Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 6/2018

01-06-2018 | Original Article

Bone mineral density averaged over a region of interest on femur is affected by age-related change of bone geometry

Author: Y. Luo

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

Femur expansion occurs during normal aging in both men and women. Average bone mineral density (BMD) over a region of interest (ROI) on the femur may considerably decrease with age even in healthy people, and therefore, it is inaccurate if used to monitor treatment-induced bone change.

Introduction

Areal bone mineral density (BMD), averaged over a region of interest (ROI) on the femur, is widely used in the diagnosis of osteoporosis, assessment of fracture risk, and monitoring of treatment effectiveness. We studied the effect of age-related change in femur geometry on average BMD.

Methods

The effect of age-related bone geometric change on averaged BMD was investigated by a cross-sectional study. Total 83 healthy subjects were selected for this study. For each subject, QCT of left femur was scanned using clinical scanner. For each standard volume of interest (VOI), integral/cortical/trabecular bone volume, volumetric BMD (vBMD), and bone mass were measured using QCT Pro; the corresponding areal BMD (aBMD) was projected using CTXA-Hip. Both QCT Pro and CTXA-Hip are commercial software. Correlations between bone volume/density/mass and age were studied.

Results

In the studied population, there was no association between body weight/BMI (body mass index) and age, correlation between normalized femoral neck width and age was 0.24 (p < 0.05). Both aBMD and integral vBMD decreased with age (after adjusted by BMI, for aBMD, r = − 0.21 to − 0.24, p ≤ 0.05 except at trochanter; for vBMD, r = − 0.20 to − 0.31, p < 0.05); cortical vBMD had no significant change; trabecular vBMD decreased at all VOIs except at trochanter (after adjusted by BMI, r = − 0.22 to 0.32, p ≤ 0.05). Integral volume showed slight increase but only significant at the trochanter after adjusted by body size, cortical volume showed insignificant decrease, and trabecular volume considerably increased with age in all VOIs (after adjusted by body size, r = 0.27–0.40, p < 0.05). Integral, cortical, and trabecular mass had no significant change in all VOIs, except that at the trochanter trabecular mass slightly increased with age (r = 0.31, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Even though there is no change in bone mass, average BMD may considerably decrease with age due to bone expansion. Comparatively, aBMD is less affected than vBMD.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kling JM, Clarke BL, Sandhu NP (2014) Osteoporosis prevention, screening, and treatment: a review. J Women's Health 23:563–572CrossRef Kling JM, Clarke BL, Sandhu NP (2014) Osteoporosis prevention, screening, and treatment: a review. J Women's Health 23:563–572CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Jeremiah MP, Unwin BK, Greenawald MH (2015) Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Am Fam Physician 92:261–268PubMed Jeremiah MP, Unwin BK, Greenawald MH (2015) Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Am Fam Physician 92:261–268PubMed
4.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Odén A, Johansson H, Borgström F, Ström O, McCloskey EV (2010) FRAX®, a new tool for assessing fracture risk: clinical applications and intervention thresholds. Medicographia 32:33–40 Kanis JA, Odén A, Johansson H, Borgström F, Ström O, McCloskey EV (2010) FRAX®, a new tool for assessing fracture risk: clinical applications and intervention thresholds. Medicographia 32:33–40
5.
go back to reference J.H. Krege, X. Wan, B.C. Lentle, C. Berger, L. Langsetmo, J.D. Adachi, J.C. Prior, A. Tenenhouse, J. P. Brown, N. Kreiger, W.P. Olszynski, R.G. Josse, and D. Goltzman (on behalf of the CaMos Research Group) (2013). Fracture risk prediction: importance of age, BMD and spine fracture status. BoneKey Rep 2 . doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/bonekey.2013.138. J.H. Krege, X. Wan, B.C. Lentle, C. Berger, L. Langsetmo, J.D. Adachi, J.C. Prior, A. Tenenhouse, J. P. Brown, N. Kreiger, W.P. Olszynski, R.G. Josse, and D. Goltzman (on behalf of the CaMos Research Group) (2013). Fracture risk prediction: importance of age, BMD and spine fracture status. BoneKey Rep 2 . doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1038/​bonekey.​2013.​138.
6.
go back to reference Carballido-Gamio J, Harnish R, Saeed I et al (2013) Proximal femoral density distribution and structure in relation to age and hip fracture risk in women. J Bone Miner Res 28:537–546CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carballido-Gamio J, Harnish R, Saeed I et al (2013) Proximal femoral density distribution and structure in relation to age and hip fracture risk in women. J Bone Miner Res 28:537–546CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Lewiecki EM (2010) Bone density testing to monitor osteoporosis therapy in clinical practice. Am Fam Physician 82:749–750PubMed Lewiecki EM (2010) Bone density testing to monitor osteoporosis therapy in clinical practice. Am Fam Physician 82:749–750PubMed
8.
go back to reference McNabb BL, Vittinghoff E, Schwartz AV, Eastell R, Bauer DC, Ensrud K, Rosenberg E, Santora A, Barrett-Connor E, Black DM (2013) BMD changes and predictors of increased bone loss in postmenopausal women after a 5-year course of alendronate. J Bone Miner Res 28:1319–1327CrossRefPubMed McNabb BL, Vittinghoff E, Schwartz AV, Eastell R, Bauer DC, Ensrud K, Rosenberg E, Santora A, Barrett-Connor E, Black DM (2013) BMD changes and predictors of increased bone loss in postmenopausal women after a 5-year course of alendronate. J Bone Miner Res 28:1319–1327CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Barrett-Connor E, Siris ES, Wehren LE, Miller PD, Abbott TA, Berger ML, Santora AC, Sherwood LM (2005) Osteoporosis and fracture risk in women of different ethnic groups. J Bone Miner Res 20:185–194CrossRefPubMed Barrett-Connor E, Siris ES, Wehren LE, Miller PD, Abbott TA, Berger ML, Santora AC, Sherwood LM (2005) Osteoporosis and fracture risk in women of different ethnic groups. J Bone Miner Res 20:185–194CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bergot C, Bousson V, Meunier A, Laval-Jeantet M, Laredo JD (2002) Hip fracture risk and proximal femur geometry from DXA scans. Osteoporos Int 13:542–550CrossRefPubMed Bergot C, Bousson V, Meunier A, Laval-Jeantet M, Laredo JD (2002) Hip fracture risk and proximal femur geometry from DXA scans. Osteoporos Int 13:542–550CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey EV (2009) Assessment of fracture risk. Eur J Radiol 71:392–397CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey EV (2009) Assessment of fracture risk. Eur J Radiol 71:392–397CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bruyere O, Reginster J-Y (2014) Monitoring of osteoporosis therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 28:835–841CrossRefPubMed Bruyere O, Reginster J-Y (2014) Monitoring of osteoporosis therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 28:835–841CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Watts NB, Lewiecki EM, Bonnick SL et al (2009) Clinical value of monitoring BMD in patients treated with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 24:1643–1646CrossRefPubMed Watts NB, Lewiecki EM, Bonnick SL et al (2009) Clinical value of monitoring BMD in patients treated with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 24:1643–1646CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ruff CB, Hayes WC (1982) Subperiosteal expansion and cortical remodeling of the human femur and tibia with aging. Science 217:945–948CrossRefPubMed Ruff CB, Hayes WC (1982) Subperiosteal expansion and cortical remodeling of the human femur and tibia with aging. Science 217:945–948CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Cox M, Mays S (2000) Human osteology in archaeology and forensic science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Cox M, Mays S (2000) Human osteology in archaeology and forensic science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
18.
go back to reference Osterhoff G, Morgan EF, Shefelbine SJ, Karim L, McNamara LM, Augatg P (2016) Bone mechanical properties and changes with osteoporosis. Injury 47:S11–S20CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Osterhoff G, Morgan EF, Shefelbine SJ, Karim L, McNamara LM, Augatg P (2016) Bone mechanical properties and changes with osteoporosis. Injury 47:S11–S20CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Arden E, Arden N, Hunter D (2008) Osteoarthritis. Oxford University Press, New York Arden E, Arden N, Hunter D (2008) Osteoarthritis. Oxford University Press, New York
20.
go back to reference Berger C, Langsetmo L, Joseph L et al (2008) Change in bone mineral density as a function of age in women and men and association with the use of antiresorptive agents. CMAJ 178:1660–1668CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Berger C, Langsetmo L, Joseph L et al (2008) Change in bone mineral density as a function of age in women and men and association with the use of antiresorptive agents. CMAJ 178:1660–1668CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Warming L, Hassager C, Christiansen C (2002) Changes in bone mineral density with age in men and women: a longitudinal study. Osteoporos Int 13:105–112CrossRefPubMed Warming L, Hassager C, Christiansen C (2002) Changes in bone mineral density with age in men and women: a longitudinal study. Osteoporos Int 13:105–112CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Beck TJ, Looker AC, Ruff CB, Sievanen H, Wahner HW (2000) Structural trends in the aging femoral neck and proximal shaft: analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data. J Bone Miner Res 15:2297–2304CrossRefPubMed Beck TJ, Looker AC, Ruff CB, Sievanen H, Wahner HW (2000) Structural trends in the aging femoral neck and proximal shaft: analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data. J Bone Miner Res 15:2297–2304CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ito M, Nakata T, Nishida A, Uetani M (2011) Age-related changes in bone density, geometry and biomechanical properties of the proximal femur: CT-based 3D hip structure analysis in normal postmenopausal women. Bone 48:627–630CrossRefPubMed Ito M, Nakata T, Nishida A, Uetani M (2011) Age-related changes in bone density, geometry and biomechanical properties of the proximal femur: CT-based 3D hip structure analysis in normal postmenopausal women. Bone 48:627–630CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Engelke K (2017) Quantitative computed tomography-current status and new developments. J Clin Densitom 20:309–321CrossRefPubMed Engelke K (2017) Quantitative computed tomography-current status and new developments. J Clin Densitom 20:309–321CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Treece GM, Gee AH (2015) Independent measurement of femoral cortical thickness and cortical bone density using clinical CT. Med Image Anal 20:249–264CrossRefPubMed Treece GM, Gee AH (2015) Independent measurement of femoral cortical thickness and cortical bone density using clinical CT. Med Image Anal 20:249–264CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Bone mineral density averaged over a region of interest on femur is affected by age-related change of bone geometry
Author
Y. Luo
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4461-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Osteoporosis International 6/2018 Go to the issue