Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 12/2023

Open Access 11-10-2023 | Bone Defect | KNEE

Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects

Authors: Michael Eder-Halbedl, Andrea Fink, Martin Pietsch, Oliver Djahani, Siegfried Hofmann

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 12/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Severe metaphyseal bone defects remain a challenge and represent a growing problem in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). The purpose of this study was to examine the survival of first-generation tantalum metal cones (TMC) and to assess clinical and radiographic data obtained from mid- to long-term follow-ups (FU) after RTKA with severe bony defects.

Methods

This retrospective case series included 100 consecutive patients of the same centre, who underwent RTKA surgery with TMC for tibia and/or femur bone defects between January 2011 and December 2015. Fourteen patients had died and six were lost for FU, leaving a total of eighty patients (one hundred and twelve TMC) for final evaluation. Clinical parameters including the Knee Society Score (KSS), visual analogue scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and range of motion (ROM) were determined preoperatively based on the patients’ medical charts, and assessed again during the final FU after an average of 6.1 (5–9) years postoperative. Standardised postoperative X-rays were analysed during the final FU visit for osseointegration of the cones, and any signs of implant loosening were assessed with the modified Knee Society Radiographic review criteria. Perioperative and postoperative complications, reoperations, as well as implant and cone re-revisions were analysed. Survivorship analysis was performed with (a) cone-related revision for any reason and (b) implant component revision for any reason.

Results

Previous RTKA had to be performed due to 64 (80%) aseptic and 16 (20%) septic failures. At the final FU, 75 (94%) tibia and 76 (95%) femur TMCs and implants were clinically stable. One patient experienced loosening of cones and implants at the femur and tibia but denied re-revision surgery. There were eight (10%) reoperations including two early wound healing problems, two inlay changes, two periprosthetic fractures, one debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR), and one secondary patella replacement. The six (7.5%) re-revisions included two aseptic loosening’s of the opposite implant without TMC, one arthrodesis for recurrent instability, and three deep infections managed by two two-stage exchanges, and one amputation for persistent infection. At re-revision, all TMC cones were osteointegrated without signs of loosening. The determined clinical parameters showed significant (p < 0.001) postoperative improvement, and objective KSS was rated as excellent in 51%, and as good in 22% of patients at the final FU. The estimated 8-year Kaplan–Meier survival was 95% for TMC and 92.5% for implant components.

Conclusion

Tantalum metal cones (TMC) demonstrate a secure fixation for treatment of severe femoral and tibial metaphyseal bone defects during RTKA. This fixation concept showed excellent mid- to long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes with promising 8-year survival rates for cones and implant components.

Level of evidence

Retrospective cohort study, Level IV.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abdelaziz H, Biewald P, Anastasiadis Z, Haasper C, Gehrke T, Hawi N, Citak M (2020) Midterm results after tantalum cones in 1-stage knee exchange for periprosthetic joint infection: a single-center study. J Arthroplasty 35:1084–1089CrossRefPubMed Abdelaziz H, Biewald P, Anastasiadis Z, Haasper C, Gehrke T, Hawi N, Citak M (2020) Midterm results after tantalum cones in 1-stage knee exchange for periprosthetic joint infection: a single-center study. J Arthroplasty 35:1084–1089CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Abdelaziz H, Jaramillo R, Gehrke T, Ohlmeier M, Citak M (2019) Clinical survivorship of aseptic revision TKA using hinged knees and tantalum cones at minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 34:3018–3022CrossRefPubMed Abdelaziz H, Jaramillo R, Gehrke T, Ohlmeier M, Citak M (2019) Clinical survivorship of aseptic revision TKA using hinged knees and tantalum cones at minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 34:3018–3022CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Aboltins CA, Berdal JE, Casas F, Corona PS, Cuellar D, Ferrari MC, Hendershot E, Huang W, Kuo F, Malkani A, Reyes F, Rudelli S, Safir O, Seyler T, Tan TL, Townsend R, Tuncay I, Turner D, Winkler H, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Yates AJ, Zahar A (2019) Hip and knee section, prevention, antimicrobials (systemic): proceedings of international consensus on orthopedic infections. J Arthroplasty 34:S279–S288 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.012 Aboltins CA, Berdal JE, Casas F, Corona PS, Cuellar D, Ferrari MC, Hendershot E, Huang W, Kuo F, Malkani A, Reyes F, Rudelli S, Safir O, Seyler T, Tan TL, Townsend R, Tuncay I, Turner D, Winkler H, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Yates AJ, Zahar A (2019) Hip and knee section, prevention, antimicrobials (systemic): proceedings of international consensus on orthopedic infections. J Arthroplasty 34:S279–S288 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​arth.​2018.​09.​012
6.
go back to reference Behery OA, Shing EZ, Yu Z, Springer BD, Fehring TK, Otero JE (2021) Survivorship and radiographic evaluation of metaphyseal cones with short cemented stems in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 37:330–335CrossRefPubMed Behery OA, Shing EZ, Yu Z, Springer BD, Fehring TK, Otero JE (2021) Survivorship and radiographic evaluation of metaphyseal cones with short cemented stems in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 37:330–335CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bloch BV, Shannak OA, Palan J, Phillips JRA, James PJ (2020) Metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty provide reliable fixation and excellent medium to long-term implant survivorship. J Arthroplasty 35:495–499CrossRefPubMed Bloch BV, Shannak OA, Palan J, Phillips JRA, James PJ (2020) Metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty provide reliable fixation and excellent medium to long-term implant survivorship. J Arthroplasty 35:495–499CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Carender CN, An Q, Tetreault MW, De A, Brown TS, Bedard NA (2022) Use of cementless metaphyseal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty 37:554–558CrossRefPubMed Carender CN, An Q, Tetreault MW, De A, Brown TS, Bedard NA (2022) Use of cementless metaphyseal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty 37:554–558CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Chalmers BP, Desy NM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Taunton MJ (2017) Survivorship of metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:1565–1570CrossRefPubMed Chalmers BP, Desy NM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Taunton MJ (2017) Survivorship of metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:1565–1570CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference De Martino I, Mancino F, Di Matteo V, Singlitico A, Maccauro G, Gasparini G (2022) Tantalum cones for severe bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty: a minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 38:886–892CrossRefPubMed De Martino I, Mancino F, Di Matteo V, Singlitico A, Maccauro G, Gasparini G (2022) Tantalum cones for severe bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty: a minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 38:886–892CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (1999) Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 48:167–175PubMed Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (1999) Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 48:167–175PubMed
17.
go back to reference Hernandez NM, Hinton ZW, Wu CJ, Ryan SP, Bolognesi MP (2021) Mid-term results of tibial cones: reasonable survivorship but increased failure in those with significant bone loss and prior infection. Bone Joint 103-B:158–164 Hernandez NM, Hinton ZW, Wu CJ, Ryan SP, Bolognesi MP (2021) Mid-term results of tibial cones: reasonable survivorship but increased failure in those with significant bone loss and prior infection. Bone Joint 103-B:158–164
18.
go back to reference Hofmann S, Seitlinger G, Djahani O, Pietsch M (2011) The painful knee after TKA: a diagnostic algorithm for failure analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1442–1452CrossRefPubMed Hofmann S, Seitlinger G, Djahani O, Pietsch M (2011) The painful knee after TKA: a diagnostic algorithm for failure analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1442–1452CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Jacquet C, Ros F, Guy S, Parratte S, Ollivier M, Argenson J (2021) Trabecular metal cones combined with short cemented stem allow favorable outcomes in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 36:657–663CrossRefPubMed Jacquet C, Ros F, Guy S, Parratte S, Ollivier M, Argenson J (2021) Trabecular metal cones combined with short cemented stem allow favorable outcomes in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 36:657–663CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Levent A, Suero EM, Gehrke T, Bakhtiari IG, Citak M (2021) Risk factors for aseptic loosening in complex revision total knee arthroplasty using rotating hinge implants. Int Orthop Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 45:125–132 Levent A, Suero EM, Gehrke T, Bakhtiari IG, Citak M (2021) Risk factors for aseptic loosening in complex revision total knee arthroplasty using rotating hinge implants. Int Orthop Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 45:125–132
23.
go back to reference Longo UG, Salvatore SD, Intermesoli G, Pirato F, Piergentili I, Becker R, Denaro V (2022) Metaphyseal cones and sleeves are similar in improving short- and mid-term outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty revisions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31:861–882CrossRefPubMed Longo UG, Salvatore SD, Intermesoli G, Pirato F, Piergentili I, Becker R, Denaro V (2022) Metaphyseal cones and sleeves are similar in improving short- and mid-term outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty revisions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31:861–882CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Lotke PA, Carolan GF, Puri N (2006) Technique for impaction bone grafting of large bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:57–60CrossRefPubMed Lotke PA, Carolan GF, Puri N (2006) Technique for impaction bone grafting of large bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:57–60CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Mancuso F, Beltrame A, Colombo E, Miani E, Bassini F (2017) Management of metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense 88:98–111 Mancuso F, Beltrame A, Colombo E, Miani E, Bassini F (2017) Management of metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense 88:98–111
26.
go back to reference Miralles-Muñoz FA, Gonzalez-Parreño S, Martinez-Mendez D, Gonzalez-Navarro B, Ruiz-Lozano M, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Alonso-Montero C (2022) A validated outcome categorization of the knee society score for total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30:1266–1272CrossRefPubMed Miralles-Muñoz FA, Gonzalez-Parreño S, Martinez-Mendez D, Gonzalez-Navarro B, Ruiz-Lozano M, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Alonso-Montero C (2022) A validated outcome categorization of the knee society score for total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30:1266–1272CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Morgan-Jones R, Oussedik SI, Graichen H, Haddad FS (2015) Zonal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 97-B:147–149 Morgan-Jones R, Oussedik SI, Graichen H, Haddad FS (2015) Zonal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 97-B:147–149
28.
go back to reference Panda I, Wakde O, Singh H, Rajgopal A (2018) Management of large bone defects around the knee using porous tantalum trabecular metal cones during complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty 29:265–271CrossRef Panda I, Wakde O, Singh H, Rajgopal A (2018) Management of large bone defects around the knee using porous tantalum trabecular metal cones during complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty 29:265–271CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Potter GD, Abdel MP, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD (2016) Midterm results of porous tantalum femoral cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:1286–1291CrossRefPubMed Potter GD, Abdel MP, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD (2016) Midterm results of porous tantalum femoral cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:1286–1291CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Rajgopal A, Panda I, Yadav S, Wakde O (2018) Stacked tantalum cones as a method for treating severe distal femoral bone deficiency in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 32:833–840PubMed Rajgopal A, Panda I, Yadav S, Wakde O (2018) Stacked tantalum cones as a method for treating severe distal femoral bone deficiency in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 32:833–840PubMed
33.
go back to reference Sculco PK, Abdel MP, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG (2016) The management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: rebuild, reinforce, and augment. Bone Joint J 98-B:120–124 Sculco PK, Abdel MP, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG (2016) The management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: rebuild, reinforce, and augment. Bone Joint J 98-B:120–124
34.
go back to reference Sheth NP, Bonadio MB, Demange MK (2017) Bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 25:348–357CrossRefPubMed Sheth NP, Bonadio MB, Demange MK (2017) Bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 25:348–357CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Siddiqi A, Chen AF, Piuzzi NS, Kelly MA (2021) The use of metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 29:e904–e920CrossRefPubMed Siddiqi A, Chen AF, Piuzzi NS, Kelly MA (2021) The use of metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 29:e904–e920CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Small I, Meghpara M, Stein J, Goh G, Banerjee S, Courtney PM (2022) Intermediate-term survivorship of metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision TKA. J Arthroplasty 37:1839–1843CrossRefPubMed Small I, Meghpara M, Stein J, Goh G, Banerjee S, Courtney PM (2022) Intermediate-term survivorship of metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision TKA. J Arthroplasty 37:1839–1843CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Vince K, Oakes D (2006) Three-step technique for revision total knee arthroplasty. In: Scuderi GR, Tria AJ (eds) Knee arthroplasty handbook. Springer, New York, pp 104–115CrossRef Vince K, Oakes D (2006) Three-step technique for revision total knee arthroplasty. In: Scuderi GR, Tria AJ (eds) Knee arthroplasty handbook. Springer, New York, pp 104–115CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Xie S, Conlisk N, Hamilton D, Scott C, Burnett R, Pankaj P (2020) A finite element analysis of tibial tritanium cones without stems in varying bone defects. Knee 27:656–666CrossRefPubMed Xie S, Conlisk N, Hamilton D, Scott C, Burnett R, Pankaj P (2020) A finite element analysis of tibial tritanium cones without stems in varying bone defects. Knee 27:656–666CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects
Authors
Michael Eder-Halbedl
Andrea Fink
Martin Pietsch
Oliver Djahani
Siegfried Hofmann
Publication date
11-10-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Bone Defect
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 12/2023
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07593-8

Other articles of this Issue 12/2023

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 12/2023 Go to the issue