Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Psychiatry
Published in: BMC Psychiatry 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Study protocol

BLEND-A: blending internet treatment into conventional face-to-face treatment for alcohol use disorder - a study protocol

Authors: Angelina Isabella Mellentin, Silke Behrendt, Randi Bilberg, Matthijs Blankers, Marie Paldam Folker, Kristine Tarp, Jakob Uffelmann, Anette Søgaard Nielsen

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A major challenge to psychological treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD) is patient non-compliance. A promising new treatment approach that is hypothesized to increase patient compliance is blended treatment, consisting of face-to-face contact with a therapist combined with modules delivered over the internet within the same protocol. While this treatment concept has been developed and proven effective for a variety of mental disorders, it has not yet been examined for AUD.

Aims

The study described in this protocol aims to examine and evaluate patient compliance with blended AUD treatment as well as the clinical and cost effectiveness of such treatment compared to face-to-face treatment only.

Methods

The study design is a pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. The included outpatient institutions (planned number of patients: n = 1800) will be randomized in clusters to implement either blended AUD treatment or face-to-face treatment only, i.e. treatment as usual (TAU). Both treatment approaches consist of motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy. Data on sociodemographics, treatment (e.g. intensity, duration), type of treatment conclusion (compliance vs. dropout), alcohol consumption, addiction severity, consequences of drinking, and quality of life, will be collected at treatment entry, at treatment conclusion, and 6 months after treatment conclusion. The primary outcome is compliance at treatment conclusion, and the secondary outcomes include alcohol consumption and quality of life at six-months follow-up. Data will be analyzed with an Intention-to-treat approach by means of generalized linear mixed models with a random effect for cluster and fixed effect for each step. Also, analyses evaluating cost-effectiveness will be conducted.

Discussion

Blended treatment may increase treatment compliance and thus improve treatment outcomes due to increased flexibility of the treatment course. Since this study is conducted within an implementation framework it can easily be scaled up, and when successful, blended treatment has the potential to become an alternative offer in many outpatient clinics nationwide and internationally.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.​gov.: NCT04535258, retrospectively registered 01.09.20.
Literature
1.
NICE. National Institute for Health & Clinical Excellence: Diagnosis, assessment and management of harmful drinking and alcohol dependence. National Clinical Practice Guideline 115. Great Britain: The British Psychological Society and The Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2011.
2.
3.
Martin GW, Rehm J. The effectiveness of psychosocial modalities in the treatment of alcohol problems in adults: a review of the evidence. Can J Psychiatr. 2012;57(6):350–8.CrossRef
4.
Rehm J, et al. Alcohol dependence and treatment utilization in Europe - a representative cross-sectional study in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16:90.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
Degenhardt L, et al. Estimating treatment coverage for people with substance use disorders: an analysis of data from the world mental health surveys. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(3):299–307.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
Koski-Janne A, Cunningham J. Interest in different forms of self-help in a general population sample of drinkers. Addict Behav. 2001;26(1):91–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Davies EL, et al. Intention to reduce drinking alcohol and preferred sources of support: an international cross-sectional study. J Subst Abus Treat. 2019;99:80–7.CrossRef
8.
Wallhed Finn S, Bakshi AS, Andreasson S. Alcohol consumption, dependence, and treatment barriers: perceptions among nontreatment seekers with alcohol dependence. Subst Use Misuse. 2014;49(6):762–9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Khadjesari Z, et al. Negotiating the ‘grey area between normal social drinking and being a smelly tramp’: a qualitative study of people searching for help online to reduce their drinking. Health Expect. 2015;18(6):2011–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
Probst C, et al. Alcohol use disorder severity and reported reasons not to seek treatment: a cross-sectional study in European primary care practices. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2015;10:32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Nielsen B, Nielsen AS, Wraae O. Factors associated with compliance of alcoholics in outpatient treatment. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2000;188(2):101–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Schwarz A-S, Nielsen B, Nielsen AS. Changes in profile of patients seeking alcohol treatment and treatment outcomes following policy changes. J Public Health.  2018;26(1):59-67.
13.
14.
Rogers MA, et al. Internet-delivered health interventions that work: systematic review of meta-analyses and evaluation of website availability. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(3):e90.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
16.
17.
Nielssen O, et al. Procedures for risk management and a review of crisis referrals from the MindSpot Clinic, a national service for the remote assessment and treatment of anxiety and depression. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15(1):304.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
Riper H, et al. Effectiveness of guided and unguided low-intensity internet interventions for adult alcohol misuse: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99912.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
20.
Donoghue K, et al. The effectiveness of electronic screening and brief intervention for reducing levels of alcohol consumption: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(6):e142.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Kaner EF, et al. Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community-dwelling populations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;9:CD011479.PubMed
22.
23.
Riper H, et al. Effectiveness and treatment moderators of internet interventions for adult problem drinking: an individual patient data meta-analysis of 19 randomised controlled trials. PLoS Med. 2018;15(12):e1002714.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Darvell MJ, Kavanagh DJ, Conolly JM. A qualitative exploration of internet-based treatment for comorbid depression and alcohol misuse. Internet Interv. 2015;2:174–83.CrossRef
25.
Wilhelmsen M, et al. Motivation to persist with internet-based cognitive behavioural treatment using blended care: a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:296.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Andersson G, Cuijpers P. Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: a meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther. 2009;38(4):196–205.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Richards D, Richardson T. Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012;32(4):329–42.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Sundstrom C, et al. High- versus low-intensity internet interventions for alcohol use disorders: results of a three-armed randomized controlled superiority trial. Addiction. 2020;115(5):863–74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
30.
Sundstrom C, et al. High-intensity therapist-guided internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for alcohol use disorder: a pilot study. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):197.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Erbe D, et al. Blending face-to-face and internet-based interventions for the treatment of mental disorders in adults: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(9):e306.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
Vaart R, et al. Blending online therapy into regular face-to-face therapy for depression: content, ratio and preconditions according to patients and therapists using a Delphi study. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:355.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
Månsson KN, et al. Development and initial evaluation of an Internet-based support system for face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy: a proof of concept study. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(12):e280.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
Smit F, et al. Modeling the cost-effectiveness of health care systems for alcohol use disorders: how implementation of eHealth interventions improves cost-effectiveness. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(3):e56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
van der Vaart R, et al. Blending online therapy into regular face-to-face therapy for depression: content, ratio and preconditions according to patients and therapists using a Delphi study. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:355.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
Kooistra LC, et al. Blended vs. face-to-face cognitive behavioural treatment for major depression in specialized mental health care: study protocol of a randomized controlled cost-effectiveness trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:290.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Romijn G, et al. Cost-effectiveness of blended vs. face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for severe anxiety disorders: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:311.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
Kemmeren LL, et al. Effectiveness of blended depression treatment for adults in specialised mental healthcare: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:113.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
Kleiboer A, et al. European COMPARative effectiveness research on blended depression treatment versus treatment-as-usual (E-COMPARED): study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial in eight European countries. Trials. 2016;17(1):387.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
41.
Rozental A, et al. Negative effects of internet interventions: a qualitative content analysis of patients' experiences with treatments delivered online. Cogn Behav Ther. 2015;44(3):223–36.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Newman MG, et al. A review of technology-assisted self-help and minimal contact therapies for drug and alcohol abuse and smoking addiction: is human contact necessary for therapeutic efficacy? Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31(1):178–86.PubMedCrossRef
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
Hemming K, Lilford R, Girling AJ. Stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trials: a generic framework including parallel and multiple-level designs. Stat Med. 2015;34(2):181–96.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Schwarz A-S, Nielsen B, Nielsen AS. Changes in profile of patients seeking alcohol treatment and treatment outcomes following policy changes. J Public Health. 2018;26(1):59–67.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Becker U, et al. KVALITET I ALKOHOLBEHANDLING - et rådgivningsmaterial [Quality in Treatment for Alcohol Dependence - advisory material]: Sundhedsstyrelsen, Center for Forebyggels [National Health Authorities]; 2008.
50.
Sundhedsstyrelsen, National Klinisk Retningslinje for behandling af alkoholafhængighed [in Danish]. 2015, opdateret i 2018.
51.
Kokkevi A, Hartgers C. "EuropASI: European adaptation of a multidimensional assessment instrument for drug and alcohol dependence". European Addiction Research. 1995;1(4):208-210.
52.
McLellan AT. et al, The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. 1992;9(3):199–213.
53.
Babor TF, et al. AUDIT - The Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test. Guidelines for use in Primary Care. 2nd ed. Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
54.
Skinner HA, Allen BA. Alcohol dependence syndrome: measurement and validation. J Abnorm Psychol. 1982;91(3):199–209.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Skinner HA, Horn JL. Alcohol Dependence Scale (ADS) User's Guide. Ontario: Addiction Research Foundation; 1984. p. 76.
56.
Miller W, Tonigan J, Longabaugh R. The Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInC): An instrument for assessing adverse consequences of alcohol abuse. Test manual, Project MATCH Monograph Series, vol. 4; 1995.
57.
Janssen MF, et al. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(7):1717–27.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Janssen B, Szende A. In: Szende A, Janssen B, Cabases J, editors. Population Norms for the EQ-5D, in Self-Reported Population Health: An International Perspective based on EQ-5D. Dordrecht (NL): Springer Netherlands; 2014. p. 19–30.
59.
Brooke, J.J.U.e.i.i. SUS: a quick and dirty'usability; 1996. p. 189.
60.
61.
Titzler I, et al. Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of blended psychotherapy for depression: a qualitative pilot study of therapists' perspective. Internet Interv. 2018;12:150–64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
62.
Hemming K, et al. The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. BMJ. 2015;350:h391.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Husereau D, et al. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement. BMJ. 2013;346:f1049.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Ramsey SD, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials II-an ISPOR good research practices task force report. Value Health. 2015;18(2):161–72.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Drummond M, Sculpher M. And K.C.e. al., Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
66.
Sundhedsdatastyrelsen, Alkoholbehandlingen i Danmark 2014. 2016.
67.
Hemming K, Taljaard M. Sample size calculations for stepped wedge and cluster randomised trials: a unified approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69:137–46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
68.
Gainsbury S, Blaszczynski A. A systematic review of internet-based therapy for the treatment of addictions. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31(3):490–8.PubMedCrossRef
69.
70.
71.
72.
Van Ballegooijen W, et al. Adherence to Internet-based and face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e100674.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
73.
Mohr DC, et al. Interest in behavioral and psychological treatments delivered face-to-face, by telephone, and by internet. Ann Behav Med. 2010;40(1):89–98.PubMedCrossRef
74.
Nielsen AS. Behandlernes oplevelse af behandlingen af alkoholmisbrugere. En kvalitativ analyse. Nord Alkohol Narkotikatidskrift. 2003;20(3):315–31.
75.
Bornstein RFJPPR, Practice. The Dependent Patient: Diagnosis, Assessment, and Treatment. 2005;36(1):82.
76.
Leitner A, et al. Patients’ perceptions of risky developments during psychotherapy. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. 2013;43(2):95–105.CrossRef
77.
Ekstrom V, Johansson M. Sort of a nice distance: a qualitative study of the experiences of therapists working with internet-based treatment of problematic substance use. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2019;14(1):44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
78.
Waller G, Turner H. Therapist drift redux: why well-meaning clinicians fail to deliver evidence-based therapy, and how to get back on track. Behav Res Ther. 2016;77:129–37.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
BLEND-A: blending internet treatment into conventional face-to-face treatment for alcohol use disorder - a study protocol
Authors
Angelina Isabella Mellentin
Silke Behrendt
Randi Bilberg
Matthijs Blankers
Marie Paldam Folker
Kristine Tarp
Jakob Uffelmann
Anette Søgaard Nielsen
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03122-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Psychiatry 1/2021 Go to the issue

Research article

Associations of living arrangements with symptoms and functioning in schizophrenia

Research

Organisation and timeline of measures in French psychiatric establishments during the first wave of the COVID-19 epidemic: EvOlu’Psy study

Research

Smoking among inpatients in treatment for substance use disorders: prevalence and effect on mental health and quality of life

Research article

Using the Goal Attainment Scale adapted for depression to better understand treatment outcomes in patients with major depressive disorder switching to vortioxetine: a phase 4, single-arm, open-label, multicenter study

Correction

Correction to: A national evaluation of the Irish public health counselling in primary care service– examination of initial effectiveness data

Research article

Temperament and character of patients with alcohol toxicity during COVID − 19 pandemic