Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2009

01-11-2009 | Knee

Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic all-inside meniscus repairs

Authors: Taner Gunes, Bora Bostan, Mehmet Erdem, Murat Asci, Cengiz Sen, Mehmet Halidun Kelestemur

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 11/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Viper is a new device for arthroscopically all-inside meniscal repairing. In previous studies about Viper device, procedures were not applied arthroscopically despite this device has been designed for arthroscopic application. In this study, we evaluated primary fixation strength of arthroscopically applied meniscal repair using Viper device to obtain better clinical relevance. Two centimeter in length meniscal tear 2–3 mm far from periferic edge of medial meniscus of 50 calves were created arthroscopically. The menisci were divided into five groups including 10 menisci in each. In group 1, tears were repaired by outside-in vertical loop suture technique with No: 0 PDS. Tears were fixed by all-inside vertical suture by using Viper device with No: 0 PDS in group 2. In meniscal implant groups, RapidLoc, H-Fix, and Clearfix were applied in groups 3,4, and 5, respectively. Primary fixation strength of repairing techniques were evaluated with bio-mechanical testing machine. Fixation strengths determined in groups 1 and 2 were detected as 145 ± 13 and 136 ± 33 N, respectively. There was no difference in pull-out strength between groups 1 and 2. Fixation strengths in these two groups were significantly higher compared to groups 3, 4, and 5. There was no significant difference between group 3 (33 ± 6 N) and 5 (28 ± 6 N) in terms of fixation strengths whereas fixation strengths of these two groups were significantly higher compared to group 4 (20 ± 3 N) (P = 0.005, P = 0.018, respectively). All-inside vertical suture technique using Viper device revealed comparable primary fixation strength with outside-in vertical suture technique for meniscal repair. We suggest that the Viper device is safe and reliable for meniscal repair.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Allen PR, Denham RA, Swan AV (1984) Late degenerative changes after meniscectomy. Factors affecting the knee after operation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:666–671PubMed Allen PR, Denham RA, Swan AV (1984) Late degenerative changes after meniscectomy. Factors affecting the knee after operation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:666–671PubMed
2.
go back to reference Anderson K, Marx RG, Hannafin J, Warren RF (2000) Chondral injury following meniscal repair with a biodegradable implant. Arthroscopy 16:749–753PubMedCrossRef Anderson K, Marx RG, Hannafin J, Warren RF (2000) Chondral injury following meniscal repair with a biodegradable implant. Arthroscopy 16:749–753PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Arnoczky SP, Lavagnino M (2001) Tensile fixation strengths of absorbable meniscal repair devices as a function of hydrolysis time. An in vitro experimental study. Am J Sports Med 29:118–123PubMed Arnoczky SP, Lavagnino M (2001) Tensile fixation strengths of absorbable meniscal repair devices as a function of hydrolysis time. An in vitro experimental study. Am J Sports Med 29:118–123PubMed
4.
go back to reference Arnoczky SP, Warren RF (1983) The microvasculature of the meniscus and its response to injury. An experimental study in the dog. Am J Sports Med 11:131–141CrossRefPubMed Arnoczky SP, Warren RF (1983) The microvasculature of the meniscus and its response to injury. An experimental study in the dog. Am J Sports Med 11:131–141CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Asik M, Sener N, Akpinar S, Durmaz H, Goksan A (1997) Strength of different meniscus suturing techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:80–83CrossRefPubMed Asik M, Sener N, Akpinar S, Durmaz H, Goksan A (1997) Strength of different meniscus suturing techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:80–83CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Asik M, Sener N (2002) Failure strength of repair devices versus meniscus suturing techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:25–29CrossRefPubMed Asik M, Sener N (2002) Failure strength of repair devices versus meniscus suturing techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:25–29CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Austin KS (1996) Complications of arthroscopic meniscal repair. Clin Sports Med 15:613–619PubMed Austin KS (1996) Complications of arthroscopic meniscal repair. Clin Sports Med 15:613–619PubMed
8.
go back to reference Barber FA, Herbert MA, Richards DP (2004) Load to failure testing of new meniscal repair devices. Arthroscopy 20:45–50PubMedCrossRef Barber FA, Herbert MA, Richards DP (2004) Load to failure testing of new meniscal repair devices. Arthroscopy 20:45–50PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Barber FA, Herbert MA (2000) Meniscal repair devices. Arthroscopy 16:613–618PubMed Barber FA, Herbert MA (2000) Meniscal repair devices. Arthroscopy 16:613–618PubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Becker R, Schroder M, Starke C, Urbach D, Nebelung W (2001) Biomechanical investigations of different meniscal repair implants in comparison with horizontal sutures on human meniscus. Arthroscopy 17:439–444PubMedCrossRef Becker R, Schroder M, Starke C, Urbach D, Nebelung W (2001) Biomechanical investigations of different meniscal repair implants in comparison with horizontal sutures on human meniscus. Arthroscopy 17:439–444PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Labey L, Van Audekercke R (2002) Fixation strength of meniscal repair devices. Knee 9:11–14CrossRefPubMed Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Labey L, Van Audekercke R (2002) Fixation strength of meniscal repair devices. Knee 9:11–14CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Boenisch UW, Faber KJ, Ciarelli M, Steadman JR, Arnoczky SP (1999) Pull-out strength and stiffness of meniscal repair using absorbable arrows or Ti-Cron vertical and horizontal loop sutures. Am J Sports Med 27:626–631PubMed Boenisch UW, Faber KJ, Ciarelli M, Steadman JR, Arnoczky SP (1999) Pull-out strength and stiffness of meniscal repair using absorbable arrows or Ti-Cron vertical and horizontal loop sutures. Am J Sports Med 27:626–631PubMed
14.
go back to reference Chang HC, Caborn DN, Nyland J, Burden R (2006) Effect of lesion location on fixation strength of the meniscal viper repair system: an in vitro study using porcine menisci. Arthroscopy 22:394–399PubMed Chang HC, Caborn DN, Nyland J, Burden R (2006) Effect of lesion location on fixation strength of the meniscal viper repair system: an in vitro study using porcine menisci. Arthroscopy 22:394–399PubMed
15.
go back to reference Chang HC, Nyland J, Caborn DN, Burden R (2005) Biomechanical evaluation of meniscal repair systems: a comparison of the meniscal Viper Repair System, the vertical mattress FasT-Fix Device, and vertical mattress ethibond sutures. Am J Sports Med 33:1846–1852CrossRefPubMed Chang HC, Nyland J, Caborn DN, Burden R (2005) Biomechanical evaluation of meniscal repair systems: a comparison of the meniscal Viper Repair System, the vertical mattress FasT-Fix Device, and vertical mattress ethibond sutures. Am J Sports Med 33:1846–1852CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Fisher SR, Markel DC, Koman JD, Atkinson TS (2002) Pull-out and shear failure strengths of arthroscopic meniscal repair systems. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:294–299PubMed Fisher SR, Markel DC, Koman JD, Atkinson TS (2002) Pull-out and shear failure strengths of arthroscopic meniscal repair systems. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:294–299PubMed
17.
go back to reference Hechtman KS, Uribe JW (1999) Cystic hematoma formation following use of a biodegradable arrow for meniscal repair. Arthroscopy 15:207–210PubMedCrossRef Hechtman KS, Uribe JW (1999) Cystic hematoma formation following use of a biodegradable arrow for meniscal repair. Arthroscopy 15:207–210PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hsieh HH, Walker PS (1976) Stabilizing mechanisms of the loaded and unloaded knee joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:87–93PubMed Hsieh HH, Walker PS (1976) Stabilizing mechanisms of the loaded and unloaded knee joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:87–93PubMed
19.
go back to reference Hutchinson MR, Ash SA (1999) Failure of a biodegradable meniscal arrow. A case report. Am J Sports Med 27:101–103PubMed Hutchinson MR, Ash SA (1999) Failure of a biodegradable meniscal arrow. A case report. Am J Sports Med 27:101–103PubMed
20.
go back to reference Jeffries JT, Gainor BJ, Allen WC, Cikrit D (1987) Injury to the popliteal artery as a complication of arthroscopic surgery. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:783–785PubMed Jeffries JT, Gainor BJ, Allen WC, Cikrit D (1987) Injury to the popliteal artery as a complication of arthroscopic surgery. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:783–785PubMed
21.
go back to reference Jorgensen U, Sonne-Holm S, Lauridsen F, Rosenklint A (1987) Long-term follow-up of meniscectomy in athletes. A prospective longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:80–83PubMed Jorgensen U, Sonne-Holm S, Lauridsen F, Rosenklint A (1987) Long-term follow-up of meniscectomy in athletes. A prospective longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:80–83PubMed
22.
go back to reference Jurist KA, Greene PW 3rd, Shirkhoda A (1989) Peroneal nerve dysfunction as a complication of lateral meniscus repair: a case report and anatomic dissection. Arthroscopy 5:141–147PubMedCrossRef Jurist KA, Greene PW 3rd, Shirkhoda A (1989) Peroneal nerve dysfunction as a complication of lateral meniscus repair: a case report and anatomic dissection. Arthroscopy 5:141–147PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kohn D, Siebert W (1989) Meniscus suture techniques: a comparative biomechanical cadaver study. Arthroscopy 5:324–327PubMedCrossRef Kohn D, Siebert W (1989) Meniscus suture techniques: a comparative biomechanical cadaver study. Arthroscopy 5:324–327PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kurosawa H, Fukubayashi T, Nakajima H (1980) Load-bearing mode of the knee joint: physical behavior of the knee joint with or without menisci. Clin Orthop Relat Res 149:283–290PubMed Kurosawa H, Fukubayashi T, Nakajima H (1980) Load-bearing mode of the knee joint: physical behavior of the knee joint with or without menisci. Clin Orthop Relat Res 149:283–290PubMed
25.
go back to reference MacConaill MA (1950) The movements of bones and joints; the synovial fluid and its assistants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 32:244–252PubMed MacConaill MA (1950) The movements of bones and joints; the synovial fluid and its assistants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 32:244–252PubMed
26.
go back to reference Menche DS, Phillips GI, Pitman MI, Steiner GC (1999) Inflammatory foreign-body reaction to an arthroscopic bioabsorbable meniscal arrow repair. Arthroscopy. B-15:770–772CrossRef Menche DS, Phillips GI, Pitman MI, Steiner GC (1999) Inflammatory foreign-body reaction to an arthroscopic bioabsorbable meniscal arrow repair. Arthroscopy. B-15:770–772CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Menetrey J, Seil R, Rupp S, Fritschy D (2002) Chondral damage after meniscal repair with the use of a bioabsorbable implant. Am J Sports Med 30:896–899PubMed Menetrey J, Seil R, Rupp S, Fritschy D (2002) Chondral damage after meniscal repair with the use of a bioabsorbable implant. Am J Sports Med 30:896–899PubMed
28.
go back to reference Miller MD, Kline AJ, Jepsen KG (2004) “All-inside” meniscal repair devices: an experimental study in the goat model. Am J Sports Med 32:858–862CrossRefPubMed Miller MD, Kline AJ, Jepsen KG (2004) “All-inside” meniscal repair devices: an experimental study in the goat model. Am J Sports Med 32:858–862CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Morgan CD, Wojtys EM, Casscells CD, Casscells SW (1991) Arthroscopic meniscal repair evaluated by second-look arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 19:632–637CrossRefPubMed Morgan CD, Wojtys EM, Casscells CD, Casscells SW (1991) Arthroscopic meniscal repair evaluated by second-look arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 19:632–637CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Naqui SZ, Thiryayi WA, Hopgood P, Ryan WG (2006) A biomechanical comparison of the Mitek RapidLoc, Mitek Meniscal repair system, clearfix screws and vertical PDS and Ti-Cron sutures. Knee 13:151–157CrossRefPubMed Naqui SZ, Thiryayi WA, Hopgood P, Ryan WG (2006) A biomechanical comparison of the Mitek RapidLoc, Mitek Meniscal repair system, clearfix screws and vertical PDS and Ti-Cron sutures. Knee 13:151–157CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Oliverson TJ, Lintner DM (2000) Biofix arrow appearing as a subcutaneous foreign body. Arthroscopy 16:652–655PubMedCrossRef Oliverson TJ, Lintner DM (2000) Biofix arrow appearing as a subcutaneous foreign body. Arthroscopy 16:652–655PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Post WR, Akers SR, Kish V (1997) Load to failure of common meniscal repair techniques: effects of suture technique and suture material. Arthroscopy 13:731–736PubMedCrossRef Post WR, Akers SR, Kish V (1997) Load to failure of common meniscal repair techniques: effects of suture technique and suture material. Arthroscopy 13:731–736PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Proctor CS, Schmidt MB, Whipple RR, Kelly MA, Mow VC (1989) Material properties of the normal medial bovine meniscus. J Orthop Res 7:771–782CrossRefPubMed Proctor CS, Schmidt MB, Whipple RR, Kelly MA, Mow VC (1989) Material properties of the normal medial bovine meniscus. J Orthop Res 7:771–782CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Rankin CC, Lintner DM, Noble PC, Paravic V, Greer E (2002) A biomechanical analysis of meniscal repair techniques. Am J Sports Med 30:492–497PubMed Rankin CC, Lintner DM, Noble PC, Paravic V, Greer E (2002) A biomechanical analysis of meniscal repair techniques. Am J Sports Med 30:492–497PubMed
35.
go back to reference Ross G, Grabill J, McDevitt E (2000) Chondral injury after meniscal repair with bioabsorbable arrows. Arthroscopy 16:754–756PubMed Ross G, Grabill J, McDevitt E (2000) Chondral injury after meniscal repair with bioabsorbable arrows. Arthroscopy 16:754–756PubMed
36.
go back to reference Seil R, Rupp S, Jurecka C, Georg T, Kohn D (2003) Biodegradable meniscus fixations: a comparative biomechanical study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 89:35–43PubMed Seil R, Rupp S, Jurecka C, Georg T, Kohn D (2003) Biodegradable meniscus fixations: a comparative biomechanical study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 89:35–43PubMed
37.
go back to reference Sgaglione NA, Steadman JR, Shaffer B, Miller MD, Fu FH (2003) Current concepts in meniscus surgery: resection to replacement. Arthroscopy 19(suppl 1):161–188PubMedCrossRef Sgaglione NA, Steadman JR, Shaffer B, Miller MD, Fu FH (2003) Current concepts in meniscus surgery: resection to replacement. Arthroscopy 19(suppl 1):161–188PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Small NC (1990) Complications in arthroscopic meniscal surgery. Clin Sports Med 9:609–617PubMed Small NC (1990) Complications in arthroscopic meniscal surgery. Clin Sports Med 9:609–617PubMed
39.
go back to reference Small NC (1988) Complications in arthroscopic surgery performed by experienced arthroscopists. Arthroscopy 4:215–221PubMedCrossRef Small NC (1988) Complications in arthroscopic surgery performed by experienced arthroscopists. Arthroscopy 4:215–221PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Voloshin AS, Wosk J (1983) Shock absorption of meniscectomized and painful knees: a comparative in vivo study. J Biomed Eng 5:157–161CrossRefPubMed Voloshin AS, Wosk J (1983) Shock absorption of meniscectomized and painful knees: a comparative in vivo study. J Biomed Eng 5:157–161CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic all-inside meniscus repairs
Authors
Taner Gunes
Bora Bostan
Mehmet Erdem
Murat Asci
Cengiz Sen
Mehmet Halidun Kelestemur
Publication date
01-11-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 11/2009
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0871-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2009

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2009 Go to the issue