Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 12/2008

01-12-2008

Benefit of Ultrasonography in the Detection of Clinically and Mammographically Occult Breast Cancer

Authors: Sharon W. W. Chan, Polly S. Y. Cheung, Stefanie Chan, Suk Sze Lau, Ting Ting Wong, Michael Ma, Ada Wong, Yuen Ching Law

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 12/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of high-resolution ultrasonography in the detection of clinically and mammographically occult breast cancer.

Materials and methods

From September 2003 to November 2006, a total of 1485 patients were confirmed to have in situ or invasive breast cancer in Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital Breast Care Centre. All patients underwent mammography (MMG) and/ or sonography (USG) evaluation. Patients’ age and size of tumor detected by USG alone were compared with those detected by MMG.

Results

Altogether, 222 patients (17%) had positive imaging findings on USG only, among which 22 (13%) patients had nonpalpable tumors. Performing USG increased the cancer detection rate among clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions by 14.3%. The mean size of the tumors detected only by USG was 1.98 cm, which was not significantly different from the mean size of tumor detected by MMG (1.46) (p = 0.23). This remains true in the group of patients with nonpalpable tumors (1.36 vs. 1.46 cm, p = 0.88). The sensitivity of USG is 91%, which is significantly higher than that of MMG (78%) (p = 0.001). This remains true in patients age <40 or ≥40, tumor grading I toIII, and LVI +/− cases. However, MMG had higher sensitivity in the group of patients with nonpalpable tumors (73% vs. 62%, p = 0.01) and noninvasive cancers (72% vs. 69%, p = 0.01).

Conclusions

The use of high-resolution USG may lead to detection of a significant number of occult cancers that are no different in size from nonpalpable mammographically detected lesions.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Nystrom L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, et al. (2002) Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomized trials. Lancet 359:909–919PubMedCrossRef Nystrom L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, et al. (2002) Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomized trials. Lancet 359:909–919PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, et al. (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:1784–1792PubMedCrossRef Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, et al. (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:1784–1792PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bassett LW, Kimme-Smith C, Sutherland LK, et al. (1987) Automated and hand-held breast US: effect on patient management. Radiology 165:103–108PubMed Bassett LW, Kimme-Smith C, Sutherland LK, et al. (1987) Automated and hand-held breast US: effect on patient management. Radiology 165:103–108PubMed
6.
go back to reference Sickles EA, Filly RA, Callen PW (1983) Breast cancer detection with sonography and mammography: comparison using state-of the-art equipment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 140:843–845PubMed Sickles EA, Filly RA, Callen PW (1983) Breast cancer detection with sonography and mammography: comparison using state-of the-art equipment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 140:843–845PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kopan DB, Meyer JE, Lindfors KK (1985) Whole-breast US imaging: four year follow-up. Radiology 157:505–507 Kopan DB, Meyer JE, Lindfors KK (1985) Whole-breast US imaging: four year follow-up. Radiology 157:505–507
8.
go back to reference Cole-Beuglet C, Soriano RZ, Kurtz AB, et al. (1983) Ultrasound analysis of 104 primary breast carcinomas classified according to histopathologic type. Radiology 147:191–196PubMed Cole-Beuglet C, Soriano RZ, Kurtz AB, et al. (1983) Ultrasound analysis of 104 primary breast carcinomas classified according to histopathologic type. Radiology 147:191–196PubMed
9.
go back to reference Egan RL, Egan KL (1984) Detection of breast carcinoma: comparison of automated water-path whole breast sonography, mammography, and physical examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 143:493–497PubMed Egan RL, Egan KL (1984) Detection of breast carcinoma: comparison of automated water-path whole breast sonography, mammography, and physical examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 143:493–497PubMed
10.
go back to reference Gorden PB. Goldenberg SL (1995) Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: a retrospective review. Cancer 76:626–630CrossRef Gorden PB. Goldenberg SL (1995) Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: a retrospective review. Cancer 76:626–630CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (1998) Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 207:191–199PubMed Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (1998) Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 207:191–199PubMed
12.
go back to reference Buchberger W, Dekoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P, et al. (1999) Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:921–927PubMed Buchberger W, Dekoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P, et al. (1999) Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:921–927PubMed
13.
go back to reference Kaplan SS (2001) Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 221:641–649PubMedCrossRef Kaplan SS (2001) Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 221:641–649PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bassett LW, Kimme-Smith C (1991) Breast sonography. Am J Radiol 156:449–455 Bassett LW, Kimme-Smith C (1991) Breast sonography. Am J Radiol 156:449–455
16.
go back to reference Coveney EC, Geraghty JG, O’Laoide R, et al. (1994) Reasons underlying negative mammography in patients Clin Radiol 49:123–125PubMedCrossRef Coveney EC, Geraghty JG, O’Laoide R, et al. (1994) Reasons underlying negative mammography in patients Clin Radiol 49:123–125PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL, Chan NHL (1993) Solid breast lesions: diagnosis with US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Radiology 189:573–580PubMed Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL, Chan NHL (1993) Solid breast lesions: diagnosis with US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Radiology 189:573–580PubMed
19.
go back to reference Kwong A, Cheung PSY, Wong AYW, et al. (2007)The acceptance and feasibility of breast cancer screening in the East. Breast Aug 24; [Epub ahead of print] Kwong A, Cheung PSY, Wong AYW, et al. (2007)The acceptance and feasibility of breast cancer screening in the East. Breast Aug 24; [Epub ahead of print]
20.
go back to reference Crystal P, Strano SD, Shcharynski S, et al. (2003) Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. Am J Radiol 181:177–182 Crystal P, Strano SD, Shcharynski S, et al. (2003) Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. Am J Radiol 181:177–182
21.
go back to reference Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Duffy SW, et al. (1992) Update of the Swedish Two-Country Program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 30:187–210PubMed Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Duffy SW, et al. (1992) Update of the Swedish Two-Country Program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 30:187–210PubMed
22.
go back to reference Berg WA (2003) Rationale for a trial of screening breast ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN 6666). AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1225–1226PubMed Berg WA (2003) Rationale for a trial of screening breast ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN 6666). AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1225–1226PubMed
Metadata
Title
Benefit of Ultrasonography in the Detection of Clinically and Mammographically Occult Breast Cancer
Authors
Sharon W. W. Chan
Polly S. Y. Cheung
Stefanie Chan
Suk Sze Lau
Ting Ting Wong
Michael Ma
Ada Wong
Yuen Ching Law
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 12/2008
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9273-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2008

World Journal of Surgery 12/2008 Go to the issue