Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2019

Open Access 01-07-2019 | Bone Defect | KNEE

Age, gender, functional KSS, reason for revision and type of bone defect predict functional outcome 5 years after revision total knee arthroplasty: a multivariable prediction model

Authors: Jan F. M. Verbeek, Gerjon Hannink, Koen C. Defoort, Ate B. Wymenga, Petra J. C. Heesterbeek

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 7/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The number of revision total knee arthroplasties (rTKA) is increasing. Unfortunately, not all patients benefit from revision surgery. The aim of this study was to develop a clinical prediction model that can be used to predict the functional outcome 5 years after rTKA.

Methods

Data of patients receiving rTKA at Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, from 2004 onwards were prospectively collected. Demographic and clinical variables and patient-reported outcome scores were collected and considered as potential predictors. Beneficial outcome was defined as an increase of ≥ 20 points on the functional knee society scores (fKSS) or an absolute fKSS ≥ 80 points 5 years after surgery. The prediction model was developed using backward logistic regression. Regression coefficients were converted into an easy to use prediction rule.

Results

Overall, 295 rTKA patients were included of whom 157 (53%) had beneficial fKSS 5 years later. Age, gender, femoral bone defects, preoperative fKSS, and stiffness as reason for revision were included in the model. Men had a higher chance of beneficial fKSS than women (OR 1.59, 95% CI 0.91–2.78). Patients with major bone defects (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22–0.85), higher age (IQR OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.26–0.58), higher preoperative fKSS (IQR OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.30–0.59), and severe stiffness (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.20–1.15) had a lower chance of successful outcome. The model’s AUC was 0.76, 95% CI 0.70–0.81.

Conclusion

Easily determinable characteristics of patients who need rTKA can be used to predict future functional outcome. Young men with low preoperative fKSS without severe stiffness are more likely to achieve a beneficial outcome.

Level of evidence

IV.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abdel MP, Della Valle CJ (2016) The surgical approach for revision total knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 98-B:113–115CrossRef Abdel MP, Della Valle CJ (2016) The surgical approach for revision total knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 98-B:113–115CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Baier C, Luring C, Schaumburger J, Kock F, Beckmann J, Tingart M, Zeman F, Grifka J, Springorum HR (2013) Assessing patient-oriented results after revision total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 18:955–961CrossRefPubMed Baier C, Luring C, Schaumburger J, Kock F, Beckmann J, Tingart M, Zeman F, Grifka J, Springorum HR (2013) Assessing patient-oriented results after revision total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 18:955–961CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG (2015) Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ 350:g7594CrossRefPubMed Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG (2015) Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ 350:g7594CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Davenport DL, Bowe EA, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Mentzer RM Jr (2006) National surgical quality improvement program (NSQIP) risk factors can be used to validate American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASAPS) levels. Ann Surg 243:636–641CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Davenport DL, Bowe EA, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Mentzer RM Jr (2006) National surgical quality improvement program (NSQIP) risk factors can be used to validate American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASAPS) levels. Ann Surg 243:636–641CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Dowsey MM, Choong PF (2013) The utility of outcome measures in total knee replacement surgery. Int J Rheumatol 2013:506518 Dowsey MM, Choong PF (2013) The utility of outcome measures in total knee replacement surgery. Int J Rheumatol 2013:506518
6.
go back to reference Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (1998) Classification and preoperative radiographic evaluation: knee. Orthop Clin North Am 29:205–217CrossRefPubMed Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (1998) Classification and preoperative radiographic evaluation: knee. Orthop Clin North Am 29:205–217CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Franke KF, Nusem I, Gamboa G, Morgan DA (2013) Outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with bone allograft in 30 cases. Acta Orthop Belg 79:427–434PubMed Franke KF, Nusem I, Gamboa G, Morgan DA (2013) Outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with bone allograft in 30 cases. Acta Orthop Belg 79:427–434PubMed
8.
go back to reference Giesinger JM, Hamilton DF, Jost B, Behrend H, Giesinger K (2015) WOMAC, EQ-5D and knee society score thresholds for treatment success after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 30:2154–2158CrossRef Giesinger JM, Hamilton DF, Jost B, Behrend H, Giesinger K (2015) WOMAC, EQ-5D and knee society score thresholds for treatment success after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 30:2154–2158CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Giesinger JM, Loth FL, MacDonald DJ, Giesinger K, Patton JT, Simpson A, Howie CR, Hamilton DF (2018) Patient-reported outcome metrics following total knee arthroplasty are influenced differently by patients’ body mass index. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:3257–3264CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Giesinger JM, Loth FL, MacDonald DJ, Giesinger K, Patton JT, Simpson A, Howie CR, Hamilton DF (2018) Patient-reported outcome metrics following total knee arthroplasty are influenced differently by patients’ body mass index. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:3257–3264CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Hardeman F, Londers J, Favril A, Witvrouw E, Bellemans J, Victor J (2012) Predisposing factors which are relevant for the clinical outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1049–1056CrossRefPubMed Hardeman F, Londers J, Favril A, Witvrouw E, Bellemans J, Victor J (2012) Predisposing factors which are relevant for the clinical outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1049–1056CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Harrell FE Jr (2015) Multivariable modeling strategies. In: Regression modeling strategies. With applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, Cham, pp 63–102 Harrell FE Jr (2015) Multivariable modeling strategies. In: Regression modeling strategies. With applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, Cham, pp 63–102
12.
go back to reference Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14 Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14
13.
go back to reference Jacobs CA, Christensen CP (2009) Correlations between knee society function scores and functional force measures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:2414–2419CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jacobs CA, Christensen CP (2009) Correlations between knee society function scores and functional force measures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:2414–2419CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Kasmire KE, Rasouli MR, Mortazavi SM, Sharkey PF, Parvizi J (2014) Predictors of functional outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty following aseptic failure. Knee 21:264–267CrossRefPubMed Kasmire KE, Rasouli MR, Mortazavi SM, Sharkey PF, Parvizi J (2014) Predictors of functional outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty following aseptic failure. Knee 21:264–267CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89:780–785 Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89:780–785
16.
go back to reference Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M, Bozic KJ (2009) Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:2606–2612CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M, Bozic KJ (2009) Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:2606–2612CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ (2014) Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96:624–630CrossRef Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ (2014) Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96:624–630CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Labek G, Thaler M, Janda W, Agreiter M, Stockl B (2011) Revision rates after total joint replacement: cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93:293–297CrossRef Labek G, Thaler M, Janda W, Agreiter M, Stockl B (2011) Revision rates after total joint replacement: cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93:293–297CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lee WC, Kwan YH, Chong HC, Yeo SJ (2017) The minimal clinically important difference for knee society clinical rating system after total knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:3354–3359CrossRefPubMed Lee WC, Kwan YH, Chong HC, Yeo SJ (2017) The minimal clinically important difference for knee society clinical rating system after total knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:3354–3359CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Meek RM, Masri BA, Dunlop D, Garbuz DS, Greidanus NV, McGraw R, Duncan CP (2003) Patient satisfaction and functional status after treatment of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty with use of the PROSTALAC articulating spacer. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85A:1888–1892CrossRef Meek RM, Masri BA, Dunlop D, Garbuz DS, Greidanus NV, McGraw R, Duncan CP (2003) Patient satisfaction and functional status after treatment of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty with use of the PROSTALAC articulating spacer. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85A:1888–1892CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mulhall KJ, Ghomrawi HM, Mihalko W, Cui Q, Saleh KJ (2007) Adverse effects of increased body mass index and weight on survivorship of total knee arthroplasty and subsequent outcomes of revision TKA. J Knee Surg 20:199–204CrossRefPubMed Mulhall KJ, Ghomrawi HM, Mihalko W, Cui Q, Saleh KJ (2007) Adverse effects of increased body mass index and weight on survivorship of total knee arthroplasty and subsequent outcomes of revision TKA. J Knee Surg 20:199–204CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Namba RS, Cafri G, Khatod M, Inacio MC, Brox TW, Paxton EW (2013) Risk factors for total knee arthroplasty aseptic revision. J Arthroplast 28:122–127CrossRef Namba RS, Cafri G, Khatod M, Inacio MC, Brox TW, Paxton EW (2013) Risk factors for total knee arthroplasty aseptic revision. J Arthroplast 28:122–127CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Nikolaus OB, McLendon PB, Hanssen AD, Mabry TM, Berbari EF, Sierra RJ (2016) Factors associated with 20-year cumulative risk of infection after aseptic index revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 31:872–877CrossRef Nikolaus OB, McLendon PB, Hanssen AD, Mabry TM, Berbari EF, Sierra RJ (2016) Factors associated with 20-year cumulative risk of infection after aseptic index revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 31:872–877CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Nwachukwu BU, Gurary EB, Lerner V, Collins JE, Thornhill TS, Losina E, Katz JN (2015) Effect of smoking and soft tissue release on risk of revision after total knee arthroplasty: a case-control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:245CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nwachukwu BU, Gurary EB, Lerner V, Collins JE, Thornhill TS, Losina E, Katz JN (2015) Effect of smoking and soft tissue release on risk of revision after total knee arthroplasty: a case-control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:245CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Patil N, Lee K, Huddleston JI, Harris AH, Goodman SB (2010) Aseptic versus septic revision total knee arthroplasty: patient satisfaction, outcome and quality of life improvement. Knee 17:200–203CrossRefPubMed Patil N, Lee K, Huddleston JI, Harris AH, Goodman SB (2010) Aseptic versus septic revision total knee arthroplasty: patient satisfaction, outcome and quality of life improvement. Knee 17:200–203CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Paxton EW, Inacio MC, Khatod M, Yue E, Funahashi T, Barber T (2015) Risk calculators predict failures of knee and hip arthroplasties: findings from a large health maintenance organization. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:3965–3973CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Paxton EW, Inacio MC, Khatod M, Yue E, Funahashi T, Barber T (2015) Risk calculators predict failures of knee and hip arthroplasties: findings from a large health maintenance organization. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:3965–3973CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Pun SY, Ries MD (2008) Effect of gender and preoperative diagnosis on results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2701–2705CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pun SY, Ries MD (2008) Effect of gender and preoperative diagnosis on results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2701–2705CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Sheng P, Lehto M, Kataja M, Halonen P, Moilanen T, Pajamaki J (2004) Patient outcome following revision total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 28:78–81CrossRefPubMed Sheng P, Lehto M, Kataja M, Halonen P, Moilanen T, Pajamaki J (2004) Patient outcome following revision total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 28:78–81CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Springer BD, Hanssen AD, Sim FH, Lewallen DG (2001) The kinematic rotating hinge prosthesis for complex knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:283–291CrossRef Springer BD, Hanssen AD, Sim FH, Lewallen DG (2001) The kinematic rotating hinge prosthesis for complex knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:283–291CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Steyerberg EW (2009) Overfitting and Optimism in Prediction Models. In: Clinical prediction models. A practical approach to development, validation, and updating. Springer Science + Business Media LLC, New York, pp 83–99 Steyerberg EW (2009) Overfitting and Optimism in Prediction Models. In: Clinical prediction models. A practical approach to development, validation, and updating. Springer Science + Business Media LLC, New York, pp 83–99
32.
go back to reference van Buuren S (2012) Multivariate missing data. In: Flexible imputation of missing data. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, pp 95–121CrossRef van Buuren S (2012) Multivariate missing data. In: Flexible imputation of missing data. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, pp 95–121CrossRef
33.
go back to reference van Kempen RW, Schimmel JJ, van Hellemondt GG, Vandenneucker H, Wymenga AB (2013) Reason for revision TKA predicts clinical outcome: prospective evaluation of 150 consecutive patients with 2-years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2296–2302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Kempen RW, Schimmel JJ, van Hellemondt GG, Vandenneucker H, Wymenga AB (2013) Reason for revision TKA predicts clinical outcome: prospective evaluation of 150 consecutive patients with 2-years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2296–2302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Whitlock KG, Piponov HI, Shah SH, Wang OJ, Gonzalez MH (2016) Gender role in total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of perioperative outcomes in US patients. J Arthroplast 31:2736–2740CrossRef Whitlock KG, Piponov HI, Shah SH, Wang OJ, Gonzalez MH (2016) Gender role in total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of perioperative outcomes in US patients. J Arthroplast 31:2736–2740CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Wilke BK, Wagner ER, Trousdale RT (2014) Long-term survival of semi-constrained total knee arthroplasty for revision surgery. J Arthroplast 29:1005–1008CrossRef Wilke BK, Wagner ER, Trousdale RT (2014) Long-term survival of semi-constrained total knee arthroplasty for revision surgery. J Arthroplast 29:1005–1008CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Wood AM, White IR, Royston P (2008) How should variable selection be performed with multiply imputed data? Stat Med 27:3227–3246CrossRefPubMed Wood AM, White IR, Royston P (2008) How should variable selection be performed with multiply imputed data? Stat Med 27:3227–3246CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Age, gender, functional KSS, reason for revision and type of bone defect predict functional outcome 5 years after revision total knee arthroplasty: a multivariable prediction model
Authors
Jan F. M. Verbeek
Gerjon Hannink
Koen C. Defoort
Ate B. Wymenga
Petra J. C. Heesterbeek
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Bone Defect
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05365-x

Other articles of this Issue 7/2019

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2019 Go to the issue