Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drugs 12/2011

01-08-2011 | Current Opinion

Biosimilars of Biological Drug Therapies

Regulatory, Clinical and Commercial Considerations

Authors: Dr George Dranitsaris, Eitan Amir, Kristine Dorward

Published in: Drugs | Issue 12/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Biologicals are distinct from small molecule drugs in that they are larger, more structurally complex agents. While the overall risk is modest, the active protein structure characteristic of biologicals makes them more prone to induce an acute and/or chronic immune response. Biosimilars are a new class of drugs intended to offer comparable safety and efficacy to the reference, off-patent biological. They are not generic alternatives per se and are generally not interchangeable. Given their structural complexity, multifaceted manufacturing process and risk for immunogenicity, unique regulatory pathways are required for biosimilars. In this article, we review the clinical, safety and submission requirements for biosimilars in several major markets. We also highlight issues of ongoing debate amongst key stakeholders and examine some of the commercial challenges faced by developers of biosimilars. As the leader of biosimilars drug approval and product uptake, the EU is highlighted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Woodcock J, Griffin J, Behrman R, et al. The FDA’s assessment of follow on protein products: a historical perspective. Nat Rev Drug Discovery 2007; 6: 437–42CrossRef Woodcock J, Griffin J, Behrman R, et al. The FDA’s assessment of follow on protein products: a historical perspective. Nat Rev Drug Discovery 2007; 6: 437–42CrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference Beck A. European medicines workshop on biosimilars monoclonal antibodies: perspective from the EU. MAbs 2009; 1: 406–10CrossRef Beck A. European medicines workshop on biosimilars monoclonal antibodies: perspective from the EU. MAbs 2009; 1: 406–10CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kueppers E. Follow on biologics: how to develop a competitive advantage. Bus Dev Licens J 2010; 12: 17–8 Kueppers E. Follow on biologics: how to develop a competitive advantage. Bus Dev Licens J 2010; 12: 17–8
7.
go back to reference Fox A. Biosimilar medicines: new challenges for a new class of medicine. J Biopharm Stat 2010; 20: 3–9PubMedCrossRef Fox A. Biosimilar medicines: new challenges for a new class of medicine. J Biopharm Stat 2010; 20: 3–9PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gottlieb S. Biosimilars: policy, clinical, and regulatory considerations. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008; 65 (14 Suppl. 6): S2–8PubMedCrossRef Gottlieb S. Biosimilars: policy, clinical, and regulatory considerations. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008; 65 (14 Suppl. 6): S2–8PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Roger SD. Biosimilars: current status and future directions. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2010; 10: 1011–8PubMedCrossRef Roger SD. Biosimilars: current status and future directions. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2010; 10: 1011–8PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Minghetti P, Rocco P, Del Vecchio L, et al. Biosimilars and regulatory authorities. Nephron Clin Pract 2010; 117: c1–7PubMedCrossRef Minghetti P, Rocco P, Del Vecchio L, et al. Biosimilars and regulatory authorities. Nephron Clin Pract 2010; 117: c1–7PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
go back to reference Reichert JM, Beck A. European medicines workshop on biosimilars monoclonal antibodies. MAbs 2009; 1: 394–405PubMedCrossRef Reichert JM, Beck A. European medicines workshop on biosimilars monoclonal antibodies. MAbs 2009; 1: 394–405PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schellekens H. Bioequivalence and the immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2002; 1: 457–62PubMedCrossRef Schellekens H. Bioequivalence and the immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2002; 1: 457–62PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schellekens H. Biosimilar therapeutic agents: issues with bioequivalence and immunogenicity. Eur J Clin Invest 2004; 34: 797–9PubMedCrossRef Schellekens H. Biosimilar therapeutic agents: issues with bioequivalence and immunogenicity. Eur J Clin Invest 2004; 34: 797–9PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Roger SD, Mikhail A. Biosimilars: opportunity or cause for concern? J Pharm Sci 2007; 10: 405–10 Roger SD, Mikhail A. Biosimilars: opportunity or cause for concern? J Pharm Sci 2007; 10: 405–10
17.
go back to reference Chirino AJ, Ary ML, Marshall SA. Minimizing the immunogenicity of protein therapeutics. Drug Discov Today 2004; 9: 82–90PubMedCrossRef Chirino AJ, Ary ML, Marshall SA. Minimizing the immunogenicity of protein therapeutics. Drug Discov Today 2004; 9: 82–90PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Iyer H. European medicines workshop on biosimilars monoclonal antibodies: perspectives from India. MAbs 2009; 1:411–3 Iyer H. European medicines workshop on biosimilars monoclonal antibodies: perspectives from India. MAbs 2009; 1:411–3
21.
go back to reference Whalen J. Roche CEO girds for first biotech fight. New York (NY): Wall Street Journal, 2010 Nov 2 Whalen J. Roche CEO girds for first biotech fight. New York (NY): Wall Street Journal, 2010 Nov 2
23.
go back to reference Crandall MA. World markets for biogenerics. New York (NY): Kalorama Information, 2008: 79–80 Crandall MA. World markets for biogenerics. New York (NY): Kalorama Information, 2008: 79–80
Metadata
Title
Biosimilars of Biological Drug Therapies
Regulatory, Clinical and Commercial Considerations
Authors
Dr George Dranitsaris
Eitan Amir
Kristine Dorward
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drugs / Issue 12/2011
Print ISSN: 0012-6667
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1950
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11593730-000000000-00000

Other articles of this Issue 12/2011

Drugs 12/2011 Go to the issue

Leading Article

Edoxaban

Adis Drug Evaluation

Plerixafor

Therapy in Practice

Acute Myeloid Leukaemia

Adis Drug Profile

Nilotinib