Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Birthplace choices: what are the information needs of women when choosing where to give birth in England? A qualitative study using online and face to face focus groups

Authors: Lisa Hinton, Carol Dumelow, Rachel Rowe, Jennifer Hollowell

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Current clinical guidelines and national policy in England support offering ‘low risk’ women a choice of birth setting. Options include: home, free-standing midwifery unit (FMU), alongside midwifery unit (AMU) or obstetric unit (OU). This study, which is part of a broader project designed to inform policy on ‘choice’ in relation to childbirth, aimed to provide evidence on UK women’s experiences of choice and decision-making in the period since the publication of the Birthplace findings (2011) and new NICE guidelines (2014). This paper reports on findings relating to women’s information needs when making decisions about where to give birth.

Methods

A qualitative focus group study including 69 women in the last trimester of pregnancy in England in 2015–16. Seven focus groups were conducted online via a bespoke web portal, and one was face-to-face. To explore different aspects of women’s experience, each group included women with specific characteristics or options; planning a home birth, living in areas with lots of choice, living in areas with limited choice, first time mothers, living close to a FMU, living in opt-out AMU areas, living in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas and planning to give birth in an OU. Focus group transcripts were analysed thematically.

Results

Women drew on multiple sources when making choices about where to give birth. Sources included; the Internet, friends’ recommendations and experiences, antenatal classes and their own personal experiences. Their midwife was not the main source of information. Women wanted the option to discuss and consider their birth preferences throughout their pregnancy, not at a fixed point.

Conclusions

Birthplace choice is informed by many factors. Women may encounter fewer overt obstacles to exercising choice than in the past, but women do not consistently receive information about birthplace options from their midwife at a time and in a manner that they find helpful. Introducing options early in pregnancy, but deferring decision-making about birthplace until a woman has had time to consider and explore options and discuss these with her midwife, might facilitate choice.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
NICE. Intrapartum care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. NICE clinical guideline 190. London: NICE; 2014.
3.
Birthplace in England Collaborative Group. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2011;343:d7400. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmj.​d7400.
4.
Hollowell J, Chisholm A, Li Y, Malouf R. Evidence review to support the National Maternity Review 2015. Report 4: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative literature on women's preferences and experiences of choosing their intended place of birth in the UK. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford; 2015.
5.
National Audit Office. Maternity Services in England. Report by the comptroller and auditor general. London: The Stationery Office; 2013.
6.
Care Quality Commission: 2015 survey of women's experiences of maternity care - statistical release In.; 2015.
7.
Office for National Statistics: Births in England and Wales by Characteristics of Birth 2: 2013. Statistical Bulletin. Home births and multiple births in England broken down by mother's age group.. In.; 2014.
8.
9.
Redshaw M, Rowe R, Schroeder L, Puddicombe D, Macfarlane A, Newburn M, McCourt C. Mapping maternity care. The configuration of maternity care in England. Birthplace in England research programme. Final report part 3. In. London: NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation programme; 2011.
10.
Coxon K, Sandall J, Fulop NJ. To what extent are women free to choose where to give birth? How discourses of risk, blame and responsibility influence birth place decisions. Health, Risk & Society. 2013;16(1):51–67.CrossRef
11.
Barber T, Rogers J, Marsh S. The birth place choice project: phase one. British Journal of Midwifery. 2006;14(10):609–13.CrossRef
12.
13.
Coxon K, Chisholm A, Malouf R, Rowe R, Hollowell J. What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a ‘best fit’ framework approach. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017;17(1):103.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
Brocklehurst P, Hardy P, Hollowell J, Linsell L, Macfarlane A, McCourt C, Marlow N, Miller A, Newburn M, Petrou S, et al. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2011;343:d7400.PubMedCrossRef
15.
16.
17.
NVivo for Windows. NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Version 10: QSR Internaltional Pty Ltd; 2012.
18.
Ziebland S, McPherson A. Making sense of qualitative data analysis: an introduction with illustrations from DIPEx (personal experiences of health and illness). Med Educ. 2006;40(5):405–14.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Houghton G, Bedwell C, Forsey M, Baker L, Lavender T. Factors influencing choice in birth place -- an exploration of the views of women, their partners and professionals. Evidence Based. Midwifery. 2008;6(2):59–64.
20.
Madi BC, Crow R. A qualitative study of information about available options for childbirth venue and pregnant women's preference for a place of delivery. Midwifery. 2003;19(4):328–36.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Emslie MJ, Campbell MK, Walker KA, Robertson S, Campbell A. Developing consumer-led maternity services: a survey of women's views in a local healthcare setting. Health Expect. 1999;2(3):195–207.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
Longworth L, Ratcliffe J, Boulton M. Investigating women's preferences for intrapartum care: home versus hospital births. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2001;9(6):404–13.CrossRef
23.
Watts K, Fraser DM, Munir F. The impact of the establishment of a midwife managed unit on women in a rural setting in England. Midwifery. 2003;19(2):106–12.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Robinson MB, Sim FM, Chapple J. Which maternity unit? Who makes the choice? J Public Health Med. 1993;15(3):277–80.PubMed
25.
Jomeen J. Choice in childbirth: a realistic expectation? British Journal of Midwifery. 2007;15(8):485–90.CrossRef
26.
Tinkler A, Quinney D. Team midwifery: the influence of the midwife-woman relationship on women's experiences and perceptions of maternity care. J Adv Nurs. 1998;28(1):30–5.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Lavender T, Chapple J. How women choose where to give birth. Practising Midwife. 2005;8(7):10–5.PubMed
28.
Mansion EM, McGuire MM. Professional issues. Factors which influence women in their choice of DOMINO care. British Journal of Midwifery. 1998;6(10):664–8.CrossRef
29.
Pitchforth E, van Teijlingen E, Watson V, Tucker J, Kiger A, Ireland J, Farmer J, Rennie A, Gibb S, Thomson E, et al. "choice" and place of delivery: a qualitative study of women in remote and rural Scotland. Quality & Safety in Health Care. 2009;18(1):42–8.CrossRef
30.
Shaw R, Kitzinger C. Calls to a home birth helpline: empowerment in childbirth. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(11):2374–83.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Stapleton H, Kirkham M, Thomas G. Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care. Br Med J. 2002;324(7338):639.CrossRef
32.
Woog CL. Where do you want to have your baby?‘Women’s narratives of how they chose their birthplace. British Journal of Midwifery. 2017;25(2):94-102.
33.
Andrews A. Home birth experience 1: decision and expectation. British Journal of Midwifery. 2004;12(8):518–23.CrossRef
34.
Coxon K, Sandall J, Fulop NJ. To what extent are women free to choose where to give birth? How discourses of risk, blame and responsibility influence birth place decisions. Health, Risk and Society. 2014;16(1):51–67.CrossRef
35.
Ogden J, Shaw A, Zander L. Women's memories of homebirth. Part 2: deciding on a homebirth: help and hindrances. British Journal of Midwifery. 1997;5(4):211–5.
36.
Coxon K, Sandall J, Fulop NJ. How do pregnancy and birth experiences influence planned place of birth in future pregnancies? Findings from a longitudinal, narrative study. Birth. 2015;42(2):141–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
McCutcheon R, Brown D. A qualitative exploration of women's experiences and reflections upon giving birth at home. Evidence Based. Midwifery. 2012;10(1):23–8.
38.
Walsh DJ. Nesting' and 'Matrescence' as distinctive features of a free-standing birth centre in the UK. Midwifery. 2006;22(3):228–39.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Ogden J, Shaw A, Zander L. Women's memories of homebirth. Part 3: a decision with a lasting effect. British Journal of Midwifery. 1997;5:216–8.CrossRef
40.
Lagan BM, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG. Pregnant women’s use of the internet: a review of published and unpublished evidence. Evidence Based. Midwifery. 2006;4(1):17–23.
41.
Sayakhot P, Carolan-Olah M. Internet use by pregnant women seeking pregnancy-related information: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:65.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
Redshaw M, Henderson J. Safely delivered: a national survey of women's experience of maternity care 2014. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiolgy Unit; 2015.
43.
Lagan BM, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG. What is the impact of the internet on decision-making in pregnancy? A global study. Birth. 2011;38(4):336–45.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Kraschnewski JL, Chuang CH, Poole ES, Peyton T, Blubaugh I, Pauli J, Feher A, Reddy M. Paging "Dr. Google": does technology fill the gap created by the prenatal care visit structure? Qualitative focus group study with pregnant women. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(6):e147.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
Soltani H, Dickinson FM. Exploring women’s views on information provided during pregnancy. British Journal of Midwifery. 2005;13(10):633–6.CrossRef
46.
Henshall C, Taylor B, Kenyon S. A systematic review to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options for where to give birth. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2016;16(1):1–13.CrossRef
47.
Barber T, Rogers J, Marsh S. Increasing out-of-hospital births: what needs to change? British Journal of Midwifery. 2007;15(1):16–20.CrossRef
48.
49.
Pitchforth E, Watson V, Tucker J, Ryan M, van Teijlingen E, Farmer J, Ireland J, Thomson E, Kiger A, Bryers H. Models of intrapartum care and women's trade-offs in remote and rural Scotland: a mixed-methods study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115(5):560–9.CrossRef
50.
51.
Rowe R. Birthplace terms and definitions: consensus process. Birthplace in England research programme. Final report part 2. In: NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme; 2011.
Metadata
Title
Birthplace choices: what are the information needs of women when choosing where to give birth in England? A qualitative study using online and face to face focus groups
Authors
Lisa Hinton
Carol Dumelow
Rachel Rowe
Jennifer Hollowell
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1601-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

Efficacy and safety of ferric carboxymaltose versus ferrous sulfate for iron deficiency anemia during pregnancy: subgroup analysis of Korean women

Research article

A systematic review of non-antibiotic measures for the prevention of urinary tract infections in pregnancy

Research article

Comparison of the effect of breast pump stimulation and oxytocin administration on the length of the third stage of labor, postpartum hemorrhage, and anemia: a randomized controlled trial

Research article

Husbands’ involvement in antenatal care and its association with women’s utilization of skilled birth attendants in Sidama zone, Ethiopia: a prospective cohort study

Research article

The dynamics of vaginal and rectal Lactobacillus spp. flora in subsequent trimesters of pregnancy in healthy Polish women, assessed using the Sanger sequencing method

Research article

The need for trust and safety inducing encounters: a qualitative exploration of women’s experiences of seeking perinatal care when living as undocumented migrants in Sweden