Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2022

28-05-2019 | Breast Augmentation | Editor’s Invited Commentary

Invited Discussion on: Rippling Following Breast Augmentation or Reconstruction: Aetiology, Emerging Treatment Options and a Novel Classification of Severity

Author: Kamran Khoobehi

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Special Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Excerpt

Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Macadam SA, Ho AL, Lennox PA, Pusic AL (2013) Patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction: a comparison of shaped cohesive gel and round cohesive gel implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(3):431–441CrossRef Macadam SA, Ho AL, Lennox PA, Pusic AL (2013) Patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction: a comparison of shaped cohesive gel and round cohesive gel implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(3):431–441CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF et al (2017) Normative data for interpreting the BREAST-Q: augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(4):846–853CrossRef Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF et al (2017) Normative data for interpreting the BREAST-Q: augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(4):846–853CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. BREAST-Q Version 2.0© A Guide for Researchers and Clinicians USER’S GUIDE VERSION 2.0 November 2017. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. BREAST-Q Version 2.0© A Guide for Researchers and Clinicians USER’S GUIDE VERSION 2.0 November 2017.
4.
go back to reference Codner MA, Mejia JD, Locke MB, Mahoney A, Thiels C, Nahai FR, Hester TR, Nahai F (2011) A 15-year experience with primary breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(3):1300–1310CrossRef Codner MA, Mejia JD, Locke MB, Mahoney A, Thiels C, Nahai FR, Hester TR, Nahai F (2011) A 15-year experience with primary breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(3):1300–1310CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Katzel EB, Bucky LP (2017) Fat grafting to the breast: clinical applications and outcomes for reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 140 (5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction): 69S–76S Katzel EB, Bucky LP (2017) Fat grafting to the breast: clinical applications and outcomes for reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 140 (5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction): 69S–76S
6.
go back to reference Duncan DI (2001) Correction of implant rippling using allograft dermis. Aesthet Surg J 21:81–84CrossRef Duncan DI (2001) Correction of implant rippling using allograft dermis. Aesthet Surg J 21:81–84CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Baker BG, Irri R, MacCallum V, Chattopadhyay R, Murphy J, Harvey JR (2018) A prospective comparison of short-term outcomes of subpectoral and prepectoral strattice-based immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 141(5):1077–1084CrossRef Baker BG, Irri R, MacCallum V, Chattopadhyay R, Murphy J, Harvey JR (2018) A prospective comparison of short-term outcomes of subpectoral and prepectoral strattice-based immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 141(5):1077–1084CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Adams WP (2008) The process of breast augmentation: four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(6):1892–1900CrossRef Adams WP (2008) The process of breast augmentation: four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(6):1892–1900CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Spear SL, Sinkin JC, Al-Attar A (2013) Porcine acellular dermal matrix (strattice) in primary and revision cosmetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(5):1140–1148CrossRef Spear SL, Sinkin JC, Al-Attar A (2013) Porcine acellular dermal matrix (strattice) in primary and revision cosmetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(5):1140–1148CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Spear SL, Seruya M, Clemens MW, Teitelbaum S, Nahabedian MY (2011) Acellular dermal matrix for the treatment and prevention of implant-associated breast deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(3):1047–1058CrossRef Spear SL, Seruya M, Clemens MW, Teitelbaum S, Nahabedian MY (2011) Acellular dermal matrix for the treatment and prevention of implant-associated breast deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(3):1047–1058CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Slavin SA, Lin SJ (2012) The use of acellular dermal matrices in revisional breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5 Suppl 2):70S–85SCrossRef Slavin SA, Lin SJ (2012) The use of acellular dermal matrices in revisional breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5 Suppl 2):70S–85SCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Invited Discussion on: Rippling Following Breast Augmentation or Reconstruction: Aetiology, Emerging Treatment Options and a Novel Classification of Severity
Author
Kamran Khoobehi
Publication date
28-05-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue Special Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01381-x

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2022

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2022 Go to the issue