Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 8/2010

01-08-2010 | Original

Bolus remifentanil for chest drain removal in ICU: a randomized double-blind comparison of three modes of analgesia in post-cardiac surgical patients

Authors: Eoin Casey, Aoife Lane, Dinesh Kuriakose, Shane McGeary, Niamh Hayes, Dermot Phelan, Donal Buggy

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 8/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We compared 1 versus 0.5 μg/kg bolus remifentanil versus placebo in alleviating pain due to chest drain removal. Effects on sedation, respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation, heart rate (HR) and blood pressure were also evaluated.

Methods

Sixty patients following cardiac surgery were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Patients were randomized to 1 or 0.5 μg/kg remifentanil or placebo. All received standardized analgesia. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and cardio-respiratory data were recorded pre-procedure, at drain removal and at 2 min intervals post procedure.

Results

Patients receiving remifentanil had statistically significantly less pain than placebo at drain removal [median (25–75%) VAS: 0.5 μg/kg remifentanil 1 (0–2) versus placebo 5 (3–6), P = 0.001; 1.0 μg/kg remifentanil 0 (0–2) versus placebo 5 (3–6), P = 0.0001]. VAS scores between remifentanil groups were equivalent. Remifentanil 1 μg/kg versus placebo at drain removal revealed significant reductions in HR [mean ± standard deviation (SD): 76 ± 15 versus 92 ± 10, P = 0.01], blood pressure [mean ± SD: 103 ± 22 versus 131 ± 14, P = 0.01] and RR [median (25–75%): 10 (8–12) versus 16 (14–18), P = 0.001]. Remifentanil 0.5 μg/kg versus placebo at drain removal revealed significant reductions in blood pressure [mean ± SD: 116 ± 19 versus 131 ± 14, P = 0.02] and RR [median (25–75%): 12 (10–13) versus 18 (16–18), P = 0.001]. SpO2 at drain removal was significantly reduced when comparing 1 μg/kg remifentanil versus placebo [median (25–75%): 94 (88–97) versus 97 (96–98), P = 0.049] but not 0.5 μg/kg remifentanil versus placebo. Two patients became apnoeic following 1 μg/kg remifentanil, necessitating respiratory support. Sedation scores in all groups were similar.

Conclusions

Bolus remifentanil at the tested doses delivers excellent analgesia, but 1 μg/kg remifentanil results in respiratory depression. Remifentanil bolus at 0.5 μg/kg is safe and effective for chest drain removal after heart surgery in ICU.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mimnaugh L, Winegar M, Mabrey Y, Davis JE (1999) Sensation experienced during removal of tubes in acute postoperative patients. Appl Nurs Res 12:78–85CrossRefPubMed Mimnaugh L, Winegar M, Mabrey Y, Davis JE (1999) Sensation experienced during removal of tubes in acute postoperative patients. Appl Nurs Res 12:78–85CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Carson MM, Barton DM, Morrison CC, Tribble CG (1994) Managing pain during mediastinal chest tube removal. Heart Lung 23:500–505PubMed Carson MM, Barton DM, Morrison CC, Tribble CG (1994) Managing pain during mediastinal chest tube removal. Heart Lung 23:500–505PubMed
3.
go back to reference Paiement B, Boulanger M, Jones CW, Roy M (1979) Intubation and other experiences in cardiac surgery: the consumer’s views. Can Anaesth Soc J 26:173–180CrossRefPubMed Paiement B, Boulanger M, Jones CW, Roy M (1979) Intubation and other experiences in cardiac surgery: the consumer’s views. Can Anaesth Soc J 26:173–180CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Singh M, Gopinath R (2005) Topical analgesia for chest tube removal in cardiac patients. J Cardithorac Vasc Anaesth 19:719–722CrossRef Singh M, Gopinath R (2005) Topical analgesia for chest tube removal in cardiac patients. J Cardithorac Vasc Anaesth 19:719–722CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Akrofi M, Miller S, Colfar S, Corry PR, Fabri BM, Pullan MD, Russell GN, Fox MA (2005) A randomized comparison of three methods of analgesia for chest drain removal in postcardiac surgical patients. Anaesth Analg 100:205–209CrossRef Akrofi M, Miller S, Colfar S, Corry PR, Fabri BM, Pullan MD, Russell GN, Fox MA (2005) A randomized comparison of three methods of analgesia for chest drain removal in postcardiac surgical patients. Anaesth Analg 100:205–209CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Joshi VS, Chauhan S, Kiran U, Bisoi AK, Kapoor PM (2007) Comparison of analgesic efficacy of fentanyl and sufentanil for chest tube removal after cardiac surgery. Ann Cardiac Anaesth 10:42–45CrossRef Joshi VS, Chauhan S, Kiran U, Bisoi AK, Kapoor PM (2007) Comparison of analgesic efficacy of fentanyl and sufentanil for chest tube removal after cardiac surgery. Ann Cardiac Anaesth 10:42–45CrossRef
7.
go back to reference McMurray TJ, Bhanumurthy S, Groogan F (1995) Low dose propofol for chest tube removal. Anaesthesia 50:556CrossRef McMurray TJ, Bhanumurthy S, Groogan F (1995) Low dose propofol for chest tube removal. Anaesthesia 50:556CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bryden FM, McFarlane H, Tunstall ME, Ross JA (1997) Isoflurane for removal of chest drains after cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia 52:169–178CrossRef Bryden FM, McFarlane H, Tunstall ME, Ross JA (1997) Isoflurane for removal of chest drains after cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia 52:169–178CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Friesner SA, Curry DM, Moddeman GR (2006) Comparison of two pain-management strategies during chest tube removal: relaxation exercise with opioids and opioids alone. Heart Lung 35:269–276CrossRefPubMed Friesner SA, Curry DM, Moddeman GR (2006) Comparison of two pain-management strategies during chest tube removal: relaxation exercise with opioids and opioids alone. Heart Lung 35:269–276CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Broscious S (1999) Music; an intervention for pain during chest tube removal after open heart surgery. Am J Crit Care 8:410–415PubMed Broscious S (1999) Music; an intervention for pain during chest tube removal after open heart surgery. Am J Crit Care 8:410–415PubMed
11.
go back to reference Houston S, Jesurum J (1999) The quick relaxation technique. Effect on pain associated with chest tube removal. Appl Nurs Res 12:196–205CrossRefPubMed Houston S, Jesurum J (1999) The quick relaxation technique. Effect on pain associated with chest tube removal. Appl Nurs Res 12:196–205CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Glass PS, Gan TJ, Howell S (1999) A review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil. Anaesth Analg 89:S7–S14CrossRef Glass PS, Gan TJ, Howell S (1999) A review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil. Anaesth Analg 89:S7–S14CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Egan TD, Kern SE, Muir KT, White J (2004) Remifentanil by bolus injection: a safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and age effect in human volunteers. Br J Anaesth 92:335–343CrossRefPubMed Egan TD, Kern SE, Muir KT, White J (2004) Remifentanil by bolus injection: a safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and age effect in human volunteers. Br J Anaesth 92:335–343CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R (1974) Controlled sedation with Alphaxalone–Alphadolone. BMJ 11:656–659CrossRef Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R (1974) Controlled sedation with Alphaxalone–Alphadolone. BMJ 11:656–659CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Carrasco G, Molina R, Costa J, Soler JM, Paniagua J, Cabré LL (1993) Usefulness of sedation scales in ICU. A comparative randomized study in patients sedated with propofol, midazolam or opiates plus benzodiazepines. Intensive Care Med 18(Suppl 2):158 Carrasco G, Molina R, Costa J, Soler JM, Paniagua J, Cabré LL (1993) Usefulness of sedation scales in ICU. A comparative randomized study in patients sedated with propofol, midazolam or opiates plus benzodiazepines. Intensive Care Med 18(Suppl 2):158
16.
go back to reference Riker RR, Picard JT, Fraser GL (1999) Prospective evaluation of the sedation–agitation scale for adult critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 27:1325–1329CrossRefPubMed Riker RR, Picard JT, Fraser GL (1999) Prospective evaluation of the sedation–agitation scale for adult critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 27:1325–1329CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Barnard J, Thompson J, Dunning J (2004) Can any intervention effectively reduce the pain associated with chest drain removal. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 3:229–232CrossRefPubMed Barnard J, Thompson J, Dunning J (2004) Can any intervention effectively reduce the pain associated with chest drain removal. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 3:229–232CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Xu ZY, Wang X, Si YY, Wu JC, Zuo YX, Xue FS, Liu J (2008) Intravenous remifentanil and propofol for gastroscopy. J Clin Anaesth 5:352–355CrossRef Xu ZY, Wang X, Si YY, Wu JC, Zuo YX, Xue FS, Liu J (2008) Intravenous remifentanil and propofol for gastroscopy. J Clin Anaesth 5:352–355CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Johnson KB, Swenson JD, Egan TD, Jarrett R, Johnson M (2002) Midazolam and Remifentanil by bolus injection for intensely stimulating procedures of brief duration: experience with awake laryngoscopy. Anaesth Analg 94:1241–1243CrossRef Johnson KB, Swenson JD, Egan TD, Jarrett R, Johnson M (2002) Midazolam and Remifentanil by bolus injection for intensely stimulating procedures of brief duration: experience with awake laryngoscopy. Anaesth Analg 94:1241–1243CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Phillips WJ, Halpin J, Jones J, McKenzie K (2009) Remifentanil for procedural sedation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 53:163CrossRefPubMed Phillips WJ, Halpin J, Jones J, McKenzie K (2009) Remifentanil for procedural sedation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 53:163CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Gaston-Johansson F, Gustafsson M (1990) Rheumatoid arthritis: determination of pain characteristics and comparison of RAI and VAS in its measurement. Pain 41:35–40CrossRefPubMed Gaston-Johansson F, Gustafsson M (1990) Rheumatoid arthritis: determination of pain characteristics and comparison of RAI and VAS in its measurement. Pain 41:35–40CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Jensen MP, Miller L, Fisher LD (1998) Assessment of pain during medical procedures: a comparison of three scales. Clin J Pain 14:343–349CrossRefPubMed Jensen MP, Miller L, Fisher LD (1998) Assessment of pain during medical procedures: a comparison of three scales. Clin J Pain 14:343–349CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference DeLoach LJ, Higgins MS, Caplan AB, Stiff JL (1998) The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale. Anesth Analg 86:102–106CrossRefPubMed DeLoach LJ, Higgins MS, Caplan AB, Stiff JL (1998) The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale. Anesth Analg 86:102–106CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Gallagher EJ, Bijur PE, Latimer C, Silver W (2002) Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 20:287–290CrossRefPubMed Gallagher EJ, Bijur PE, Latimer C, Silver W (2002) Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 20:287–290CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Bolus remifentanil for chest drain removal in ICU: a randomized double-blind comparison of three modes of analgesia in post-cardiac surgical patients
Authors
Eoin Casey
Aoife Lane
Dinesh Kuriakose
Shane McGeary
Niamh Hayes
Dermot Phelan
Donal Buggy
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 8/2010
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-010-1836-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2010

Intensive Care Medicine 8/2010 Go to the issue