Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2021

01-10-2021 | Breast Augmentation | Original Article

Quantitative Analysis of Nipple to Inframammary Fold Distance Variation in Tuberous Breast Augmentation: Is there a Progressive Lower Pole Expansion?

Authors: Stefano Avvedimento, Paolo Montemurro, Emanuele Cigna, Antonio Guastafierro, Barbara Cagli, Adriano Santorelli

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

In patients with short nipple to inframammary fold (N-IMF) distance, as in tuberous breast, the cohesivity and gel distribution of shaped implants work as a controlled tissue expander, progressively adapting the tissues to the implant’s shape. This phenomenon translates into a gradual increase of the N-IMF distance over time, but the true extent to which this occurs has not been quantified to date. This study aims to quantify the postoperative variation of the N-IMF distance in tuberous breast treated with shaped cohesive silicone breast implants.

Methods

We did a retrospective review of a prospective maintained database of all consecutive patients with bilateral Groulleau I and II tuberous breasts who underwent primary breast augmentation between April 2017 and May 2018 at our institution.
To quantify the lower mammary pole's morphological changes, we evaluated the N-IMF distance under maximal stretch as an endpoint. We recorded this value at time 0 (preoperative), immediate post-op (equivalent to the distance planned preoperatively) and at month 1, month 6 and 1-year post-op. Then we calculated the average N-IMF distance variation of our sample of patients with a 99% interval of confidence for each breast obtained. Comparisons were performed using the Sign test and the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

The average implant weight was 353g (range 290-450; SD ±46.147). Of the 54 breasts analyzed, the immediate post-op N-IMF distance was on average 2.43 cm longer than the preop IMF with a 99% confidence interval between 2.01 and 2.86 and SD of ±1.22. The mean difference between the preop N-IMF distance and after 1, 6 and 12 months was respectively 2.78 cm (SD,1.56) (99% CI, 2.24–3.34), 3.08 cm (SD, 1.57) (99% CI, 2.53–3.64), and 3.36 (1.55) (99% CI, 2.82–3.91) Comparing immediate postoperative nipple to inframammary fold distance (N-IMF) to the 1, 6 and 12 months N-IMF values, an average of 4.23% (CI 1.3–7.16), 7.74% (CI 4.25–11.23) and 10.84% (CI 7.21–14.49) of skin length, was gained respectively. According to implants’ weight, subgroup analysis showed that implants > 400 g were associated with significantly higher N-IMF distance increase (p <0.05) compared to implants < 400 g.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that a significant progressive postoperative increase in N-IMF distance should be expected in all cases of tuberous breast augmentation with anatomical implants over a 1 year period. This aspect may have an important implication on the IMF incision and the new fold position preoperative planning.

Level of Evidence IV

Literature
11.
go back to reference Randquist C, Gribbe Ö (2010) Highly cohesive textured form stable gel implants: principles and technique. In: Aesthetic and reconstructive surgery of the breast, Elsevier, Amsterdam Randquist C, Gribbe Ö (2010) Highly cohesive textured form stable gel implants: principles and technique. In: Aesthetic and reconstructive surgery of the breast, Elsevier, Amsterdam
29.
go back to reference Montemurro P, Agko M, Li AQ, Avvedimento S, Hedén P (2017) Implementation of an integrated biodimensional method of breast augmentation with anatomic, highly cohesive silicone gel implants: short-term results with the first 620 consecutive cases. Aesthetic Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx024CrossRef Montemurro P, Agko M, Li AQ, Avvedimento S, Hedén P (2017) Implementation of an integrated biodimensional method of breast augmentation with anatomic, highly cohesive silicone gel implants: short-term results with the first 620 consecutive cases. Aesthetic Surg J. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​asj/​sjx024CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Mallucci P, Branford OA (2016) Design for natural breast augmentation: the ICE principle. plast reconstr surg 1:45–68 Mallucci P, Branford OA (2016) Design for natural breast augmentation: the ICE principle. plast reconstr surg 1:45–68
35.
38.
go back to reference Bengtson BP (2012) The highly cohesive, style 410 form-stable gel implant for primary breast augmentation. In: Surgery of the breast: principles and art, 3rd edn. Lippincott Bengtson BP (2012) The highly cohesive, style 410 form-stable gel implant for primary breast augmentation. In: Surgery of the breast: principles and art, 3rd edn. Lippincott
Metadata
Title
Quantitative Analysis of Nipple to Inframammary Fold Distance Variation in Tuberous Breast Augmentation: Is there a Progressive Lower Pole Expansion?
Authors
Stefano Avvedimento
Paolo Montemurro
Emanuele Cigna
Antonio Guastafierro
Barbara Cagli
Adriano Santorelli
Publication date
01-10-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02363-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2021 Go to the issue

Editor’s Invited Commentary

Invited Discussion on: What is Beauty?