Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Bleeding on Probing | Research

Effect of microthread design on the preservation of marginal bone around immediately placed implants: a 5-years prospective cohort study

Authors: Hoori Aslroosta, Solmaz Akbari, Nima Naddafpour, Seyed Taha Adnaninia, Afshin Khorsand, Niusha Namadmalian Esfahani

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the microthread design at the implant neck on the preservation of marginal bone around immediately-placed implants in a 5-year follow up.

Methods

Thirty patients received 41 immediately placed implants which were randomly assigned to treatment groups with microthreaded implants (test group, n = 22) or threaded implants (control group, n = 19). Clinical and radiographic analyses were carried out after 1 and5 years. Plaque index, bleeding on probing, suppuration, probing depth and marginal bone loss were subject to evaluations. The results were analyzed with the T-test, Fisher’s exact test and Mann–Whitney U test.

Results

No implants failed; thirty-five implants (in 27 patients); 21 microthreaded and 14 threaded implants; completed the 5 year follow up. The mean values of the marginal bone loss in microthreaded and threaded groups were 1.12 ± 0.95 mm and 0.87 ± 0.78 mm, respectively during an observation period of 70.9 ± 10.4 months; the differences in marginal bone loss and other pre-implant parameters were not significant between groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Both implant designs showed acceptable results in terms of the clinical parameters and marginal bone level. Within the limitation of this study, the results did not demonstrate any superiority of the microthread design compared to threaded one in marginal bone preservation around immediately placed implants over 5 years of loading.

Vignoletti F, Sanz-Esporrin J, Sanz-Martin I, Nuñez J, Luengo F, Sanz M. Ridge alterations after implant placement in fresh extraction sockets or in healed crests: an experimental in vivo investigation. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2019;30(4):353–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13421.CrossRef

Ting M, Tenaglia MS, Jones GH, Suzuki JB. Surgical and patient factors affecting marginal bone levels around dental implants: a comprehensive overview of systematic reviews. Implant Dent. 2017;26(2):303–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000565.CrossRefPubMed

Siadat H, Panjnoosh M, Alikhasi M, Alihoseini M, Bassir SH, Rokn AR. Does implant staging choice affect crestal bone loss? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(2):307–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.09.006.CrossRefPubMed

Sanz M, Ivanoff CJ, Weingart D, Wiltfang J, Gahlert M, Cordaro L, et al. Clinical and radiologic outcomes after submerged and transmucosal implant placement with two-piece implants in the anterior maxilla and mandible: 3-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(2):234–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12107.CrossRefPubMed

Novaes AB Jr, Suaid F, Queiroz AC, Muglia VA, Souza SL, Palioto DB, et al. Buccal bone plate remodeling after immediate implant placement with and without synthetic bone grafting and flapless surgery: radiographic study in dogs. J Oral Implantol. 2012;38(6):687–98. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00176.CrossRefPubMed

Glibert M, Vervaeke S, Jacquet W, Vermeersch K, Ostman PO, De Bruyn H. A randomized controlled clinical trial to assess crestal bone remodeling of four different implant designs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(4):455–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12604.CrossRefPubMed

Lee DW, Choi YS, Park KH, Kim CS, Moon IS. Effect of microthread on the maintenance of marginal bone level: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(4):465–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01302.x.CrossRefPubMed

Zhang Q, Yue X. Marginal bone loss around machined smooth neck implants compared to rough threaded neck implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthodont. 2021;30:401–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13333.CrossRefPubMed

Jokstad A, Ganeles J. Systematic review of clinical and patient-reported outcomes following oral rehabilitation on dental implants with a tapered compared to a non-tapered implant design. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(Suppl 16):41–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13128.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Falco A, Berardini M, Trisi P. Correlation between implant geometry, implant surface, insertion torque, and primary stability: in vitro biomechanical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(4):824–30.CrossRef

11.

Song DW, Lee DW, Kim CK, Park KH, Moon IS. Comparative analysis of peri-implant marginal bone loss based on microthread location: a 1-year prospective study after loading. J Periodontol. 2009;80(12):1937–44. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.090330.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Kang YI, Lee DW, Park KH, Moon IS. Effect of thread size on the implant neck area: preliminary results at 1 year of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(10):1147–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02298.x.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Chang YY, Kim SH, Park KO, Yun JH. Effect of microthreads on coronal bone healing of narrow-diameter implants with reverse-tapered design in beagle dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(12):1532–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13022.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Schwarz F, et al. Influence of implant neck and abutment characteristics on peri-implant tissue health and stability: oral reconstruction foundation consensus report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(6):588–93.CrossRef

15.

Al-Thobity AM, Kutkut A, Almas K. Microthreaded implants and crestal bone loss: a systematic review. J Oral Implantol. 2017;43(2):157–66. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00170.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Mei DM, Zhao B, Xu H, Wang Y. Radiographic and clinical outcomes of rooted, platform-switched, microthreaded implants with a sandblasted, large-grid, and acid-etched surface: a 5-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19(6):1074–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12543.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Hudieb MI, Wakabayashi N, Kasugai S. Magnitude and direction of mechanical stress at the osseointegrated interface of the microthread implant. J Periodontol. 2011;82(7):1061–70. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100237.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Yamanishi Y, Yamaguchi S, Imazato S, Nakano T, Yatani H. Influences of implant neck design and implant-abutment joint type on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Dent Mater. 2012;28(11):1126–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.160.CrossRefPubMed

19.

de Andrade CL, Carvalho MA, Del Bel Cury AA, Sotto-Maior BS. Biomechanical effect of prosthetic connection and implant body shape in low-quality bone of maxillary posterior single implant-supported restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(4):e92–7.CrossRef

20.

Jin ZH, Peng MD, Li Q. The effect of implant neck microthread design on stress distribution of peri-implant bone with different level: a finite element analysis. J Dent Sci. 2020;15(4):466–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2019.12.003.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Ryu HS, Namgung C, Lee JH, Lim YJ. The influence of thread geometry on implant osseointegration under immediate loading: a literature review. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6(6):547–54. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.6.547.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Bratu EA, Tandlich M, Shapira L. A rough surface implant neck with microthreads reduces the amount of marginal bone loss: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(8):827–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01730.x.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Happe A, Zoller JE, Eitner S. A 5-year prospective radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels adjacent to parallel-screw cylinder machined-neck implants and rough-surfaced microthreaded implants using digitized panoramic radiographs. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41(7):564–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2012.11.027.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Spies BC, Bateli M, Ben Rahal G, Christmann M, Vach K, Kohal RJ. Does oral implant design affect marginal bone loss? Results of a parallel-group randomized controlled equivalence trial. Biomed Res Int. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8436437.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Messias A, Nicolau P, Guerra F. Titanium dental implants with different collar design and surface modifications: a systematic review on survival rates and marginal bone levels. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(1):20–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13389.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Khorsand A, Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA, Naddafpour N, Shayesteh YS, Khojasteh A. Effect of microthread design on marginal bone level around dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets. Implant Dent. 2016;25(1):90–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000350.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Rokn A, Aslroosta H, Akbari S, Najafi H, Zayeri F, Hashemi K. Prevalence of peri-implantitis in patients not participating in well-designed supportive periodontal treatments: a cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(3):314–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12800.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1(1):11–25.PubMed

29.

Galindo-Moreno P, León-Cano A, Ortega-Oller I, Monje AO, Valle F, Catena A. Marginal bone loss as success criterion in implant dentistry: beyond 2 mm. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(4):28–34.CrossRef

30.

Covani U, Chiappe G, Bosco M, Orlando B, Quaranta A, Barone A. A 10-year evaluation of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a prospective cohort study. J Periodontol. 2012;83(10):1226–34. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.110583.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Hur Y, Ogata Y. No clinically significant differences in crestal bone loss between immediate implant placement and implants placed in healed bone: a systematic review of articles published from 1966 through 2012. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016;147(12):987–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2016.10.002.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Mello CC, Lemos CAA, Verri FR, Dos Santos DM, Goiato MC, Pellizzer EP. Immediate implant placement into fresh extraction sockets versus delayed implants into healed sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46(9):1162–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.03.016.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Hansson S. The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements: a biomechanical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10(5):394–405. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100506.x.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Koutouzis T. Implant-abutment connection as contributing factor to peri-implant diseases. Periodontol. 2019;81(1):152–66.CrossRef

35.

Spinato S, Galindo-Moreno P, Bernardello F, Zaffe D. Minimum abutment height to eliminate bone loss: influence of implant neck design and platform switching. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(2):405–11.CrossRef

36.

Lemos CAA, Verri FR, Bonfante EA, Santiago Junior JF, Pellizzer EP. Comparison of external and internal implant-abutment connections for implant supported prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2018;70:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.12.001.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Caricasulo R, Malchiodi L, Ghensi P, Fantozzi G, Cucchi A. The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(4):653–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12620.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Blanco J, Pico A, Caneiro L, Nóvoa L, Batalla P, Martín-Lancharro P. Effect of abutment height on interproximal implant bone level in the early healing: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(1):108–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13108.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Vandeweghe S, Cosyn J, Thevissen E, Teerlinck J, De Bruyn H. The influence of implant design on bone remodeling around surface-modified Southern Implants^®. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(5):655–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00308.x.CrossRefPubMed

40.

De Bruyn H, Christiaens V, Doornewaard R, Jacobsson M, Cosyn J, Jacquet W, et al. Implant surface roughness and patient factors on long-term peri-implant bone loss. Periodontol. 2017;73(1):218–27.CrossRef

41.

Reddy MS, Sundram R, Eid Abdemagyd HA. Application of finite element model in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019;11(Suppl 2):S85–91. https://doi.org/10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_296_18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

de Sanctis M, Vignoletti F, Discepoli N, Zucchelli G, Sanz M. Immediate implants at fresh extraction sockets: bone healing in four different implant systems. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(8):705–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01427.x.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Lee SY, Piao CM, Koak JY, Kim SK, Kim YS, Ku Y, et al. A 3-year prospective radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around different implant systems. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(7):538–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02083.x.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Gopalakrishnan D, Joshi V, Romanos GE. Soft and hard tissue changes around laser microtexture single tooth implants–a clinical and radiographic evaluation. Implant Dent. 2014;23(5):570–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000134.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Schoolfield JD, Jones AA, Oates TW. A prospective multicenter 5-year radiographic evaluation of crestal bone levels over time in 596 dental implants placed in 192 patients. J Periodontol. 2009;80(5):725–33. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080401.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Chang M, Wennstrom JL. Longitudinal changes in tooth/single-implant relationship and bone topography: an 8-year retrospective analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(3):388–94. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080401.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Lee CT, Huang YW, Zhu L, Weltman R. Prevalences of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2017;1(62):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.011.CrossRef

48.

Valles C, Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Muñoz F, Permuy M, López-Alonso H, et al. Influence of implant neck surface and placement depth on crestal bone changes and soft tissue dimensions around platform-switched implants: a histologic study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(7):869–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12887.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Cassetta M, Di Giorgio R, Barbato E. Are intraoral radiographs reliable in determining peri-implant marginal bone level changes? The correlation between open surgical measurements and peri-apical radiographs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47(10):1358–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2018.05.018.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Kamperos G, Zambara I, Petsinis V, Zambaras D. The impact of buccal bone defects and immediate placement on the esthetic outcome of maxillary anterior single-tooth implants. J Oral Implantol. 2016;42(4):337–41. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00004.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Meijer HJA, Slagter KW, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Buccal bone thickness at dental implants in the maxillary anterior region with large bony defects at time of immediate implant placement: a 1-year cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(1):73–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12701.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Fewtrell MS, Kennedy K, Singhal A, Martin RM, Ness A, Hadders-Algra M, et al. How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies? Arch Dis Child. 2008;93(6):458–61. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2007.127316.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Lieber R, Pandis N, Faggion CM. Reporting and handling of incomplete outcome data in implant dentistry: a survey of randomized clinical trials. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47(2):257–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13222.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Effect of microthread design on the preservation of marginal bone around immediately placed implants: a 5-years prospective cohort study
Authors: Hoori Aslroosta
Solmaz Akbari
Nima Naddafpour
Seyed Taha Adnaninia
Afshin Khorsand
Niusha Namadmalian Esfahani
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keywords: Bleeding on Probing
Dental Plaque Index
Published in: BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01881-w

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Effect of microthread design on the preservation of marginal bone around immediately placed implants: a 5-years prospective cohort study

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Current status of periodontitis and its association with tobacco use amongst adult population of Sunsari district, in Nepal

Analysing the effectiveness of topical bleeding care following tooth extraction in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy-retrospective observational study

Magnification of fear and intention of avoidance in non-experienced versus experienced dental treatment in adults

A comparative assessment of oral health-related quality of life of children born with orofacial clefts in Sudan and their caregivers'

Risk of coronary heart disease in patients with periodontitis among the middled-aged and elderly in China: a cohort study

Knowledge, awareness, and perception of dental students, interns, and freshly graduated dentists regarding dental implant complications in Saudi Arabia: a web-based anonymous survey