Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Neurocritical Care
Literature
1.
2.
Rady MY, Verheijde JL. Legislative enforcement of nonconsensual determination of neurological (brain) death in muslim patients: a violation of religious rights. J Relig Health. 2018;57(2):649–61.CrossRef
3.
Verheijde JL, Rady MY, Potts M. Neuroscience and brain death controversies: the elephant in the room. J Relig Health. 2018;57(5):1745–63.CrossRef
4.
5.
President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Defining death: a report on the medical, legal and ethical issues in the determination of death. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1981.
6.
Youngner S, Hyun I. Pig experiment challenges assumptions around brain damage in people. Nature. 2019;568(7752):302–4.CrossRef
7.
Wijdicks EF, Varelas PN, Gronseth GS, Greer DM. Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2010;74(23):1911–8.CrossRef
8.
Hansen G, Joffe AR. Confounding brain stem function during pediatric brain death determination: two case reports. J Child Neurol. 2017;32(7):676–9.CrossRef
9.
Shewmon DA. False-positive diagnosis of brain death following the pediatric guidelines: case report and discussion. J Child Neurol. 2017;32(14):1104–17.CrossRef
10.
Yanke G, Rady MY, Verheijde JL. Ethical and legal concerns with Nevada’s brain death amendments. Bioeth Inq. 2018;15(2):193–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Objections to Brain Death Determination: Religion and Neuroscience
Author
Mohamed Y. Rady
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Brain Death
Published in
Neurocritical Care / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1541-6933
Electronic ISSN: 1556-0961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00808-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Neurocritical Care 2/2019 Go to the issue

Brief Communication

Burnout and Resilience Among Neurosciences Critical Care Unit Staff

Invited Editorial Commentary

Autoregulation Monitoring is Important: Even After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage—Isn’t it?

Neurocritical Care Through History

The Ascending Reticular Activating System

Original Work

Early Transcranial Doppler Evaluation of Cerebral Autoregulation Independently Predicts Functional Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Letter to the editor

Feasibility and Safety of Transnasal High Flow Air to Reduce Core Body Temperature

Neuro-Images

Bedside Cranial Ultrasonography in Patients with Hemicraniectomies: A Novel Window into Pathology