Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2022

01-04-2022 | Blepharoplasty | Original Article

Evaluating the Reliability and Quality of the Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Videos on YouTube

Authors: Mehmet Egemen Karataş, Gamze Karataş

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study was to assess the quality of videos on YouTube as educational resources for patients and physicians about blepharoplastic surgery.

Methods

This study is a retrospective and cross-sectional study. A YouTube search for the term “blepharoplasty” was made and the first 210 videos were recorded (all video searches were done by clearing all search history without any user login). The number of views, likes and dislikes, upload time (i.e. age) of all videos, video duration, and source (i.e. physicians, non- physicians) were recorded. The video uploader, physicians, healthcare provider, health-related channels were gathered in a group. Video sources were evaluated as physician and non-physician. The DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), and Global Quality scores of all videos were also evaluated and recorded by two experienced oculoplastic surgeons.

Results

Considering our exclusion criteria from 210 videos we evaluated, 186 videos were included in the study. 147 (79%) of these videos were uploaded by physicians and 39 (21%) by non-physicians users. The total viewing average was 69,548 ± 14,533. The average length (min) of all videos was 7.59 ± 8.75 min. The average of total likes was 301.72 ± 578.89, dislike was 28.47 ± 68.90. The mean DISCERN score was 45.06 ± 12.88 (fair quality), the mean JAMA score was 1.39 ± 1.06 (poor quality), and the mean Global Quality score was 2.39 ± 1.03 (intermediate quality). DISCERN, JAMA, GQS scores were statistically significant between videos uploaded by physicians and non- physicians (p< 0.001).

Conclusions

As a result of the videos reviewed, YouTube videos can be educational and informative for patients and physicians. Only if the video source and content are selected correctly. We hope that YouTube will become more useful in terms of healthcare and education once its role in e-learning is clear.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Avcı K, Celikden SG, Eren S, Aydenizoz D (2015) Assessment of medical students’ attitudes on social media use in medicine: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ 15:18CrossRef Avcı K, Celikden SG, Eren S, Aydenizoz D (2015) Assessment of medical students’ attitudes on social media use in medicine: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ 15:18CrossRef
3.
go back to reference McCord CD (2001) Upper blepharoplasty and eyebrow surgery. In: Chen WP (ed) Oculoplastic Surgery. Thieme, New York, pp 125–145 McCord CD (2001) Upper blepharoplasty and eyebrow surgery. In: Chen WP (ed) Oculoplastic Surgery. Thieme, New York, pp 125–145
4.
go back to reference Bhattacharjee K, Misra DK, Deori N (2017) Updates on upper eyelid blepharoplasty. Indian J opt 65(7):551–558CrossRef Bhattacharjee K, Misra DK, Deori N (2017) Updates on upper eyelid blepharoplasty. Indian J opt 65(7):551–558CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Charnock D (1998) The DISCERN Handbook. Radcliffe Medical Press, Oxford Charnock D (1998) The DISCERN Handbook. Radcliffe Medical Press, Oxford
6.
go back to reference Weil AG, Bojanowski MW, Jamart J et al (2014) Evaluation of the quality of information on the Internet available to patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. World Neurosurg. 82:e31–e39CrossRef Weil AG, Bojanowski MW, Jamart J et al (2014) Evaluation of the quality of information on the Internet available to patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. World Neurosurg. 82:e31–e39CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA (1997) Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: caveant lector et viewor—let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 277:1244–1245CrossRef Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA (1997) Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: caveant lector et viewor—let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 277:1244–1245CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tolu S, Yurdakul OV, Basaran B, Rezvani A (2018) Englishlanguage videos on YouTube as a source of information on selfadminister subcutaneous anti-tumour necrosis factor agent injections. Rheumatol Int 38:1285–1292CrossRef Tolu S, Yurdakul OV, Basaran B, Rezvani A (2018) Englishlanguage videos on YouTube as a source of information on selfadminister subcutaneous anti-tumour necrosis factor agent injections. Rheumatol Int 38:1285–1292CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Langille M, Bernard A, Rodgers C, Hughes S, Leddin D, van Zanten SV (2010) Systematic review of the quality of patient information on the internet regarding inflammatory bowel disease treatments. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:322–328CrossRef Langille M, Bernard A, Rodgers C, Hughes S, Leddin D, van Zanten SV (2010) Systematic review of the quality of patient information on the internet regarding inflammatory bowel disease treatments. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:322–328CrossRef
10.
go back to reference van der Marel S, Duijvestein M, Hardwick JC et al (2009) Quality of web-based information on inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis 15:1891–1896CrossRef van der Marel S, Duijvestein M, Hardwick JC et al (2009) Quality of web-based information on inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis 15:1891–1896CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rees CE, Ford JE, Sheard CE (2002) Evaluating the reliability of DISCERN: a tool for assessing the quality of written patient information on treatment choices. Patient Educ Couns 47:273–275CrossRef Rees CE, Ford JE, Sheard CE (2002) Evaluating the reliability of DISCERN: a tool for assessing the quality of written patient information on treatment choices. Patient Educ Couns 47:273–275CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kunze KN, Cohn MR, Wakefield C, Hamati F, LaPrade RF, Forsythe B, Yanke AB, Chahla J (2019) Youtube as a source of information about the posterior cruciate ligament: a content-quality and reliability analysis. Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation 1(2):e109–e114CrossRef Kunze KN, Cohn MR, Wakefield C, Hamati F, LaPrade RF, Forsythe B, Yanke AB, Chahla J (2019) Youtube as a source of information about the posterior cruciate ligament: a content-quality and reliability analysis. Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation 1(2):e109–e114CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Erdem MN, Karaca S (2018) Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the ınformation in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine 43(22):E1334–E1339CrossRef Erdem MN, Karaca S (2018) Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the ınformation in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine 43(22):E1334–E1339CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kocyigit BF, Akaltun MS (2019) Does YouTube provide high quality information? Assessment of secukinumab videos. Rheumatol Int. 39(7):1263–1268CrossRef Kocyigit BF, Akaltun MS (2019) Does YouTube provide high quality information? Assessment of secukinumab videos. Rheumatol Int. 39(7):1263–1268CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S (2007) A systematic review of patient infammatory bowel disease information resources on the world wide web. Am J Gastroenterol 102:2070–2077CrossRef Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S (2007) A systematic review of patient infammatory bowel disease information resources on the world wide web. Am J Gastroenterol 102:2070–2077CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluating the Reliability and Quality of the Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Videos on YouTube
Authors
Mehmet Egemen Karataş
Gamze Karataş
Publication date
01-04-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02504-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2022 Go to the issue