossRef Awal DH, Mills C (2018) Cosmetic facial surgery: are online resources reliable and do patients understand them? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:124–128CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Menon AV (2017) Do online reviews diminish physician authority? The case of cosmetic surgery in the U.S. Soc Sci Med 181:1–8CrossRef Menon AV (2017) Do online reviews diminish physician authority? The case of cosmetic surgery in the U.S. Soc Sci Med 181:1–8CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Jeacle I, Carter C (2011) In TripAdvisor we trust: rankings, calculative regimes and abstract systems. Account Organ Soc 36:293–309CrossRef Jeacle I, Carter C (2011) In TripAdvisor we trust: rankings, calculative regimes and abstract systems. Account Organ Soc 36:293–309CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2014) What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organ Sci 25:8688–8891CrossRef Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2014) What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organ Sci 25:8688–8891CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Zuk G, Palma AF, Eylert G, Raptis DA, Guggenheim M, Shafighi M (2016) Systematic review of quality of patient information on liposuction in the Internet. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4:e759CrossRef Zuk G, Palma AF, Eylert G, Raptis DA, Guggenheim M, Shafighi M (2016) Systematic review of quality of patient information on liposuction in the Internet. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4:e759CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Bates BR, Romina S, Ahmed R, Hopson D (2006) The effect of source credibility on consumers’ perceptions of the quality of health information on the Internet. Med Inform Internet Med 31:45–52CrossRef Bates BR, Romina S, Ahmed R, Hopson D (2006) The effect of source credibility on consumers’ perceptions of the quality of health information on the Internet. Med Inform Internet Med 31:45–52CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A qualitative assessment of women’s perspectives and experience of cosmetic surgery
Author
Ayhan Okumuş
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-020-01623-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 4/2020 Go to the issue