Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Bisphosphonate | Original Article

Trends in osteoporosis diagnosis and management in Australia

Authors: Leon Smith, Stephen Wilson

Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

Trends in bone mineral density monitoring, and drug treatment for osteoporosis, in Australia were examined. Rates of DEXA scanning have increased in response to changes to government policy affecting reimbursement. The drug denosumab is being utilised at an increasing rate, while bisphosphonate use has declined. Osteoporosis prevalence remained stable over the same timeframe, while rate of hip fractures declined, suggesting that introduction of osteoporosis screening was associated with a reduction in adverse osteoporosis outcomes, but may also have been associated with overutilisation.

Introduction

Radiology interventions to diagnose and medications to manage osteoporosis in Australia are reimbursed under the Medicare benefits schedule (MBS) and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). Monitoring of these databases enables changes in utilisation of these practices to be monitored over time.

Methods

This study examined rates of utilisation for bone mineral density (BMD) measurement and osteoporosis pharmacotherapy subsidised under the MBS. Rates of osteoporosis and hip fracture were estimated using data reported by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) and Australian Institute for Health and Welfare (AIHW).

Results

Rates of BMD measurement increased since the technology was first reimbursed, with changes to policy regarding reimbursement for screening for individuals over 70 leading to an increase in BMD measurement after 2007. Prescribing rates also increased over time, initially with the introduction of oral bisphosphonates and subsequently for denosumab, which has subsequently become the most commonly prescribed agent for osteoporosis management in Australia, while bisphosphonate use has declined. Osteoporosis prevalence in Australia has remained relatively static at 3–4% of the population since 2001 to 2017, while rates of minimal trauma hip fracture hospitalisations have declined from 195 per 100,000 to 174 per 100,000 in the same timeframe.

Conclusion

Available data indicates that osteoporosis screening rates changed over time from 2001 to 2018 and that changes to government policy had a significant effect on the rates at which screening was performed. Over the same timeframe, there was a sustained reduction in hip fracture hospitalisation rates, with no change to reported osteoporosis prevalence. This suggests that policy changes permitting unlimited access to BMD measurement were associated with a reduction in osteoporotic fractures, but may also have been associated with overutilisation. Prospective studies to assess the efficacy of specific policies to ensure screening is performed in accordance with best-practice guidelines may be desirable.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Walker BR, Colledge NR, Ralston S, Penman ID, Britton R, editors. Davidson’s principles and practice of medicine. 22nd edition. Edinburgh ; New York: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2014. 1372 p. Walker BR, Colledge NR, Ralston S, Penman ID, Britton R, editors. Davidson’s principles and practice of medicine. 22nd edition. Edinburgh ; New York: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2014. 1372 p.
4.
go back to reference Jarvinen TL, Michaelsson K, Jokihaara J, Collins GS, Perry TL, Mintzes B et al (2015) Overdiagnosis of bone fragility in the quest to prevent hip fracture. BMJ 350(may26 12):h2088–h2088CrossRefPubMed Jarvinen TL, Michaelsson K, Jokihaara J, Collins GS, Perry TL, Mintzes B et al (2015) Overdiagnosis of bone fragility in the quest to prevent hip fracture. BMJ 350(may26 12):h2088–h2088CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference US Preventive Services Task Force (2018) Screening for osteoporosis to prevent fractures: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 319(24):2521–2531CrossRef US Preventive Services Task Force (2018) Screening for osteoporosis to prevent fractures: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 319(24):2521–2531CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Reid IR, Green JR, Lyles KW, Reid DM, Trechsel U, Hosking DJ et al (2020) Zoledronate Bone 137:115390CrossRefPubMed Reid IR, Green JR, Lyles KW, Reid DM, Trechsel U, Hosking DJ et al (2020) Zoledronate Bone 137:115390CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hanley DA, Adachi JD, Bell A, Brown V (2012) Denosumab: mechanism of action and clinical outcomes. Int J Clin Pract 66(12):1139–1146CrossRefPubMed Hanley DA, Adachi JD, Bell A, Brown V (2012) Denosumab: mechanism of action and clinical outcomes. Int J Clin Pract 66(12):1139–1146CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Cromer SJ, D’Silva KM, Yu EW, Landon J, Desai RJ, Kim SC 2021 Secular trends in the pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis and malignancy-related bone disease from 2009 to 2020. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jun 7; Cromer SJ, D’Silva KM, Yu EW, Landon J, Desai RJ, Kim SC 2021 Secular trends in the pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis and malignancy-related bone disease from 2009 to 2020. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jun 7;
17.
go back to reference Noble JA, McKenna MJ, Crowley RK (2021) Should denosumab treatment for osteoporosis be continued indefinitely? Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab 1(12):20420188211010052 Noble JA, McKenna MJ, Crowley RK (2021) Should denosumab treatment for osteoporosis be continued indefinitely? Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab 1(12):20420188211010052
18.
go back to reference Dhital R, Lynn T, Tachamo N, Poudel DR (2019) The trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect 9(3):211–214CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dhital R, Lynn T, Tachamo N, Poudel DR (2019) The trend of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fragility fractures in inpatients: results from a national database. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect 9(3):211–214CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference King AB, Fiorentino DM (2011) Medicare payment cuts for osteoporosis testing reduced use despite tests’ benefit in reducing fractures. Health Aff Proj Hope 30(12):2362–2370CrossRef King AB, Fiorentino DM (2011) Medicare payment cuts for osteoporosis testing reduced use despite tests’ benefit in reducing fractures. Health Aff Proj Hope 30(12):2362–2370CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hayes BL, Curtis JR, Laster A, Saag K, Tanner SB, Liu C et al (2010) Osteoporosis care in the United States after declines in reimbursements for DXA. J Clin Densitom Off J Int Soc Clin Densitom 13(4):352–360CrossRef Hayes BL, Curtis JR, Laster A, Saag K, Tanner SB, Liu C et al (2010) Osteoporosis care in the United States after declines in reimbursements for DXA. J Clin Densitom Off J Int Soc Clin Densitom 13(4):352–360CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Trends in osteoporosis diagnosis and management in Australia
Authors
Leon Smith
Stephen Wilson
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Archives of Osteoporosis / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1862-3522
Electronic ISSN: 1862-3514
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01139-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2022 Go to the issue