Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Bone Defect | Research article

Bone restoration after revision hip arthroplasty with femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems with cortical strut allografts

Authors: Zichuan Ding, Tingxian Ling, Ping Mou, Duan Wang, Kai Zhou, Zongke Zhou

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Stress shielding and bone loss of the femur are of great concern after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) with extensively porous-coated stems, especially in a femur with already bone loss. The femoral bone remodeling patterns after revision THA with femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems with cortical strut allografts remain unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 47 patients who underwent revision THA using extensively porous-coated stems combined with cortical strut allografts and 75 patients without allografts. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Femoral bone remodeling signs, including stress shielding, bone restoration in bone defect area, distal cortical hypertrophy, and femoral width, were compared between patients with and without cortical strut allografts. Clinical outcomes were also compared between two groups.

Results

Patients with cortical strut allografts showed less severe stress shielding (P = 0.01) than patients without allografts. Patients with allografts had more osseous restoration in bone defect area than patients without allografts (63.8% vs 30.7%, P < 0.001). Femoral width was significantly higher in femur with allografts than in femur without allografts at the immediate postoperative stage and latest follow-up (both P < 0.001). The hip function score, re-revision rate, and complications were comparable between two groups.

Conclusion

The application of cortical strut allografts can decrease the severity of stress shielding, augment osseous restoration in bone defect area and improve femoral bone stock after revision THA using extensively porous-coated stems.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;369:230–42.CrossRef Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;369:230–42.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Moreland JR, Bernstein ML. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;319:141–50. Moreland JR, Bernstein ML. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;319:141–50.
3.
go back to reference Nadaud MC, Griffin WL, Fehring TK, Mason JB, Tabor OB Jr, Odum S, et al. Cementless revision total hip arthroplasty without allograft in severe proximal femoral defects. J Arthroplast. 2005;20(6):738–44.CrossRef Nadaud MC, Griffin WL, Fehring TK, Mason JB, Tabor OB Jr, Odum S, et al. Cementless revision total hip arthroplasty without allograft in severe proximal femoral defects. J Arthroplast. 2005;20(6):738–44.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Thomsen PB, Jensen NJ, Kampmann J, Baek HT. Revision hip arthroplasty with an extensively porous-coated stem - excellent long-term results also in severe femoral bone stock loss. Hip Int. 2013;23(4):352–8.CrossRef Thomsen PB, Jensen NJ, Kampmann J, Baek HT. Revision hip arthroplasty with an extensively porous-coated stem - excellent long-term results also in severe femoral bone stock loss. Hip Int. 2013;23(4):352–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chung LH, Wu PK, Chen CF, Chen WM, Chen TH, Liu CL. Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: reliable choice for stem revision in Paprosky femoral type III defects. Orthopedics. 2012;35(7):e1017–21.CrossRef Chung LH, Wu PK, Chen CF, Chen WM, Chen TH, Liu CL. Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: reliable choice for stem revision in Paprosky femoral type III defects. Orthopedics. 2012;35(7):e1017–21.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fukui K, Kaneuji A, Sugimori T, Ichiseki T, Matsumoto T. Bone remodeling after a mean of 10 years in diaphyseal cortical defects repaired with femoral revision using bypass fixation of extensively porous-coated stems with high stiffness. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015;25(4):741–7.CrossRef Fukui K, Kaneuji A, Sugimori T, Ichiseki T, Matsumoto T. Bone remodeling after a mean of 10 years in diaphyseal cortical defects repaired with femoral revision using bypass fixation of extensively porous-coated stems with high stiffness. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015;25(4):741–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Richards CJ, Duncan CP, Masri BA, Garbuz DS. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a comparison of two stem designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(2):491–6.CrossRef Richards CJ, Duncan CP, Masri BA, Garbuz DS. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a comparison of two stem designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(2):491–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kusano T, Seki T, Higuchi Y, Takegami Y, Osawa Y, Ishiguro N. Preoperative canal bone ratio is related to high-degree stress shielding: a minimum 5yYear follow-up study of a proximally hydroxyapatite-coated straight tapered titanium femoral component. J Arthroplast. 2018;33(6):1764–9.CrossRef Kusano T, Seki T, Higuchi Y, Takegami Y, Osawa Y, Ishiguro N. Preoperative canal bone ratio is related to high-degree stress shielding: a minimum 5yYear follow-up study of a proximally hydroxyapatite-coated straight tapered titanium femoral component. J Arthroplast. 2018;33(6):1764–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Goosen JH, Swieringa AJ, Keet JG, Verheyen CC. Excellent results from proximally HA-coated femoral stems with a minimum of 6 years follow-up: a prospective evaluation of 100 patients. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(2):190–7.CrossRef Goosen JH, Swieringa AJ, Keet JG, Verheyen CC. Excellent results from proximally HA-coated femoral stems with a minimum of 6 years follow-up: a prospective evaluation of 100 patients. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(2):190–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wilkinson JM, Hamer AJ, Rogers A, Stockley I, Eastell R. Bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover in aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2003;21(4):691–6.CrossRef Wilkinson JM, Hamer AJ, Rogers A, Stockley I, Eastell R. Bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover in aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2003;21(4):691–6.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lindahl H. Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty. Injury. 2007;38(6):651–4.CrossRef Lindahl H. Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty. Injury. 2007;38(6):651–4.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Callaghan JJ, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM, Wilson PD Jr, Ranawat CS. Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(7):1074–85.CrossRef Callaghan JJ, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM, Wilson PD Jr, Ranawat CS. Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(7):1074–85.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Emerson RH Jr, Malinin TI, Cuellar AD, Head WC, Peters PC. Cortical strut allografts in the reconstruction of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty. A basic science and clinical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;285:35–44. Emerson RH Jr, Malinin TI, Cuellar AD, Head WC, Peters PC. Cortical strut allografts in the reconstruction of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty. A basic science and clinical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;285:35–44.
14.
go back to reference Mokka J, Keemu H, Koivisto M, Stormi T, Vahlberg T, Virolainen P, et al. Experience of structural onlay allografts for the treatment of bone deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. Scand J Surg. 2013;102(4):265–70.CrossRef Mokka J, Keemu H, Koivisto M, Stormi T, Vahlberg T, Virolainen P, et al. Experience of structural onlay allografts for the treatment of bone deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. Scand J Surg. 2013;102(4):265–70.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pak JH, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, Lawrence JM. Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;295:172–8. Pak JH, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, Lawrence JM. Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;295:172–8.
16.
go back to reference Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Rastogi D. High survivorship with cementless stems and cortical strut allografts for large femoral bone defects in revision THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(9):2990–3000.CrossRef Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Rastogi D. High survivorship with cementless stems and cortical strut allografts for large femoral bone defects in revision THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(9):2990–3000.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ding ZC, Ling TX, Yuan MC, Qin YZ, Mou P, Wang HY, et al. Minimum 8-year follow-up of revision THA with severe femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems and cortical strut allografts. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):218.CrossRef Ding ZC, Ling TX, Yuan MC, Qin YZ, Mou P, Wang HY, et al. Minimum 8-year follow-up of revision THA with severe femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems and cortical strut allografts. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):218.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Head WC, Wagner RA, Emerson RH Jr, Malinin TI. Restoration of femoral bone stock in revision total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24(4):697–703.PubMed Head WC, Wagner RA, Emerson RH Jr, Malinin TI. Restoration of femoral bone stock in revision total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24(4):697–703.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Head WC, Malinin TI. Results of onlay allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:108–12.CrossRef Head WC, Malinin TI. Results of onlay allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:108–12.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Malinin T, Latta LL, Wagner JL, Brown MD. Healing of fractures with freeze-dried cortical bone plates. Comparison with compression plating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;190:281–6. Malinin T, Latta LL, Wagner JL, Brown MD. Healing of fractures with freeze-dried cortical bone plates. Comparison with compression plating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;190:281–6.
21.
go back to reference Wu LD, Xiong Y, Yu HC. Effects of rhBMP-2 on cortical strut allograft healing to the femur in revision total hip arthroplasties: an experimental study. Int Orthop. 2007;31(5):605–11.CrossRef Wu LD, Xiong Y, Yu HC. Effects of rhBMP-2 on cortical strut allograft healing to the femur in revision total hip arthroplasties: an experimental study. Int Orthop. 2007;31(5):605–11.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Barden B, Fitzek JG, Huttegger C, Loer F. Supportive strut grafts for diaphyseal bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;387:148–55.CrossRef Barden B, Fitzek JG, Huttegger C, Loer F. Supportive strut grafts for diaphyseal bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;387:148–55.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Buoncristiani AM, Dorr LD, Johnson C, Wan Z. Cementless revision of total hip arthroplasty using the anatomic porous replacement revision prosthesis. J Arthroplast. 1997;12(4):403–15.CrossRef Buoncristiani AM, Dorr LD, Johnson C, Wan Z. Cementless revision of total hip arthroplasty using the anatomic porous replacement revision prosthesis. J Arthroplast. 1997;12(4):403–15.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ding ZC, Xu B, Liang ZM, Wang HY, Luo ZY, Zhou ZK. Limited influence of comorbidities on length of stay after total hip arthroplasty: experience of enhanced recovery after surgery. Orthop Surg. 2020;12(1):153–61.CrossRef Ding ZC, Xu B, Liang ZM, Wang HY, Luo ZY, Zhou ZK. Limited influence of comorbidities on length of stay after total hip arthroplasty: experience of enhanced recovery after surgery. Orthop Surg. 2020;12(1):153–61.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;141:17–27. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;141:17–27.
26.
go back to reference Engh CA, Bobyn JD. The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;231:7–28. Engh CA, Bobyn JD. The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;231:7–28.
27.
go back to reference Moreland JR, Moreno MA. Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty of the hip: minimum 5 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:194–201.CrossRef Moreland JR, Moreno MA. Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty of the hip: minimum 5 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:194–201.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bohm P, Bischel O. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem : evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(7):1023–31.CrossRef Bohm P, Bischel O. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem : evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(7):1023–31.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ritter MA, Fechtman RW. Distal cortical hypertrophy following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 1988;3(2):117–21.CrossRef Ritter MA, Fechtman RW. Distal cortical hypertrophy following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 1988;3(2):117–21.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Buttaro MA, Costantini J, Comba F, Piccaluga F. The use of femoral struts and impacted cancellous bone allograft in patients with severe femoral bone loss who undergo revision total hip replacement: a three- to nine-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2012;94(2):167–72.CrossRef Buttaro MA, Costantini J, Comba F, Piccaluga F. The use of femoral struts and impacted cancellous bone allograft in patients with severe femoral bone loss who undergo revision total hip replacement: a three- to nine-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2012;94(2):167–72.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;257:107–28. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;257:107–28.
32.
go back to reference Ding ZC, Lin YK, Gan YK, Tang TT. Molecular pathogenesis of fracture nonunion. J Orthop Translat. 2018;14:45–56.CrossRef Ding ZC, Lin YK, Gan YK, Tang TT. Molecular pathogenesis of fracture nonunion. J Orthop Translat. 2018;14:45–56.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Huang Y, Shao H, Zhou Y, Gu J, Tang H, Yang D. Femoral bone remodeling in revision total hip arthroplasty with use of modular compared with monoblock tapered fluted titanium stems: the role of stem length and stiffness. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(6):531–8.CrossRef Huang Y, Shao H, Zhou Y, Gu J, Tang H, Yang D. Femoral bone remodeling in revision total hip arthroplasty with use of modular compared with monoblock tapered fluted titanium stems: the role of stem length and stiffness. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(6):531–8.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Riviere C, Grappiolo G, Engh CA Jr, Vidalain JP, Chen AF, Boehler N, et al. Long-term bone remodelling around 'legendary' cementless femoral stems. EFORT Open Rev. 2018;3(2):45–57.CrossRef Riviere C, Grappiolo G, Engh CA Jr, Vidalain JP, Chen AF, Boehler N, et al. Long-term bone remodelling around 'legendary' cementless femoral stems. EFORT Open Rev. 2018;3(2):45–57.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Sariyilmaz K, Dikici F, Dikmen G, Bozdag E, Sunbuloglu E, Bekler B, et al. The effect of strut allograft and its position on Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a biomechanical study. J Arthroplast. 2014;29(7):1485–90.CrossRef Sariyilmaz K, Dikici F, Dikmen G, Bozdag E, Sunbuloglu E, Bekler B, et al. The effect of strut allograft and its position on Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a biomechanical study. J Arthroplast. 2014;29(7):1485–90.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Zdero R, Walker R, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH. Biomechanical evaluation of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(5):1068–77.CrossRef Zdero R, Walker R, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH. Biomechanical evaluation of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(5):1068–77.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Sheth NP, Melnic CM, Rozell JC, Paprosky WG. Management of severe femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2015;46(3):329–42 ix.CrossRef Sheth NP, Melnic CM, Rozell JC, Paprosky WG. Management of severe femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2015;46(3):329–42 ix.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Kimura H, Kaneuji A, Sugimori T, Matsumoto T. Revision total hip arthroplasty by nonmodular short and long cementless stems. J Orthop Sci. 2008;13(4):335–40.CrossRef Kimura H, Kaneuji A, Sugimori T, Matsumoto T. Revision total hip arthroplasty by nonmodular short and long cementless stems. J Orthop Sci. 2008;13(4):335–40.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Lim CT, Amanatullah DF, Huddleston JI 3rd, Hwang KL, Maloney WJ, Goodman SB. Cortical strut allograft support of modular femoral junctions during revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2017;32(5):1586–92.CrossRef Lim CT, Amanatullah DF, Huddleston JI 3rd, Hwang KL, Maloney WJ, Goodman SB. Cortical strut allograft support of modular femoral junctions during revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2017;32(5):1586–92.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Bone restoration after revision hip arthroplasty with femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems with cortical strut allografts
Authors
Zichuan Ding
Tingxian Ling
Ping Mou
Duan Wang
Kai Zhou
Zongke Zhou
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1749-799X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01720-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2020 Go to the issue