Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurological Sciences 5/2018

01-05-2018 | Original Article

Benton visual form discrimination test in healthy children: normative data and qualitative analysis

Authors: Daniela Smirni, Massimiliano Oliveri, Patrizia Turriziani, Giovanni Di Martino, Pietro Smirni

Published in: Neurological Sciences | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The attention evaluation may be considered a crucial phase in neuropsychological assessment. It must take into account the systemic nature of the attentional functions and must use different reliable tests in relation to the neurological and attentional problems to be addressed. The aim of the study was to offer the clinician an effective tool for attention assessment and provide the normative data and performance analysis on the Benton Visual Form Discrimination Test on an Italian sample (number 323) of healthy school children, from ages 5 to 11. Performance on Visual Form Discrimination Test (VFDT) significantly increased with growing age. Performances were significantly different when the test was divided into four sets. All groups, especially the younger ones, showed some difficulty in maintenance and sustained attention. The correct answers were significantly more numerous when they were placed at the top quadrants. This effect was more marked in the younger groups. Sex was never a significantly influencing performance. Our data seem to indicate that the higher attentional frontoparietal network becomes more functionally organized around 9–10 years. VFDT appears as a discriminative task. In clinical practice, our normative data can be used both on complex visual attention skill evaluation in children and on the ability to maintain visual attention in time.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Nobre AC, Coull JT, Mesulam MM, Frith CD (1997) The neural system for directing spatial and temporal attention compared with PET. Soc Neurosci Abstr 23:300 Nobre AC, Coull JT, Mesulam MM, Frith CD (1997) The neural system for directing spatial and temporal attention compared with PET. Soc Neurosci Abstr 23:300
3.
go back to reference Corbetta M, Shulman GL (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3(3):201–215 ReviewCrossRefPubMed Corbetta M, Shulman GL (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3(3):201–215 ReviewCrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mesulam MM (2000) Principles of behavioral and cognitive neurology, Oxford University Press Mesulam MM (2000) Principles of behavioral and cognitive neurology, Oxford University Press
7.
go back to reference Mangano GR, Oliveri M, Turriziani P, Smirni D, Zhaoping L, Cipolotti L (2014) Impairments in top down attentional processes in right parietal patients: paradoxical functional facilitation in visual search. Vis Res 97:74–82CrossRefPubMed Mangano GR, Oliveri M, Turriziani P, Smirni D, Zhaoping L, Cipolotti L (2014) Impairments in top down attentional processes in right parietal patients: paradoxical functional facilitation in visual search. Vis Res 97:74–82CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Manly T, Robertson IH (2004) The rehabilitation of attentional deficits. In: Halligan P, Kischka U, Marshall JC (eds) Handbook of clinical neuropsychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 89–107 Manly T, Robertson IH (2004) The rehabilitation of attentional deficits. In: Halligan P, Kischka U, Marshall JC (eds) Handbook of clinical neuropsychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 89–107
13.
go back to reference Benton AL, Hamsher K, Varney NR, Spreen O (1983) Contributions to neuropsychological assessment: a clinical manual. Oxford University Press, New York Benton AL, Hamsher K, Varney NR, Spreen O (1983) Contributions to neuropsychological assessment: a clinical manual. Oxford University Press, New York
14.
go back to reference Benton AL, Sivan AB, Hamsher K, Varney NR, Spreen O (1994) Contributions to neuropsychological assessment: a clinical manual, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York Benton AL, Sivan AB, Hamsher K, Varney NR, Spreen O (1994) Contributions to neuropsychological assessment: a clinical manual, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York
16.
go back to reference Lockwood CA, Mansoor Y, Homer-Smith E, Moses JA Jr (2011) Factor structure of the Benton visual retention tests: dimensionalization of the Benton visual retention test, Benton visual retention test—multiple choice, and the visual form discrimination test. Clin Neuropsychol 25(1):90–107CrossRefPubMed Lockwood CA, Mansoor Y, Homer-Smith E, Moses JA Jr (2011) Factor structure of the Benton visual retention tests: dimensionalization of the Benton visual retention test, Benton visual retention test—multiple choice, and the visual form discrimination test. Clin Neuropsychol 25(1):90–107CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mitrushina MN, Boone KB, Razani J, D’Elia LF (2005) Handbook of normative data for neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 241–277 Mitrushina MN, Boone KB, Razani J, D’Elia LF (2005) Handbook of normative data for neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 241–277
19.
go back to reference Nabors NA, Vangel SJ, Lichtenberg PA (1996) Visual form discrimination test with elderly medical inpatients. Clin Gerontol 17(1):43–53CrossRef Nabors NA, Vangel SJ, Lichtenberg PA (1996) Visual form discrimination test with elderly medical inpatients. Clin Gerontol 17(1):43–53CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kaskie B, Storandt M (1995) Visuospatial deficit in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Arch Neurol 52:422–425CrossRefPubMed Kaskie B, Storandt M (1995) Visuospatial deficit in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Arch Neurol 52:422–425CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Mendez MF, Mendex MA, Martin R, Smyth KA, Whitehouse PJ (1990) Complex visual disturbances in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 40:439–443CrossRefPubMed Mendez MF, Mendex MA, Martin R, Smyth KA, Whitehouse PJ (1990) Complex visual disturbances in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 40:439–443CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Tang C, Liu Y (1993) Impairment of visual form discrimination in Parkinson’s disease. Acta Psychol Sin 25:258–263 Tang C, Liu Y (1993) Impairment of visual form discrimination in Parkinson’s disease. Acta Psychol Sin 25:258–263
23.
go back to reference Iverson GL, Woodward TS, Smith-Seemiller L (2000) Internal consistency and concurrent validity of two short forms of the Visual Form Discrimination Test. Appl Neuropsychol 7:108–110CrossRefPubMed Iverson GL, Woodward TS, Smith-Seemiller L (2000) Internal consistency and concurrent validity of two short forms of the Visual Form Discrimination Test. Appl Neuropsychol 7:108–110CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wilde MC, Boake C, Sherer M (2000) Wechsler adult intelligence scale–revised block design broken configuration errors in nonpenetrating traumatic brain injury. Appl Neuropsychol 7:208–214CrossRefPubMed Wilde MC, Boake C, Sherer M (2000) Wechsler adult intelligence scale–revised block design broken configuration errors in nonpenetrating traumatic brain injury. Appl Neuropsychol 7:208–214CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Malina A, Regan T, Bowers D, Millis S (2001) Psychometric analysis of the visual form discrimination test. Percept Mot Skills 92:449–455CrossRefPubMed Malina A, Regan T, Bowers D, Millis S (2001) Psychometric analysis of the visual form discrimination test. Percept Mot Skills 92:449–455CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Campo P, Morales M (2003) Reliability and normative data for the Benton visual form discrimination test. Clin Neuropsychol 17(2):220–225CrossRefPubMed Campo P, Morales M (2003) Reliability and normative data for the Benton visual form discrimination test. Clin Neuropsychol 17(2):220–225CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Kasai M, Ishizaki J, Ishii H, Yamaguchi S, Yamadori A, Meguro K (2009) Normative data on Benton Visual Form Discrimination Test for older adults and impaired scores in Clinical Dementia Rating 0.5 participants: community-based study. The Osaki-Tajiri Project. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 63(1):9–16CrossRefPubMed Kasai M, Ishizaki J, Ishii H, Yamaguchi S, Yamadori A, Meguro K (2009) Normative data on Benton Visual Form Discrimination Test for older adults and impaired scores in Clinical Dementia Rating 0.5 participants: community-based study. The Osaki-Tajiri Project. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 63(1):9–16CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Caplan B, Schultheis MT (1998) An interpretive table for the visual form discrimination test. Percept Mot Skills 87:1203–1207CrossRefPubMed Caplan B, Schultheis MT (1998) An interpretive table for the visual form discrimination test. Percept Mot Skills 87:1203–1207CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Kempen JH, Kritchevsky M, Feldmen S (1994) Effect of visual impairment on neuropsychological test performance. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 16:223–231CrossRefPubMed Kempen JH, Kritchevsky M, Feldmen S (1994) Effect of visual impairment on neuropsychological test performance. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 16:223–231CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Bobele RM (1975) Children’s norms for the visual retention test: multiple choice form I. Doctoral dissertation, University of Houston Bobele RM (1975) Children’s norms for the visual retention test: multiple choice form I. Doctoral dissertation, University of Houston
31.
go back to reference Woods AJ, Göksun T, Chatterjee A, Zelonis S, Mehta A, Smith SE (2013) The development of organized visual search. Acta Psychol 143(2):191–199CrossRef Woods AJ, Göksun T, Chatterjee A, Zelonis S, Mehta A, Smith SE (2013) The development of organized visual search. Acta Psychol 143(2):191–199CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Taylor MJ, Chevalier H, Lobaugh NJ (2003) Discrimination of single features and conjunctions by children. Int J Psychophysiol 51(1):85–95CrossRefPubMed Taylor MJ, Chevalier H, Lobaugh NJ (2003) Discrimination of single features and conjunctions by children. Int J Psychophysiol 51(1):85–95CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Merrill EC, Lookadoo R (2004) Selective search for conjunctively defined targets by children and young adults. J Exp Child Psychol 89:72–90CrossRefPubMed Merrill EC, Lookadoo R (2004) Selective search for conjunctively defined targets by children and young adults. J Exp Child Psychol 89:72–90CrossRefPubMed
35.
36.
go back to reference Benton AL, Hamsher KD, Stone BF (1977) Visual retention test: multiple choice form 1: administration F: visual form discrimination, administration G: multiple choice-memory. Division of Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, University Hospitals, Iowa City Benton AL, Hamsher KD, Stone BF (1977) Visual retention test: multiple choice form 1: administration F: visual form discrimination, administration G: multiple choice-memory. Division of Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, University Hospitals, Iowa City
37.
go back to reference Stuss DT, Benson DF (1984) Neuropsychological studies of the frontal lobes. Psychol Bull 95(1):3–28CrossRefPubMed Stuss DT, Benson DF (1984) Neuropsychological studies of the frontal lobes. Psychol Bull 95(1):3–28CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Lezak MD (2004) Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press: USA Lezak MD (2004) Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press: USA
39.
go back to reference Raven JC (1995) Coloured progressive matrices sets A, Ab, B. Manual Sections 1 & 2. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press Raven JC (1995) Coloured progressive matrices sets A, Ab, B. Manual Sections 1 & 2. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press
Metadata
Title
Benton visual form discrimination test in healthy children: normative data and qualitative analysis
Authors
Daniela Smirni
Massimiliano Oliveri
Patrizia Turriziani
Giovanni Di Martino
Pietro Smirni
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Neurological Sciences / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1590-1874
Electronic ISSN: 1590-3478
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-018-3297-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Neurological Sciences 5/2018 Go to the issue