Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Sexual Health Reports 4/2020

01-12-2020 | Female Sexual Dysfunction and Disorders (A Stanton & T Lorenz, Section Editors)

Beyond the Dyad: a Review of the Novel Insights Gained From Studying Consensual Non-monogamy

Authors: Rhonda N. Balzarini, Amy Muise

Published in: Current Sexual Health Reports | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to highlight the major advancements in our understanding of consensually non-monogamous (CNM) relationships—or intimate relationships between three or more people who are non-exclusive sexually and/or emotionally. We aim to review key insights from research on the benefits (i.e., diversification of need fulfillment) and challenges (i.e., continued stigma) of CNM relationships and how research on CNM highlights some limitations of the existing theories of relationships.

Recent Findings

The last two decades have seen a trend towards increasing diversity of family structures. Although monogamy remains the most common relationship structure, CNM relationships are increasing in prevalence and in interest to both lay people and researchers. Recent research has begun to uncover novel insights into who is more likely to be drawn to and engage in CNM, how CNM relationships compare to monogamous relationships, and the potential benefits and challenges of engaging in CNM relationships.

Summary

While people in CNM relationships still experience stigma, for those who desire such relationships, CNM can be a viable and healthy alternative to monogamy, and may even help people meet more of their needs through diversifying need fulfillment across multiple partners. Despite this, many existing relationship theories are not inclusive of CNM relationship experiences and aspects of existing theories of positive relationships and sexuality may not extend to people in CNM relationships. Moving forward it is important to consider whether our concepts and measures are inclusive to people in diverse relationships, including those in CNM relationships.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Rosenfeld M, Byung-Soo K. The independence of young adults and the rise of interracial and same sex unions. Am Sociol Rev. 2005;70:541–62. Rosenfeld M, Byung-Soo K. The independence of young adults and the rise of interracial and same sex unions. Am Sociol Rev. 2005;70:541–62.
3.
go back to reference Tamura R, Murphy KM, Simon CJ. Fertility decline, baby boom and economic growth. J Hum Cap. 2008;2:262–302. Tamura R, Murphy KM, Simon CJ. Fertility decline, baby boom and economic growth. J Hum Cap. 2008;2:262–302.
4.
go back to reference Tamura R, Simon C. Secular fertility declines, baby booms and economic growth: international evidence. Macroecon Dyn. 2016;21:1601–72. Tamura R, Simon C. Secular fertility declines, baby booms and economic growth: international evidence. Macroecon Dyn. 2016;21:1601–72.
5.
go back to reference Conley TD, Ziegler A, Moors AC, Matsick J, Valentine B. A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2013;2:124–41. Conley TD, Ziegler A, Moors AC, Matsick J, Valentine B. A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2013;2:124–41.
6.
go back to reference Ryan C, Jetha C. Sex at dawn: how we mate, why we stray, and what it means for modern relationships. New York: Harper; 2010. Ryan C, Jetha C. Sex at dawn: how we mate, why we stray, and what it means for modern relationships. New York: Harper; 2010.
7.
go back to reference Bittman M, Pixley J. The double life of the family. Sydney: Allen & Unwin; 1997. Bittman M, Pixley J. The double life of the family. Sydney: Allen & Unwin; 1997.
8.
go back to reference Stacey J. In the name of the family: rethinking family values in the postmodern age. Boston: Beacon Press; 1996. Stacey J. In the name of the family: rethinking family values in the postmodern age. Boston: Beacon Press; 1996.
9.
go back to reference Conley TD, Moors AC, Matsick JL, Ziegler A. The fewer the merrier? Assessing stigma surrounding consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2013;13:1–30. Conley TD, Moors AC, Matsick JL, Ziegler A. The fewer the merrier? Assessing stigma surrounding consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2013;13:1–30.
10.
go back to reference Grunt-Mejer K, Campbell C. Around consensual nonmonogamies: assessing attitudes toward nonexclusive relationships. J Sex Res. 2016;53:45–53.PubMed Grunt-Mejer K, Campbell C. Around consensual nonmonogamies: assessing attitudes toward nonexclusive relationships. J Sex Res. 2016;53:45–53.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Sizemore KM, Olmstead SB. A systematic review of research on attitudes towards and willingness to engage in consensual non-monogamy among emerging adults: methodological issues considered. Psychol and Sex. 2017;8:4–23. Sizemore KM, Olmstead SB. A systematic review of research on attitudes towards and willingness to engage in consensual non-monogamy among emerging adults: methodological issues considered. Psychol and Sex. 2017;8:4–23.
13.
go back to reference Moors AC. Has the American public’s interest in information related to relationships beyond “the couple” increased over time? J Sex Res. 2016;54:677–84.PubMed Moors AC. Has the American public’s interest in information related to relationships beyond “the couple” increased over time? J Sex Res. 2016;54:677–84.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Rubel AN, Bogaert AF. Consensual nonmonogamy: psychological well-being and relationship quality correlates. J Sex Res. 2015;52:961–82.PubMed Rubel AN, Bogaert AF. Consensual nonmonogamy: psychological well-being and relationship quality correlates. J Sex Res. 2015;52:961–82.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Barker M, Langdridge D. Whatever happened to non-monogamies? Critical reflections on recent research and theory. Sexualities. 2010;13:748–72. Barker M, Langdridge D. Whatever happened to non-monogamies? Critical reflections on recent research and theory. Sexualities. 2010;13:748–72.
17.
go back to reference • Balzarini RN, Dharma C, Kohut T, Campbell L, Lehmiller JJ, Harman JJ, et al. Comparing relationship quality across different types of romantic partners in polyamorous and monogamous relationships. Arch Sex Behav. 2019;48:1749–67. This article presents research demonstrating differences in reports of relationship quality for partners in polyamorous and monogamous relationships.PubMed • Balzarini RN, Dharma C, Kohut T, Campbell L, Lehmiller JJ, Harman JJ, et al. Comparing relationship quality across different types of romantic partners in polyamorous and monogamous relationships. Arch Sex Behav. 2019;48:1749–67. This article presents research demonstrating differences in reports of relationship quality for partners in polyamorous and monogamous relationships.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Balzarini RN, Dharma C, Muise A, Kohut T. Eroticism versus nurturance: how eroticism and nurturance differ in polyamorous and monogamous relationships. Soc Psychol. 2019;50:185–200. Balzarini RN, Dharma C, Muise A, Kohut T. Eroticism versus nurturance: how eroticism and nurturance differ in polyamorous and monogamous relationships. Soc Psychol. 2019;50:185–200.
19.
go back to reference Mitchell ME, Bartholomew K, Cobb RC. Need fulfillment in polyamorous relationships. J Sex Res. 2014;51:329–39.PubMed Mitchell ME, Bartholomew K, Cobb RC. Need fulfillment in polyamorous relationships. J Sex Res. 2014;51:329–39.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Muise A, Laughton A, Moors AC, Impett EA. Sexual need fulfillment and satisfaction in consensually nonmonogamous relationships. J Soc Pers Relat. 2019;36:1917–38. Muise A, Laughton A, Moors AC, Impett EA. Sexual need fulfillment and satisfaction in consensually nonmonogamous relationships. J Soc Pers Relat. 2019;36:1917–38.
21.
go back to reference Fraley RC. Attachment in adulthood: recent developments, emerging debates, and future directions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019;70:401–22.PubMed Fraley RC. Attachment in adulthood: recent developments, emerging debates, and future directions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019;70:401–22.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Fairbrother N, Hart TA, Fairbrother M. Open relationship prevalence, characteristics, and correlates in a nationally representative sample of Canadian adults. J Sex Res. 2019;56:695–704.PubMed Fairbrother N, Hart TA, Fairbrother M. Open relationship prevalence, characteristics, and correlates in a nationally representative sample of Canadian adults. J Sex Res. 2019;56:695–704.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Haupert M, Gesselman A, Moors A, Fisher H, Garcia J. Prevalence of experiences with consensual non-monogamous relationships: findings from two nationally representative samples of single Americans. J Sex Marital Ther. 2017;43:424–40.PubMed Haupert M, Gesselman A, Moors A, Fisher H, Garcia J. Prevalence of experiences with consensual non-monogamous relationships: findings from two nationally representative samples of single Americans. J Sex Marital Ther. 2017;43:424–40.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Lehmiller JJ. Tell me what you want: the science of sexual desire and how it can help you improve your sex life. Boston: DaCapo; 2018. Lehmiller JJ. Tell me what you want: the science of sexual desire and how it can help you improve your sex life. Boston: DaCapo; 2018.
25.
go back to reference Barker M. Monogamies and non-monogamies - a response to: ‘The challenge of monogamy: bringing it out of the closet and into the treatment room’ by Marianne Brandon. Sex Relatsh Ther. 2011;26:281–7. Barker M. Monogamies and non-monogamies - a response to: ‘The challenge of monogamy: bringing it out of the closet and into the treatment room’ by Marianne Brandon. Sex Relatsh Ther. 2011;26:281–7.
26.
go back to reference Matsick JL, Conley TD, Ziegler A, Moors AC, Rubin JD. Love and sex: polyamorous relationships are perceived more favourably than swinging and open relationships. Psychol and Sex. 2014;5:339–48. Matsick JL, Conley TD, Ziegler A, Moors AC, Rubin JD. Love and sex: polyamorous relationships are perceived more favourably than swinging and open relationships. Psychol and Sex. 2014;5:339–48.
27.
go back to reference Klesse C. Polyamory and its ‘others’: contesting the terms of non-monogamy. Sexualities. 2006;9:565–83. Klesse C. Polyamory and its ‘others’: contesting the terms of non-monogamy. Sexualities. 2006;9:565–83.
28.
go back to reference Adam BD. Relationship innovation in male couples. Sexualities. 2006;9:5–26. Adam BD. Relationship innovation in male couples. Sexualities. 2006;9:5–26.
29.
go back to reference Jenks RJ. Swinging: a review of literature. Arch Sex Behav. 1998;27:507–21.PubMed Jenks RJ. Swinging: a review of literature. Arch Sex Behav. 1998;27:507–21.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Easton D, Hardy JW. The ethical slut. 2nd ed. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press; 2009. Easton D, Hardy JW. The ethical slut. 2nd ed. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press; 2009.
31.
go back to reference Taormino T. Opening up. San Francisco: Cleis Press; 2008. Taormino T. Opening up. San Francisco: Cleis Press; 2008.
33.
go back to reference • Balzarini RN, Campbell L, Kohut T, Holmes BM, Lehmiller JJ, Harman JJ, et al. Perceptions of primary and secondary relationships in polyamory. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0177841. This article presents research demonstrating differences in reports of relationship quality across primary and secondary partners in polyamorous relationships.PubMedPubMedCentral • Balzarini RN, Campbell L, Kohut T, Holmes BM, Lehmiller JJ, Harman JJ, et al. Perceptions of primary and secondary relationships in polyamory. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0177841. This article presents research demonstrating differences in reports of relationship quality across primary and secondary partners in polyamorous relationships.PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Buchanan DR, Poppen PJ, Reisen CA. The nature of partner relationship and AIDS sexual risk-taking in gay men. Psychol Health. 1996;11:541–55. Buchanan DR, Poppen PJ, Reisen CA. The nature of partner relationship and AIDS sexual risk-taking in gay men. Psychol Health. 1996;11:541–55.
35.
go back to reference Poppen PJ, Reisen CA, Zea MC, Bianchi FT, Echeverry JJ. Predictors of unprotected anal intercourse among HIV-positive Latino gay and bisexual men. AIDS Behav. 2004;8:379–89.PubMed Poppen PJ, Reisen CA, Zea MC, Bianchi FT, Echeverry JJ. Predictors of unprotected anal intercourse among HIV-positive Latino gay and bisexual men. AIDS Behav. 2004;8:379–89.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Moors AC, Matsick JL, Ziegler A, Rubin J, Conley TD. Stigma toward individuals engaged in consensual non-monogamy: robust and worthy of additional research. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2013;13:52–69. Moors AC, Matsick JL, Ziegler A, Rubin J, Conley TD. Stigma toward individuals engaged in consensual non-monogamy: robust and worthy of additional research. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2013;13:52–69.
38.
go back to reference Balzarini RN, Shumlich E, Kohut T, Campbell L. Dimming the “halo” around monogamy: re-assessing stigma surrounding consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships as a function of personal relationship. Front Psychol. 2018;894. Balzarini RN, Shumlich E, Kohut T, Campbell L. Dimming the “halo” around monogamy: re-assessing stigma surrounding consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships as a function of personal relationship. Front Psychol. 2018;894.
39.
go back to reference Johnson SM, Giuliano TA, Herselman JR, Hutzler KT. Development of a brief measure of attitudes towards polyamory. Psychol and Sex. 2015;6:325–39. Johnson SM, Giuliano TA, Herselman JR, Hutzler KT. Development of a brief measure of attitudes towards polyamory. Psychol and Sex. 2015;6:325–39.
40.
go back to reference Lehmiller JJ. A comparison of sexual health history and practices among monogamous and consensually nonmonogamous sexual partners. J Sex Med. 2015;12:2022–8.PubMed Lehmiller JJ. A comparison of sexual health history and practices among monogamous and consensually nonmonogamous sexual partners. J Sex Med. 2015;12:2022–8.PubMed
41.
go back to reference Conley TD, Moors AC, Ziegler A, Karathanasis C. Unfaithful individuals are less likely to practice safer sex than openly nonmonogamous individuals. J Sex Med. 2012;9:1559–65.PubMed Conley TD, Moors AC, Ziegler A, Karathanasis C. Unfaithful individuals are less likely to practice safer sex than openly nonmonogamous individuals. J Sex Med. 2012;9:1559–65.PubMed
42.
go back to reference Hutzler KT, Giuliano TA, Herselman JR, Johnson SM. Three’s a crowd: public awareness and (mis)perceptions of polyamory. Psychol and Sex. 2016;7:69–87. Hutzler KT, Giuliano TA, Herselman JR, Johnson SM. Three’s a crowd: public awareness and (mis)perceptions of polyamory. Psychol and Sex. 2016;7:69–87.
43.
go back to reference Greeley A. Marital infidelity. Society. 1994;31:9–13. Greeley A. Marital infidelity. Society. 1994;31:9–13.
44.
go back to reference Laumann EO, Gagnon JH, Michael RT, Michaels S. The social organization of sexuality: sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994. Laumann EO, Gagnon JH, Michael RT, Michaels S. The social organization of sexuality: sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994.
45.
go back to reference Wiederman MW. Extramarital sex: prevalence and correlates in a national survey. J Sex Res. 1997;34:167–74. Wiederman MW. Extramarital sex: prevalence and correlates in a national survey. J Sex Res. 1997;34:167–74.
46.
go back to reference Hinton-Dampf AM. Non-monogamous individuals compared to monogamous individuals: the differences in their relationships, specifically sexual risk behaviors and level of trust. Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO; 2011. Hinton-Dampf AM. Non-monogamous individuals compared to monogamous individuals: the differences in their relationships, specifically sexual risk behaviors and level of trust. Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO; 2011.
47.
go back to reference Conley TD, Matsick J, Moors AC, Ziegler A. Investigation of consensually nonmonogamous relationships: theories, methods, and new directions. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017;12:205–32.PubMed Conley TD, Matsick J, Moors AC, Ziegler A. Investigation of consensually nonmonogamous relationships: theories, methods, and new directions. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017;12:205–32.PubMed
48.
go back to reference Balzarini RN, McDonald J, Kohut T, Harman JJ, Lehmiller JJ, Holmes BM. Compersion: when jealousy inducing situations don’t (just) induce jealousy. Arch Sex Behav. in press. Balzarini RN, McDonald J, Kohut T, Harman JJ, Lehmiller JJ, Holmes BM. Compersion: when jealousy inducing situations don’t (just) induce jealousy. Arch Sex Behav. in press.
49.
go back to reference Mogilski JK, Reeve SD, Nicolas SCA, Donaldson SH, Mitchell VE, Welling LLM. Jealousy, consent, and compersion within monogamous and consensually nonmonogamous romantic relationships. Arch Sex Behav. 2019;48:1811–28.PubMed Mogilski JK, Reeve SD, Nicolas SCA, Donaldson SH, Mitchell VE, Welling LLM. Jealousy, consent, and compersion within monogamous and consensually nonmonogamous romantic relationships. Arch Sex Behav. 2019;48:1811–28.PubMed
50.
go back to reference Balzarini RN, Muise A. Does diversifying sexual need fulfilment across partners in polyamorous relationships buffer the detriments of unmet sexual ideals? Arch Sex Behav. conditional acceptance. Balzarini RN, Muise A. Does diversifying sexual need fulfilment across partners in polyamorous relationships buffer the detriments of unmet sexual ideals? Arch Sex Behav. conditional acceptance.
51.
go back to reference Perel E. Mating in captivity: unlocking erotic intelligence. New York: HarperCollins; 2007. Perel E. Mating in captivity: unlocking erotic intelligence. New York: HarperCollins; 2007.
52.
go back to reference Finkel EJ, Hui CM, Carswell KL, Larson GM. The suffocation of marriage: climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychol Inq. 2014;25:1–41. Finkel EJ, Hui CM, Carswell KL, Larson GM. The suffocation of marriage: climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychol Inq. 2014;25:1–41.
53.
go back to reference Conley TD, Moors AC. More oxygen please! How polyamorous relationship strategies might oxygenate marriage. Psychol Inq. 2014;25:56–63. Conley TD, Moors AC. More oxygen please! How polyamorous relationship strategies might oxygenate marriage. Psychol Inq. 2014;25:56–63.
54.
go back to reference • Moors AC, Matsick JL, Schechinger H. Unique and shared relationship benefits of consensually non-monogamous and monogamous relationships: a review and insights for moving forward. Eur Psychol. 2017;22:55–71. This article reviews research CNM and monogamous relationships and examines the unique and shared benefits of engaging in either CNM or monogamous relationships, discussing implications and future directions of this research so far. • Moors AC, Matsick JL, Schechinger H. Unique and shared relationship benefits of consensually non-monogamous and monogamous relationships: a review and insights for moving forward. Eur Psychol. 2017;22:55–71. This article reviews research CNM and monogamous relationships and examines the unique and shared benefits of engaging in either CNM or monogamous relationships, discussing implications and future directions of this research so far.
55.
go back to reference Murphy AP, Joel S, Muise A. A prospective investigation of the decision to open up a romantic relationship. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2020:194855061989715 advanced online publication. Murphy AP, Joel S, Muise A. A prospective investigation of the decision to open up a romantic relationship. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2020:194855061989715 advanced online publication.
56.
go back to reference Mogilski JK, Memering SL, Welling LL, Shackelford TK. Monogamy versus consensual non-monogamy: alternative approaches to pursuing a strategically pluralistic mating strategy. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46:407–17.PubMed Mogilski JK, Memering SL, Welling LL, Shackelford TK. Monogamy versus consensual non-monogamy: alternative approaches to pursuing a strategically pluralistic mating strategy. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46:407–17.PubMed
57.
go back to reference Cook E. Commitment in polyamorous relationships (unpublished master’s thesis). Regis University, Colorado; 2005. Cook E. Commitment in polyamorous relationships (unpublished master’s thesis). Regis University, Colorado; 2005.
58.
go back to reference Sheff E. Polyamorous families, same-sex marriage, and the slippery slope. J Contemp Ethnogr. 2011;40:487–520. Sheff E. Polyamorous families, same-sex marriage, and the slippery slope. J Contemp Ethnogr. 2011;40:487–520.
60.
go back to reference Hatfield E, Sprecher S. Measuring passionate love in intimate relationships. J Adolesc. 1986;9:383–410.PubMed Hatfield E, Sprecher S. Measuring passionate love in intimate relationships. J Adolesc. 1986;9:383–410.PubMed
61.
go back to reference Ritchie A, Barker M. Hot bi babes and feminist families: polyamorous women speak out. Lesb and Gay Psychol Rev. 2007;8:141–51. Ritchie A, Barker M. Hot bi babes and feminist families: polyamorous women speak out. Lesb and Gay Psychol Rev. 2007;8:141–51.
62.
go back to reference Sheff E. The polyamorists next door: inside multiple partner relationships and families. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; 2014. Sheff E. The polyamorists next door: inside multiple partner relationships and families. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; 2014.
63.
go back to reference Hazan C, Shaver PR. Attachment theory as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychol Inq. 1994;5:1–22. Hazan C, Shaver PR. Attachment theory as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychol Inq. 1994;5:1–22.
64.
go back to reference Hazan C, Shaver P. Conceptualizing romantic love as an attachment process. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;52:511–24.PubMed Hazan C, Shaver P. Conceptualizing romantic love as an attachment process. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;52:511–24.PubMed
65.
go back to reference DeWall CN, Lambert NM, Slotter EB, Pond RS, Deckman T, Finkel, E. J.…Fincham, F. D. So far away from one’s partner, yet so close to romantic alternatives: avoidant attachment, interest in alternatives, and infidelity. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011;101:1302–16.PubMed DeWall CN, Lambert NM, Slotter EB, Pond RS, Deckman T, Finkel, E. J.…Fincham, F. D. So far away from one’s partner, yet so close to romantic alternatives: avoidant attachment, interest in alternatives, and infidelity. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011;101:1302–16.PubMed
66.
go back to reference Hazan C, Campa M, Gur-Yaish N. What is adult attachment? In: Mikulincer M, Goodman GS, editors. Dynamics of romantic love: attachment, caregiving, and sex. New York: Guilford Press; 2006. p. 47–70. Hazan C, Campa M, Gur-Yaish N. What is adult attachment? In: Mikulincer M, Goodman GS, editors. Dynamics of romantic love: attachment, caregiving, and sex. New York: Guilford Press; 2006. p. 47–70.
67.
go back to reference Hazan C, Zeifman D. Pair bonds as attachments: evaluating the evidence. In: Cassidy J, Shaver P, editors. Handbook of attachment. New York: Guilford Press; 1999. p. 336–54. Hazan C, Zeifman D. Pair bonds as attachments: evaluating the evidence. In: Cassidy J, Shaver P, editors. Handbook of attachment. New York: Guilford Press; 1999. p. 336–54.
68.
go back to reference Moors AC, Ryan W, Chopik WJ. Multiple loves: the effects of attachment with multiple concurrent romantic partners on relational functioning. Personal Individ Differ. 2019;147:102–10. Moors AC, Ryan W, Chopik WJ. Multiple loves: the effects of attachment with multiple concurrent romantic partners on relational functioning. Personal Individ Differ. 2019;147:102–10.
Metadata
Title
Beyond the Dyad: a Review of the Novel Insights Gained From Studying Consensual Non-monogamy
Authors
Rhonda N. Balzarini
Amy Muise
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Sexual Health Reports / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1548-3584
Electronic ISSN: 1548-3592
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-020-00297-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Current Sexual Health Reports 4/2020 Go to the issue

Female Sexual Dysfunction and Disorder (A Stanton & T Lorenz, Section Editor)

Mind-Body-Spirit Model for the Medical Management of Female Sexual Well-Being

Male Sexual Dysfunction and Disorder (N Thirumavalavan, Section Editors)

Treatment of Delayed Ejaculation

Sociocultural Issues and Epidemiology (J Abdulcadir & D Bader, Section Editors)

Rethinking the Anti-FGM Zero-Tolerance Policy: from Intellectual Concerns to Empirical Challenges

Male Sexual Dysfunction and Disorders (N Thirumavalavan, Section Editor)

It Is Time We Rethink Our Approach to Enhancing Access to Male Infertility Care

Preclinical and Psychophysiology (F Guarraci & G Rodríguez-Manzo, Section Editors)

Advances in Knowledge of Androgens: How Intentional and Accidental Neurosteroid Changes Inform Us of Their Action and Role

Medical Comorbidities (O Raheem and J Kovac, Section Editors)

Sexual Dysfunction After Spinal Cord Injury