Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Spine Journal
Published in: European Spine Journal 7/2014

01-07-2014 | Original Article

Body posture and backpack loading: an upright magnetic resonance imaging study of the adult lumbar spine

Authors: Stephen Shymon, Alan R. Hargens, Lawrence A. Minkoff, Douglas G. Chang

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 7/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Axial loading of the spine while supine, simulating upright posture, decreases intervertebral disc (IVD) height and lumbar length and increases lumbar lordosis. The purpose of this study is to measure the adult lumbar spine’s response to upright posture and a backpack load using upright magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We hypothesize that higher spinal loads, while upright and with a backpack, will compress lumbar length and IVD height as well as decrease lumbar lordosis.

Methods

Six volunteers (45 ± 6 years) underwent 0.6 T MRI scans of the lumbar spine while supine, upright, and upright with a 10 % body weight (BW) backpack. Main outcomes were IVD height, lumbar spinal length (distance between anterior–superior corners of L1 and S1), and lumbar lordosis (Cobb angle between the superior endplates of L1 and S1).

Results

The 10 % BW load significantly compressed the L4–L5 and L5–S1 IVDs relative to supine (p < 0.05). The upright and upright plus 10 % BW backpack conditions significantly compressed the anterior height of L5–S1 relative to supine (p < 0.05), but did not significantly change the lumbar length or lumbar lordosis.

Conclusions

The L4–L5 and L5–S1 IVDs compress, particularly anteriorly, when transitioning from supine to upright position with a 10 % BW backpack. This study is the first radiographic analysis to describe the adult lumbar spine wearing common backpack loads. The novel upright MRI protocol described allows for functional, in vivo, loaded measurements of the spine that enables the study of spinal biomechanics and therapeutic interventions.
Literature
1.
Alyas F, Connell D, Saifuddin A (2008) Upright positional MRI of the lumbar spine. Clin Radiol 63:1035–1048PubMedCrossRef
2.
Saifuddin A, Blease S, MacSweeney E (2003) Axial loaded MRI of the lumbar spine. Clin Radiol 58:661–671PubMedCrossRef
3.
Alexander LA, Hancock E, Agouris I et al (2007) The response of the nucleus pulposus of the lumbar intervertebral discs to functionally loaded positions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1508–1512CrossRef
4.
Madsen R, Jensen TS, Pope M et al (2008) The effect of body position and axial load on spinal canal morphology: an MRI study of central spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:61–67CrossRef
5.
Kimura S, Steinbach GC, Watenpaugh DE, Hargens AR (2001) Lumbar spine disc height and curvature responses to an axial load generated by a compression device compatible with magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2596–2600CrossRef
6.
Lee SH, Hargens AR, Fredericson M, Lang P (2003) Lumbar spine disc heights and curvature: upright posture vs. supine compression harness. Aviat Sp Env Med 74:512–516
7.
Neuschwander TB, Cutrone J, Macias BR et al (2010) The effect of backpacks on the lumbar spine in children: a standing magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:83–88CrossRef
8.
Dimitriadis A, Papagelopoulos P, Smith F et al (2011) Intervertebral disc changes after 1 h of running: a study on athletes. J Int Med Res 39:569–579PubMedCrossRef
9.
Macias BR, Cao P, Watenpaugh DE, Hargens AR (2007) LBNP treadmill exercise maintains spine function and muscle strength in identical twins during 28-day simulated microgravity. J Appl Physiol 102:2274–2278PubMedCrossRef
10.
Tarantino U, Fanucci E, Iundusi R et al (2012) Lumbar spine MRI in upright position for diagnosing acute and chronic low back pain: statistical analysis of morphological changes. J Orthop Traumatol 14:15–22PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
Rodríguez-Soto AE, Jaworski R, Jensen A et al (2013) Effect of load carriage on lumbar spine kinematics. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:783–791CrossRef
12.
Shymon S, Hargens AR, Minkoff LA, Chang DG (2013) Body position and backpack loading: an upright magnetic resonance imaging study of the adult lumbar spine. Poster session presented at: Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology Conference, Boston
13.
Recuerda M, Périé D, Gilbert G, Beaudoin G (2012) Assessment of mechanical properties of isolated bovine intervertebral discs from multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:195PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
Cao P, Kimura S, Macias BR, Ueno T, Watenpaugh DE, Hargens AR (2005) Exercise within lower body negative pressure partially counteracts lumbar spine deconditioning associated with 28-day bed rest. J Appl Physiol 99:39–44PubMedCrossRef
15.
Dabbs VM, Dabbs LG (1990) Correlation between disc height narrowing and low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15:1366–1369CrossRef
16.
Andersson GBJ, Murphy RW, Ortengren R, Nachemson AL (1979) The influence of backrest inclination and lumbar support on lumbar lordosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 4:52–58CrossRef
17.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191PubMedCrossRef
18.
Schmid MR, Dueweii S, Romanowski B, Hodler J (1999) Changes in cross-sectional measurements of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramina as a function of body position: in vivo studies on an open-configuration MR system. Am J Roentgenol 1095–1102
19.
Urban JP, McMullin JF (1988) Swelling pressure of the lumbar intervertebral discs: influence of age, spinal level, composition, and degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13:179–187CrossRef
20.
Wisneski RJ, Garfin SR, Rothman RH (1999) Lumbar disc disease. In: Herkowitz HN, Garfin SR, Balderston RA (eds) Spine, vol 1. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 613–679
21.
White AA, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical biomechanics of the spine, 2nd edn. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia
22.
Krag M, Cohen M, Haugh L, Pope M (1990) Body height change during upright and recumbent posture. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15:202–207CrossRef
23.
Lotz JC, Haughton V, Boden SD et al (2012) New treatments and imaging strategies in degenerative disease of the intervertebral disks. Radiology 264:6–19PubMedCrossRef
24.
Rijn RM, Tulder MW, Verhagen AP et al (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing lumbar spinal pathology in adult patients with low back pain or sciatica: a diagnostic systematic review. Eur Spine J 21:220–227PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
25.
Hargens AR, Bhattacharya R, Schneider SM (2013) Space physiology VI: exercise, artificial gravity, and countermeasure development for prolonged space flight. Eur J Appl Physiol 113:2183–2192PubMedCrossRef
26.
Kerstman EL, Scheuring RA, Barnes MG, DeKorse TB, Saile LG (2012) Space adaptation back pain: a retrospective study. Aviat Sp Env Med 83:2–7CrossRef
27.
Sayson JV, Hargens AR (2008) Pathophysiology of low back pain during exposure to microgravity. Aviat Sp Env Med 79:364–373
28.
Styf JR, Ballard RE, Fechner K, Watenpaugh DE, Kahan NJ, Hargens AR (1997) Height increase, neuromuscular function, and back pain during 6 degrees head-down tilt with traction. Aviat Sp Env Med 68:24–29
29.
Tyrrell AR, Reilly T, Troup JD (1985) Circadian variation in stature and the effects of spinal loading. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 10:161–164CrossRef
30.
Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N et al (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med 331:69–73PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Body posture and backpack loading: an upright magnetic resonance imaging study of the adult lumbar spine
Authors
Stephen Shymon
Alan R. Hargens
Lawrence A. Minkoff
Douglas G. Chang
Publication date
01-07-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 7/2014
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3247-5

Other articles of this Issue 7/2014

European Spine Journal 7/2014 Go to the issue

Original Article

Usefulness of diffusion tensor MR imaging in the assessment of intramedullary changes of the cervical spinal cord in different stages of degenerative spine disease

Original Article

Segmental anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion with preservation of middle vertebrae in the surgical management of 4-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Original Article

Early neurological recovery course after surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study with 2-year follow-up using three different functional assessment tests

Original Article

Impact of spinal alignment and back muscle strength on shoulder range of motion in middle-aged and elderly people in a prospective cohort study

Letter to the Editor

Comment on Guo et al. entitled “A prospective randomized controlled study on the treatment outcome of SpineCor brace versus rigid brace for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with follow-up according to the SRS standardized criteria”

Original Article

Is the “snake-eye” MRI sign correlated to anterior spinal artery occlusion on CT angiography in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and amyotrophy?